Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
221 result(s) for "Acetazolamide - administration "
Sort by:
Furosemide with adjunctive acetazolamide vs furosemide only in critically ill patients: A pilot two-center randomized controlled trial
Furosemide is the most commonly used diuretic in intensive care units (ICU). We aimed to evaluate the physiological effects of adjunctive acetazolamide with furosemide on diuresis and the prevention of potential furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis. We performed a two-center, pilot, open-label, randomized trial. Where the treating physicians planned intravenous diuretic therapy, we randomized ICU patients to a bolus of furosemide (40 mg) plus acetazolamide (500 mg) (n = 15) or furosemide alone (40 mg) (n = 15). Urine output, additional furosemide use, acid-base parameters, and electrolytes were compared following a Bayesian framework. Adjunctive acetazolamide didn't increase urine output in the first six hours (mean difference: −112 ml, credible interval: [−742, 514]). However, compared with furosemide alone, it maintained a greater urine output response to furosemide over 24 h, with 100 % probability. Acetazolamide also acidified plasma (pH difference: −0.045, [−0.081, −0.008]) while alkalinizing urine (1.10, [0.04, 2.11]) at six hours, compared to furosemide alone with >95 % probability. Finally, we didn't observe severe acidosis or electrolyte disturbances over 24 h. Adjunctive acetazolamide may increase diuretic efficacy and counterbalance furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis without safety concerns. Larger trials are warranted to verify these findings and assess their impacts on clinical outcomes. ACTRN12623000624684. A pilot trial of single versus dual diuretic therapy in the intensive care unit. •Pathophysiologic effects of adjunctive acetazolamide were assessed in this pilot RCT.•Acetazolamide may have preserved urine output response to furosemide.•Acetazolamide may have counterbalanced furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis.•Adjunctive acetazolamide may not result in severe acidosis or electrolyte disturbance.•Larger trials to evaluate the effect of adjunctive acetazolamide appear justified.
Natriuretic Peptide–driven Fluid Management during Ventilator Weaning
Difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation is often associated with fluid overload. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been proposed as a tool for predicting and detecting weaning failure of cardiovascular origin. To investigate whether fluid management guided by daily BNP plasma concentrations improves weaning outcomes compared with empirical therapy dictated by clinical acumen. In a randomized controlled multicenter study, we allocated 304 patients to either a BNP-driven or physician-driven strategy of fluid management during ventilator weaning. To standardize the weaning process, patients in both groups were ventilated with an automatic computer-driven weaning system. The primary end point was time to successful extubation. In the BNP-driven group, furosemide and acetazolamide were given more often and in higher doses than in the control group, resulting in a more negative median (interquartile range) fluid balance during weaning (-2,320 [-4,735, 738] vs. -180 [-2,556, 2,832] ml; P < 0.0001). Time to successful extubation was significantly shorter with the BNP-driven strategy (58.6 [23.3, 139.8] vs. 42.4 [20.8, 107.5] h; P = 0.034). The BNP-driven strategy increased the number of ventilator-free days but did not change length of stay or mortality. The effect on weaning time was strongest in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The two strategies did not differ significantly regarding electrolyte imbalance, renal failure, or shock. Our results suggest that a BNP-driven fluid management strategy decreases the duration of weaning without increasing adverse events, especially in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00473148).
CSF pressure, papilledema grade, and response to acetazolamide in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial
Previous reports suggest an association between the degree of optic nerve head edema and CSF pressure (CSFp) in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We hypothesized that CSFp would be associated with Frisén papilledema grade (FPG) and other clinical features, and that FPG would modify the CSFp response to acetazolamide in participants in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT). In the IIHTT, eligible patients underwent lumbar puncture (LP) prior to enrollment and were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: acetazolamide plus supervised diet or placebo plus supervised diet. Trial eligibility required baseline CSFp ≥250 mm H 2 O or ≥200 mm H 2 O with compelling clinical or imaging IIH findings. Associations between CSFp and FPG and other clinical features were examined at baseline. The effect of acetazolamide on 6-month change in CSFp was examined in those with low FPG (grades I–III) and those with high FPG (grades IV–V) at baseline. All 165 enrolled subjects had a baseline LP and 85 had an LP at 6 months. There was an association between CSFp and FPG at baseline: CSFp was more elevated in subjects with high FPG (378 ± 90 mm H 2 O, n  = 50) than in subjects with low FPG (331 ± 77, n  = 115, p  = 0.002). At 6 months, acetazolamide had a similar effect on CSFp in subjects with high FPG (−79.9 mm H 2 O) and in subjects with low FPG (−50.9 mm H 2 O, p  = 0.50). We found a modest association between CSFp and FPG. Acetazolamide had a beneficial effect on CSFp regardless of baseline FPG.
Efficacy and safety of preoperative IOP reduction using a preservative-free fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol eye drops versus oral acetazolamide and dexamethasone eye drops and assessment of the clinical outcome of trabeculectomy in glaucoma
To demonstrate that preoperative treatment for 28 days with topical dorzolamide/timolol is non-inferior (Δ = 4 mm Hg) to oral acetazolamide and topical dexamethasone (standard therapy) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction 3 and 6 months after trabeculectomy in glaucoma patients. Sixty-two eyes undergoing trabeculectomy with mitomycin C were included in this monocentric prospective randomized controlled study. IOP change between baseline and 3 months post-op was defined as the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included the number of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injections, needlings, suture lyses, preoperative IOP change, hypertension rate and change of conjunctival redness 3 and 6 months post-op. Safety was assessed based on the documentation of adverse events. Preoperative treatment with topical dorzolamide/timolol was non-inferior to oral acetazolamide and topical dexamethasone in terms of IOP reduction 3 months after trabeculectomy (adjusted means -8.12 mmHg versus -8.30 mmHg; Difference: 0.18; 95% CI -1.91 to 2.26, p = 0.8662). Similar results were found 6 months after trabeculectomy (-9.13 mmHg versus -9.06 mmHg; p = 0.9401). Comparable results were also shown for both groups concerning the classification of the filtering bleb, corneal staining, and numbers of treatments with 5-FU, needlings and suture lyses. More patients reported AEs in the acetazolamide/dexamethasone group than in the dorzolamide/timolol group. Preoperative, preservative-free, fixed-dose dorzolamide/timolol seems to be equally effective as preoperative acetazolamide and dexamethasone and has a favourable safety profile.
Efficacy of ambulatory intravenous diuresis for chronic heart failure patients: Insights from the DEA‐HF trial
Aims Oral diuretic treatment has limited efficacy in managing chronic heart failure (HF) patients. Novel strategies are needed to manage patients with refractory congestion despite optimal HF therapy and high‐dose oral diuretic treatment. In the present study, we prospectively quantified the efficacy and safety of an ambulatory, weekly, high‐dose parenteral diuresis strategy. Methods and results Data from the prospective, randomized, cross‐over controlled study for comparisons of diuresis efficacy in HF patients (DEA‐HF) were analysed. Chronic HF patients with congestion despite guideline‐directed medical therapy were enrolled to receive three high‐intensity diuretic regimens, once a week, in a randomized order: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250 mg; IV furosemide 250 mg + oral metolazone 5 mg; and IV furosemide 250 mg + IV acetazolamide 500 mg. The primary outcome compared the total sodium excretion following each diuretic regimen. Here, all regimens were pooled to assess the effect of weekly intensive diuresis approach on congestion parameters. The study population included 42 patients, 40% females, with a mean age of 72 ± 9 years. Following three consecutive weekly treatments, the mean body weight was decreased from 85.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.7–91.2] to 83.1 kg (95% CI: 77.4–88.9. P = 0.0005), accompanied by a significant decrease in congestion score, N‐terminal‐pro‐brain natriuretic peptide levels and lung ultrasound B‐line count. Serum creatinine mildly but significantly increased from 1.81 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.62–2.01) to 2.01 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.81–2.21. P < 0.001), and no hospitalizations due to acute kidney injury occurred. Conclusions In patients with congestion‐refractory HF, an ambulatory strategy utilizing high‐intensity weekly IV diuretic therapy achieved effective decongestion without major safety concerns. This escalated strategy may improve clinical outcomes and prevent hospitalizations of chronic HF patients who require diuresis intensification. Graphical presentation of the study design, main results and conclusion. Abbreviations: Y/O = year old; HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Kg = kilograms; NYHA = New York Heart Association; ACE = angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNI = angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; SGLT2i = sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor; NT‐proBNP = N‐terminal‐pro‐brain natriuretic peptide; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; IV = intravenous; PO = per os; mg = milligram.
Acetazolamide: A Treatment for Chronic Mountain Sickness
Chronic mountain sickness or Monge's disease is characterized by an excessive polycythemia in high-altitude dwellers, with a prevalence of 5 to 18% above 3,200 m. To date, no pharmacologic treatment is available. We evaluated the efficacy of acetazolamide in the treatment of chronic mountain sickness and the importance of nocturnal hypoxemia in its pathophysiology. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed in three groups of patients from Cerro de Pasco, Peru (4,300 m), treated orally for 3 weeks with placebo (n = 10), 250 mg of acetazolamide (n = 10), or 500 mg of acetazolamide (n = 10), daily. Acetazolamide decreased hematocrit by 7.1% (p < 0.001) and 6.7% (p < 0.001), serum erythropoietin by 67% (p < 0.01) and 50% (p < 0.001), and serum soluble transferrin receptors by 11.1% (p < 0.05) and 3.4% (p < 0.001), and increased serum ferritin by 540% (p < 0.001) and 134% (p < 0.001), for groups treated with 250 and 500 mg of acetazolamide, respectively. Acetazolamide (250 mg) increased nocturnal arterial O(2) saturation by 5% (p < 0.01) and decreased mean nocturnal heart rate by 11% (p < 0.05) and the number of apnea-hypopnea episodes during sleep by 74% (p < 0.05). The decrease in erythropoietin was attributed mainly to the acetazolamide-induced increase in ventilation and arterial O(2) saturation. Acetazolamide, the first efficient pharmacologic treatment of chronic mountain sickness without adverse effects, reduces hypoventilation, which may be accentuated during sleep, and blunts erythropoiesis. Its low cost may allow wide development with a considerable positive impact on public health in high-altitude regions.
Short-term intraocular pressure trends following intravitreal ranibizumab injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration—the role of oral acetazolamide in protecting glaucoma patients
Purpose To determine the effect of oral acetazolamide on lowering the peak and duration of intraocular pressure (IOP) rise in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients, following intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods The study was an open-label, parallel, randomised, controlled trial (EudraCT Number: 2010-023037-35). Twenty-four glaucoma or glaucoma suspect patients received either 500 mg acetazolamide or no treatment 60–90 min before 0.5 mg ranibizumab. The primary outcome measure was the difference in IOP immediately after injection (T0) and 5, 10, and 30 min following injection. ANCOVA was used to compare groups, adjusting for baseline IOP. The study was powered to detect a 9-mm Hg difference at T0. Results The IOP at T0 was 2.3 mm Hg higher in the non-treated group (mean 44.5 mm Hg, range (19–86 mm Hg)) compared with the treated group (mean 42.2 mm Hg, range (25–58 mm Hg)), but was not statistically significant after adjusting for baseline IOP ( P =0.440). At 30 min, IOP was 4.9 mm Hg higher in the non-treated group (mean 20.6 mm Hg, range (11–46 mm Hg)) compared with the treated group (mean 15.7 mm Hg, range (8–21 mm Hg)). This was statistically significant after adjusting for baseline IOP ( P =0.013). Conclusions Although the primary end points were not reached, 500 mg oral acetazolamide, 60–90 min before intravitreal injection, results in a statistically significant reduction in IOP at 3O min post injection. Prophylactic treatment may be considered as an option to minimise neuro-retinal rim damage in high-risk glaucoma patients who are most vulnerable to IOP spikes and undergoing repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab.
A pilot randomized study on use of oral acetazolamide in patients with refractory dysuria
Purpose Assessment of daily oral acetazolamide in treatment of refractory dysuria. Methods Forty-one patients were randomly allocated to either be treated with acetazolamide (250 mg twice daily) or to receive placebo. The irritative voiding symptoms and urinary pH were recorded before and after treatment. The quality of life indices including the impact of voiding symptoms on daily and social activities, mood disturbance and sleep disorders were also measured by a questionnaire. Results Urinary pH was increased in the group taking acetazolamide ( P  < 0.001). They also reported alleviation of dysuria ( P  < 0.001), frequency ( P  = 0.039) and urgency ( P  = 0.016). However, nocturia was not improved in the study group. No change was observed in the aforementioned parameters in the placebo group. Daily personal life, social activities and the quality of sleep were improved by 52, 38 and 33%, respectively. Conclusion Oral acetazolamide can reduce the irritative voiding symptoms and improve the quality of life which is concomitant with an increase in urinary pH.
Effects of Acetazolamide on Ventilatory, Cerebrovascular, and Pulmonary Vascular Responses to Hypoxia
Acute mountain sickness (AMS) may affect individuals who (rapidly) ascend to altitudes higher than 2,000-3,000 m. A more serious consequence of rapid ascent may be high-altitude pulmonary edema, a hydrostatic edema associated with increased pulmonary capillary pressures. Acetazolamide is effective against AMS, possibly by increasing ventilation and cerebral blood flow (CBF). In animals, it inhibits hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. We examined the influence of acetazolamide on the response to hypoxia of ventilation, CBF, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, nine subjects ingested 250 mg acetazolamide every 8 h for 3 d. On the fourth test day, we measured the responses of ventilation, PVR, and CBF to acute isocapnic hypoxia (20 min) and sustained poikilocapnic hypoxia (4 h). Ventilation was measured with pneumotachography. Hypoxia was achieved with dynamic end-tidal forcing. The maximum pressure difference across the tricuspid valve (DeltaPmax, a good index of PVR) was measured with Doppler echocardiography. CBF was measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. In normoxia, acetazolamide increased ventilation and reduced DeltaPmax, but did not influence CBF. The ventilatory and CBF responses to acute isocapnic hypoxia were unaltered, but the rise in DeltaPmax was reduced by 57%. The increase in DeltaPmax by sustained poikilocapnic hypoxia observed after placebo was reduced by 34% after acetazolamide, the ventilatory response was increased, but the CBF response remained unaltered. Acetazolamide has complex effects on ventilation, PVR, and CBF that converge to optimize brain oxygenation and may be a valuable means to prevent/treat high-altitude pulmonary edema.
Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Acetazolamide Versus Ibuprofen for Prophylaxis Against High Altitude Headache: The Headache Evaluation at Altitude Trial (HEAT)
High altitude headache (HAH) is the most common neurological complaint at altitude and the defining component of acute mountain sickness (AMS). However, there is a paucity of literature concerning its prevention. Toward this end, we initiated a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the Nepal Himalaya designed to compare the effectiveness of ibuprofen and acetazolamide for the prevention of HAH. Three hundred forty-three healthy western trekkers were recruited at altitudes of 4280 m and 4358 m and assigned to receive ibuprofen 600 mg, acetazolamide 85 mg, or placebo 3 times daily before continued ascent to 4928 m. Outcome measures included headache incidence and severity, AMS incidence and severity on the Lake Louise AMS Questionnaire (LLQ), and visual analog scale (VAS). Two hundred sixty-five of 343 subjects completed the trial. HAH incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (27.1%) or ibuprofen (27.5%; P = .95), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (45.3%; P = .01). AMS incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (18.8%) or ibuprofen (13.7%; P = .34), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (28.6%; P = .03). In fully compliant participants, moderate or severe headache incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (3.8%) or ibuprofen (4.7%; P = .79), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (13.5%; P = .03). Ibuprofen and acetazolamide were similarly effective in preventing HAH. Ibuprofen was similar to acetazolamide in preventing symptoms of AMS, an interesting finding that implies a potentially new approach to prevention of cerebral forms of acute altitude illness.