Explore the vast range of titles available.

This book examines the future of birthing practices, particularly by focusing on epidural analgesia in childbirth. It describes historical and cultural trajectories that have shaped the way in which birth is understood in Western, developed nations. In setting out the nature of epidural history, knowledge and practice, the book delves into related birth practices within the hospital setting. By critically examining these practices, which are embedded in a scientific discourse that rationalises and relies upon technology use, the authors argue that epidural analgesia has been positioned as a safe technology in contemporary maternity culture, despite it carrying particular risks. In examining alternative research the book proposes that increasing epidural rates are not only due to greater pain relief requirements or access but are influenced by technocratic values and a fragmented maternity system. The authors outline the way in which this epidural discourse influences how information is presented to women and how this affects their choices around the use of pain relief in labour.

Reports have suggested the use of intravenous infusion of vasopressors as an approach to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) in women undergoing cesarean deliveries. However, data on the suitability of this technique for obese people are limited. As such, the current experiment was designed to clarify the dose-response relationship associated with the preventive administration of phenylephrine to avoid SAIH during cesarean delivery in obese parturients under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The current study included 100 parturients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m who were undergoing cesarean section delivery. They were randomly treated with phenylephrine at different doses: 0.375, 0.5, 0.625, or 0.75 μg/kg/min. An infusion of phenylephrine was deemed beneficial if hypotension was absent, with hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or <80% of the baseline value between spinal injection and the delivery of the newborn. The 50% and 90% effective doses (ED and ED , respectively) for prophylactic phenylephrine were determined via a probit regression. Respective rates of hypotension in the 0.375, 0.5, 0.625, and 0.75 groups were 52% (13/25), 40% (10/25), 20% (5/25), and 0% (0/25). ED and ED values of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.30-0.48) and 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.60-0.87) μg/kg/min were calculated for phenylephrine treatment. The study results indicated that prophylactic phenylephrine, which prevents SAIH in obese parturients following cesarean delivery, has calculated values of 0.42 and 0.68 μg/kg/min. These findings may contribute to developing appropriate clinical practice guidelines for improved patient management. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=153050 . Identifier ChiCTR2200058125.

•Remimazolam significantly reduces nausea and vomiting in cesarean sections, enhancing patient satisfaction (P < 0.05).•Intravenous remimazolam administration effectively mitigates adverse reactions to carboprost tromethamine without affecting postpartum bleeding.•Study demonstrates remimazolam's potential for improving sedative outcomes in cesarean sections with CSEA anesthesia. To evaluate the effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing adverse reactions triggered by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section procedures. A total of 200 parturients scheduled for cesarean sections at risk of postpartum hemorrhage in our hospital from October 2022 to July 2023 were included. The participants were assigned via random number table method to either a study group or a control group, resulting in 100 cases in each. All parturients received combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) during cesarean section, followed by administration of carboprost tromethamine (250 µg) for preventing postpartum hemorrhage after childbirth. CSEA was performed with 1.8 to 2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 7 to 10 mL of 2% lidocaine. The study group was given remimazolam via intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.3 mg/kg/h commencing at 1 minute prior to CSEA and concluding with a final dosage adjustment 20 minutes preceding the end of surgery, while the control group was given the same volume of saline within this time frame. Primary outcome measures were adverse reactions and sedative effects of the parturients. Nausea and vomiting were the only adverse reactions that exhibited significant differences between groups. The study group reported significantly fewer cases (32 cases) of nausea and vomiting when compared to the 48 cases observed in the control group. Moreover, the use of remimazolam appeared to alleviate the severity of nausea and vomiting, as evidenced by the significantly lower incidence of Grade III event and the higher risk of Grade I event in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). The Apgar scores of newborns at birth and 5 minutes after birth were compared, and no statistically significant difference was found (P > 0.05). Parturients receiving remimazolam exhibited better effective sedation outcomes and were more satisfied with the treatment when compared with controls (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postpartum bleeding volume at 2 and 12 hours postpartum, as well as in the duration of postpartum bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05). Intravenous administration of remimazolam effectively prevents adverse reactions induced by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section performed under CSEA, thereby improving sedative effects.

Spinal anesthesia often causes hypotension, with consequent risk to the fetus. The use of vasopressor agents has been highly recommended for the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean delivery. Many studies have shown that norepinephrine can provide more stable maternal hemodynamics than phenylephrine. We therefore tested the hypothesis that norepinephrine preserves fetal circulation better than phenylephrine when used to treat maternal hypotension consequent to spinal anesthesia. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Operating room. We recruited 223 parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who were scheduled for elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The patients received prophylactic intravenous infusion of either 0.08 μg/kg/min norepinephrine or 0.5 μg/kg/min phenylephrine for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. Changes in fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output before and after spinal anesthesia were measured using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound. 90 subjects who received norepinephrine infusion and 93 subjects who received phenylephrine infusion were ultimately analyzed in the present study. The effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the change of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output at 3 and 6 min after spinal block were similar. Although there was a statistically significant decrease in fetal cardiac output at 6 min after subarachnoid block initiation in both the norepinephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0–0.04 L/min; P = 0.03) and the phenylephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0–0.04 L/min; P = 0.02), it remained within the normal range. Prophylactic infusion of comparable doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine has similar effects on fetal heart rate and cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Neither phenylephrine nor norepinephrine has meaningful detrimental effects on fetal circulation or neonatal outcomes. •Prophylactic infusion of comparable doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine has similar effects on fetal heart rate and cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia.•Neither phenylephrine nor norepinephrine has meaningful detrimental effects on fetal circulation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous palonosetron compared to ondansetron on hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section. Fifty-four women scheduled for elective cesarean section were, randomly allocated to ondansetron group (n = 27) or palonosetron group (n = 27). Ten minutes prior to the administration of spinal anesthesia, participants received an intravenous injection of either ondansetron or palonosetron. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was initiated immediately following the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The infusion rate was titrated to maintain adequate blood pressure until the time of fetal delivery. The primary outcome was total dose of phenylephrine administered. The secondary outcomes were nausea or vomiting, the need for rescue antiemetics, hypotension, bradycardia, and shivering. Complete response rate, defined as the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and no need for additional antiemetics, were assessed for up to 24 hours post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in the total dose of phenylephrine used between the ondansetron and palonosetron groups (387.5 μg [interquartile range, 291.3-507.8 μg versus 428.0 μg [interquartile range, 305.0-507.0 μg], P = 0.42). Complete response rates also showed no significant differences between the groups both within two hours post-spinal anesthesia (88.9% in the ondansetron group versus 100% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.24) and at 24 hours post-surgery (81.5% in the ondansetron group versus 88.8% in the palonosetron group; P = 0.7). In addition, there was no difference in other secondary outcomes. Prophylactic administration of palonosetron did not demonstrate a superior effect over ondansetron in mitigating hemodynamic changes or reducing phenylephrine requirements in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl for cesarean section.

Background Intravenous fluid administration and prophylactic vasopressor infusion are the primary methods for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. However, evidence regarding the impact of different volumes of crystalloid solution on the phenylephrine infusion dosage for preventing this hypotension remains inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the effect of two IV fluid infusion rates (10 or 20 mL/kg/h) on phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. Methods Eighty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL/kg/h (group 10) or 20 mL/kg/h (group 20) of lactated Ringer’s solution. The first patient in each group received 0.5 µg/kg/min of phenylephrine infusion immediately after intrathecal injection. The phenylephrine dose in subsequent patients was adjusted by increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the previous patient’s response. The ED50 of phenylephrine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery was estimated using a modified up-down sequential analysis, with probit analysis applied as a backup sensitivity analysis. Results The ED50 values for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.30 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.29–0.32 µg/kg/min) for group 10, and 0.19 µg/kg/min (95% CI, 0.16–0.22 µg/kg/min) for group 20, respectively. The estimated relative potency for phenylephrine in group 10 compared to group 20 was 1.52 (95%CI, 1.24–1.97), showing a significant difference in the ED50 values between the two groups. Conclusion This study found that a higher crystalloid co-loading rate significantly reduces prophylactic phenylephrine requirement for preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension. Trials registration https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125918 (Trial number: ChiCTR2100048002).

IntroductionPeripheral vasodilation causes a redistribution of body temperature from the core to the periphery, resulting in shivering and hypothermia. These are normal pathological and physiological processes during spinal anaesthesia. Two drugs, norepinephrine and phenylephrine, have peripheral vasoconstrictive effects. It is unclear the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on shivering and hypothermia in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.Methods analysis240 eligible parturients will be recruited for this randomised, double-blind, controlled trial and randomly assigned to either the norepinephrine or phenylephrine groups. The primary outcome will be the incidence of shivering while secondary outcomes will include the severity of shivering, rectal temperature, incidence of hypothermia and umbilical artery blood pH value.Ethics and disseminationThe Institutional Ethics Committee of The Second People’s Hospital of Hefei approved the trial protocol (ID: 2023-093). The results will be published in a compliant journal. The original data will be released in December 2029 on the ResMan original data-sharing platform of the China Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.medresman.org.cn).Trial registration numberChiCTR2300077164.

Background The hemodynamic effects of relatively low-dose epinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were compared. Methods This randomized controlled trial included full-term pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean delivery. After spinal anesthesia, participants received either epinephrine (0.03 mcg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.4 mcg/kg/min) infusion that continued until 5 min after delivery. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the occurrence of any of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and/or tachycardia. Neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery blood gas and Apgar scores, were assessed. Results In total, 98 patients in each group were analyzed, and the number of patients with the composite outcome was comparable between the epinephrine and phenylephrine groups (30/98 [31%] vs. 31/98 [32%], respectively; P  = 0.877). However, the incidence of hypotension was likely lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group ( P  = 0.066), and the number of hypotensive episodes per patient was lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group. On the other hand, the incidence of tachycardia was higher in the epinephrine group than that in the phenylephrine group. The incidence of hypertension was comparable between the two groups and none of the participants developed bradycardia. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Epinephrine and phenylephrine infusion produced comparable maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes. Epinephrine was associated with a higher incidence of maternal tachycardia and likely lower incidence of maternal hypotension than phenylephrine. IRB number: MD-245–2022. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered on May 31, 2023 at clinicaltrials.gov registry, NCT05881915, URL: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05881915term=NCT05881915&draw=2&rank=1

Previous studies have shown that a 0.05 μg/kg/min of norepinephrine infusion in combination with an initial bolus reduces the incidence of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. The initial norepinephrine bolus influences the incidence of spinal hypotension during continuous norepinephrine infusion; however, the ideal initial bolus dose for 0.05 μg/kg/min of continuous infusion remains unknown. This randomized, controlled, dose-finding study randomly allocated 120 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery to receive initial bolus doses of 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 μg/kg of norepinephrine, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min. The primary outcome was the dose-response relationship of the initial norepinephrine bolus in preventing the incidence of spinal hypotension. Spinal hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to <80% of the baseline value or to an absolute value of <90 mmHg from intrathecal injection to delivery, and severe spinal hypotension was defined as SBP decreased to <60% of the baseline value. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, hypertension, and bradycardia, as well as the Apgar scores and results of the umbilical arterial blood gas analysis. The effective dose (ED) 90 and ED95 were estimated using probit regression. The per-protocol analysis included 117 patients. The incidence of spinal hypotension varied significantly among the groups: Group 0 (51.7%), Group 0.05 (44.8%), Group 0.10 (23.3%), and Group 0.15 (6.9%). The ED90 and ED95 values were 0.150 μg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.114–0.241 μg/kg) and 0.187 μg/kg (95% CI, 0.141–0.313 μg/kg), respectively. However, the ED95 value fell outside the dose range examined in this study. The incidence of severe spinal hypotension differed significantly (P = 0.02) among Groups 0 (17.2%), 0.05 (10.3%), 0.10 (3.3%), and 0.15 (0.0%); however, the incidence of hypertension and bradycardia did not. The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting decreased with an increase in the initial bolus dose (P = 0.03). The fetal outcomes were comparable among the groups. An initial bolus of 0.150 μg/kg of norepinephrine may be the optimal dose for preventing spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery with a continuous infusion rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min, and does not significantly increase the incidence of hypertension but substantially reduces the risk of nausea and/or vomiting. •An initial bolus reduces the incidence of spinal hypotension with norepinephrine infusion rate at 0.05 µg/kg/min.•The ideal dose of the initial bolus remains unknown.•In this RCT, the ED90, and ED95 values were 0.150 μg/kg and 0.187 μg/kg for preventing spinal hypotension.•The 0.150 μg/kg of norepinephrine may be optimal dose for preventing spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery.