Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Age-specific cumulative risk"
Sort by:
Population-Based Estimates of the Age-Specific Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer for Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2: Findings from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry
2021
Case-control studies of breast cancer have consistently shown that pathogenic variants in CHEK2 are associated with about a 3-fold increased risk of breast cancer. Information about the recurrent protein-truncating variant CHEK2 c.1100delC dominates this estimate. There have been no formal estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for all CHEK2 pathogenic (including likely pathogenic) variants combined. We conducted a population-based case-control-family study of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (26 families, 1071 relatives) and estimated the age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer using segregation analysis. The estimated hazard ratio for carriers of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (combined) was 4.9 (95% CI 2.5–9.5) relative to non-carriers. The HR for carriers of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant was estimated to be 3.5 (95% CI 1.02–11.6) and the HR for carriers of all other CHEK2 variants combined was estimated to be 5.7 (95% CI 2.5–12.9). The age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was estimated to be 18% (95% CI 11–30%) and 33% (95% CI 21–48%) to age 60 and 80 years, respectively. These findings provide important information for the clinical management of breast cancer risk for women carrying pathogenic variants in CHEK2.
Journal Article
Population-based estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for pathogenic variants in ATM
by
Renault, Anne-Laure
,
Giles, Graham G.
,
Winship, Ingrid M.
in
Age Factors
,
Age-specific cumulative risk
,
Aged, 80 and over
2022
Background
Multigene panel tests for breast cancer predisposition routinely include
ATM
as it is now a well-established breast cancer predisposition gene.
Methods
We included
ATM
in a multigene panel test applied to the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry (ABCFR), a population-based case–control–family study of breast cancer, with the purpose of estimating the prevalence and penetrance of heterozygous
ATM
pathogenic variants from the family data, using segregation analysis.
Results
The estimated breast cancer hazard ratio for carriers of pathogenic
ATM
variants in the ABCFR was 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.45–3.87;
P
= 0.6). The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 80 years for heterozygous
ATM
pathogenic variant carriers was estimated to be 13% (95% CI 4.6–30).
Conclusions
Although
ATM
has been definitively identified as a breast cancer predisposition gene, further evidence, such as variant-specific penetrance estimates, are needed to inform risk management strategies for carriers of pathogenic variants to increase the clinical utility of population testing of this gene.
Journal Article