Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundMany hospitalized adults do not have the capacity to make their own health care decisions and thus require a surrogate decision-maker. While the ethical standard suggests that decisions should focus on a patient’s preferences, our study explores the principles that surrogates consider most important when making decisions for older hospitalized patients.ObjectivesWe sought to determine how frequently surrogate decision-makers prioritized patient preferences in decision-making and what factors may predict their doing so.Design and ParticipantsWe performed a secondary data analysis of a study conducted at three local hospitals that surveyed surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized patients 65 years of age and older.Main MeasuresSurrogates rated the importance of 16 decision-making principles and selected the one that was most important. We divided the surrogates into two groups: those who prioritized patient preferences and those who prioritized patient well-being. We analyzed the two groups for differences in knowledge of patient preferences, presence of advance directives, and psychological outcomes.Key ResultsA total of 362 surrogates rated an average of six principles as being extremely important in decision-making; 77.8% of surrogates selected a patient well-being principle as the most important, whereas only 21.1% selected a patient preferences principle. Advance directives were more common to the patient preferences group than the patient well-being group (61.3% vs. 44.9%; 95% CI: 1.01–3.18; p = 0.04), whereas having conversations with the patient about their health care preferences was not a significant predictor of surrogate group identity (81.3% vs. 67.4%; 95% CI: 0.39–1.14; p = 0.14). We found no differences between the two groups regarding surrogate anxiety, depression, or decisional conflict.ConclusionsWhile surrogates considered many factors, they focused more often on patient well-being than on patient preferences, in contravention of our current ethical framework. Surrogates more commonly prioritized patient preferences if they had advance directives available to them.

Objective To investigate the impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients.Design Prospective randomised controlled trial.Setting Single centre study in a university hospital in Melbourne, Australia.Participants 309 legally competent medical inpatients aged 80 or more and followed for six months or until death.Interventions Participants were randomised to receive usual care or usual care plus facilitated advance care planning. Advance care planning aimed to assist patients to reflect on their goals, values, and beliefs; to consider future medical treatment preferences; to appoint a surrogate; and to document their wishes.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was whether a patient’s end of life wishes were known and respected. Other outcomes included patient and family satisfaction with hospital stay and levels of stress, anxiety, and depression in relatives of patients who died.Results 154 of the 309 patients were randomised to advance care planning, 125 (81%) received advance care planning, and 108 (84%) expressed wishes or appointed a surrogate, or both. Of the 56 patients who died by six months, end of life wishes were much more likely to be known and followed in the intervention group (25/29, 86%) compared with the control group (8/27, 30%; P<0.001). In the intervention group, family members of patients who died had significantly less stress (intervention 5, control 15; P<0.001), anxiety (intervention 0, control 3; P=0.02), and depression (intervention 0, control 5; P=0.002) than those of the control patients. Patient and family satisfaction was higher in the intervention group.Conclusions Advance care planning improves end of life care and patient and family satisfaction and reduces stress, anxiety, and depression in surviving relatives.Trial registration Australian New Zealand clinical trials registry ACTRN12608000539336.

Background/aims The extent to which low- and middle-income countries have implemented Advance Care Planning (ACP) and Advance Directives (AD) remains unclear. We aimed to map the current status of ACP/AD in Latin America. Methods This cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey of ACP/AD in LA comprised interviews with 18 key informants from 18 out of 20 countries, most of whom were appointed by national Palliative Care Associations. Online interviews were conducted with each informant, covering a range of relevant topics from AD regulations to the use of ACP/AD in the context of end-of-life clinical decision making. We performed member checking and data triangulation to confirm our findings. Results Only eight (44%) countries have some form of ACP/AD regulations. Most regulatory frameworks tend to adopt a legalistic pattern heavily influenced by the North American model. Despite that characteristic of AD regulations in LA, the leading strategy used by patients to avoid unwanted treatment at the end of life is through conversations with their families, whereas the least common strategy was consulting with a lawyer. In six (33%) countries, informants believed it was common for patients to grant their families permission to modify their previous choices regarding future treatments. The religiosity/spirituality of populations play an important role in the implementation of ACP in the region. Additionally, respecting patients’ preferences of care at the end of life appears to be tied more to aspects related to the characteristics of doctor-patient relationship, and the degree of integration of palliative care into the healthcare system than the existence or content of AD regulations. There was consensus that none of the countries provide sufficient education about ACP/AD to healthcare professionals. Conclusions Our findings encourage rethinking ACP/AD in LA from a decolonial perspective, considering characteristics such as the preference for a relational model of autonomy in several countries and the importance of taking the religiosity/spirituality of individuals into account during ACP conversations. Our data also suggest that honoring patients’ preferences of care at the end of life entails integrating palliative care into health care systems, educating healthcare professionals and the population, and fostering longitudinal trusting relationships between those professionals, patients, and their families.

Context: The legal tools of health care advance planning have substantially changed since their emergence in the mid-1970s. Thirty years of policy development, primarily at the state legislative level addressing surrogate decision making and advance directives, have resulted in a disjointed policy landscape, yet with important points of convergence evolving over time. An understanding of the evolution of advance care planning policy has important implications for policy at both the state and federal levels. Methods: This article is a longitudinal statutory and literature review of health care advance planning from its origins to the present. Findings: While considerable variability across the states still remains, changes in law and policy over time suggest a gradual paradigm shift from what is described as a \"legal transactional approach\" to a \"communications approach,\" the most recent extension of which is the emergence of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, or POLST. The communications approach helps translate patients' goals into visible and portable medical orders. Conclusions: States are likely to continue gradually moving away from a legal transactional mode of advance planning toward a communications model, albeit with challenges to authentic and reliable communication that accurately translates patients' wishes into the care they receive. In the meantime, the states and their health care institutions will continue to serve as the primary laboratory for advance care planning policy and practice.

Introduction Advance Care Planning (ACP) refers to a process that includes Advance Care Directives (ACD) and Goals of Care (GOC), a practice widely used for over three decades. Following the findings of an audit and a cross-sectional study in 2019 and 2021 respectively, we implemented several educational and other interventional strategies aimed at enhancing staff awareness and emphasizing the importance of recognizing and documenting of ACD/GOC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acknowledgement and use of ACD and GOC by Emergency Department (ED) staff following these interventions. Method We used a mixed methods approach, incorporating both observational and cross-sectional designs with reflexive thematic analysis. Data extraction for the observational study took place between 1st April and 30th June 2023 focusing on a target population of randomly sampled adults aged ≥ 65 years. Demographics and other ACD and GOC related patients’ clinical data were collected. Data collection for the cross-sectional study occurred between 19th July and 13th September 2023 targeting all ED staff. Information gathered included demographics, awareness about ACD and GOC, including storage location and implementation, as well as knowledge of Medical Treatment decision Makers (MTDM), a jurisdictional term identifying a person legally appointed to make healthcare decisions on behalf of someone who lacks decision-making capacity and other Victorian State legislative requirements were collected. Results In the observational period, 22,335 patients attended the ED and 19% ( n  = 6546) qualified for inclusion from which a sample of 308 patients were randomly extracted. We found ACD documents were noted in the medical records of 6.5% of the sample, fewer than 8% identified in our previous study. There was no correlation between ACD record availability and age ( p  = 0.054; CI ranging from − 0.065 to 7.768). The response rate for the cross-sectional survey was 12% ( n  = 340) in contrast to earlier study with 28% ( n  = 476) respondents. Staff knowledge and familiarity with ACD was 25% and GOC 45%. Conclusion After implementing interventions in staff education and ACP awareness, we found that ACD documentation did not improve. However, GOC documentation increased in the context of heightened institutional awareness and integration into the Electronic Medical Records (EMR).

Background Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the upper and lower motoneuron. It is associated with a life expectancy of 2–4 years after diagnosis. Individuals experience paralysis, dysphagia, respiratory failure and loss of communicative function, rendering advance care planning (ACP) critically important. This systematic review primarily aimed to internationally compare the application of advance directives (AD) and ACP in ALS. Its secondary aim was to identify ACP preferences, identify fields for future research and to generate recommendations for improving patient care through ACP. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo and CENTRAL) were searched for qualitative and quantitative primary literature from 1999 to 2024. Cross-references were used to identify additional publications. Study selection was performed based on inclusion criteria. Number and content of AD were extracted systematically. After statistical analysis consecutive meta-analysis was performed for international differences and changes over time. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool). PROSPERO Registration (June 07, 2021) : CRD42021248040. Results A total of 998 records was screened of which 26 were included in the synthesis. An increase in publication numbers of 88.9% was observed from 1999 to 2024. Results regarding use and content of AD were heterogeneous and international differences were detected. AD were signed in 60.4% of records (1,629 / 2,696 patients). The number of AD decreased over time when separating the review period in two decades (1st 1999–2011: 78% vs. 2nd 2012–2024: 42%). Study quality was superior in qualitative and mixed method designs compared to quantitative studies. Conclusion Further prospective studies should include detailed analyses on preferences regarding ventilation and artificial nutrition in ALS and should encompass countries of the global south. Despite the complexity of ACP with regard to individual patient needs, ACP should be part of each individual support plan for ALS patients and should specifically comprise a discussion on the preferred place of death. The available disease-specific AD documents should be preferred.

PurposeWhile advance care planning holds promise, uptake is variable and it is unclear how well people engage with or comprehend advance care planning. The objective of this study was to explore how people with cancer comprehended advance care plans and examine how accurately advance care planning documentation represented patient wishes.MethodsThis study used a qualitative descriptive design. Data collection comprised interviews and an examination of participants’ existing advance care planning documentation. Participants included those who had any diagnosis of cancer with an advance care plan recorded: Refusal of Treatment Certificate, Statement of Choices, and/or Enduring Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) at one cancer treatment centre.ResultsFourteen participants were involved in the study. Twelve participants were female (86%). The mean age was 77 (range: 61–91), and participants had completed their advance care planning documentation between 8 and 72 weeks prior to the interview (mean 33 weeks). Three themes were evident from the data: incomplete advance care planning understanding and confidence, limited congruence for attitude and documentation, advance care planning can enable peace of mind. Complete advance care planning understanding was unusual; most participants demonstrated partial comprehension of their own advance care plan, and some indicated very limited understanding. Participants’ attitudes and their written document congruence were limited, but advance care planning was seen as helpful.ConclusionsThis study highlighted advance care planning was not a completely accurate representation of patient wishes. There is opportunity to improve how patients comprehend their own advance care planning documentation.

Background In Taiwan, psychiatric patients often face premature judgments regarding cognitive impairment, emotional instability, communication barriers, or issues related to guardianship rights due to their psychiatric diagnosis. This leads to a reduction in their autonomy in healthcare decision-making. Advocacy for and experiential understanding of Advance Care Planning (ACP) among individuals with psychiatric disorders are significantly lacking. This research explores the influence of an interactive educational approach on the ACP process for psychiatric patients and whether this approach can enhance their comprehension, attitudes, and intentions regarding Advance Decisions (AD). Methods To accommodate potential variances and ensure robustness in our findings, we ultimately elected to recruit 90 participants. Using a computer-generated random number generator, we conducted a randomized trial, assigning 45 individuals to the control group and an equal number to the intervention group. The control group continued with the routine self-care educational curriculum, while the intervention group, in addition to the standard curriculum, participated in bi-weekly intervention sessions for three months. This resulted in six group health education sessions, each lasting one hour. To evaluate participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and intent to sign regarding ACP, the effects of group, time, and their interactions were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations. Results Both groups were homogeneous at baseline. Post-intervention, Knowledge improved by 3.31 points ( p  < 0.001) and Attitude by 4.91 points ( p  < 0.001). However, the increase in Intent to Sign (0.73 points, p  = 0.222) was not statistically significant. The overarching findings indicate that the application of an interactive educational model significantly enhances psychiatric patients’ knowledge and attitudes toward ACP, although it does not substantially impact their intention to sign. Conclusions Interactive education effectively enhances psychiatric patients’ knowledge and attitudes toward ACP but does not significantly influence their intent to sign AD. We advocate for their empowerment in ACP discussions. This study highlights the feasibility of integrating ACP promotion into routine psychiatric care.

ObjectivesIt is important that the outcomes of advance care planning (ACP) conversations are documented and available at the point of care. Advance care directives (ACDs) are a subset of ACP documentation and refer to structured documents that are completed and signed by competent adults. Other ACP documentation includes informal documentation by the person or on behalf of the person by someone else (eg, clinician, family). The primary objectives were to describe the prevalence and correlates of ACDs among Australians aged 65 and over accessing health and residential aged care services. The secondary aim was to describe the prevalence of other ACP documentation.Design and settingA prospective multicentre health record audit in general practices (n=13), hospitals (n=12) and residential aged care facilities (RACFs; n=26).Participants503 people attending general practice, 574 people admitted to hospitals and 1208 people in RACFs.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrevalence of one or more ACDs; prevalence of other ACP documentation.Results29.8% of people had at least one ACD on file. The majority were non-statutory documents (20.9%). ACD prevalence was significantly higher in RACFs (47.7%) than hospitals (15.7%) and general practices (3.2%) (p<0.001), and varied across jurisdictions. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the odds of having an ACD were positively associated with greater functional impairment and being in an RACF or hospital compared with general practice. 21.6% of people had other ACP documentation.ConclusionsIn this study, 30% of people had ACDs accessible and a further 20% had other ACP documentation, suggesting that approximately half of participants had some form of ACP. Correlates of ACD completion were greater impairment and being in an RACF or hospital. Greater efforts to promote and standardise ACDs across jurisdictions may help to assist older people to navigate and complete ACDs and to receive care consistent with their preferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12617000743369.