Explore the vast range of titles available.

The movement towards open science is a consequence of seemingly pervasive failures to replicate previous research. This transition comes with great benefits but also significant challenges that are likely to affect those who carry out the research, usually early career researchers (ECRs). Here, we describe key benefits, including reputational gains, increased chances of publication, and a broader increase in the reliability of research. The increased chances of publication are supported by exploratory analyses indicating null findings are substantially more likely to be published via open registered reports in comparison to more conventional methods. These benefits are balanced by challenges that we have encountered and that involve increased costs in terms of flexibility, time, and issues with the current incentive structure, all of which seem to affect ECRs acutely. Although there are major obstacles to the early adoption of open science, overall open science practices should benefit both the ECR and improve the quality of research. We review 3 benefits and 3 challenges and provide suggestions from the perspective of ECRs for moving towards open science practices, which we believe scientists and institutions at all levels would do well to consider.

High-quality academic publishing is built on rigorous peer review [...]

Halfway through Agnès Varda's film The Gleaners and I, a judge in full regalia stands in a field of newly harvested tomatoes and reads an edict from 1554 that authorizes \"the poor, the wretched, and the underprivileged to go to the fields after the harvest, from sunrise to sundown, and glean leftover fruit and vegetables.\" The artists David Allen Burns and Austin Young of Fallen Fruit have joyfully adopted the ancient practice of gleaning and brought it to contemporary urban neighborhoods. They invite you to experience your city as a fruitful place and to radically shift public participation and the function of urban spaces, and to explore the meaning of community through creating and sharing new and abundant resources--like fruit trees. Fallen Fruit began in 2004 when Burns, Young, and Matias Viegener, who left the collaboration in 2013, created a map of their Los Angeles neighborhood showing fruit on the margins of public space that could be harvested. Through their ongoing project Endless Orchard, Fallen Fruit continue to map urban fruit trees, organize community fruit tree plantings, and talk about public spaces as shared resources.

Following his time as a graduate student, David worked as an Intramural Research Training Award Fellow at the Laboratory of Neurosciences' Neurochemistry and Brain Transport Section of the National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). During his career he was a principal investigator on more than 30 research projects funded by NIH, the American Heart Association, AACP, the government of Chile, and pharmaceutical companies. Another of David's mentors, Dr. Lois Nora, former president and chief executive officer of the American Board of Medical Specialties, hired him as the founding dean of the College of Pharmacy at the Northeast Ohio Medical University.

Theatre arts offers models for negotiating creative contributions and credit. Many people participate on any given piece of theatre—from the playwright to the director to designers to stage hands to performers—making theatre arts practices important sites for examining the many and various forms of negotiation within creative, collaborative processes. While there are many ways of making theatre—from more conventional interpretations of an existing play script to devised theatre practices, in which the script is collaboratively developed by all participants—all theatre relies on creative participants working together through shared processes to produce a production. We have begun to examine the issues of ownership and originality in shared content and creative practices by interviewing nearly twenty theatre artists about their working methods. The interviews of theatre artists were conducted as part of a larger study of writers and theatre artists that investigated the interplay of originality and collaboration within processes of artistic creation. Most of the interviews were conducted in the theatres, studios, or workspaces of the theatre artist. Interviews were typically an hour to two hours in length and focused on questions of creative process and collaboration. In particular, the interviews probed whom the artists collaborated with; roles for collaboration/creation; methods for managing collaboration; and conceptions of ownership of the products of collaboration.

The role of government in the economy has been a major public policy issue for more than two centuries. Critics of capitalism have argued that the system is skewed to benefit the political and economic elite at the expense of the masses. Two recent books have looked at these issues, one from the vantage point of the political left and the other from the political right. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate economist and frequent commentator on the political left, discusses the way the system is skewed in his book The Price of Inequality, while conservative writer and former Michigan congressman and budget director in the Reagan administration David Stockman addresses these same issues from the political right in The Great Deformation. Both Stiglitz and Stockman argue that corruption of the US political system is damaging both the economic system and democracy. This article documents the commonality of ideas in their two books while recognizing the significant differences in their policy recommendations. Adapted from the source document.