Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeAromatase inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-dependent early breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Among Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.27 participants, anastrozole and exemestane had comparable 5-year event-free survival. This companion study examined differences in patient-reported treatment-related symptoms (TRS) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) among postmenopausal women randomized to anastrozole or exemestane.MethodsMA.27 participants (N = 686, of 7576) randomized to 5 years of anastrozole (1 mg/day, n = 371, Arm A) or exemestane (25 mg/day, n = 315, Arm E) completed the 56-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) questionnaire to assess TRS and HRQL. The FACT-ES was completed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.ResultsNo significant differences in FACT-ES median scores measuring TRS and HRQL were observed between treatment arms at any time point. Change in TRS from baseline was statistically significant at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. HRQL was stable over time in both arms. Greater TRS burden was associated with poorer HRQL (coefficient = 0.57, p < 0.001). Twenty percent of patients discontinued AI therapy by month 24 and 32% discontinued AIs at 4 years. In both arms, patients reporting more side effect bother prior to initiating study treatment had a higher risk of discontinuing treatment before completing protocol therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.08–1.55, p = 0.01).ConclusionsTRS and HRQL were comparable between anastrozole and exemestane. TRS negatively affect HRQL. Women who report being bothered by treatment side effects prior to initiating an AI are at increased risk for early treatment discontinuation.

Two large clinical trials have shown a reduced rate of breast cancer development in high-risk women in the initial 5 years of follow-up after use of aromatase inhibitors (MAP.3 and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II [IBIS-II]). Here, we report blinded long-term follow-up results for the IBIS-II trial, which compared anastrozole with placebo, with the objective of determining the efficacy of anastrozole for preventing breast cancer (both invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) in the post-treatment period. IBIS-II is an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either anastrozole (1 mg per day, oral) or matching placebo daily for 5 years. After treatment completion, women were followed on a yearly basis to collect data on breast cancer incidence, death, other cancers, and major adverse events (cardiovascular events and fractures). The primary outcome was all breast cancer. 3864 women were recruited between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012. 1920 women were randomly assigned to 5 years anastrozole and 1944 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 131 months (IQR 105–156), a 49% reduction in breast cancer was observed for anastrozole (85 vs 165 cases, hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·39–0·66, p<0·0001). The reduction was larger in the first 5 years (35 vs 89, 0·39, 0·27–0·58, p<0·0001), but still significant after 5 years (50 vs 76 new cases, 0·64, 0·45–0·91, p=0·014), and not significantly different from the first 5 years (p=0·087). Invasive oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was reduced by 54% (HR 0·46, 95% CI 0·33–0·65, p<0·0001), with a continued significant effect in the period after treatment. A 59% reduction in ductal carcinoma in situ was observed (0·41, 0·22–0·79, p=0·0081), especially in participants known to be oestrogen receptor-positive (0·22, 0·78–0·65, p<0·0001). No significant difference in deaths was observed overall (69 vs 70, HR 0·96, 95% CI 0·69–1·34, p=0·82) or for breast cancer (two anastrozole vs three placebo). A significant decrease in non-breast cancers was observed for anastrozole (147 vs 200, odds ratio 0·72, 95% CI 0·57–0·91, p=0·0042), owing primarily to non-melanoma skin cancer. No excess of fractures or cardiovascular disease was observed. This analysis has identified a significant continuing reduction in breast cancer with anastrozole in the post-treatment follow-up period, with no evidence of new late side-effects. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on breast cancer mortality. Cancer Research UK, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Sanofi Aventis, and AstraZeneca.

Postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor–positive breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were randomly assigned to an additional 2 years or 5 years of therapy with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. No between-group differences were noted in disease-free survival, but patients in the 5-year group had more bone fractures.

The addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer led to significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 15 months) and overall survival (median, 50 months) than anastrozole alone (13.5 and 42 months, respectively) when given as first-line endocrine therapy.

Background Anastrozole has been associated with substantial accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss during active treatment. Methods One thousand four hundred and ten women were included in a BMD substudy and stratified into three strata according to their baseline T-score at spine or femoral neck. The primary objective of this analysis was to investigate whether DXA BMD at the spine and hip changed two years after treatment cessation (between years 5 and 7) in those who did not receive risedronate. Results Five- and seven-year BMD data were available for a total of 528 women who did not receive risedronate. In women with normal BMD at baseline, an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine after anastrozole withdrawal was observed 1.25% (95% CI 0.73 to 1.77) ( P  = 0.0004), which was larger than in those on placebo (0.14% (−0.29 to 0.56))). At the hip, BMD remained unchanged between years 5 and 7 for those previously on anastrozole but continued to a decrease in those who had been randomised to placebo (−1.35% (−1.70 to −0.98)). Conclusions These are the first results reporting BMD changes after stopping anastrozole in a breast cancer prevention setting. Our results show that the negative effects of anastrozole on BMD in the preventive setting are partially reversible.

This post hoc analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 assesses the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in East Asian patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer. MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 are global, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3 studies of abemaciclib/placebo + fulvestrant and abemaciclib/placebo + nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI, anastrozole or letrozole), respectively. The East Asian population comprised 212 (31.7%) of the 669 intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population in the MONARCH 2 trial and 144 (29.2%) of the 493 ITT patients in the MONARCH 3 trial. In the East Asian population, median progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm compared with placebo in both MONARCH 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.520; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.362 to 0.747; P < .001; median: 21.2 vs 11.6 months) and MONARCH 3 (HR, 0.326; 95% CI, 0.200 to 0.531, P < .001; median: not reached vs 12.82 months). Diarrhea (MONARCH 2: 90%; MONARCH 3: 88%) and neutropenia (MONARCH 2: 68%; MONARCH 3: 58%) were the most frequent adverse events observed in the East Asian populations. Abemaciclib exposures and PK were similar in East Asians and the non‐East Asian populations of both trials. Abemaciclib in combination with ET in the East Asian populations of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 provided consistent results with the ITT populations, demonstrating improvements in efficacy with generally tolerable safety profiles for patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer. Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in the East Asian populations of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 improved efficacy for patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer.

The development of efficient drug delivery systems is critical for improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing side effects in cancer treatment. This study investigates the potential of iron-doped boron nitride nanoparticles (Fe-BNNPs) as a nanocarrier for Anastrozole, a key aromatase inhibitor used in breast cancer therapy. Using density functional theory (DFT), we systematically analyzed the interaction mechanisms between Anastrozole and Fe-BNNPs, focusing on binding energies, electronic properties, and structural stability. Our results reveal a strong adsorption of Anastrozole on Fe-BNNPs, with binding energies ranging from − 0.6 to − 1.4 eV, indicating a stable and efficient drug-carrier interaction. Iron doping significantly enhances the reactivity of BNNPs, improving drug loading and release capabilities. Nanoparticles passivated with -H and -OH groups and functionalized with iron nanoclusters were examined, demonstrating that -H passivation yields more stable structures compared to -OH, despite minor variations in electronic properties such as energy gaps (e.g., 2.51 eV for -H vs. 2.54 eV for -OH). The incorporation of iron nanoclusters further increases the binding energy of Anastrozole by approximately 40%, highlighting its role in optimizing drug-nanocarrier interactions. Optical absorption spectra reveal distinct peaks for Anastrozole adsorption on -H and -OH passivated surfaces, providing a clear indicator of interaction states. These findings underscore the potential of Fe-BNNPs as a promising nanocarrier for targeted Anastrozole delivery, offering enhanced precision and therapeutic efficacy.

BackgroundThe ACOSOG Z1031 trial addressed the ability of three neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors (NAIs) to reduce residual disease (cohort A) and to assess whether switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) after 4 weeks of receiving NAI with Ki67 greater than 10% increases pathologic complete response (pCR) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-enriched (Allred score 6–8) breast cancer (BC).MethodsThe study enrolled 622 women with clinical stage 2 or 3 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC. Cohort A comprised 377 patients, and cohort B had 245 patients. The analysis cohort consisted of 509 patients after exclusion of patients who did not meet the trial eligibility criteria, switched to NCT or surgery due to 4-week Ki67 greater than 10%, or withdrew before surgery. Distribution of time to local-regional recurrence (LRR) was estimated using the competing-risk approach, in which distant recurrence and second primaries were considered to be competing-risk events. Patients who died without LRR, distant recurrence, or a second primary were censored at the last evaluation.ResultsOf the 509 patients, 342 (67.2%) had breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Of 221 patients thought to require mastectomy at presentation, 50% were able to have BCS. Five (1%) patients had no residual disease in the breast or nodes at surgery. Among 382 women alive at this writing, 90% have been followed longer than 5 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate for LRR is estimated to be 1.53% (95% confidence interval 0.7–3.0%).ConclusionsRarely does NAI result in pCR for patients with stage 2 or 3 ER+ BC. However, a significant proportion will have downstaged to allow for BCS. Local-regional recurrence after surgery is uncommon (1.5% at 5 years), supporting the use of BCS after NAI.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcomes for estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2-negative breast cancers (BCs), yet intrinsic and acquired resistance exist. Here, we evaluated anastrozole in combination with palbociclib (ANA/PAL) in the NeoPalAna Endocrine-Resistant cohort (NCT01723774). Thirty-four patients with clinical stage II/III ER + /HER2– BCs resistant to standard neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (on-treatment Ki67 > 10%) received neoadjuvant ANA/PAL, with serial biopsies analyzed. The primary endpoint, complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA; Ki67 C1D15  ≤ 2.7% at cycle 1, day 15), was achieved in 57.6% of patients (95%CI: 39.2–74.5%). Resistance to ANA/PAL (Ki67 C1D15  > 10%) was associated with higher pre-treatment tumor grade, Ki67, and specific PAM50 subtypes. Resistant tumors demonstrated reduced ER signaling and upregulation of cell cycle, mTOR, interferon, JAK/STAT, and immune checkpoints. Additionally, a 33-gene signature that predicted neoadjuvant Ki67 response to ANA/PAL was prognostic in a metastatic validation cohort. These findings underscore dysregulated oncogenic pathways as potential resistance mechanisms and biomarkers of response to CDK4/6i. CDK4/6 inhibitors are promising treatments for ER+ breast cancer, however resistance remains a challenge. Here, the authors analyse the NeoPalANA cohort and indicate that a 33 gene signature was predictive of response to neoadjuvant anastrozole and palbociclib.

Treatment strategies for preventing liver fibrosis have not yet been established. Letrozole, widely used for breast cancer, has recently been reported to suppress liver fibrosis in murine models. Therefore, we aimed to validate the suppressive effects of letrozole on liver fibrosis in the clinical setting. From 2006 to 2020, 23 consecutive patients who received continuous letrozole treatment for 24 months or more and had a liver fibrosis marker FIB-4 index of ≥ 2.30, were included. Forty-three patients who underwent anastrozole treatment for 24 months or more and had a liver fibrosis marker FIB-4 index of ≥ 2.30, were also included as controls. The Fisher exact, chi-square, unpaired Student t , and paired Student t test were used to analyze the data. The patient characteristics were similar between the letrozole- and anastrozole-treated patient groups. Among the letrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index tended to decline during letrozole treatment; a significant decrease was observed at 18 and 24 months compared with the baseline values (p = 0.044 and p = 0.013). In addition, the mean aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) decreased during letrozole treatment; the values at 18 and 24 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (p = 0.024 and p = 0.026). In contrast, among anastrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index and APRI did not change during anastrozole treatment. When changes in the FIB-4 index were further examined in a limited number of patients with a FIB-4 index ≥ 2.67, a significant reduction in the FIB-4 index at 24 months compared with baseline was also observed in letrozole-treated patients (p = 0.023), but not in anastrozole-treated patients. In conclusion, our findings support a possible suppressive effect of letrozole on liver fibrosis in the clinical setting. Further studies are required to better understand the pharmacological effects of letrozole.