Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeArtificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing product recommendations, but little is known about consumer acceptance of AI recommendations. This study examines how to improve consumers' acceptance of AI recommendations from the perspective of product type (material vs experiential).Design/methodology/approachFour studies, including a field experiment and three online experiments, tested how consumers' preference for AI-based (vs human) recommendations differs between material and experiential product purchases.FindingsResults show that people perceive AI recommendations as more competent than human recommendations for material products, whereas they believe human recommendations are more competent than AI recommendations for experiential products. Therefore, people are more (less) likely to choose AI recommendations when buying material (vs experiential) products. However, this effect is eliminated when is used as an assistant to rather than a replacement for a human recommendation.Originality/valueThis study is the first to focus on how products' material and experiential attributes influence people's attitudes toward AI recommendations. The authors also identify under what circumstances resistance to algorithmic advice is attenuated. These findings contribute to the research on the psychology of artificial intelligence and on human–technology interaction by investigating how experiential and material attributes influence preference for or resistance to AI recommenders.

The advent of autonomous vehicles has heralded a transformative era in transportation, reshaping the landscape of mobility through cutting-edge technologies. Central to this evolution is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), propelling vehicles into realms of unprecedented autonomy. Commencing with an overview of the current industry landscape with respect to Operational Design Domain (ODD), this paper delves into the fundamental role of AI in shaping the autonomous decision-making capabilities of vehicles. It elucidates the steps involved in the AI-powered development life cycle in vehicles, addressing various challenges such as safety, security, privacy, and ethical considerations in AI-driven software development for autonomous vehicles. The study presents statistical insights into the usage and types of AI algorithms over the years, showcasing the evolving research landscape within the automotive industry. Furthermore, the paper highlights the pivotal role of parameters in refining algorithms for both trucks and cars, facilitating vehicles to adapt, learn, and improve performance over time. It concludes by outlining different levels of autonomy, elucidating the nuanced usage of AI algorithms, and discussing the automation of key tasks and the software package size at each level. Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the current industry landscape, focusing on several critical aspects.

PurposeThis study aims to determine how the attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) of religious tourists affect their AI self-efficacy and their engagement in AI. This study specifically intends to investigate the mediating role of AI self-efficacy in the relationship between attitudes toward AI and the engagement in AI of religious tourists. This study also seeks to identify the role of AI assistant use as a moderator in the relationship between attitudes toward AI and AI self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachThe data used in this study was gathered from a sample of 282 religious tourists who had just visited Karbala, central Iraq. Purposive sampling, which comprises a focused and systematic approach to data collection, was used after carefully assessing the distinctive characteristics and properties of the research population.FindingsThe results showed that attitudes to AI had a noticeable impact on AI self-efficacy, which, in turn, exerted a positive impact on engagement with AI. In addition, the use of AI assistants acted to positively moderate AI self-efficacy in terms of mediating the link between attitudes to AI and AI engagement.Originality/valueThe distinctive focus on religious tourists adds an original perspective to the existing literature, shedding light on how their attitudes towards AI impact not only their self-efficacy but also their engagement in dealing with AI. In addition, this study delves into the moderating role of AI assistant use, introducing a unique factor in understanding the complex interplay between attitudes, self-efficacy, and engagement in the context of religious tourism. The selection of Karbala, central Iraq, as this study site further adds originality, providing insights into a specific religious and cultural context.

Purpose Artificially intelligent (AI) assistant-enabled smart speaker not only can provide assistance by navigating the massive amount of product and brand information on the internet but also can facilitate two-way conversations with individuals, thus resembling a human interaction. Although smart speakers have substantial implications for practitioners, the knowledge of the underlying psychological factors that drive continuance usage remains limited. Drawing on social response theory and the technology acceptance model, this study aims to elucidate the adoption process of smart speakers. Design/methodology/approach A field survey of 391 smart speaker users were obtained. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Findings Media richness (social cues) and parasocial interactions (social role) are key determinants affecting the establishment of trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which, in turn, affect attitude, continuance usage intentions and online purchase intentions through AI assistants. Originality/value AI assistant-enabled smart speakers are revolutionizing how people interact with smart products. Studies of smart speakers have mainly focused on functional or technical perspectives. This study is the first to propose a comprehensive model from both functional and social perspectives of continuance usage intention of the smart speaker and online purchase intentions through AI assistants.

AstroSage-Llama-3.1-8B is a domain-specialized natural-language AI assistant tailored for research in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, and astronomical instrumentation. Trained on the complete collection of astronomy-related arXiv papers from 2007 to 2024 along with millions of synthetically-generated question-answer pairs and other astronomical literature, AstroSage-Llama-3.1-8B demonstrates remarkable proficiency on a wide range of questions. AstroSage-Llama-3.1-8B scores 80.9% on the AstroMLab-1 benchmark, greatly outperforming all models—proprietary and open-weight—in the 8-billion parameter class, and performing on par with GPT-4o. This achievement demonstrates the potential of domain specialization in AI, suggesting that focused training can yield capabilities exceeding those of much larger, general-purpose models. AstroSage-Llama-3.1-8B is freely available, enabling widespread access to advanced AI capabilities for astronomical education and research.

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, AI assistants are gradually penetrating daily life and work. However, the internal mechanism of their user acceptance still needs to be further explored. Therefore, this study is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), introducing three external variables, Aesthetic Pleasure (AP), Information Quality (IQ), and AI Skills (AIS), to construct an extended model to explore the acceptance of AI assistants by Chinese users and its influencing factors. The results showed that aesthetic pleasure, information quality, and AI skills significantly affect perceived usefulness and ease of use by analyzing questionnaire survey data from 363 Chinese users and using structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) to validate hypotheses. AI skills, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use significantly affect behavioral intention. Notably, aesthetic pleasure and information quality do not affect behavioral intention. This study provides theoretical support for the design of AI assistants, helping designers and developers understand users’ needs and preferences to better design AI assistants.

The exponential growth of multimodal orthopedic data, ranging from longitudinal Electronic Health Records to high-resolution musculoskeletal imaging, has rendered manual analysis insufficient. This has established Large Language Models (LLMs) as algorithmically necessary for managing healthcare complexity. However, their deployment in high-stakes surgical environments presents a fundamental algorithmic paradox: while generic foundation models possess vast reasoning capabilities, they often lack the precise, protocol-driven domain knowledge required for safe orthopedic decision support. This review provides a structured synthesis of the emerging algorithmic frameworks required to build modern clinical AI assistants. We deconstruct current methodologies into their core components: large-language-model adaptation, multimodal data fusion, and standardized data interoperability pipelines. Rather than proposing a single proprietary architecture, we analyze how recent literature connects specific algorithmic choices such as the trade-offs between full fine-tuning and Low-Rank Adaptation to their computational costs and factual reliability. Furthermore, we examine the theoretical architectures required for ‘agentic’ capabilities, where AI systems integrate outputs from deep convolutional neural networks and biosensors. The review concludes by outlining the unresolved challenges in algorithmic bias, security, and interoperability that must be addressed to transition these technologies from research prototypes to scalable clinical solutions.

The administrative burden of clinical documentation contributes to health care practitioner burnout and diverts valuable time away from direct patient care. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes—also called “digital scribes” or “AI scribes”—are emerging as a promising solution, given their potential to automate clinical note generation and reduce clinician workload, and those specifically built on a large language model (LLM) are emerging as technologies for facilitating real-time clinical documentation tasks. This potentially transformative development has a foundation on longer-standing, AI-based transcription software, which uses automated speech recognition and/or natural language processing. Recent studies have highlighted the potential impact of ambient AI scribes on clinician well-being, workflow efficiency, documentation quality, user experience, and patient interaction. So far, limited evidence indicates that ambient AI scribes are associated with reduced clinician burnout, lower cognitive task load, and significant time savings in documentation, particularly in after-hours electronic health record (EHR) work. One consistently reported benefit is the improvement in the patient-physician interaction, as physicians feel more present during a clinical encounter. However, these benefits are counterbalanced by persisting concerns regarding the accuracy, consistency, language use, and style of AI-generated notes. Studies noting errors, omissions, or hallucinations caution that diligent clinician oversight is necessary. The user experience is also heterogeneous, with benefits varying by specialty and individual workflow. Further, there are concerns about ethical and legal issues, algorithmic bias, the potential for long-term “cognitive debt” from overreliance on AI, and even the potential loss of physician autonomy. Additional pragmatic concerns include security, privacy, integration, interoperability, user acceptance and training, and the cost-effectiveness of adoption at scale. Finally, limited studies describe adoption or evaluation of these technologies by nonphysician clinicians and health professionals. Although ambient AI scribes and AI-driven documentation technologies are promising as potentially practice-changing tools, there are many questions remaining. Key issues persist, including responsible deployment with the goal of ensuring that ambient AI scribes produce clinical documentation that supports more efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care. To advance our collective understanding and address key issues, JMIR Medical Informatics is launching a call for papers for a new section on “Ambient AI Scribes and AI-Driven Documentation Technologies.” As editors, we look forward to the opportunity to advance the science and understanding of these fields through publishing high-quality and rigorous scholarly work in this new section of JMIR Medical Informatics .

Image generation technology using generative adversarial networks has been widely used in front-end design, but existing models have problems such as fuzzy generation and limited style expression. This study proposes an improved StyleGAN (Style Generative Adversarial Network) model to achieve style transfer and high-quality generation of front-end interface elements. An additional module is added after the generator to calculate the mutual information between the latent variables and the output of the network layer, and integrate it into the discriminator loss function for joint optimization to enhance the ability to control details. The overall FID (Frechet Inception Distance) value of the images generated by the improved model on the Rico dataset reaches 12.5, and the MS-SSIM (Multi-Scale Structural Similarity) reaches 0.92. Among them, the IS (Inception Score) value of the image generated for the Navigation Menu category reaches 7.41, which is about 14.2% higher than the baseline StyleGAN. The method used effectively solves the problem of detail distortion in front-end page generation, and realizes the precise mapping of style features and design elements through the mutual information constraint mechanism, providing a highly customizable technical framework for front-end intelligent design.

The exceptional progress in artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape of technical jobs and the educational requirements needed for these. This study’s purpose is to present and evaluate an intuitive open-source framework that transforms existing courses into interactive, AI-enhanced learning environments. Our team performed a study on the proposed method’s advantages in a pilot population of teachers and students which assessed it as “involving, trustworthy and easy to use”. Furthermore, we evaluated the AI components on standard large language model (LLM) benchmarks. This free, open-source, AI-enhanced educational platform can be used to improve the learning experience in all existing secondary and higher education institutions, with the potential of reaching the majority of the world’s students.