Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
976
result(s) for
"Albendazole - therapeutic use"
Sort by:
Emodepside for Trichuris trichiura and Hookworm Infection
by
Ali, Said M.
,
Welsche, Sophie
,
Mrimi, Emmanuel C.
in
Administration, Oral
,
Adult
,
Adverse events
2023
Treatments are limited for soil-transmitted helminth infections, especially those due to
Trichuris trichiura
. In this phase 2a, dose-ranging clinical trial, emodepside showed activity against
T. trichiura
and hookworm infections.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of emodepside compared with albendazole in adolescents and adults with hookworm infection in Pemba Island, Tanzania: a double-blind, superiority, phase 2b, randomised controlled trial
by
Ali, Said Mohammed
,
Hattendorf, Jan
,
Mohammed, Ibrahim Said
in
Adolescent
,
Adolescents
,
Adult
2024
Human hookworm is a cause of enormous global morbidity. Current treatments have insufficient efficacy and their extensive and indiscriminate distribution could also result in drug resistance. Therefore, we tested the efficacy and safety of emodepside, a strong anthelmintic candidate that is currently undergoing clinical development for onchocerciasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections.
We conducted a double-blind, superiority, phase 2b, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing emodepside and albendazole. Participants in the emodepside group received six 5 mg tablets of emodepside (totalling 30 mg) and one placebo; participants in the albendazole group received one 400 mg tablet of albendazole and six placebos. Participants were recruited from four endemic villages and three secondary schools in Pemba Island, Tanzania. Participants aged 12–60 years were eligible for treatment if they were positive for hookworm infection, and they had 48 or more eggs per gram from four Kato–Katz thick smears and at least two slides had more than one hookworm egg present. Participants’ treatment allocation was stratified by infection intensity and efficacy was measured by cure rate: participants who were hookworm positive and became hookworm negative after treatment. Adverse events were reported at 3 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 14–21 days post-treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05538767.
From Sept 15 to Nov 8, 2022, and from Feb 15 to March 15, 2023, 1609 individuals were screened for hookworm. Of these, 293 individuals were treated: 147 with albendazole and 146 with emodepside. Emodepside demonstrated superiority, with an observed cure rate against hookworm of 96·6%, which was significantly higher compared with albendazole (cure rate 81·2%, odds ratio 0·14, 95% CI 0·04–0·35; p=0·0001). The most common adverse event in the emodepside treatment group was vision blur at 3 h after treatment (57 [39%] of 146). Other common adverse events were vision blur at 24 h after treatment (55 [38%]), and headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (55 [38%] for headache and 43 [30%] for dizziness). In the emodepside treatment group, 298 (93%) of the 319 adverse events were mild. The most commonly reported adverse events in the albendazole treatment group were headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (27 [18%] of 147 for headache and 14 [10%] for dizziness). No serious adverse events were reported.
This phase 2b clinical trial confirms the high efficacy of emodepside against hookworm infections, solidifying emodepside as a promising anthelmintic candidate. However, although the observed safety events were generally mild in severity, considerations must be made to balance the strong efficacy outcomes with the increased frequency of adverse events compared with albendazole.
European Research Council.
Journal Article
Moxidectin combination therapies for lymphatic filariasis: an open-label, observer-masked, randomised controlled trial
2025
Lymphatic filariasis caused by Wuchereria bancrofti causes hydroceles and lymphedema in millions of individuals worldwide. Annual mass drug administration of ivermectin plus albendazole (IA) temporarily clears microfilariae from the blood of infected individuals and is used in Africa to reduce W bancrofti transmission. This study aimed to investigate whether moxidectin combination therapies are superior to ivermectin combination therapies for clearance of W bancrofti microfilaremia.
In this open-label, parallel assignment, masked-observer, randomised, superiority clinical trial in Côte d'Ivoire, we used gender-stratified, block randomisation to sequentially assign adults with bancroftian filariasis (1:1:1:1) to receive annual ivermectin plus albendazole (IA; standard of care) or one of three single-dose regimens: moxidectin plus albendazole (MoxA), ivermectin plus diethylcarbamazine (DEC) plus albendazole (IDA), or moxidectin plus DEC plus albendazole (MoxDA). This trial was conducted at the Filariasis Research Center in Agboville, located at the Centre Hôspitalier Regional, d'Agboville, Côte d'Ivoire. Men and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding women aged 18–70 years in good general health and with screening microfilaria loads of at least 40 per mL (≥3 microfilariae on 60μL nocturnal thick blood smear) were eligible for enrolment; those found to have at least 40 microfilariae per mL by 1 mL blood filtration at enrolment were eligible for inclusion in the primary, modified intention-to-treat, efficacy analysis. Medicines were administered by an unmasked pharmacist; all other team members were masked to treatment assignment. Primary outcomes were complete microfilaria clearance at 12 months (MoxA vs IA) or 24 months (MoxDA vs IDA) post-treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04410406) and is complete.
Enrolment occurred from Aug 20, 2020 to July 31, 2021. 190 individuals were predicted to have nocturnal blood microfilariae counts of at least 40 microfilariae per mL, of whom 26 were excluded and 164 were randomly assigned to an intervention (41 to the IA group, 40 to the MoxA group, 41 to the IDA group, and 42 to the MoxDA group). 113 participants met the pre-specified efficacy analysis criteria and completed follow-up. The proportion of participants who were amicrofilaraemic at 12 months was eight of 25 (32% [95% CI 15–54]) among IA recipients versus 18 of 19 (95% [95% CI 74–100]) among MoxA recipients (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 2·79 [95% CI 1·59–4·90]; p=0·0004). The proportion of amicrofilaraemic participants at 24 months was 20 of 22 (91% [95% CI 71–99]) for IDA versus 21 of 23 (91% [72–99]) for MoxDA (adjusted RR 0·98 [95% CI 0·83–1·15]; p=0·78). Most MoxA recipients (14 of 16 [88%; 95% CI 62–98]) remained amicrofilaraemic at 24 months.
In this study, single-dose MoxA was superior to IA for W bancrofti microfilaria clearance at 12 months and provided prolonged microfilaria clearance for most participants. These results suggest that MoxA could be a powerful tool to accelerate the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Africa.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of moxidectin and albendazole compared with ivermectin and albendazole coadministration in adolescents infected with Trichuris trichiura in Tanzania: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial
2023
Control efforts against soil-transmitted helminths focus on preventive chemotherapy with albendazole and mebendazole, however these drugs yield unsatisfactory results against Trichuris trichiura infections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of moxidectin and albendazole compared with ivermectin and albendazole against T trichiura in adolescents living on Pemba Island, Tanzania.
This open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial was done in four secondary schools (Kilindi, Kwale, Ndagoni [Chake Chake District], and Kiuyu [Wete District]) on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Adolescents aged 12–19 years who tested positive for T trichiura in at least two of four Kato-Katz slides with a mean infection intensity of 48 eggs per gram (EPG) of stool or higher were considered for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned (21:21:2:2:8) to five treatment groups (8 mg moxidectin and 400 mg albendazole [group 1], 200 μg/kg ivermectin and 400 mg albendazole [group 2], 400 mg albendazole [group 3], 200 μg/kg ivermectin [group 4], or 8 mg moxidectin [group 5]) using a computer-generated randomisation code, stratified by baseline T trichiura infection intensity. Study site investigators and participants were not masked to study treatment; however, allocation was concealed to participants. The primary outcome was egg reduction rate (ERR) of T trichiura 14–21 days after treatment in the available case population. Moxidectin and albendazole was considered non-inferior to ivermectin and albendazole (control group) when the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the difference was higher than the non-inferiority margin of –2 percentage points. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04700423.
Between March 1 and April 30, 2021, 771 participants were assessed for eligibility. 221 (29%) of 771 participants were ineligible and a further 14 (2%) were excluded. 207 (39%) of 536 participants were randomly assigned to moxidectin and albendazole, 211 (39%) to ivermectin and albendazole, 19 (4%) to albendazole, 19 (4%) to ivermectin, and 80 (15%) to moxidectin. Primary outcome data were available for all 536 participants. The geometric mean ERR of T trichiura after 14–21 days was 96·8% (95% CI 95·8 to 97·6) with moxidectin and albendazole and 99·0% (98·7 to 99·3) with ivermectin and albendazole (difference of –2·2 percentage points [–4·2 to –1·4]). No serious adverse events were reported during the study. The most reported adverse events were headache (160 [34%] of 465), abdominal pain (78 [17%]), itching (44 [9%]), and dizziness (26 [6%]).
Our findings show inferiority of moxidectin and albendazole to ivermectin and albendazole against T trichiura. However, given the high efficacy, moxidectin coadministration might complement treatment progammes, particularly in areas in which ivermectin is not available
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, reference number OPP1153928.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of co-administered ivermectin and albendazole in school-aged children and adults infected with Trichuris trichiura in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania: a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial
2022
Preventive chemotherapy with albendazole or mebendazole remains one of the cornerstones of soil-transmitted helminth control. However, these drugs are less effective against Trichuris trichiura. Combined ivermectin–albendazole is a promising treatment alternative, yet robust evidence is lacking. We aimed to demonstrate superiority of co-administered ivermectin–albendazole over albendazole monotherapy in three distinct epidemiological settings.
We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in community members aged 6–60 years infected with T trichiura in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania, between Sept 26, 2018, and June 29, 2020. Participants with at least 100 T trichiura eggs per g of stool at baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) using computer-generated randomisation sequences in varying blocks of four, six, and eight, stratified by baseline T trichiura infection intensity, to orally receive either a single dose of ivermectin (200 μg/kg) plus albendazole (400 mg) or albendazole (400 mg) plus placebo. Patients, field staff, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was cure rate against T trichiura, defined as the proportion of participants with no eggs in their faeces 14–21 days after treatment, assessed by Kato-Katz thick smears, and analysed in the available-case population according to intention-to-treat principles. Safety was a secondary outcome and was assessed 3 h and 24 h after drug administration. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03527732.
Between Sept 13 and Dec 18, 2019, Jan 12 and April 5, 2019, and Sept 26 and Nov 5, 2018, 3737, 3694, and 1435 community members were screened for trial eligibility in Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, respectively. In Côte d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, 256, 274, and 305 participants, respectively, were randomly assigned to the albendazole group, and 255, 275, and 308, respectively, to the ivermectin–albendazole group. Primary outcome data were available for 722 participants treated with albendazole and 733 treated with ivermectin–albendazole. Ivermectin–albendazole showed significantly higher cure rates against T trichiura than albendazole in Laos (66% [140 of 213]vs 8% [16 of 194]; difference 58 percentage points, 95% CI 50 to 65, p<0·0001) and Pemba Island (49% [140 of 288]vs 6% [18 of 293], 43 percentage points, 36 to 49, p<0·0001) but had similar efficacy in Côte d'Ivoire (14% [32 of 232]vs 10% [24 of 235], 4 percentage points, −2 to 10, p=0·24). No serious adverse events were reported; observed events were mostly classified as mild (95% [266 of 279] in the albendazole group and 91% [288 of 317] in the ivermectin–albendazole group), and all were transient in nature.
Treatment with ivermectin–albendazole resulted in higher efficacy against trichuriasis than albendazole alone in Laos and Pemba Island but not in Côte d'Ivoire. We recommend implementation of this combination therapy for soil-transmitted helminth control in countries with high T trichiura prevalence and proven enhanced efficacy of this treatment, particularly where ivermectin is beneficial against other endemic helminthiases.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Journal Article
Albendazole–ivermectin co-formulation for the treatment of Trichuris trichiura and other soil-transmitted helminths: a randomised phase 2/3 trial
2025
Treatments for soil-transmitted helminthiases face challenges, especially in addressing Trichuris trichiura. Combination regimens, particularly of ivermectin and albendazole, are promising. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and palatability of a combination tablet for the treatment of T trichiura, hookworm, and Strongyloides stercoralis infections among school-aged children in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Mozambique.
We conducted an adaptive phase 2/3, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, superiority trial in 15 schools in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Mozambique. Eligible participants for both phases were aged 5–18 years, weighed at least 15 kg, and were infected with T trichiura, hookworms, or S stercoralis. Participants were randomly assigned via a computer-generated sequence to either a single dose of a fixed-dose combination (FDC×1) of albendazole (400 mg) plus ivermectin (9 mg or 18 mg), three consecutive daily doses of an FDC (FDC×3) of albendazole (400 mg) plus ivermectin (9 mg or 18 mg), or a single dose of albendazole alone (400 mg) via block randomisation, stratified by soil-transmitted helminth species. Participants and those administering the treatments were not masked to treatment assignment, but those assessing the outcomes were masked. The primary outcome of phase 2 (conducted in Kenya only) was safety during the first 3 h after the intervention and for 7 days, and the primary outcome of phase 3 was efficacy (ie, the proportion of individuals cured at day 21 out of the total number infected at baseline) for T trichiura; both primary outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05124691, and is terminated.
Between Jan 20, 2022, and March 24, 2023, 1001 participants were recruited (465 [46%] were female and 536 [54%] were male). 636 (64%) were infected with T trichiura, 360 (36%) with hookworm, and 104 (10%) with S stercoralis; 94 (9%) of 1001 participants had co-infections and were included in the analysis of each infecting species. A total of 243 participants were allocated to the albendazole group, 381 to the FDC×1 group, and 377 to the FDC×3 group. In both phase 2 and 3, gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common mild-to-moderate adverse events in the FDC groups, but resolved within 48 h without intervention. At least one treatment-related adverse event occurred in 34 (14%) of 243 participants in the albendazole group, 75 (20%) of 381 participants in the FDC×1 group, and 88 (23%) of 377 participants in the FDC×3 group. No serious adverse events occurred. For T trichiura, both FDC groups had a higher cure rate (97·2% [95% CI 95·2– 99·3] for FDC×3 and 82·9% [78·2–87·5] for FDC×1) than albendazole (35·9% [27·7–44·1]), with absolute differences of 61·3% (98% CI 50·2–71·2) and 47·0% (34·7–58·1), respectively. For hookworms, FDC×3 had a higher cure rate (95·0% [95% CI 91·1–98·9]) than albendazole (65·1% [56·0–74·2]), with absolute differences of 29·9% (98% CI 17·2–42·4), whereas FDC×1 had a similar cure rate (79·8% [72·8–86·9]) to albendazole. The sample size for efficacy evaluation of S stercoralis was not met.
An FDC of albendazole plus ivermectin has a similar safety profile but superior efficacy to albendazole alone against T trichiura infection and hookworms. These findings open opportunities for control of all soil-transmitted helminth species of interest, including potentially S stercoralis. Evaluation of safety in larger populations and implementation scenarios are the next steps for this innovation to promote its incorporation into programmatic activities.
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership.
For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Journal Article
Efficacy of combined antiparasitic therapy with praziquantel and albendazole for neurocysticercosis: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
2014
Neurocysticercosis causes a substantial burden of seizure disorders worldwide. Treatment with either praziquantel or albendazole has suboptimum efficacy. We aimed to establish whether combination of these drugs would increase cysticidal efficacy and whether complete cyst resolution results in fewer seizures. We added an increased dose albendazole group to establish a potential effect of increased albendazole concentrations.
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients with viable intraparenchymal neurocysticercosis were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of combined albendazole (15 mg/kg per day) plus praziquantel (50 mg/kg per day), standard albendazole (15 mg/kg per day), or increased dose albendazole (22·5 mg/kg per day). Randomisation was done with a computer generated schedule balanced within four strata based on number of cysts and concomitant antiepileptic drug. Patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was complete cyst resolution on 6-month MRI. Enrolment was stopped after interim analysis because of parasiticidal superiority of one treatment group. Analysis excluded patients lost to follow-up before the 6-month MRI. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00441285.
Between March 3, 2010 and Nov 14, 2011, 124 patients were randomly assigned to study groups (41 to receive combined albendazole plus praziquantel [39 analysed], 43 standard albendazole [41 analysed], and 40 increased albendazole [38 analysed]). 25 (64%) of 39 patients in the combined treatment group had complete resolution of brain cysts compared with 15 (37%) of 41 patients in the standard albendazole group (rate ratio [RR] 1·75, 95% CI 1·10–2·79, p=0·014). 20 (53%) of 38 patients in the increased albendazole group had complete cyst resolution at 6-month MRI compared with 15 (37%) of 41 patients in the standard albendazole group (RR 1·44, 95% CI 0·87–2·38, p=0·151). No significant differences in adverse events were reported between treatment groups (18 in combined treatment group, 11 in standard albendazole group, and 19 in increased albendazole group).
Combination of albendazole plus praziquantel increases the parasiticidal effect in patients with multiple brain cysticercosis cysts without increased side-effects. A more efficacious parasiticidal regime without increased treatment-associated side-effects should improve the treatment and long term prognosis of patients with neurocysticercosis.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of albendazole alone versus albendazole in combination with ivermectin for the treatment of Trichuris trichiura infections: An open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial in south-western Uganda
by
Steinmann, Peter
,
Hattendorf, Jan
,
Keiser, Jennifer
in
Adverse events
,
Albendazole
,
Albendazole - administration & dosage
2024
Trichuris trichiura , a soil-transmitted helminth (STH), often persists after a single dose of anthelminthic treatment. To overcome limited efficacy against T . trichiura of benzimidazoles (albendazole or mebendazole), the primary drugs used in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns, the World Health Organization endorses the use of a combination of ivermectin and albendazole as a more effective treatment to be used for preventive chemotherapy. Given observed considerable differences in efficacy of the combination therapy over albendazole monotherapy between different settings, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of the combination before introducing it on a larger scale. This open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial in two Ugandan primary schools enrolled eligible 6- to 12-year-olds positive for T . trichiura . Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either a single dose of albendazole alone or co-administered albendazole and ivermectin. Adverse events were monitored at three and 24h post-treatment. Follow-up samples were collected 14 to 21 days post-treatment for efficacy assessment. The combination of albendazole with ivermectin showed superior efficacy against T . trichiura compared to albendazole alone, both in terms of cure rates (31.3% versus 12.3%, difference 18.9%-points, 95% CI 6.2–31.2, p < 0.004) and in terms of egg reduction rates (ERRs; 91.4% versus 52.7%). A higher cure rate against co-infecting Ascaris lumbricoides was observed in the combination compared to the albendazole monotherapy arm (100% versus 83.9%). Both therapies showed an excellent safety profile with few and only mild and transient treatment emergent adverse events observed in the albendazole monotherapy and albendazole plus ivermectin arm (total of 22 and 19 events, respectively). In conclusion, the efficacy of the combination therapy against T . trichiura in Uganda is superior to that of albendazole alone. Given the high ERRs observed, albendazole-ivermectin might aid in eliminating morbidity, an important target of STH control programs. Trial registration (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT06037876 .
Journal Article
Efficacy and risk of harms of repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria (RIMDAMAL): a cluster-randomised trial
2019
Ivermectin is widely used in mass drug administrations for controlling neglected parasitic diseases, and can be lethal to malaria vectors that bite treated humans. Therefore, it could be a new tool to reduce plasmodium transmission. We tested the hypothesis that frequently repeated mass administrations of ivermectin to village residents would reduce clinical malaria episodes in children and would be well tolerated with minimal harms.
We invited villages (clusters) in Burkina Faso to participate in a single-blind (outcomes assessor), parallel-assignment, two-arm, cluster-randomised trial over the 2015 rainy season. Villages were assigned (1:1) by random draw to either the intervention group or the control group. In both groups, all eligible participants who consented to the treatment and were at least 90 cm in height received single oral doses of ivermectin (150–200 μg/kg) and albendazole (400 mg), and those in the intervention group received five further doses of ivermectin alone at 3-week intervals thereafter over the 18-week treatment phase. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of uncomplicated malaria episodes over 18 weeks (analysed on a cluster intention-to-treat basis) in an active case detection cohort of children aged 5 years or younger living in the study villages. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02509481.
Eight villages agreed to participate, and four were randomly assigned to each group. 2712 participants (1333 [49%] males and 1379 [51%] females; median age 15 years [IQR 6–34]), including 590 children aged 5 years or younger, provided consent and were enrolled between May 22 and July 20, 2015 (except for 77 participants enrolled after these dates because of unavailability before the first mass drug administration, travel into the village during the trial, or birth), with 1447 enrolled into the intervention group and 1265 into the control group. 330 (23%) participants in the intervention group and 233 (18%) in the control group met the exclusion criteria for mass drug administration. Most children in the active case detection cohort were not treated because of height restrictions. 14 (4%) children in the intervention group and 10 (4%) in the control group were lost to follow-up. Cumulative malaria incidence was reduced in the intervention group (648 episodes among 327 children; estimated mean 2·00 episodes per child) compared with the control group (647 episodes among 263 children; 2·49 episodes per child; risk difference −0·49 [95% CI −0·79 to −0·21], p=0·0009, adjusted for sex and clustering). The risk of adverse events among all participants did not differ between groups (45 events [3%] among 1447 participants in the intervention group vs 24 events [2%] among 1265 in the control group; risk ratio 1·63 [1·01 to 2·67]; risk difference 1·21 [0·04 to 2·38], p=0·060), and no adverse reactions were reported.
Frequently repeated mass administrations of ivermectin during the malaria transmission season can reduce malaria episodes among children without significantly increasing harms in the populace.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Journal Article
Effects, equity, and cost of school-based and community-wide treatment strategies for soil-transmitted helminths in Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
2019
School-based deworming programmes can reduce morbidity attributable to soil-transmitted helminths in children but do not interrupt transmission in the wider community. We assessed the effects of alternative mass treatment strategies on community soil-transmitted helminth infection.
In this cluster-randomised controlled trial, 120 community units (clusters) serving 150 000 households in Kenya were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive albendazole through annual school-based treatment targeting 2–14 year olds or annual or biannual community-wide treatment targeting all ages. The primary outcome was community hookworm prevalence, assessed at 12 and 24 months through repeat cross-sectional surveys. Secondary outcomes were Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura prevalence, infection intensity of each soil-transmitted helminth species, and treatment coverage and costs. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02397772.
After 24 months, prevalence of hookworm changed from 18·6% (95% CI 13·9–23·2) to 13·8% (10·5–17·0) in the annual school-based treatment group, 17·9% (13·7–22·1) to 8·0% (6·0–10·1) in the annual community-wide treatment group, and 20·6% (15·8–25·5) to 6·2% (4·9–7·5) in the biannual community-wide treatment group. Relative to annual school-based treatment, the risk ratio for annual community-wide treatment was 0·59 (95% CI 0·42–0·83; p<0·001) and for biannual community-wide treatment was 0·46 (0·33–0·63; p<0·001). More modest reductions in risk were observed after 12 months. Risk ratios were similar across demographic and socioeconomic subgroups after 24 months. No adverse events related to albendazole were reported.
Community-wide treatment was more effective in reducing hookworm prevalence and intensity than school-based treatment, with little additional benefit of treating every 6 months, and was shown to be remarkably equitable in coverage and effects.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme of the Medical Research Council, the UK Department for International Development, the Wellcome Trust, and the Children's Investment Fund Foundation.
Journal Article