Explore the vast range of titles available.

The randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a single injection of the Ad26.COV2.S showed 56.3% vaccine efficacy beginning 14 days after injection and 52.9% efficacy more than 28 days after injection against moderate to severe–critical Covid-19. Protection lasted at least 6 months without an added boost. Vaccination was associated with mild-to-moderate adverse effects.

Assessment of immune correlates of severe COVID-19 has been hampered by the low numbers of severe cases in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) trials. We assess neutralizing and binding antibody levels at 4 weeks post-Ad26.COV2.S vaccination as correlates of risk and of protection against severe-critical COVID-19 through 220 days post-vaccination in the ENSEMBLE trial (NCT04505722), constituting ~4.5 months longer follow-up than our previous correlates analysis and enabling inclusion of 42 severe-critical vaccine-breakthrough cases. Neutralizing antibody titer is a strong inverse correlate of severe-critical COVID-19, with estimated hazard ratio (HR) per 10-fold increase 0.35 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.90). In a multivariable model, HRs are 0.31 (0.11, 0.89) for neutralizing antibody titer and 1.22 (0.49, 3.02) for anti-Spike binding antibody concentration. VE against severe-critical COVID-19 rises with neutralizing antibody titer: 63.1% (95% CI: 40.0%, 77.3%) at unquantifiable [<4.8975 International Units (IU)50/ml], 85.2% (47.2%, 95.3%) at just-quantifiable (5.2 IU50/ml), and 95.1% (81.1%, 96.9%) at 90 th percentile (30.2 IU50/ml). At the same titers, VE against moderate COVID-19 is 32.5% (11.8%, 48.4%), 33.9% (19.1%, 59.3%), and 60.7% (40.4%, 76.4%). Protection against moderate vs. severe disease may require higher antibody levels, and very low antibody levels and/or other immune responses may associate with protection against severe disease. In this study, the authors report that post-vaccination neutralizing and binding antibody levels in the ENSEMBLE trial associate with Ad26.COV2.S vaccine efficacy (VE) against severe-critical COVID-19, with substantial VE even at unquantifiable neutralizing antibody titer.

A trial involving 434 participants examined the effects of no boosting or of boosting with one of the three approved Covid-19 vaccines — Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2 — 3 months after the primary vaccination. All the vaccines increased neutralizing-antibody levels and T-cell responses, but the increases with the mRNA vaccines were higher.

Little is known about the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects in a real-world population. To evaluate factors potentially associated with participant-reported adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination. The COVID-19 Citizen Science Study, an online cohort study, includes adults aged 18 years and older with a smartphone or internet access. Participants complete daily, weekly, and monthly surveys on health and COVID-19-related events. This analysis includes participants who provided consent between March 26, 2020, and May 19, 2021, and received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Participant-reported COVID-19 vaccination. Participant-reported adverse effects and adverse effect severity. Candidate factors in multivariable logistic regression models included age, sex, race, ethnicity, subjective social status, prior COVID-19 infection, medical conditions, substance use, vaccine dose, and vaccine brand. The 19 586 participants had a median (IQR) age of 54 (38-66) years, and 13 420 (68.8%) were women. Allergic reaction or anaphylaxis was reported in 26 of 8680 participants (0.3%) after 1 dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine, 27 of 11 141 (0.2%) after 2 doses of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine or 1 dose of the JNJ-78436735 (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine. The strongest factors associated with adverse effects were vaccine dose (2 doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 or 1 dose of JNJ-78436735 vs 1 dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273; odds ratio [OR], 3.10; 95% CI, 2.89-3.34; P < .001), vaccine brand (mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2, OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.86-2.15; P < .001; JNJ-78436735 vs BNT162b2: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < .001), age (per 10 years: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.72-0.76; P < .001), female sex (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.53-1.78; P < .001), and having had COVID-19 before vaccination (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.77-2.66; P < .001). In this real-world cohort, serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects were rare and comparisons across brands could be made, revealing that full vaccination dose, vaccine brand, younger age, female sex, and having had COVID-19 before vaccination were associated with greater odds of adverse effects. Large digital cohort studies may provide a mechanism for independent postmarket surveillance of drugs and devices.

VITT is caused by a somatic hypermutation of an anti–adenovirus pVII antibody that generates more avid binding of platelet factor 4 than of adenovirus pVII, its original target, which results in platelet activation.

•Homologous and heterologous Ad26.COV2.S boosters elicited neutralizing antibodies.•Responses were durable against SARS-CoV-2 reference strain and variants of concern.•Ad26 pre-existing immunity does not impact vaccine-elicited immune responses. COVID-19 vaccine boosters may optimize durability of protection against variants of concern (VOCs). In this randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial, participants received 3 different dose levels of an Ad26.COV2.S booster (5 × 1010 vp [viral particles], 2.5 × 1010 vp, or 1 × 1010 vp) ≥6 months post–primary vaccination with either single-dose Ad26.COV2.S (homologous boost; n = 774) or 2-dose BNT162b2 (heterologous boost; n = 758). Primary endpoints were noninferiority of neutralizing antibody responses at Day 15 post-boost versus Day 29 post–primary vaccination. Secondary endpoints included reactogenicity/safety and neutralizing antibody responses to VOCs. All primary endpoints passed prespecified hierarchical noninferiority criteria by Day 15 post-boost. Geometric mean increases in neutralizing antibody titers against the D614G reference strain ranged from 5.5 to 6.8 at Day 15 for homologous boosting and 12.6 to 22.0 for heterologous boosting. For VOCs, heterologous boosting elicited higher neutralizing antibody responses than homologous boosting. Neutralizing antibody responses were dose-dependent and durable for ≥6 months post-boost. More solicited systemic adverse events occurred following heterologous versus homologous boosting. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04999111.

Antibody Link for VITT and VITT-like DisordersThe antibody that mediates the occurrence of VITT associated with adenoviral-based Covid-19 vaccines is nearly identical to the antibodies produced in response to natural adenoviral infection.

•Higher doses of Ad26.COV2.S tended to be more immunogenic and more reactogenic than lower doses.•VNAs and S-bAbs persisted for at least 6 months after just 1 dose of Ad26.COV2.S 5 × 1010 vp.•Immune responses increased when the time interval between dose 1 and dose 2 increased.•Rapid, marked responses in all groups after vaccine antigen exposure indicate immune memory.•Durable immune responses were observed in all groups up to at least 6 months post vaccine antigen exposure. A single dose of Ad26.COV2.S is well-tolerated and effective in preventing moderate-to-severe disease outcomes due to COVID-19. We evaluated the impact of dose level, number of doses, and dose interval on immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of Ad26.COV2.S in adults. Anamnestic responses were also explored. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2a study was conducted in adults aged 18–55 years and ≥ 65 years (NCT04535453). Four dose levels (1.25 × 1010, 2.5 × 1010, 5 × 1010, and 1 × 1011 viral particles [vp], single and 2-dose schedules, and dose intervals of 56 and 84 days, were assessed. Four or 6 months post-primary vaccination, Ad26.COV2.S 1.25 × 1010 vp was given to evaluate anamnestic responses. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were measured. Reactogenicity and safety were assessed in all participants. All Ad26.COV2.S schedules induced humoral responses with evidence of a dose response relationship. A single dose of Ad26.COV2.S (5 × 1010 vp) induced antibody and cellular immune responses that persisted for up to at least 6 months. In the 2-dose regimens, antibody responses were higher than 1-dose regimens at comparable dose levels, and the magnitude of the immune response increased when the interval between doses was increased (84 days vs 56 days). Rapid, marked immune responses were observed in all groups after vaccine antigen exposure indicating immune memory. Durable immune responses were observed in all groups for up to at least 6 months post-antigen exposure. Strong and consistent correlations between neutralising and binding antibodies were observed CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses were similar after all regimens. Reactogenicity within 7 days post-vaccination tended to be dose-related. The study supports the primary, single dose schedule with Ad26.COV2.S at 5 × 1010 vp and homologous booster vaccination after a 6 month interval. Rapid and marked responses to vaccine antigen exposure indicate induction of immune memory by 1- and 2-dose primary vaccination.

Knowing whether COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes is crucial for informing vaccine policy, such as the need for and timing of booster doses. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the duration of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against various clinical outcomes, and to assess changes in the rates of breakthrough infection caused by the delta variant with increasing time since vaccination. This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-regression. We did a systematic review of preprint and peer-reviewed published article databases from June 17, 2021, to Dec 2, 2021. Randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness were eligible. Studies with vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates at discrete time intervals of people who had received full vaccination and that met predefined screening criteria underwent full-text review. We used random-effects meta-regression to estimate the average change in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness 1–6 months after full vaccination. Of 13 744 studies screened, 310 underwent full-text review, and 18 studies were included (all studies were carried out before the omicron variant began to circulate widely). Risk of bias, established using the risk of bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials or the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool was low for three studies, moderate for eight studies, and serious for seven studies. We included 78 vaccine-specific vaccine efficacy or effectiveness evaluations (Pfizer–BioNTech-Comirnaty, n=38; Moderna-mRNA-1273, n=23; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S, n=9; and AstraZeneca-Vaxzevria, n=8). On average, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased from 1 month to 6 months after full vaccination by 21·0 percentage points (95% CI 13·9–29·8) among people of all ages and 20·7 percentage points (10·2–36·6) among older people (as defined by each study, who were at least 50 years old). For symptomatic COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 24·9 percentage points (95% CI 13·4–41·6) in people of all ages and 32·0 percentage points (11·0–69·0) in older people. For severe COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 10·0 percentage points (95% CI 6·1–15·4) in people of all ages and 9·5 percentage points (5·7–14·6) in older people. Most (81%) vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates against severe disease remained greater than 70% over time. COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained high, although it did decrease somewhat by 6 months after full vaccination. By contrast, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease decreased approximately 20–30 percentage points by 6 months. The decrease in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness is likely caused by, at least in part, waning immunity, although an effect of bias cannot be ruled out. Evaluating vaccine efficacy or effectiveness beyond 6 months will be crucial for updating COVID-19 vaccine policy. Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

Identifying immune correlates of risk following COVID-19 vaccine boosters has become paramount as a result of the challenges in generating additional efficacy data. The trial data described here was collected in the United States, with a large part of the study conduct coinciding with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant. The vaccine trial involved the administration of a booster dose of Ad26.COV2·S at least 6 months after primary vaccination with either a single dose of Ad26.COV2·S or a 2-dose BNT162b2 vaccine regimen. Immunogenicity was assessed through Wuhan Spike binding antibodies (bAb), neutralizing antibodies (nAb), and Omicron BA.1 cross-neutralizing antibodies (nAb BA.1) at Day 1 (pre-boost), Day 15-, and 6-months post-boost. Immune correlates analyses demonstrate that, higher titers of bAb, nAb, and nAb BA.1 at Day 15 were consistently associated with a lower risk of symptomatic COVID-19 following a booster dose of Ad26.COV2·S, irrespective of the primary vaccine regimen. Similar results were obtained using multivariable analyses. Furthermore, Day 1 nAb levels against the Wuhan reference strain exhibited a statistically significant inverse relationship with the risk of symptomatic COVID-19. These findings highlight the value of assessing immune correlates for vaccine boosters, especially in the context of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Clinical trials registration:NCT04999111 •Identifying immune correlates of COVID-19 risk following COVID-19 vaccine boosters is important especially in context of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.•Higher levels of Wuhan Spike binding antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, and Omicron BA.1 cross-neutralizing antibodies following Ad26.COV2.S booster were associated with lower risk of symptomatic COVID-19, regardless of primary vaccine regimen.•Pre-boost neutralizing antibody levels against the Wuhan reference strain were inversely associated with risk of symptomatic COVID-19 following the Ad26.COV2.S booster, while Omicron BA.1 was the circulating variant.