Explore the vast range of titles available.

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia were treated with intensive chemotherapy and then randomly assigned to receive placebo or oral azacitidine (CC-486) daily for 14 days per 28-day cycle. CC-486 was associated with significantly longer relapse-free and overall survival, with some gastrointestinal side effects but maintenance of quality of life.

Patients who complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer without a pathological complete response have a high risk of relapse. A randomized trial comparing capecitabine with no additional adjuvant therapy showed that capecitabine prolonged disease-free and overall survival. Patients who have residual invasive breast cancer after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of relapse. 1 The rate of complete response as assessed on pathological testing (hereafter, pathological complete response) ranges from 13 to 22% among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative primary breast cancer. 1 Patients who do not have a pathological complete response after the receipt of neoadjuvant taxane and anthracycline chemotherapy have a 20 to 30% risk of relapse. 2 Patients with HER2-negative cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy often receive postoperative radiation therapy, whereas endocrine therapy is administered to patients with hormone-receptor–positive disease . . .

Despite improvements in multidisciplinary management, patients with biliary tract cancer have a poor outcome. Only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection with curative intent, with 5-year overall survival of less than 10% for all patients. To our knowledge, no studies have described a benefit of adjuvant therapy. We aimed to determine whether adjuvant capecitabine improved overall survival compared with observation following surgery for biliary tract cancer. This randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study was done across 44 specialist hepatopancreatobiliary centres in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma or muscle-invasive gallbladder cancer who had undergone a macroscopically complete resection (which includes liver resection, pancreatic resection, or, less commonly, both) with curative intent, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than 2. Patients who had not completely recovered from previous surgery or who had previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer were also excluded. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle, for eight cycles) or observation commencing within 16 weeks of surgery. Treatment was not masked, and allocation concealment was achieved with a computerised minimisation algorithm that stratified patients by surgical centre, site of disease, resection status, and performance status. The primary outcome was overall survival. As prespecified, analyses were done by intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-003318-13. Between March 15, 2006, and Dec 4, 2014, 447 patients were enrolled; 223 patients with biliary tract cancer resected with curative intent were randomly assigned to the capecitabine group and 224 to the observation group. The data cutoff for this analysis was March 6, 2017. The median follow-up for all patients was 60 months (IQR 37–60). In the intention-to-treat analysis, median overall survival was 51·1 months (95% CI 34·6–59·1) in the capecitabine group compared with 36·4 months (29·7–44·5) in the observation group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·63–1·04; p=0·097). In a protocol-specified sensitivity analysis, adjusting for minimisation factors and nodal status, grade, and gender, the overall survival HR was 0·71 (95% CI 0·55–0·92; p=0·010). In the prespecified per-protocol analysis (210 patients in the capecitabine group and 220 in the observation group), median overall survival was 53 months (95% CI 40 to not reached) in the capecitabine group and 36 months (30–44) in the observation group (adjusted HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·58–0·97; p=0·028). In the intention-to-treat analysis, median recurrence-free survival was 24·4 months (95% CI 18·6–35·9) in the capecitabine group and 17·5 months (12·0–23·8) in the observation group. In the per-protocol analysis, median recurrence-free survival was 25·9 months (95% CI 19·8–46·3) in the capecitabine group and 17·4 months (12·0–23·7) in the observation group. Adverse events were measured in the capecitabine group only, and of the 213 patients who received at least one cycle, 94 (44%) had at least one grade 3 toxicity, the most frequent of which were hand-foot syndrome in 43 (20%) patients, diarrhoea in 16 (8%) patients, and fatigue in 16 (8%) patients. One (<1%) patient had grade 4 cardiac ischaemia or infarction. Serious adverse events were observed in 47 (21%) of 223 patients in the capecitabine group and 22 (10%) of 224 patients in the observation group. No deaths were deemed to be treatment related. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint of improving overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, the prespecified sensitivity and per-protocol analyses suggest that capecitabine can improve overall survival in patients with resected biliary tract cancer when used as adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery and could be considered as standard of care. Furthermore, the safety profile is manageable, supporting the use of capecitabine in this setting. Cancer Research UK and Roche.

Capecitabine (CAP) is one of the fluoropyrimidine deoxynucleoside carbamates, which can be converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by thymine deoxynucleoside phosphorylase (dThdPase) to exert antitumor effects. The purpose of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence (BE), and safety of two CAP tablets in Chinese patients with solid tumor cancer. The results showed that the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0−t and AUC0–∞ of CAP T/R reagent were 90.26%, 95.27%, and 95.07, respectively. The values and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of AUC0−t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax all fall within the range of 80.00–125.00%. In addition, a total of 22 subjects in this study had 30 adverse events, with an incidence of 45.83%, and there were no serious adverse events and adverse events that led to withdrawal from the trial.

The ESPAC-3 trial showed that adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard of care based on similar survival to and less toxicity than adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Other clinical trials have shown better survival and tumour response with gemcitabine and capecitabine than with gemcitabine alone in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer. We did a phase 3, two-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised clinical trial at 92 hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had undergone complete macroscopic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (R0 or R1 resection). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) within 12 weeks of surgery to receive six cycles of either 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine alone administered once a week for three of every 4 weeks (one cycle) or with 1660 mg/m2 oral capecitabine administered for 21 days followed by 7 days' rest (one cycle). Randomisation was based on a minimisation routine, and country was used as a stratification factor. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Toxicity was analysed in all patients who received trial treatment. This trial was registered with the EudraCT, number 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN, number ISRCTN96397434. Of 732 patients enrolled, 730 were included in the final analysis. Of these, 366 were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine and 364 to gemcitabine plus capecitabine. The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee requested reporting of the results after there were 458 (95%) of a target of 480 deaths. The median overall survival for patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group was 28·0 months (95% CI 23·5–31·5) compared with 25·5 months (22·7–27·9) in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio 0·82 [95% CI 0·68–0·98], p=0·032). 608 grade 3–4 adverse events were reported by 226 of 359 patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group compared with 481 grade 3–4 adverse events in 196 of 366 patients in the gemcitabine group. The adjuvant combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine should be the new standard of care following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Research UK.

Phase I/II clinical trials of S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer have yielded good responses and the treatment was well tolerated. In this S-1 Plus cisplatin versus S-1 In RCT In the Treatment for Stomach cancer (SPIRITS) trial, we aimed to verify that overall survival was better in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin than with S-1 alone. In this phase III trial, chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled betweeen March 26, 2002, and Nov 30, 2004, at 38 centres in Japan, and randomly assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin or S-1 alone. In patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin, S-1 (40–60 mg depending on patient's body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, and 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin was given intravenously on day 8, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 5-week cycle. Those assigned to S-1 alone received the same dose of S-1 twice daily for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 6-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, proportions of responders, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150670. 305 patients were enrolled; seven patients were ineligible or withdrew consent, therefore, 148 patients were assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin and 150 patients were assigned to S-1 alone. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin (13·0 months [IQR 7·6–21·9]) than in those assigned to S-1 alone (11·0 months [5·6–19·8]; hazard ratio for death, 0·77; 95% CI 0·61–0·98; p=0·04). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in those assigned to S-1 alone (median progression-free survival 6·0 months [3·3–12·9] vs 4·0 months [2·1–6·8]; p<0·0001). Additionally, of 87 patients assigned S-1 plus cisplatin who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 46 patients had partial responses, ie, a total of 54% (range 43–65). Of 106 patients assigned S-1 alone who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 32 had partial responses, ie, a total of 31% (23–41). We recorded more grade 3 or 4 adverse events including leucopenia, neutropenia, anaemia, nausea, and anorexia, in the group assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in the group assigned to S-1 alone. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. S-1 plus cisplatin holds promise of becoming a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

In this report, the addition of nab-paclitaxel to standard gemcitabine increased the response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival among patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in Europe and the United States. 1 , 2 Since 1997, gemcitabine therapy has been the standard first-line treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. 3 Among patients with metastatic disease, the 5-year survival rate is only 2%, 1 and 1-year survival rates of 17 to 23% have been reported with gemcitabine. 3 – 5 Numerous phase 2 studies involving patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have shown promising results; however, most subsequent large phase 3 studies have not shown significantly improved survival, 6 – 16 with the exception of a study involving patients who . . .

An increasing number of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have achieved no evidence of diseases (NED) status after surgery or other treatments. However, the latest guidelines for colorectal cancer do not recommend an appropriate treatment for patients with mCRC who achieve NED status. Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy has the advantages of significant efficacy and minimal adverse reactions, it is a potential effective method for maintenance treatment for mCRC, but no RCTs have been reported. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy for mCRC patients who achieve NED. This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study that evaluates the efficacy and safety of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy for patients with mCRC who achieve NED status. 240 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either a capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy group or a \"watch and wait\" group at a 1:1 allocation ratio. Eligible patients diagnosed with stage IV mCRC, both the primary tumor and the metastases, are those who have achieved R0 resection (or complete destruction by ablation) and reached NED. Participants who are enrolled in the capecitabine group will receive capecitabine (500 mg/m2 body surface area twice daily) for 2 years. Meanwhile, those who are assigned to the control group will receive regular imaging examination and follow-up only. All participants will follow up for 1 year after receiving 2 years of intervention. The primary outcomes will be disease-free survival (DFS) from randomization, stratified by preoperative chemotherapy, metastatic organs, number of metastases, lenght of previous systemic treatment, response to previous chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes will include overall survival (OS), 1-year,2-year,3-year survival rate and adverse reactions. As a potentially effective treatment, low-dose capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy has been explored in clinical practice. The results of this trial will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy for patients with mCRC who have reached NED status. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100047149, protocol version number F2.0).

Conventional management of Crohn's disease features incremental use of therapies. However, early combined immunosuppression (ECI), with a TNF antagonist and antimetabolite might be a more effective strategy. We compared the efficacy of ECI with that of conventional management for treatment of Crohn's disease. In this open-label cluster randomised controlled trial (Randomised Evaluation of an Algorithm for Crohn's Treatment, REACT), we included community gastroenterology practices from Belgium and Canada that were willing to be assigned to either of the study groups, participate in all aspects of the study, and provide data on up to 60 patients with Crohn's disease. These practices were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ECI or conventional management. The computer-generated randomisation was minimised by country and practice size. Up to 60 consecutive adult patients were assessed within practices. Patients who were aged 18 years or older; documented to have Crohn's disease; able to speak or understand English, French, or Dutch; able to access a telephone; and able to provide written informed consent were followed up for 2 years. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index score ≤4) at 12 months at the practice level. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01030809. This study took place between March 15, 2010, and Oct 1, 2013. Of the 60 practices screened, 41 were randomly assigned to either ECI (n=22) or conventional management (n=19). Two practices (one in each group) discontinued because of insufficient resources. 921 (85%) of the 1084 patients at ECI practices and 806 (90%) of 898 patients at conventional management practices completed 12 months follow-up and were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. The 12 month practice-level remission rates were similar at ECI and conventional management practices (66·0% [SD 14·0] and 61·9% [16·9]; adjusted difference 2·5%, 95% CI −5·2% to 10·2%, p=0·5169). The 24 month patient-level composite rate of major adverse outcomes defined as occurrence of surgery, hospital admission, or serious disease-related complications was lower at ECI practices than at conventional management practices (27·7% and 35·1%, absolute difference [AD] 7·3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0·73, 95% CI 0·62 to 0·86, p=0·0003). There were no differences in serious drug-related adverse events. Although ECI was not more effective than conventional management for controlling Crohn's disease symptoms, the risk of major adverse outcomes was lower. The latter finding should be considered hypothesis-generating for future trials. ECI was not associated with an increased risk of serious drug-related adverse events or mortality. AbbVie Pharmaceuticals.

In this study, a four-drug combination chemotherapy regimen was associated with objective responses in more than 30% of patients and increased survival by more than 4 months, as compared with standard gemcitabine. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in the United States in 2010, 1 and it carries a grim prognosis: the 5-year survival rate is 6% in Europe and the United States. 1 , 2 Gemcitabine became the reference regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer after a randomized trial showed significant improvement in the median overall survival as compared with fluorouracil administered as an intravenous bolus (5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P=0.002). 3 In the subsequent phase 3 trials of single-agent gemcitabine, 4 the median overall survival ranged from 5.0 to 7.2 months. The combination of gemcitabine with a variety of cytotoxic and . . .