Explore the vast range of titles available.

Natural killer (NK) cells can swiftly kill multiple adjacent cells if these show surface markers associated with oncogenic transformation. This property, which is unique among immune cells, and their capacity to enhance antibody and T cell responses support a role for NK cells as anticancer agents. Although tumours may develop several mechanisms to resist attacks from endogenous NK cells, ex vivo activation, expansion and genetic modification of NK cells can greatly increase their antitumour activity and equip them to overcome resistance. Some of these methods have been translated into clinical-grade platforms and support clinical trials of NK cell infusions in patients with haematological malignancies or solid tumours, which have yielded encouraging results so far. The next generation of NK cell products will be engineered to enhance activating signals and proliferation, suppress inhibitory signals and promote their homing to tumours. These modifications promise to significantly increase their clinical activity. Finally, there is emerging evidence of increased NK cell-mediated tumour cell killing in the context of molecularly targeted therapies. These observations, in addition to the capacity of NK cells to magnify immune responses, suggest that NK cells are poised to become key components of multipronged therapeutic strategies for cancer.Natural killer (NK) cells have a primordial role in tumour immunosurveillance. Given their potent antitumour activity, therapeutic manipulation of NK cells provides an attractive strategy for cancer treatment. This Review discusses new approaches to activate NK cells, increase their proliferation in vivo and increase their capacity to recognize tumour cells.

Autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have changed the therapeutic landscape in haematological malignancies. Nevertheless, the use of allogeneic CAR T cells from donors has many potential advantages over autologous approaches, such as the immediate availability of cryopreserved batches for patient treatment, possible standardization of the CAR-T cell product, time for multiple cell modifications, redosing or combination of CAR T cells directed against different targets, and decreased cost using an industrialized process. However, allogeneic CAR T cells may cause life-threatening graft-versus-host disease and may be rapidly eliminated by the host immune system. The development of next-generation allogeneic CAR T cells to address these issues is an active area of research. In this Review, we analyse the different sources of T cells for optimal allogeneic CAR-T cell therapy and describe the different technological approaches, mainly based on gene editing, to produce allogeneic CAR T cells with limited potential for graft-versus-host disease. These improved allogeneic CAR-T cell products will pave the way for further breakthroughs in the treatment of cancer.The use of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T cells from donors has many potential advantages over autologous approaches, such as immediate availability, standardization and the possibility of redosing or combination. This Review analyses the different sources of T cells and technological approaches to produce optimal allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T cells with limited potential for graft-versus-host disease and increased persistence.

The haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) microenvironment in the bone marrow, termed the niche, ensures haematopoietic homeostasis by controlling the proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation and migration of HSCs and progenitor cells at steady state and in response to emergencies and injury. Improved methods for HSC isolation, driven by advances in single-cell and molecular technologies, have led to a better understanding of their behaviour, heterogeneity and lineage fate and of the niche cells and signals that regulate their function. Niche regulatory signals can be in the form of cell-bound or secreted factors and other local physical cues. A combination of technological advances in bone marrow imaging and genetic manipulation of crucial regulatory factors has enabled the identification of several candidate cell types regulating the niche, including both non-haematopoietic (for example, perivascular mesenchymal stem and endothelial cells) and HSC-derived (for example, megakaryocytes, macrophages and regulatory T cells), with better topographical understanding of HSC localization in the bone marrow. Here, we review advances in our understanding of HSC regulation by niches during homeostasis, ageing and cancer, and we discuss their implications for the development of therapies to rejuvenate aged HSCs or niches or to disrupt self-reinforcing malignant niches.The haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niche in the bone marrow ensures haematopoiesis by regulating the function of HSCs and progenitor cells. An improved understanding of this regulation in homeostasis, ageing and cancer should aid the development of therapies to rejuvenate aged HSCs or niches and treat malignancies.

Advances in the derivation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and their differentiation to specific cell types could have diverse clinical applications. Trounson and DeWitt provide an overview of the progress in using embryonic stem cell and induced PSC derivatives for disease treatment and discuss the potential and limitations of such approaches. Basic experimental stem cell research has opened up the possibility of many diverse clinical applications; however, translation to clinical trials has been restricted to only a few diseases. To broaden this clinical scope, pluripotent stem cell derivatives provide a uniquely scalable source of functional differentiated cells that can potentially repair damaged or diseased tissues to treat a wide spectrum of diseases and injuries. However, gathering sound data on their distribution, longevity, function and mechanisms of action in host tissues is imperative to realizing their clinical benefit. The large-scale availability of treatments involving pluripotent stem cells remains some years away, because of the long and demanding regulatory pathway that is needed to ensure their safety.

Key Points Adoptive immunotherapy has rapidly evolved to harness modern genetic techniques to create T cells with enhanced specificity, efficacy and safety. Artificial expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) in autologous T cells has enabled a new generation of targeted cellular therapeutics. Early clinical trials targeting B cell malignancies have shown great promise, generating unprecedented response rates to treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL). As more patients with different B cell malignancies are treated, areas for further optimization are brought to light. Engineered T cell therapy has been adapted to treat non-B cell malignancies, including multiple myeloma and myeloid malignancies as well as solid tumours. To date, target selection has proved challenging as many tumour-conserved markers are also expressed on benign tissues (for example, mesothelin) and other tumour-specific markers are less uniformly expressed (for example, epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII)). More precise targeting of tumour cell subsets, such as cancer stem cells, or targeting of portions of intracellular tumour markers in the context of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), may enhance specificity and limit off-tumour effects. Combining non-specific and specific immune responses (for example, T cells redirected for universal cytokine killing (TRUCKs), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–folate plus FITC-CAR T cell) could further enhance antitumour immune response, while minimizing off-tumour effects. Although lentiviral and retroviral transduction are still the most common approaches to ex vivo T cell gene modification, DNA and RNA transfection have some advantages. In particular, RNA transfection of short guide RNAs enables CRISPR–Cas9 modification of T cells. This targeted gene disruption approach could help to create engineered T cells with supraphysiological antitumour capabilities. In addition to specificity-enhancing artificial receptor expression, the next generation of engineered T cells may include modifications to overcome tumour-mediated immune suppression, additional receptors to enable Boolean gating of signal transduction or safety switches to enhance precision control of in vivo engineered T cell activity. This Review assesses what we have learnt about adoptive cell transfer of engineered T cells for the treatment of patients with B cell malignancies and discusses how this therapy can be improved and applied to other malignancies, including solid tumours. The immune system evolved to distinguish non-self from self to protect the organism. As cancer is derived from our own cells, immune responses to dysregulated cell growth present a unique challenge. This is compounded by mechanisms of immune evasion and immunosuppression that develop in the tumour microenvironment. The modern genetic toolbox enables the adoptive transfer of engineered T cells to create enhanced anticancer immune functions where natural cancer-specific immune responses have failed. Genetically engineered T cells, so-called 'living drugs', represent a new paradigm in anticancer therapy. Recent clinical trials using T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) have produced stunning results in patients with relapsed or refractory haematological malignancies. In this Review we describe some of the most recent and promising advances in engineered T cell therapy with a particular emphasis on what the next generation of T cell therapy is likely to entail.

Key Points Pancreatic islet transplantation is an effective β-cell replacement therapy that has the capacity to normalize glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus To date, over 1,500 patients have undergone islet transplantation in approximately 40 international centres The long-term clinical outcomes of islet transplantation alone in selected centres are now similar to the results of whole-pancreas transplantation alone, with 50–70% of patients achieving insulin independence at 5 years An NIH funded phase III multicentre trial in North America has confirmed that islet transplantation is a safe and effective method for treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus complicated by hypoglycaemia unawareness and serve hypoglycaemic events Islet transplantation has become a realistic treatment option for a subset of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This Review outlines the techniques involved in the procedure, as well as the risks, long-term outcomes and advances in the care of patients after they have received an islet transplant. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation can be considered one of the safest and least invasive transplant procedures. Remarkable progress has occurred in both the technical aspects of islet cell processing and the outcomes of clinical islet transplantation. With >1,500 patients treated since 2000, this therapeutic strategy has moved from a curiosity to a realistic treatment option for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (that is, those with hypoglycaemia unawareness, severe hypoglycaemic episodes and glycaemic lability). This Review outlines the techniques required for human islet isolation, in vitro culture before the transplant and clinical islet transplantation, and discusses indications, optimization of recipient immunosuppression and management of adjunctive immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory strategies. The potential risks, long-term outcomes and advances in treatment after the transplant are also discussed to further move this treatment towards becoming a more widely available option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and eventually a potential cure.

The prospect of transplanting cells and tissues without the risk of immune rejection or the need for powerful immunosuppressive drugs is the ‘holy grail’ of transplantation medicine. Now, with the advent of pluripotent stem cells, CRISPR–Cas9 and other gene-editing technologies, the race to create ‘off-the-shelf’ donor cells that are invisible to the immune system (‘universal cells’) has started. One important approach for creating such cells involves the manipulation of genes required for immune recognition, in particular HLA class I and II proteins. Other approaches leverage knowledge of immune-cloaking strategies used by certain bacteria, viruses, parasites, the fetus and cancer cells to induce tolerance to allogeneic cell-based therapies by modifying cells to express immune-suppressive molecules such as PD-L1 and CTLA4–Ig. Various academic groups as well as biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are on the verge of bringing these therapies into the clinic.

Key Points Ablative therapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an increasingly studied and used strategy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) AHSCT confers benefits for patients with MS by achieving radical suppression of inflammatory MS activity Qualitative changes in the reconstituted immune system and durable remissions without additional immune intervention support the notion that AHSCT regenerates the immune system (a process known as immune resetting) Complete suppression of MS disease activity for 4–5 years has been documented in 70–80% of patients with relapsing–remitting MS who have undergone AHSCT; neurological improvements have also been demonstrated Optimal candidates for AHSCT are young, ambulatory and have inflammatory-active relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS); current appropriate indications for AHSCT include aggressive and highly active treatment-refractory RRMS Clinical trials to compare AHSCT with approved drugs in RRMS and determine its benefits in inflammatory-active progressive MS are warranted, but progress is hindered by a lack of investment and funding Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation has produced striking results in patients with aggressive multiple sclerosis in small trials. In this Review, Muraro et al . provide an overview of the procedure, detail evidence for its high efficacy in multiple sclerosis, and provide recommendations for its clinical use and future trials. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a multistep procedure that enables destruction of the immune system and its reconstitution from haematopoietic stem cells. Originally developed for the treatment of haematological malignancies, the procedure has been adapted for the treatment of severe immune-mediated disorders. Results from ∼20 years of research make a compelling case for selective use of AHSCT in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS), and for controlled trials. Immunological studies support the notion that AHSCT causes qualitative immune resetting, and have provided insight into the mechanisms that might underlie the powerful treatment effects that last well beyond recovery of immune cell numbers. Indeed, studies have demonstrated that AHSCT can entirely suppress MS disease activity for 4–5 years in 70–80% of patients, a rate that is higher than those achieved with any other therapies for MS. Treatment-related mortality, which was 3.6% in studies before 2005, has decreased to 0.3% in studies since 2005. Current evidence indicates that the patients who are most likely to benefit from and tolerate AHSCT are young, ambulatory and have inflammatory MS activity. Clinical trials are required to rigorously test the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of AHSCT against highly active MS drugs.

Despite major improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation over the past decades, corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) cause high mortality. Preclinical evidence indicates the potent anti-inflammatory properties of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. In this retrospective survey, 19 stem cell transplant centers in Europe and the United States reported outcome data from 95 patients who had received ruxolitinib as salvage therapy for SR-GVHD. Patients were classified as having SR-aGVHD ( n =54, all grades III or IV) or SR-cGVHD ( n =41, all moderate or severe). The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 3 for both SR-aGVHD (1–7) and SR-cGVHD (1–10). The overall response rate was 81.5% (44/54) in SR-aGVHD including 25 complete responses (46.3%), while for SR-cGVHD the ORR was 85.4% (35/41). Of those patients responding to ruxolitinib, the rate of GVHD-relapse was 6.8% (3/44) and 5.7% (2/35) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. The 6-month-survival was 79% (67.3–90.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and 97.4% (92.3–100%, 95% CI) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia and cytomegalovirus-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD that should be validated in a prospective trial.

The aim of this work is to produce recommendations on the management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). A comprehensive systematic review of articles released from 1999 to 2015 (January) was used as a source of scientific evidence. Recommendations were produced using a Delphi process involving a panel of 23 experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet and European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Key questions included patient selection, donor selection, pre-transplant management, conditioning regimen, post-transplant management, prevention and management of relapse after transplant. Patients with intermediate-2- or high-risk disease and age <70 years should be considered as candidates for allo-SCT. Patients with intermediate-1-risk disease and age <65 years should be considered as candidates if they present with either refractory, transfusion-dependent anemia, or a percentage of blasts in peripheral blood (PB) >2%, or adverse cytogenetics. Pre-transplant splenectomy should be decided on a case by case basis. Patients with intermediate-2- or high-risk disease lacking an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor, should be enrolled in a protocol using HLA non-identical donors. PB was considered the most appropriate source of hematopoietic stem cells for HLA-matched sibling and unrelated donor transplants. The optimal intensity of the conditioning regimen still needs to be defined. Strategies such as discontinuation of immune-suppressive drugs, donor lymphocyte infusion or both were deemed appropriate to avoid clinical relapse. In conclusion, we provided consensus-based recommendations aimed to optimize allo-SCT in PMF. Unmet clinical needs were highlighted.