Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
612 result(s) for "Anderson, Paul L"
Sort by:
The Loss of Art, The Art of Loss
Anderson presents an adaptation from an address delivered at the memorial service of Paul L. Anderson on Mar 29, 2018 is presented. Anderson was a difficult man to forget in life, and his death doesn't make it any easier. There are few places where his loss isn't felt. His artist's soul was drawn to beauty everywhere, both places where many saw it, and places where few others saw it.
Architect as Developer and the Postwar U.S. Apartment, 1945–1960
The fields of professional architecture and mass-market homebuilding have stood in opposition to one another since the nineteenth century in the United States. Boundaries between the two, however, were always permeable. This article explores an overlooked chapter in this dialogue: three architects who worked, in part, as developers of multifamily housing in the fifteen years after World War II, Vernon DeMars in the San Francisco Bay Area, Brown & Guenther in New York City, and Erwin Gerber in suburban New Jersey. Each followed a distinct path to design-develop and was motivated by a different set of concerns, from financial profit to the desire to advance professional values like high-quality design. All were enabled by the postwar welfare state that while encouraging homogeneity through the large-scale production of generic houses also empowered small-scale actors, including architects, to build alternatives. In employing policy toward this end, designers-as-developers generated opportunities to move beyond the incremental give-and-take of patron and client to better control production, injecting creativity, variety, and innovation into American housing. Their example highlights the complexity of midcentury housing policy and real-estate practice and reveals new ways in which these forces helped determine the shape of the U.S. built environment.