Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasive and sphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistulas. The aim of this report is to describe the procedural steps and preliminary results of VAAFT. Methods Karl Storz Video Equipment is used. Key steps are visualization of the fistula tract using the fistuloscope, correct localization of the internal fistula opening under direct vision, endoscopic treatment of the fistula and closure of the internal opening using a stapler or cutaneous-mucosal flap. Diagnostic fistuloscopy under irrigation is followed by an operative phase of fulguration of the fistula tract, closure of the internal opening and suture reinforcement with cyanoacrylate. Results From May 2006 to May 2011, we operated on 136 patients using VAAFT. Ninety-eight patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. No major complications occurred. In most cases, both short-term and long-term postoperative pain was acceptable. Primary healing was achieved in 72 patients (73.5%) within 2–3 months of the operation. Sixty-two patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The percentage of the patients healed after 1 year was 87.1%. Conclusions The main feature of the VAAFT technique is that the procedure is performed entirely under direct endoluminal vision. With this approach, the internal opening can be found in 82.6% of cases. Moreover, fistuloscopy helps to identify any possible secondary tracts or chronic abscesses. The VAAFT technique is sphincter-saving, and the surgical wounds are extremely small. Our preliminary results are very promising.

Abstract Background and aim High complex anal fistula is a clinical challenge for proctologists and a nightmare for patients. Although the sphincter-sparing approach seems an ideal surgical intervention, there remains room for improvement in treatment efficacy. Herein, we introduce an enhanced sphincter-sparing approach, namely the fistula occlusion with the internal sphincter flap (FOISF), for treating high complex anal fistulas. Methods This study evaluated 15 patients with high complex anal fistulas who underwent FOISF between October 2021 and December 2022 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China). Data on success rates, anal function, and various surgical characteristics were subjected to rigorous analysis. Results All patients underwent the FOISF procedure, with a median operation time of 53 min. Fourteen patients achieved primary intention healing, while one patient healed by second intention. No recurrence was observed over a follow-up period of 14–30 months. All patients exhibited satisfactory anal continence, with no statistically significant difference observed between preoperative and postoperative Wexner scores (P = 0.331). A significant improvement in the quality of life was observed when compared with the preoperative assessment (P < 0.001). Conclusion The preliminary results of the FOISF procedure present an effective approach to treat high complex anal fistula.

Anal fistula (AF) is a common referral to colorectal surgeons. Management remains challenging and sometimes controversial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in initial workup for AF. However, reports often lack key information for guiding treatment strategies. It has been shown that with structured radiology reports, there is less missing information. We present a structured MRI template report including 8 key descriptors of anal fistulas, whose effectiveness and acceptability are being assessed in a cross-sectional study (NCT04541238).

Objective Horseshoe anal fistula is a common anorectal disease, and there is no standard procedure for its treatment. In this study, we performed a modified surgical procedure for the treatment of horseshoe anal fistula and investigated its efficacy and adverse effects. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with an anal fistula plug (VAAFT-Plug) in 26 patients with a horseshoe anal fistula. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected to analyze the cure rate, anal sphincter function, and incidence of complications. Results The surgeries were successfully performed in all patients, 23 of whom were cured (effective cure rate of 88.46%). Three patients developed recurrence and were cured after traditional surgery. No patients developed severe complications or postoperative anal incontinence. The VAAFT-Plug protocol was performed with a small incision in the fistula that subsequently promoted fistula healing and preserved sphincter function. Conclusion Although randomized controlled trials will be needed to fully validate these findings, our results suggest that VAAFT-Plug represents a promising treatment strategy for horseshoe anal fistulas. This technique preserves normal anal function and achieves satisfactory outcomes in most patients.

Background and aims Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is an innovative surgical approach enabling the direct visualization of the fistula tract structure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of VAAFT in comparison with that of traditional surgical methods and explore potential risk factors contributing to fistula recurrence to provide new recommendations for surgical selection. Materials and methods Information was collected from 100 patients with complex anal fistula (CAF) in our hospital who underwent surgical treatment from January 2021 to January 2023. We compared the baseline information and surgical outcomes of two groups, analyzed the risk factors for fistula recurrence by using logistic regression analysis, and conducted further exploration by using the body mass index. Results Equal numbers of patients underwent VAAFT and traditional surgeries, and no significant differences in baseline information were observed. Patients who received VAAFT experienced less intraoperative bleeding (15.5 (14.0–20.0) vs. 32.0 (25.0–36.0)), shorter hospital stays (2.0 (2.0–2.5) vs. 3.0 (3.0–3.5)), reduced postoperative pain and wound discharge, but longer operative times (43.3 ± 6.9 vs. 35.0 (31.5–40.0)) compared with patients who underwent traditional surgeries. No significant differences in recurrence rates were found three and six months after operation (the p -values were 0.790 and 0.806, respectively). However, the Wexner scores of the VAAFT group were significantly low in the first follow-up (0 (0–1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0–2.0)). Postoperative recurrence of fistulas may be associated with obesity ( p -value = 0.040), especially in patients undergoing traditional surgeries ( p -value = 0.036). Conclusion VAAFT offers advantages, such as less pain, less trauma, and faster recovery, compared with traditional surgical treatment. Obese patients with CAF are prone to recurrence, and we recommend that they undergo VAAFT treatment rather than traditional surgeries.

The best treatment of high complex anal fistula (HCAF) is to avoid anal incontinence while improving the cure rate. On this basis, several surgical procedures for preserving the anal sphincter have been proposed. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transanal opening of intersphincteric space for treating HCAF. PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and the Wanfang databases were searched to collate all the articles on transanal opening of intersphincteric space for treating HCAF. A total of two researchers independently completed the whole process, from screening and inclusion to data extraction and the data was included in the RevMan 5.3 software for analysis. The main outcomes included the patients' essential characteristics, primary healing rate, management after recurrence, final healing rate, anal incontinence score before and after surgery, postoperative complication rate and types of complications. A total of six articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the weighted final healing rate of patients following transanal opening of intersphincteric space was 89% [risk differences (RD)=0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.86-0.92; I2=0%; P<0.00001]. The results of the anal incontinence score showed that there was no significant difference between the results before and after transanal opening of intersphincteric space surgery mean differences [(MD)=-0.04, Cl=-0.10-0.02, I2=0%; P=0.21]. Only 11 patients were reported to have complications, including urinary retention and bleeding following transanal opening of intersphincteric space with a complication rate of 8% (11/138) and the weighted average complication rate was 6% (RD=0.06,95% CI=0.02-0.10; I2=9%; P=0.003). Transanal opening of intersphincteric space has a high cure rate, a favorable anal incontinence score, fewer types of postoperative complications and a low complication rate; it can be used as a minimally invasive and sphincter-preserving surgical method for treating HCAF and is worthy of further promotion and research in clinical practice.

Anal fistula (AF) is a common disease with high prevalence and surgical operations are effective treatments in clinical work. There exist many well‐known surgical techniques treating complex anal fistula (CAF), however, none is ideal. To compare the superiority of Anal fistula plug (AFP) and Endoanal advancement flap repair (EAFR) for complex anal fistula. We searched worldwide databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed from their inception to March 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes of AFP and EAFR were included according to the PICO principles. The indicators of the healing rate, recurrence rate, wound infection rate, and complication rate, et al. were extracted and compared between different surgical methods. 5 RCTS and 7 non-RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 847 patients (341 patients conducted with AFP and 506 patients with EAFR). By combining the total effect of the 12 articles, we found that there was a statistical difference reporting the healing rate of AFP 48.3% and EAFR 64.4% treating the CAF (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.30,1.55, P  = 0.03), and EAFR has a better healing rate. However, there was no significant difference in terms of the recurrence rate (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.80,3.54, P  = 0.17), the wound infection rate (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.95,3.52, P  = 0.07), and the complication rate (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.70,1.61, P  = 0.77) either in the 12 articles or in the subgroup. The meta-analysis indicated that the EAFR was superior to AFP in terms of the healing rate treating the CAF, however, there were no significant differences between the two groups when it came to the recurrence rate, the wound infection rate, and the complication rate. EAFR might be one initial treatment for the complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas compared with AFP.

Anal fistula is a common perianal disease that typically develops from an abscess caused by in-flammation in the area. It has long been believed that intestinal microbes play a significant role in its development, considering its close relation to the intestinal environment. This work attempts to identify the microbiomic signatures of anal fistula, and putative sources of microbes by analyzing microbiomes of 7 anal fistula-associated sites in 12 patients. This study found that microbes in anal fistulas may originate from the skin surface in addition to the intestinal tract. This finding was further validated by NMDS analysis, which also indicated that the microbial communities in the inner and outer openings of the fistula were more similar to their surrounding environments. Using MaAslin2, the characteristics of the microbiome were examined, demonstrating a higher similarity between the abundant bacteria in the anal fistula samples and those found on the skin surface. Moreover, pin-to-pair analysis conducted on all subjects consistently showed a higher abundance of skin-sourced bacteria in anal fistulas. This study identifies the microbiomic signatures of anal fistula, and provides novel insights into the origin of microorganisms in anal fistulas.

Background Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication characterized by fullness of the bladder without the ability to urinate. Its etiology in proctology surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for POUR after radical surgery for anal fistula. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 511 patients who underwent radical surgery for anal fistula at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from August 2022 to December 2023. Risk factors for POUR were analyzed by means of binary logistic regression analyses. Results POUR occurred in 57 patients (11.2%) within 48 h post-surgery, and males were predominantly affected (84.4%). Independent risk factors included a history of urological disease (OR = 6.048; p  < 0.001), incisions at position 1 (OR = 2.228; p  = 0.046), high anal fistula (OR = 4.768; p  < 0.001), VAS score ≥ 7 (OR = 2.805; p  = 0.010), and GAD-7 score ≥ 5 (OR = 2.405; P  = 0.024). Conclusion POUR is a significant complication post-radical surgery for anal fistula, particularly among patients with urological disease, high anal fistula, and incisions at position 1. Surgeons should pay more attention to surgical methods for high anal fistulas and fistulas in the anterior rectum, and monitor postoperative bladder volume in high-risk patients. Enhanced postoperative pain and anxiety management can reduce the incidence of POUR and prevent long-term bladder damage.

Background Therapeutic options for complex anal fistula (CAF) are limited. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) allows examination of these anatomically complex fistulae from within. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of VAAFT for a series of CAF. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients at a single centre with complex anal cryptoglandular and Crohn’s fistulae managed with VAAFT from June 2016 to June 2019. CAF was diagnosed as high intersphincteric/transsphincteric tract, multiple/secondary tracts, horseshoe or anovaginal fistulae. Patients were treated with ‘therapeutic intent’ if the internal opening was closed at the time of ablation and ‘diagnostic/staged/palliative’ VAAFT if there was no ablation/partial treatment/ablation-only, respectively. Symptom improvement was a reduction in reported pain, discharge, or pad use. Results Eighty-four patients (73 cryptoglandular, 11 Crohn’s, M:F 2.5:1, median age 43 [22–77] years), underwent 105 VAAFT procedures. Twenty patients had > 1 VAAFT. Median follow-up was 8 (1–46) months. 40 (48%) had multiple or secondary tracts; an additional 16 (19%) had horseshoe and 3 (4%) anovaginal fistulae . Of the 84 patients, 19 [16/73 (22%) cryptoglandular and 3/11 (27%) Crohn’s fistulae] healed. 34 (40%) unhealed reported improved symptoms; 23 (27%) no improvement; and 6 (7%) were worse. Sixteen (19%) had CAF > 5 years of whom none healed, albeit 50% reported symptom improvement. Five patients (6%) developed faecal incontinence: 2 temporary, 1 to flatus only and 1 to liquid and 1 to solid, all managed conservatively. Conclusions VAAFT is a useful minimally invasive procedure for complex fistula with no other minimally invasive options. Complete healing is rare, and, although symptoms can be improved in a number of cases, there is a small risk of incontinence .