Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
7,205
result(s) for
"Alternative crops"
Sort by:
Exploring the hidden treasure in arid regions: pseudocereals as sustainable, climate-resilient crops for food security
by
Gokhale, Trupti
,
Manoharan, Ramya
,
Asthana, Sugandha
in
Agricultural land
,
Agricultural practices
,
Agricultural production
2025
Agricultural productivity needs to grow in a sustainable way to eradicate hunger and malnutrition, as outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (SDGs). The demand for healthy, nutritious food is expected to rise by 50% between 2012 and 2050 as the world’s population grows. Even today, more than 800 million people face chronic hunger, while 2 billion suffer from micronutrient deficiencies. These challenges are further intensified by climate change stressors. Around 90% of the world’s farmland is affected by climate-related stress, which in some areas can cut crop production by as much as 70%. Countries near the equator, particularly arid lands, are evenly affected, where food security and sustainability are increasingly threatened by rising global food demand and worsening climatic conditions. Relying only on traditional staple crops like rice, wheat, and maize is not enough, and there is a need to explore alternative crops which are climate resilient and could contribute to food security. This review focuses on pseudocereals—crops such as amaranth, quinoa, and buckwheat. These are not true cereals but are rich in nutrients and can survive in difficult environments such as during drought, in salty soils, and at extreme temperatures. Pseudocereals such as amaranth, quinoa, and buckwheat are non-grass crops with dense nutrients. The review covers how pseudocereals can help with food security, improve health, and be used in industry. Some studies have shown that the bioavailability of pseudocereals can be increased by various processing techniques. However, these crops are mostly grown in their native regions because seeds are hard to get and markets are limited. Pseudocereal production must be expanded globally supported by strategies such as conservation of its wild species, molecular advance techniques, policies, farming practices, and integration of indigenous knowledge. Particularly, in arid regions where traditional crops face many challenges due to harsh climatic conditions and limited water resources, integrating these pseudocereal crops into their agronomy system and commodity markets could serve as a roadmap in achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). These crops could also help other vulnerable regions around the world that face hunger and poor nutrition.
Journal Article
Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health
2024
Global food production faces challenges in balancing the need for increased yields with environmental sustainability. This study presents a six-year field experiment in the North China Plain, demonstrating the benefits of diversifying traditional cereal monoculture (wheat–maize) with cash crops (sweet potato) and legumes (peanut and soybean). The diversified rotations increase equivalent yield by up to 38%, reduce N
2
O emissions by 39%, and improve the system’s greenhouse gas balance by 88%. Furthermore, including legumes in crop rotations stimulates soil microbial activities, increases soil organic carbon stocks by 8%, and enhances soil health (indexed with the selected soil physiochemical and biological properties) by 45%. The large-scale adoption of diversified cropping systems in the North China Plain could increase cereal production by 32% when wheat–maize follows alternative crops in rotation and farmer income by 20% while benefiting the environment. This study provides an example of sustainable food production practices, emphasizing the significance of crop diversification for long-term agricultural resilience and soil health.
Food production systems need to balance yield and sustainability. Here, the authors conduct 6 years long crop diversification field experiments in the North China Plain, showing that diversifying cereal monocultures with cash crops and legumes cand improve yield and reduce GHG emissions.
Journal Article
A multilevel exploration of Avena strigosa diversity as a prelude to promote alternative crop
by
Nocen, Joanna
,
Lapinski, Boguslaw
,
Puchta, Marta
in
Agriculture
,
Alternative crop
,
alternative crops
2019
Background
Sand oat (
Avena strigosa
Schreb.), one of the four cultivated species of the genus
Avena,
could be considered as another alternative crop. In gene banks 865 germplasm samples of this species have been preserved that have not been thoroughly investigated so far. The results of phenotyping (36 traits), isoenzymatic (12 systems) and genetic (8 pairs of Sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers) variation were used to obtain the complete description of 56 accessions diversity originated from different parts of world.
Results
Breeded and weedy forms represented similar pool of morphological traits that indicated a short-term and extensive breeding process, albeit all accessions which we classified as cultivated were characterized by better grain and green mass parameters compared to the weedy ones. Isoenzymes showed relationships with geographical origin, which was not possible to detect by SRAP markers. There was no similarity between morphological and biochemical results. The polymorphism level of SRAP markers was lower than indicated by the available literature data for other species, however it may result from the analysis of pooled samples of accessions with a high internal variability. The extensive type of breeding and its relatively short duration was also reflected in the population structure results. Joint analysis revealed that a secondary centre of diversity is being created in South America and that it has its genealogy from the Iberian Peninsula.
Conclusions
Despite the relatively large representation of this species is in various gene banks, it is highly probable that the vast majority of stored worldwide accessions are duplicates, and the protected gene pool is relatively narrow. Sand oat meets all the requirements for an alternative crop species, but further studies are needed to identify the genotypes/populations with the most favourable distribution of utility and quality parameters.
Journal Article
Benefits and Risks of Intercropping for Crop Resilience and Pest Management
by
Huss, C. P.
,
Holmes, K. D.
,
Blubaugh, C. K.
in
Agricultural economics
,
Agricultural ecosystems
,
Agricultural practices
2022
To combat climate change, farmers must innovate through ecological intensification to boost food production, increase resilience to weather extremes, and shrink the carbon footprint of agriculture. Intercropping (where alternative crops or noncrop plants are integrated with cash crops) can strengthen and stabilize agroecosystems under climate change by improving resource use efficiency, enhancing soil water holding capacity, and increasing the diversity and quality of habitat for beneficial insects that provide pollination services and natural pest control. Despite these benefits, intercropping has yet to be widely adopted due to perceived risks and challenges including decreased crop yield, increased management complexity, a steep learning curve for successful management, and increased susceptibility to pests. Here, we explore the major benefits of intercropping in agricultural systems for pest control and climate resilience reported in 24 meta-analyses, while addressing risks and barriers to implementation. Most studies demonstrate clear benefits of intercropping for weed, pathogen, insect pest control, relative yield, and gross profitability. However, relatively few studies document ecosystem services conferred by intercrops alongside labor costs, which are key to economic sustainability for farmers. In addition to clearer demonstrations of the economic viability of intercropping, farmers also need strong technical and financial support during the adoption process to help them troubleshoot the site-specific complexities and challenges of managing polycultures. Ecological intensification of agriculture requires a more strategic approach than simplified production systems and is not without risks and challenges. Calibrating incentive programs to reduce financial burdens of risk for farmers could promote more widespread adoption of intercropping.
Journal Article
Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and Its Potential for Cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.: A Review
by
D’Alpoim Guedes, Jade
,
Ganjyal, Girish M.
,
Habiyaremye, Cedric
in
Agricultural practices
,
Agricultural production
,
Arid zones
2017
Proso millet
L.
is a warm season grass with a growing season of 60-100 days. It is a highly nutritious cereal grain used for human consumption, bird seed, and/or ethanol production. Unique characteristics, such as drought and heat tolerance, make proso millet a promising alternative cash crop for the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the United States. Development of proso millet varieties adapted to dryland farming regions of the PNW could give growers a much-needed option for diversifying their predominantly wheat-based cropping systems. In this review, the agronomic characteristics of proso millet are discussed, with emphasis on growth habits and environmental requirements, place in prevailing crop rotations in the PNW, and nutritional and health benefits. The genetics of proso millet and the genomic resources available for breeding adapted varieties are also discussed. Last, challenges and opportunities of proso millet cultivation in the PNW are explored, including the potential for entering novel and regional markets.
Journal Article
Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender (APEX) Simulation of Spring Peanut Management in the North China Plain
by
Yang, Yadong
,
Norelli, Nicole
,
Jiang, Yao
in
aboveground biomass
,
Agricultural policy
,
Agricultural practices
2019
Spring peanut is a valuable alternative crop to mitigate water scarcity caused by excessive water use in conventional cropping systems in the North China Plain (NCP). In the present study, we evaluated the capability of the Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to predict spring peanut response to sowing dates and seeding rates in order to optimize sowing dates, seeding rates, and irrigation regimes. Data used for calibration and validation of the model included leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass (ABIOM), and pod yield data collected from a field experiment of nine sowing dates and seeding rate combinations conducted from 2017 to 2018. The calibrated model was then used to simulate peanut yield responses to extended sowing dates (5 April to 4 June with a 5-day interval) and seeding rates (15 plants m−2 to 50 plants m−2 with a 5 plants m−2 interval) using 38 years of weather data as well as yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and water stress days under different irrigation regimes (rainfed, one irrigation before planting (60 mm) or at flowering (60 mm), and two irrigation with one time before planting and one time at flowering (60 mm each time) or at pod set (60 mm each time)). Results show that the model satisfactorily simulates pod yield of peanut based on R2 = 0.70, index of agreement (d value) being 0.80 and percent bias (PBIAS) values ≤4%. Moreover, the model performed reasonably well in predicting the emergence, LAI and ABIOM, with a R2 = 0.86, d = 0.95 and PBIAS = 8% for LAI and R2 = 0.90, d = 0.97 and PBIAS = 1% for ABIOM, respectively. Simulation results indicate that the best combination of sowing dates and seeding rates is a density of 35–40 plants m−2 and dates during early-May to mid-May due to the influence of local climate and canopy structure to the growth and yield of peanut. Under the optimal sowing date and plant density, an irrigation depth of 60 mm during flowering gave a pod yield (5.6 t ha−1) and ET (464 mm), which resulted in the highest water use efficiency (12.1 kg ha−1 mm−1). The APEX model is capable of assessing the effects of management practices on the growth and yield of peanut. Sowing 35–40 plants m−2 during early-May to mid-May with 60 mm irrigation depth is the recommended agronomic practice for peanut production in the water-constrained NCP.
Journal Article
Crop diversification and saline water irrigation as potential strategies to save freshwater resources and reclamation of marginal soils—a review
by
Muscolo, Adele
,
Hussain, Muhammad Iftikhar
,
Rehman, Abdul
in
Agricultural practices
,
Agroecology
,
Agronomy
2020
Feeding 9 billion by 2050 is one of major challenges for researchers. Use of diversified crops, nonconventional water resources and rehabilitation of marginal lands are alternate options to produce more food to face climate change projections. Adaptation to climate change through climate smart agriculture practices, agroecology activities, and crop-based management packages can help transform the marginal lands from environmental burdens into productive and economic blocks. This review discusses the recent advancements on specialty group of alternate crops (oil seeds, legumes, cereals, medicinal, lignocellulose, and fruit crops) which can adapt in the marginal environments. Availability of alternate water resources (saline water, treated wastewater) for irrigation cannot be omitted. Crop diversification systems involving drought and salt-tolerant crops are likely to be the key to future agricultural and economic growth in the regions where salt-affected soils exist and/or saline aquifers are pumped for irrigation. These systems may tackle three main tasks: sustainable management of land resources and enhancement of per unit productivity; intensification of agroecological practices to increase soil fertility; and improving productivity of marginal lands for diversified climate smart crops. This review explores various aspects of marginal lands and selection of tolerant crop genotypes, crop diversification, and agroecological practices to maximize benefits.
Journal Article
Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe
by
Ecole Supérieure des Agricultures (ESA)
,
Dynamiques et écologie des paysages agriforestiers (DYNAFOR) ; École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT) ; Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan (INP - PURPAN) ; Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
,
Earth and Life Institute - Environmental Sciences (ELIE) ; Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL)
in
Agricultural practices
,
Agricultural sciences
,
Agriculture
2020
Innovations supporting a shift towards more sustainable food systems can be developed within the dominant food system regime or in alternative niches. No study has compared the challenges faced in each context. This paper, based on an analysis of 25 cases of European innovations that support crop diversification, explores the extent to which barriers to crop diversification can be related to the proximity of innovation settings with dominant food systems. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and participatory brainstorming, we highlight 46 different barriers to crop diversification across the cases, at different levels: production; downstream operations from farm to retailing, marketing and consumers; and contracts and coordination between actors. To characterise the diversity of innovation strategies at food system level, we introduce the concept of “food system innovation settings” combining: (i) the type of innovative practice promoted at farm level; (ii) the type of value chain supporting that innovation; and (iii) the type of agriculture involved (organic or conventional). Through a multiple correspondence analysis, we show different patterns of barriers to crop diversification according to three ideal-types of food system innovation settings: (i) “Changing from within”, where longer rotations are fostered on conventional farms involved in commodity supply chains; (ii) “Building outside”, where crop diversification integrates intercropping on organic farms involved in local supply chains; and (iii) “Playing horizontal”, where actors promote alternative crop diversification strategies—either strictly speaking horizontal at spatial level (e.g. strip cropping) or socially horizontal (arrangement between farmers)–without directly challenging the vertical organisation of dominant value chains. We recommend designing targeted research and policy actions according to the food systems they seek to develop. We then discuss further development of our approach to analyse barriers faced in intermediate and hybrid food system configurations.
Journal Article
Alternative crop residue management practices to mitigate the environmental and economic impacts of open burning of agricultural residues
by
Prateep Na Talang, Rutjaya
,
Sirivithayapakorn, Sanya
,
Polruang, Sucheela
in
704/172
,
704/172/4081
,
Agricultural economics
2024
Deliberate open burning of crop residues emits greenhouse gases and toxic pollutants into the atmosphere. This study investigates the environmental impacts (global warming potential, GWP) and economic impacts (net cash flow) of nine agricultural residue management schemes, including open burning, fertilizer production, and biochar production for corn residue, rice straw, and sugarcane leaves. The environmental assessment shows that, except the open burning schemes, fossil fuel consumption is the main contributor of the GWP impact. The fertilizer and biochar schemes reduce the GWP impact including black carbon by 1.88–1.96 and 2.46–3.22 times compared to open burning. The biochar schemes have the lowest GWP (− 1833.19 to − 1473.21 kg CO
2
-eq/ton). The economic assessment outcomes reveal that the biochar schemes have the highest net cash flow (222.72—889.31 US$
2022
/ton or 1258.15–13409.16 US$
2022
/ha). The expenditures of open burning are practically zero, while the biochar schemes are the most costly to operate. The most preferable agricultural residue management type is the biochar production, given the lowest GWP impact and the highest net cash flow. To discourage open burning, the government should tailor the government assistance programs to the needs of the farmers and make the financial assistance more accessible.
Journal Article
Augmentation of leaf color parameters, pigments, vitamins, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in selected Amaranthus tricolor under salinity stress
2018
Amaranthus tricolor
genotype VA13 was evaluated under four salinity stress in terms of color parameters, leaf pigments, β-carotene, vitamin C, TPC, TFC, TAC, phenolic acids and flavonoids. Salinity stress significantly increases all the studied traits. The increments of all these compounds were high under moderate and severe salinity stress compared to control condition. In this study,
trans
-cinnamic acid was newly identified phenoic acid in
A. tricolor
. Salicylic acid, vanilic acid,
trans
-cinnamic acid, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, rutin, isoquercetin and
m
-coumaric acid were the most abundant phenolic compounds of amaranth that increased with the severity of salinity stress.
A. tricolor
leaves are good source of pigments, β-carotene, vitamin C, bioactive compounds, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidants. In salt-stressed amaranth, correlation studies revealed strong antioxidant activity of leaf pigments, β-carotene, vitamin C, TPC, TFC. These bioactive compounds played a vital role in scavenging ROS and could be beneficial to human nutrition by serving as a good antioxidant and antiaging source in human health benefit.
A. tricolor
cultivated under salinity stress conditions can contribute a high quality of the final product in terms of leaf pigments, bioactive compounds, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidants. It can be a promising alternative crop in saline-prone areas.
Journal Article