Explore the vast range of titles available.

This multicenter randomized trial compared strategies of early and delayed renal-replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury. There was no significant difference in mortality, the primary outcome, between the study groups. Acute kidney injury is a common condition among patients in the intensive care unit 1 – 4 and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. 2 , 5 – 8 Renal-replacement therapy is the cornerstone of the management of severe acute kidney injury. Many studies have focused on methods of renal-replacement therapy, 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 but the issue of when to initiate the therapy in the absence of a potentially life-threatening complication directly related to renal failure remains a subject of debate. Indirect evidence has suggested that early renal-replacement therapy could confer a survival benefit. 10 – 12 However, two observational studies reported high survival rates among . . .

In patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) but no urgent indication for renal replacement therapy (RRT), the optimal time to initiate RRT remains controversial. While starting RRT preemptively may have benefits, this may expose patients to unnecessary RRT. To study this, we conducted a 12-center open-label pilot trial of critically ill adults with volume replete severe AKI. Patients were randomized to accelerated (12 h or less from eligibility) or standard RRT initiation. Outcomes were adherence to protocol-defined time windows for RRT initiation (primary), proportion of eligible patients enrolled, follow-up to 90 days, and safety in 101 fully eligible patients (57 with sepsis) with a mean age of 63 years. Median serum creatinine and urine output at enrollment were 268 micromoles/l and 356 ml per 24 h, respectively. In the accelerated arm, all patients commenced RRT and 45/48 did so within 12 h from eligibility (median 7.4 h). In the standard arm, 33 patients started RRT at a median of 31.6 h from eligibility, of which 19 did not receive RRT (6 died and 13 recovered kidney function). Clinical outcomes were available for all patients at 90 days following enrollment, with mortality 38% in the accelerated and 37% in the standard arm. Two surviving patients, both randomized to standard RRT initiation, were still RRT dependent at day 90. No safety signal was evident in either arm. Our findings can inform the design of a large-scale effectiveness randomized control trial.

The administration of intravenous fluid remains the cornerstone treatment for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. However, no well-defined protocols exist to guide fluid administration in this treatment. We aimed to establish the efficacy of a new fluid protocol to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. In this randomised, parallel-group, comparator-controlled, single-blind phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy of a new fluid protocol based on the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, which was defined as a greater than 25% or greater than 0·5 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration. Between Oct 10, 2010, and July 17, 2012, 396 patients aged 18 years or older undergoing cardiac catheterisation with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or less and one or more of several risk factors (diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or age older than 75 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided volume expansion (n=196) or the control group (n=200) who received a standard fluid administration protocol. Four computer-generated concealed randomisation schedules, each with permuted block sizes of 4, were used for randomisation, and participants were allocated to the next sequential randomisation number by sealed opaque envelopes. Patients and laboratory personnel were masked to treatment assignment, but the physicians who did the procedures were not masked. Both groups received intravenous 0·9% sodium chloride at 3 mL/kg for 1 h before cardiac catheterisation. Analyses were by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and all such events were classified by staff who were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01218828. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred less frequently in patients in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided group (6·7% [12/178]) than in the control group (16·3% [28/172]; relative risk 0·41, 95% CI 0·22–0·79; p=0·005). Hydration treatment was terminated prematurely because of shortness of breath in three patients in each group. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided fluid administration seems to be safe and effective in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. Kaiser Permanente Southern California regional research committee grant.

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant risk factor associated with reduced survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Whether the severity of AKI simply serves as a surrogate measure of worse peri-arrest conditions, or represents an additional risk to long-term survival remains unclear. Methods This is a sub-study derived from a randomized trial in which 789 comatose adult OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause and sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were enrolled. Patients without prior dialysis dependent kidney disease and surviving at least 48 h were included (N = 759). AKI was defined by the kidney disease: improving global outcome (KDIGO) classification, and patients were divided into groups based on the development of AKI and the need for continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), thus establishing three groups of patients—No AKI, AKI no CKRT, and AKI CKRT. Primary outcome was overall survival within 365 days after OHCA according to AKI group. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess overall survival within 365 days according to the three groups. Results In the whole population, median age was 64 (54–73) years, 80% male, 90% of patients presented with shockable rhythm, and time to ROSC was median 18 (12–26) min. A total of 254 (33.5%) patients developed AKI according to the KDIGO definition, with 77 requiring CKRT and 177 without need for CKRT. AKI CKRT patients had longer time-to-ROSC and worse metabolic derangement at hospital admission. Overall survival within 365 days from OHCA decreased with the severity of kidney injury. Adjusted Cox regression analysis found that AKI, both with and without CKRT, was significantly associated with reduced overall survival up until 365 days, with comparable hazard ratios relative to no AKI (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.13–2.70 vs. HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30–2.39). Conclusions In comatose patients who had been resuscitated after OHCA, patients developing AKI, with or without initiation of CKRT, had a worse 1-year overall survival compared to non-AKI patients. This association remains statistically significant after adjusting for other peri-arrest risk factors. Trial registration : The BOX trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03141099.

To better understand the diagnostic and predictive performance of urinary biomarkers of kidney injury, we evaluated γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), cystatin C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) in a prospective observational study of 529 patients in 2 general intensive care units (ICUs). Comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis, or death, and reassessed after patient stratification by baseline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and time after renal insult. On ICU entry, no biomarker had an AUC above 0.7 in the diagnosis or prediction of AKI. Several biomarkers (NGAL, CysC, and IL-18) predicted dialysis (AUC over 0.7), and all except KIM-1 predicted death at 7 days (AUC between 0.61 and 0.69). Performance was improved by stratification for eGFR or time or both. With eGFR <60ml/min, CysC and KIM-1 had AUCs of 0.69 and 0.73, respectively, within 6h of injury, and between 12 and 36h, CysC (0.88), NGAL (0.85), and IL-18 (0.94) had utility. With eGFR >60ml/min, GGT (0.73), CysC (0.68), and NGAL (0.68) had the highest AUCs within 6h of injury, and between 6 and 12h, all AUCs except AP were between 0.68 and 0.78. Beyond 12h, NGAL (0.71) and KIM-1 (0.66) performed best. Thus, the duration of injury and baseline renal function should be considered in evaluating biomarker performance to diagnose AKI.

Background Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass invariably induces renal stress and risk of irreversible kidney function loss, with no approved drug treatments. RMC-035, a recombinant human alpha-1-microglobulin with potent heme-binding and antioxidant capacity, has shown promising long-term kidney-protective effects in a phase 2a trial of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary objective of this phase 2b dose-optimisation trial is to demonstrate that RMC-035 (pooled dose groups) is superior to placebo in preserving renal function at 90 days after surgery. Methods This randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RMC-035 among approximately 161 high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are randomised into one of three treatment groups in a 2:2:3 ratio: RMC-035 (30 mg or 60 mg) or placebo. The study drug is administered via three intravenous infusions, with the first dose given intraoperatively, followed by additional doses at 6 and 24 h, respectively. The primary endpoint is the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline (pre-surgery) to Day 90. Important secondary endpoints include the incidence of major adverse kidney events at Day 90 and short-term outcomes reflecting changes in renal filtration markers up to Day 7. Safety assessments encompass adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms and routine safety laboratory tests. Additional evaluations include pharmacokinetics, anti-drug antibodies and immunological biomarkers. Discussion This multicentre, multinational phase 2b trial, will assess the change in eGFR within 90 days of the first dose, providing additional evidence of the long-term kidney-protective potential of RMC-035 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at high risk for kidney injury. Trial outcomes will inform the preferred dose, dosing regimen, and benefit-risk profile related to cardiac surgery for a future pivotal phase 3 trial. Trial registration The trial was registered June 20, 2024, at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06475274 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06475274 ). The trial including the participating EU countries is also registered with the EUCT number 2024–510658-28 under https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en&EUCT=2024-510658-28-00 . The first patient was enrolled August 26, 2024.

Introduction Haemodynamic adverse events related to renal replacement therapy are a complication of all RRT modalities used in the ICU, including intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). At present it is unclear which risk factors predispose to HAE and whether these contribute to adverse patient outcomes. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of the multinational STARRT-AKI trial to assess factors associated with the occurrence of haemodynamic adverse events (HAE) in patients receiving RRT and whether these HAE were associated with less favourable clinical outcomes. The primary analysis was a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), which included time to HAE as the dependent variable. Results Factors significantly associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for HAE during RRT were a higher SOFA score at RRT initiation (HR 1.05; 95% 1.00-1.10), use of IHD as the initial RRT modality in comparison to CRRT (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.28–2.37) and use of SLED as the initial RRT modality in comparison to CRRT (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.65–4.51). In a multivariable analysis, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics and RRT initiation covariates, there was no significant association between the occurrence of a HAE during RRT and mortality, dialysis dependence, length of stay, RRT-free days, ventilator-free days or vasoactive-free days, respectively. There was, however, a significant association between multiple haemodynamic adverse events and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Conclusions In this secondary analysis of the STARRT-AKI trial, the use of intermittent RRT modalities and higher severity of illness were associated with HAE during RRT. These events were not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, apart from a significant association between multiple HAE and all-cause mortality at 90 days.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is predominantly a disease of low and middle-income countries. Despite this, there is a particular paucity of data regarding AKI in Africa. Most published studies were conducted prior to the most recent Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition of AKI. This prospective, observational, cohort study examines AKI amongst newly admitted acute medical inpatients in a large, urban, tertiary hospital in Harare, Zimbabwe. All newly admitted, adult, medical patients in separate, randomly selected, 24-hour periods were included. Baseline demographic information, comorbidities, nephrotoxic medication use, and reason for admission were recorded on a standardised data capture record. A serum creatinine measurement was performed on all patients at the time of admission and again after 48 hours. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and AKI was defined using the most recent KDIGO definition as an increase in the serum creatinine of greater than 26.5μmol/L within 48 hours, with admission creatinine used as a baseline measurement. 253 patients were included in the analysis; 137 patients (54.2%) were female; 100 patients (39.5%) had HIV infection. 36 patients (14.2%) met the KDIGO criteria for AKI during the 48-hour follow-up period. AKI was more common among males (19.8% vs 9.5%; p = 0.019). The AKI group had a higher serum creatinine at presentation than those without AKI (296.5μmol/L vs 91.0μmol/L; p<0.001) and at 48 hours (447.7μmol/L vs 77.1μmol/L; p<0.001). In logistic regression, AKI was related negatively to female sex (OR 0.461, 95% CI 0.211, 1.003; p = 0.051) and positively predicted by the presence of comorbid hypertension (OR 3.292, 95% CI 1.52, 7.128; p = 0.003) and chronic kidney disease (OR 6.034, 95% 1.792, 20.313; p = 0.004). KDIGO-defined AKI was common in hospitalised patients in Sub-Saharan Africa and was predicted by male sex, a history of comorbid hypertension and a history of comorbid chronic kidney disease.

IntroductionSeptic shock-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is known to carry a poor prognosis. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of absorptive blood purification on haemodynamic status and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock-associated AKI.Methods and analysisThis multicentre, randomised controlled trial will evaluate an adsorbent filter (oXiris) in patients with abdominal septic shock requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The study plans to recruit 192 participants from intensive care units, who will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (oXiris set) or the control group (ST 150 set). The primary endpoint is the reduction in norepinephrine equivalence following the initiation of CRRT. Key secondary endpoints include changes in cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index, as measured by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output, following CRRT initiation, as well as overall survival and kidney recovery rates.Ethics and disseminationThe study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. The Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Renji Hospital (no. LY-2024–082-B) approved this study on 27 May 2024. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT06504316 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06504316).

PurposeWhilst there is evidence to suggest that hypohydration caused by physical work in the heat increases renal injury, whether this is the case during exercise in temperate conditions remains unknown. This study investigated the effect of manipulating hydration status during high-intensity intermittent running on biomarkers of renal injury.MethodsAfter familiarisation, 14 males (age: 33 ± 7 years; V̇O2peak: 57.1 ± 8.6 ml/kg/min; mean ± SD) completed 2 trials in a randomised cross-over design, each involving 6, 15 min blocks of shuttle running (modified Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test protocol) in temperate conditions (22.3 ± 1.0 °C; 47.9 ± 12.9% relative humidity). During exercise, subjects consumed either a volume of water equal to 90% of sweat losses (EU) or 75 mL water (HYP). Body mass, blood and urine samples were taken pre-exercise (baseline/pre), 30 min post-exercise (post) and 24 h post-baseline (24 h).ResultsPost-exercise, body mass loss, serum osmolality and urine osmolality were greater in HYP than EU (P ≤ 0.024). Osmolality-corrected urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) concentrations were increased post-exercise (P ≤ 0.048), with greater concentrations in HYP than EU (HYP: 2.76 [1.72–4.65] ng/mOsm; EU: 1.94 [1.1–2.54] ng/mOsm; P = 0.003; median [interquartile range]). Osmolality-corrected urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) concentrations were increased post-exercise (P < 0.001), but there was no trial by time interaction effect (P = 0.073).ConclusionThese results suggest that hypohydration produced by high-intensity intermittent running increases renal injury, compared to when euhydration is maintained, and that the site of this increased renal injury is at the proximal tubules.