Explore the vast range of titles available.

Signed into law in July 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective two years later, and court decisions about the law began to multiply in the middle of the decade. In The Disability Pendulum, Ruth Colker presents the first legislative history of the enactment of the ADA in Congress and analyzes the first decade of judicial decisions under the act. She assesses the success and failure of the first ten years of litigation under the ADA, focusing on its three major titles: employment, public entities, and public accommodations.The Disability Pendulum argues that despite an initial atmosphere of bipartisan support with the expectation that the ADA would make a significant difference in the lives of individuals with disabilities, judicial decisions have not been consistent with Congress' intentions. The courts have operated like a pendulum, at times swinging to a pro-disabled plaintiff and then back again to a pro-defendant stance. Colker, whose work on the ADA has been cited by the Supreme Court, offers insightful and practical suggestions on where to amend the act to make it more effective in defending disability rights, and also explains judicial hostility toward enforcing the act.

Integrate your designs with compliant access interpretations ADA in Details provides a visual interpretation of the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for a convenient, go-to reference of pertinent scoping, technical requirements, and sourcing information. Architects, designers, and everyone else involved in the built environment can turn to this authoritative resource to understand accessibility compliance for places of public accommodation, commercial facilities, and public buildings. Every detail is presented with both a clear explanation and illustrations that synthesize federal regulations and the 2016 California Building Code (CBC). A reference of this scope presenting visual detail examples and specifications for both newly constructed and existing facilities enables you to: - Get up to speed on accessibility standards and requirements - Differentiate the CBC from the ADA Standards with color contrasting text and graphics for immediate clarification - Keep a solutions guide at your fingertips for accessible routes, site features, architectural elements, restrooms, and more - Quickly find requirements for specialty areas of accessibility, including assembly areas, kitchens, storage spaces, hospitality and recreational facilities, as well as dwelling units Integrate accessibility into any space with ADA in Details.

BackgroundPatient-centered care for people with disability requires effective communication and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).ObjectiveTo understand physicians’ perspectives on communication experiences with people with disability.DesignTwenty semi-structured individual interviews. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim for analysis.SettingMassachusetts, October 2017–January 2018.ParticipantsTwenty physicians ranging from 8 to 51 years in practice in primary care or 4 other specialties.MeasurementsCommonly expressed themes around communication with people with disability.ResultsConcerns coalesced around 4 broad categories: communication experiences with people who are deaf or hard of hearing, communication with people who are blind or have vision impairment, communication with people who have intellectual disability, and recommendations for improving communication. Although participants in this study reported various efforts to communicate effectively with patients with hearing or vision loss or intellectual disability, many gaps appear to remain, as well as instances where physicians’ preferences run counter to patients’ wishes and the ADA. Examples include physicians’ preferences for remote, online sign language interpreters despite patients desiring in-person interpreters and suggesting that patients arrange for their own interpreters. Few educational materials are available in braille, and electronic medical records may not allow documents to be printed in large font for persons with low vision. Communicating with patients with intellectual disability raised particular concerns, with participants often preferring to interact with caregivers and minimal efforts to involve patients.ConclusionsEffective communication is necessary for ensuring the quality of health care for people with disability, and it is legally required under the ADA. Our results suggest that important gaps may remain in ensuring effective communication, and some practicing physicians could benefit from formal training in effective methods for communicating with patients with disability.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 was intended to send a clear message to society that discrimination on the basis of disability is unacceptable. As with most civil rights laws, the courts were given primary responsibility for implementing disability rights policy. Mezey argues that the act has not fulfilled its potential primarily because of the judiciary's \"disabling interpretations\" in adjudicating ADA claims. In the decade of litigation following the enactment of the ADA, judicial interpretation of the law has largely constricted the parameters of disability rights and excluded large numbers of claimants from the reach of the law. The Supreme Court has not interpreted the act broadly, as was intended by Congress, and this method of decision making was for the most part mirrored by the courts below. The high court's rulings to expand state sovereign immunity and insulate states from liability in damage suits has also caused claimants to become enmeshed in litigation and has encouraged defendants to challenge other laws affecting disability rights. Despite the law's strong civil rights rhetoric, disability rights remain an imperfectly realized goal.

Introduction Despite persistently low employment rates among working-age adults with disabilities, prior research on employer practices and attitudes toward workers with disabilities paints a generally rosy picture of successfully accommodated workers in a welcoming environment. Findings from previous studies might have been biased because of either employer self-selection or social desirability, yielding non-representative or artificially positive conclusions. Methods In this study, a novel approach was used to survey human resource professionals and supervisors working for employers known or reputed to be resistant to complying with the ADA’s employment provisions. Attendees of employer-requested ADA training sessions were asked to assess various possible reasons that employers in general might not hire, retain, or accommodate workers with disabilities and to rate strategies and policy changes that might make it more likely for employers to do so. Results As cited by respondents, the principal barriers to employing workers with disabilities are lack of awareness of disability and accommodation issues, concern over costs, and fear of legal liability. With regard to strategies employers might use to increase hiring and retention, respondents identified increased training and centralized disability and accommodation expertise and mechanisms. Public policy approaches preferred by respondents include no-cost external problem-solving, subsidized accommodations, tax breaks, and mediation in lieu of formal complaints or lawsuits. Conclusions Findings suggest straightforward approaches that employers might use to facilitate hiring and retention of workers with disabilities, as well as new public programs or policy changes that could increase labor force participation among working-age adults who have disabilities.

Today, considerations of disability are a vital part of health law scholarship and teaching, but that was not always the case. This Essay traces how disability’s role in health law has grown over the past three decades, alongside the author’s own evolution as a health and disability law scholar. The recent official designation of disabled people as a health disparities population is encouraging, but much work remains to achieve health equity for disabled persons.

Changes in disability law and professional practice were designed to give individuals with disabilities greater access to protections and services by emphasizing functional limitations and self-reported problems over a formal diagnosis and third-party documentation. It is not known if these changes are associated with increased access to accommodations among college students with disabilities, most of whom struggle academically yet never receive formal support. We examined college students’ access to accommodations as a function of institutional type, selectivity, and cost over time. Although access to accommodations increased from 2.8 to 5.2% over the past 12 years, this change was largely driven by students attending America’s most selective and expensive private institutions. Access to accommodations was significantly lower and remained relatively stable among students attending 2-year public colleges. These findings suggest a Matthew effect in higher education in which students most in need of academic support are increasingly least likely to receive it. We suggest four ways to reduce this access inequality: (1) encourage universal design, (2) facilitate access for students with disabilities from disadvantaged backgrounds, (3) critically evaluate documentation from students without real-world limitations, and (4) insist on evidence of symptom or performance validity before granting accommodations.

As service dogs, emotional support dogs, and therapy dogs have become more prevalent in the USA, so too has the controversy surrounding their legitimacy. Yet, there is a lack of objective data regarding the public’s understanding of the role played by each of these types of animals, as well as their perceptions regarding the legitimacy of their integration. An anonymous, online survey was distributed to examine the perceptions of US adults who do not own any type of assistance animal. A total of 505 individuals responded to the online survey, yielding 284 usable responses. Results suggest widespread misconceptions about definitions, rules, regulations, and rights associated with each type of assistance dog. In general, service dogs are more likely to be perceived as helping with a legitimate need, and their access to public spaces is viewed favorably. While there are some concerns about the legitimacy and necessary access rights for emotional support dogs, members of the public correctly identified the roles and rights of therapy dogs. Despite the media’s focus on abuses and false representation of these dogs, most participants reported feeling the majority of people are not taking advantage of the system.

For decades researchers have called attention to the problem of bullying among children and adolescents in school. Starting in 1999, states began responding to this problem by promulgating anti-bullying laws. Although anti-bullying laws now exist in every state and the District of Columbia, a comprehensive review of those law has not been conducted in nearly ten years. White et al., have provided that update. Their work is significant on a number of fronts. Still, for all their good intentions and effects, the anti-bullying laws have limitations, arguably significant limitations.

Millions of people have physical or mental limitations that make it difficult or impossible to access web content and fully participate in the online marketplace. Because many small businesses and web developers do not take such issues into consideration when building or updating a website, many web pages are incompatible with assistive technologies and are therefore inaccessible. The remedy often involves a suit filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This study provides a systematic analysis of ADA-related judicial rulings pertaining to companies that operate a purely standalone commercial website with no physical place open to the public. The results clearly reveal that there is no consensus amongst federal courts over whether ADA Title III applies to website-only businesses. It is also apparent that the problems addressed in this study are pervasive, and there are no simple solutions. Maintaining disabled user rights under the law, and reducing the number of inaccessible websites, will require a multidimensional approach. Congress and the DOJ need to specify that websites must be accessible and provide regulations outlining how a website can be ADA compliant. This will provide guidance to the judicial system. Technology companies need to develop screen readers that are better able to handle submenus and pop-up windows. Website owners need to be motivated to spend the time and money necessary to make their sites accessible. Moreover, website developers need better tools and training to help them design accessible websites more quickly and effectively.