Explore the vast range of titles available.

In patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to 70 to 99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery, aggressive medical management was superior to aggressive medical management plus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is one of the most common causes of stroke worldwide 1 – 6 and is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. 7 – 9 Patients with a recent transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke and severe stenosis (70 to 99% of the diameter of a major intracranial artery) are at particularly high risk for recurrent stroke in the territory of the stenotic artery (approximately 23% at 1 year) despite treatment with aspirin and standard management of vascular risk factors. 8 , 10 Therefore, alternative therapies are urgently needed for these patients. Two strategies have emerged for the treatment of high-risk . . .

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the most frequent causes of stroke worldwide and confers one of the greatest risks of recurrent stroke compared with other causes of stroke. Asymptomatic ICAS is increasingly recognised as a risk factor for silent brain infarctions and dementia, magnifying the global burden of ICAS. Although ICAS is a lumen-based diagnosis, newer diagnostic imaging techniques, such as high-resolution MRI, might help to identify high-risk population subgroups to test interventions that might reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Secondary stroke prevention in patients with ICAS currently consists of intensive management of modifiable risk factors and dual antiplatelet therapy, which is subsequently reduced to aspirin alone. Despite these therapies, the risk of recurrent stroke in patients presenting with stroke related to 70–99% ICAS exceeds 20% at 1 year; as such, better therapies are urgently needed. The optimal duration and combination of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ICAS is uncertain and is being investigated in addition to low-dose anticoagulation and aspirin. Other ongoing or planned studies will provide high-quality observational data on the role of transluminal angioplasty and stenting, submaximal balloon angioplasty alone, direct or indirect arterial bypass, and ischaemic conditioning for prevention of stroke in patients with ICAS.

Early results of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis trial showed that, by 30 days, 33 (14·7%) of 224 patients in the stenting group and 13 (5·8%) of 227 patients in the medical group had died or had a stroke (percentages are product limit estimates), but provided insufficient data to establish whether stenting offered any longer-term benefit. Here we report the long-term outcome of patients in this trial. We randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by centre with randomly permuted block sizes) 451 patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or stroke related to 70–99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery to aggressive medical management (antiplatelet therapy, intensive management of vascular risk factors, and a lifestyle-modification programme) or aggressive medical management plus stenting with the Wingspan stent. The primary endpoint was any of the following: stroke or death within 30 days after enrolment, ischaemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days of enrolment, or stroke or death within 30 days after a revascularisation procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up. Primary endpoint analysis of between-group differences with log-rank test was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 00576693. During a median follow-up of 32·4 months, 34 (15%) of 227 patients in the medical group and 52 (23%) of 224 patients in the stenting group had a primary endpoint event. The cumulative probability of the primary endpoints was smaller in the medical group versus the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) group (p=0·0252). Beyond 30 days, 21 (10%) of 210 patients in the medical group and 19 (10%) of 191 patients in the stenting group had a primary endpoint. The absolute differences in the primary endpoint rates between the two groups were 7·1% at year 1 (95% CI 0·2 to 13·8%; p=0·0428), 6·5% at year 2 (–0·5 to 13·5%; p=0·07) and 9·0% at year 3 (1·5 to 16·5%; p=0·0193). The occurrence of the following adverse events was higher in the PTAS group than in the medical group: any stroke (59 [26%] of 224 patients vs 42 [19%] of 227 patients; p=0·0468) and major haemorrhage (29 [13%]of 224 patients vs 10 [4%] of 227 patients; p=0·0009). The early benefit of aggressive medical management over stenting with the Wingspan stent for high-risk patients with intracranial stenosis persists over extended follow-up. Our findings lend support to the use of aggressive medical management rather than PTAS with the Wingspan system in high-risk patients with atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and others.

BackgroundAlthough endovascular stenting is considered an effective and safe therapeutic option for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD), an elevated rate of restenosis remains an important issue for the conventional bare-metal stent (BMS). Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that applying drug-coated balloons (DCB) in sICAD may decrease restenosis occurrence. Additional large randomised studies are warranted to provide firmer evidence and to determine which patients would benefit most from DCB.AimTo design a randomised trial to examine DCB angioplasty (Taijieweiye intracranial paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter) versus BMS stenting (Wingspan intracranial stent system) in patients with sICAD.DesignThis is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point study to assess whether DCB angioplasty reduces the risk of restenosis compared with BMS stenting in sICAD patients with high-grade stenosis (≥70%–99%). Our goal is to randomly assign 198 eligible individuals at a 1:1 ratio to undergo DCB angioplasty (intervention group) or BMS stenting (control group).OutcomeThe primary efficacy outcome is restenosis at 6 months post treatment, that is, >50% stenosis in or within 5 mm of the treated segment and >20% absolute luminal loss. The primary safety outcome is stroke or death within 30 days post treatment.DiscussionThe DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease trial aims to produce strong evidence on the efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty as a promising therapeutic option for sICAD cases with high-grade stenosis.

RationaleThe management of residual stenosis after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related emerge large vessel occlusive (ICAS-LVO) stroke is still unclear question in clinical practice.AimTo demonstrate the design of a clinical trial on emergency balloon angioplasty and/or stenting (BAS) combined with standard medical treatment (SMT) for residual stenosis of ICAS-LVO stroke patients with successful recanalisation.DesignASSET is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point, controlled clinical trial designed (PROBE) by investigators. This trial evaluates the effectiveness and the safety of emergency BAS in combination with SMT compared with SMT alone in ICAS-LVO stroke patients with successful recanalisation (defined as expanded treatment in cerebral ischaemia grade of 2b50-3 and maintained for more than 20 min) and residual stenosis (defined as ≥50%) up to 24 hours after the onset of symptoms or the last known well.OutcomeThe primary outcome assessed at 90 (±7) days after randomisation is the incidence of ischaemic stroke in the responsible vessel. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 24 (±3) hours is the primary safety outcome.DiscussionThe ASSET trial is designed to provide strong evidence on the effectiveness and safety of emergency BAS to treat residual stenosis after successful recanalisation in patients with ICAS-LVO stroke.Trial registration numberChiCTR2300079069

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the most common causes of stroke worldwide, and it is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke with currently recommended treatments. We aimed to evaluate the effect of chronic remote ischaemic conditioning on prevention of ischaemic events in patients with symptomatic ICAS. The RICA trial is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial at 84 stroke centres in China. Patients aged 40–80 years with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack attributable to angiographically verified 50–99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive web-based system by computer-generated randomisation code, to either remote ischaemic conditioning or sham remote ischaemic conditioning once daily for 12 months and voluntarily thereafter. All investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first occurrence of non-fatal or fatal ischaemic stroke, with survival analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The RICA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02534545. Between Oct 28, 2015, and Feb 28, 2019, 3033 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either remote ischaemic conditioning (n=1517; intervention group) or sham remote ischaemic conditioning (n=1516; sham group). Median follow-up was 3·5 years (IQR 2·7–4·4). A non-fatal or fatal ischaemic stroke occurred in 257 (16·9%) patients in the intervention group compared with 288 (19·0%) patients in sham group. There was no difference in the survival distribution for time to first occurrence of non-fatal or fatal ischaemic stroke (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·74–1·03; p=0·12). In the intervention group, 79 (5·2%) patients died from any cause, and in the sham group, 84 (5·5%) patients died from any cause (hazard ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·68–1·27; p=0·65). No intervention-related serious adverse events were observed. No evidence was found for a difference between remote ischaemic conditioning and sham remote ischaemic conditioning in lowering the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with symptomatic ICAS. The benefit of remote ischaemic conditioning might have been diluted by poor compliance. Future studies of remote ischaemic conditioning in this population should address challenges in patients’ compliance and assess longer term treatment. Ministry of Science and Technology China, Beijing Municipal Education Commission, Beijing Municipal Finance Bureau. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

RationaleThe effect of the head position as a non-pharmacological therapy on acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remains inconclusive. Our recent Head dOwn-Position for acutE moderate ischaemic Stroke with large artery atherosclerosis (HOPES 2) suggested the safety, feasibility and potential benefit of the head-down position (HDP) in AIS.AimTo investigate the benefit of HDP in acute moderate ischaemic stroke patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA).Sample size estimatesBased on a two-sided 0.05 level of significance, 600 patients are expected to yield the superiority hypothesis with 80% power, stratified by age, sex, history of diabetes, baseline systolic blood pressure, location of index vessel, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score at randomisation, onset to randomisation time, progression to moderate neurological deficit due to early neurological deterioration and degree of responsible vessel stenosis.DesignHead dOwn-Position for acutE moderate ischaemic Stroke with large artery atherosclerosis(HOPES 3) is a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint and multicentre study. Eligible patients who had an ischaemic stroke will be randomly assigned (1:1) into the HDP group receiving −20° Trendelenburg plus standard medical care in compliance with national guidelines, or control group only receiving standard medical care in compliance with national guidelines.OutcomeThe primary outcome is favourable functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes are HDP-related adverse events. All outcomes will have blinded assessment and will be analysed on the intention-to-treat basis.ConclusionsThe results of HOPES 3 will provide evidence for the effect of HDP in acute moderate ischaemic stroke patients with LAA within 24 hours of onset or in patients with progression from mild neurological deficit within 24 hours.Trial registration number NCT06010641.

Arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) is a chronic vascular disease characterized by narrowing or occlusion of the vascular lumen. Its pathogenesis is complex and closely associated with lipid metabolism disorders and chronic inflammation. Although notable progress has been made in the treatment of ASO, it still remains a cause of surgical limb loss globally. In recent years, immune checkpoints have been identified as critical regulators of the immune microenvironment that play a significant role in ASO. Furthermore, immune checkpoints can affect lipid metabolism by regulating the metabolic pathways of immune cells, thereby indirectly modulating lipid metabolic processes, such as lipid absorption, transport, and degradation, which are crucial in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. Here, we summarized and discussed progress in studies related to lipid metabolism and immune checkpoints during ASO, and highlighted how immune checkpoints regulate lipid metabolism to affect ASO. Further exploration of the interactions between lipid metabolism regulators and immune checkpoints may uncover novel potential therapeutic targets for ASO management.

Atherosclerotic disease often involves the intracranial arteries including those encased by cranial bones and dura, and those located in the subarachnoid space. Age, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are independent risk factors for intracranial atherosclerosis. Intracranial atherosclerosis can result in thromboembolism with or without hypoperfusion leading to transient or permanent cerebral ischaemic events. High rates of recurrent ischaemic stroke and other cardiovascular events mandate early diagnosis and treatment. Present treatment is based on a combination of antiplatelet drugs, optimisation of blood pressure and LDL cholesterol values, and intracranial angioplasty or stent placement, or both, in selected patients.