Explore the vast range of titles available.

Hereditary angioedema is a rare genetic disease that leads to severe and unpredictable swelling attacks. NTLA-2002 is an in vivo gene-editing therapy based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9. NTLA-2002 targets the gene encoding kallikrein B1 ( ), with the goal of lifelong control of angioedema attacks after a single dose. In this phase 1 dose-escalation portion of a combined phase 1-2 trial of NTLA-2002 in adults with hereditary angioedema, we administered NTLA-2002 at a single dose of 25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg. The primary end points were the safety and side-effect profile of NTLA-2002 therapy. Secondary and exploratory end points included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy determined on the basis of investigator-confirmed angioedema attacks. Three patients received 25 mg of NTLA-2002, four received 50 mg, and three received 75 mg. At all dose levels, the most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions and fatigue. No dose-limiting toxic effects, serious adverse events, grade 3 or higher adverse events, or clinically important laboratory findings were observed after the administration of NTLA-2002. Dose-dependent reductions in the total plasma kallikrein protein level were observed between baseline and the latest assessment, with a mean percentage change of -67% in the 25-mg group, -84% in the 50-mg group, and -95% in the 75-mg group. The mean percentage change in the number of angioedema attacks per month between baseline and weeks 1 through 16 (primary observation period) was -91% in the 25-mg group, -97% in the 50-mg group, and -80% in the 75-mg group. Among all the patients, the mean percentage change in the number of angioedema attacks per month from baseline through the latest assessment was -95%. In this small study, a single dose of NTLA-2002 led to robust, dose-dependent, and durable reductions in total plasma kallikrein levels, and no severe adverse events were observed. In exploratory analyses, reductions in the number of angioedema attacks per month were observed at all dose levels. (Funded by Intellia Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05120830.).

In this randomized, controlled trial, the number of angioedema attacks per month was approximately 75% lower among adults with hereditary angioedema who received a CRISPR-Cas9–based therapy than among those who received placebo.

Hereditary angio-oedema is a recurrent, oedematous disorder caused by deficiency of functional C1 inhibitor. Infusions of plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor deter attacks of hereditary angio-oedema, but the prophylactic effect of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor has not been rigorously studied. We aimed to assess the efficacy of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor for prophylaxis of hereditary angio-oedema. We conducted this phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial at ten centres in Canada, the Czech Republic, Israel, Italy, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 13 years or older with functional C1-inhibitor concentrations of less than 50% of normal and a history of four or more attacks of hereditary angio-oedema per month for at least 3 months before study initiation. Patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1:1:1:1:1), via an interactive response technology system with fixed allocation, to receive one of six treatment sequences. During each sequence, patients received intravenous recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (50 IU/kg; maximum 4200 IU) twice weekly, recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor once weekly and placebo once weekly, and placebo twice weekly, each for 4 weeks with a 1 week washout period between crossover. All patients, investigators, and study personnel who participated in patient care were masked to group allocation during the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of attacks of hereditary angio-oedema observed in each 4 week treatment period. Attack symptoms were recorded daily. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one injection of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02247739. Between Dec 29, 2014, and May 3, 2016, we enrolled 35 patients, of whom 32 (91%) underwent randomisation (intention-to-treat population) and 26 (81%) completed the study. The mean number of attacks of hereditary angio-oedema over 4 weeks was significantly reduced with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor twice weekly (2·7 attacks [SD 2·4]) and once weekly (4·4 attacks [3·2]) versus placebo (7·2 attacks [3·6]), with mean differences of −4·4 attacks (p<0·0001) and −2·8 attacks (p=0·0004), respectively. We recorded adverse events in ten (34%) of 29 patients given twice-weekly recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, 13 (45%) of 29 patients given the once-weekly regimen, and eight (29%) of 28 patients given placebo. Headache (twice-weekly treatment) and nasopharyngitis (once-weekly treatment) were the most common adverse events. Two (7%) adverse events (fatigue and headache) were deemed possibly related to treatment with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, but both resolved without additional treatment. No thrombotic or thromboembolic events, systemic allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), or neutralising antibodies were reported. Prophylaxis with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor provided clinically relevant reductions in frequency of hereditary angio-oedema attacks and was well tolerated. In view of the pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, our results suggest that efficacy of C1-inhibitor replacement therapy might not be a direct function of plasma trough concentrations of C1 inhibitor. Pharming Technologies.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent attacks of severe tissue swelling. In the OASIS‐HAE phase 3 study (NCT05139810), donidalorsen, an RNA‐targeted antisense oligonucleotide that reduces prekallikrein production in the liver, significantly reduced HAE attack rates. To characterize the relationship between prekallikrein concentrations and HAE attack rates following donidalorsen and predict the efficacy of potential dosing regimens, an exposure–response model was developed using data from OASIS‐HAE. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the following regimens: 80 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), 8 weeks (Q8W), 1 month (Q1M), and 2 months (Q2M), and a switch to Q2M dosing for patients who were attack‐free for 3 months on the Q1M regimen. The relationship between prekallikrein concentrations and HAE attack rates was well characterized by a sigmoidal Emax (maximum effect) model with baseline attack rate and baseline prekallikrein concentration included as covariates. The average prekallikrein concentration estimated to result in a 90% reduction in attack rate (EC10) was 47.1 mg/L. Predicted percent reductions in attack rates at steady state were similar for Q4W (84.1%) vs. Q1M (82.9%) and Q8W (72.6%) vs. Q2M (70.2%) dosing. Predicted reductions in attack rate remained similar and clinically meaningful in patients who switched from Q1M to Q2M dosing (94.0% in month 1 and 91.3% in month 2 of the 2‐month dosing interval at steady state). Overall, exposure–response analyses supported the efficacy of Q1M and Q2M dosing and indicated that switching to Q2M dosing could be a viable approach for patients who are attack‐free on the Q1M regimen.

Background: Danazol is a synthetic androgen derivative frequently used as prophylaxis in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to complement-1 esterase inhibitor deficiency. However, danazol has been reported to decrease high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and to adversely affect coagulation parameters, which are considered to be proatherothrombotic. Objective: The short- and long-term effects of danazol were evaluated on proatherogenic intermediate end points in healthy volunteers and patients with HAE. Methods: Short-term effects were evaluated in healthy men randomly assigned to 200 mg/d of danazol or placebo for 4 weeks in a crossover trial with no washout period. Long-term effects of danazol on lipoproteins, coagulation, and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) were evaluated in a cross-sectional study in which patients with HAE treated with danazol, a mean dose of 170 mg/d for ≥2 years, were compared with healthy controls matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Drug tolerability was assessed by questionnaires and adherence was measured by pill count whendrug bottles were returned after every study visit. Results: Patients in the short-term study were 15 men with a mean (SD) age of 32.6 (6.9) years and BMI of 24.3 (4.1) kg/m2. In the long-term study, patients with HAE were 10 women and 7 men with a mean (SD) age of 41.1 (12.9) years and BMI of 25.4 (2.6) kg/m2; the 17 matched controls had a mean (SD) age of 39.8 (11.8) years and BMI of 25.4 (2.6) kg/m2. Short-term danazol treatment was associated with a decrease from baseline in apolipoprotein A-I of 21% and in HDL-C of 23%. Flow-mediated dilation and coagulation parameters were unaffected after 4 weeks. Longterm danazol treatment did not adversely affect HDL-C concentration (1.1 [0.5] vs baseline, 1.2 [0.5] pmol/L), HDL-related transfer proteins such as paraoxonase-1 activity (92 [62] vs 80 [40] U/mM), cholesteryl-ester transfer protein mass (1.5 [0.4] vs 2.2 [0.6] µg/mL), lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase activity (21.2 [4.5] vs 32.1 [7.2] nmol CE · mL-1 · h-1), plasma phospholipid transfer protein activity (15.4 [1.5] vs 14.9 [1.2] AU), and apolipoproteins between patients with HAE and controls. The mean (SD) CIMT was similar between patients with HAE and controls (0.62 [0.09] vs 0.59 [0.08] mm; P = NS). However, HAE patients using danazol had increased coagulation activation when compared with controls (prothrombin fragments, 286 [119] vs 164 [57] pmol/L, P = 0.002; thrombinantithrombin complex, 3.9 [1.4] vs 2.6 [1.1] µg/L, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Short-term danazol treatment in healthy volunteers was associated with a reduction in HDL-C levels without a significant effect on endothelial function or coagulation parameters. In contrast, patients with HAE treated for >2 years with danazol had increased activation of coagulation, but there were no significant differences in HDL-C or CIMT compared with matched healthy controls.

Background Recombinant human C1-inhibitor (rhC1INH; Ruconest®) has been developed for treatment of acute angioedema attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to heterozygous deficiency of C1INH. Previous reports suggest that administration of plasma-derived C1INH products may be associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. Objectives Our aim is to evaluate the effects of rhC1INH on coagulation and fibrinolysis in symptomatic HAE patients. Methods Levels of various coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters were determined in pre- and postexposure plasma samples from HAE patients included in a randomized clinical trial. Patients were treated with either saline, or 50 or 100 U/kg rhC1INH for an acute angioedema attack. Results Prior to rhC1INH treatment, the majority of patients had low to normal activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) and increased levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimers and plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, all of which indicate activation of both coagulation and fibrinolysis. Infusion of rhC1INH at doses up to 100 U/kg did not affect these parameters except for a dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT, confirming that rhC1INH is an inhibitor of the contact system, and that F1+2 levels decreased. Conclusion Coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated in HAE patients suffering from an acute angioedema attack. Treatment with rhC1INH at 50 or 100 U/kg had no effect on parameters reflecting activation of these systems except for a significant effect on aPTT, which likely reflects a pharmacodynamic effect of rhC1INH, and a reduction on plasma levels of the prothrombin activation fragment F1+2. We conclude that these results argue against a prothrombotic effect of treatment with this rhC1INH product in HAE patients.

Angioedema is a prevailing symptom in different diseases, frequently occurring in the presence of urticaria. Recurrent angioedema without urticaria (AE) can be hereditary (HAE) and acquired (AAE), and several subtypes can be distinguished, although clinical presentation is quite similar in some of them. They present with subcutaneous and mucosal swellings, affecting extremities, face, genitals, bowels, and upper airways. AE is commonly misdiagnosed due to restricted access and availability of appropriate laboratorial tests. HAE with C1 inhibitor defect is associated with quantitative and/or functional deficiency. Although bradykinin-mediated disease results mainly from disturbance in the kallikrein–kinin system, traditionally complement evaluation has been used for diagnosis. Diagnosis is established by nephelometry, turbidimetry, or radial immunodiffusion for quantitative measurement of C1 inhibitor, and chromogenic assay or ELISA has been used for functional C1-INH analysis. Wrong handling of the samples can lead to misdiagnosis and, consequently, mistaken inappropriate approaches. Dried blood spot (DBS) tests have been used for decades in newborn screening for certain metabolic diseases, and there has been growing interest in their use for other congenital conditions. Recently, DBS is now proposed as an efficient tool to diagnose HAE with C1 inhibitor deficiency, and its use would improve the access to outbound areas and family members. Regarding HAE with normal C1 inhibitor, complement assays’ results are normal and the genetic sequencing of target genes, such as exon 9 of F12 and PLG , is the only available method. New methods to measure cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen and activated plasma kallikrein have emerged as potential biochemical tests to identify bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Validated biomarkers of kallikrein–kinin system activation could be helpful in differentiating mechanisms of angioedema. Our aim is to focus on the capability to differentiate histaminergic AE from bradykinin-mediated AE. In addition, we will describe the challenges developing specific tests like direct bradykinin measurements. The need for quality tests to improve the diagnosis is well represented by the variability of results in functional assays.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by unpredictable, episodic, incapacitating attacks of well-demarcated angioedema in the absence of urticaria and pruritus. HAE is due to deficient or dysfunctional C1-esterase inhibitor activity, which results in unopposed activation of plasma kallikrein, resulting in increased levels of bradykinin. Ecallantide is a potent and specific plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved for the treatment of acute attacks of HAE affecting any anatomic site. In Phase III clinical trials, subcutaneously administered ecallantide demonstrated significant, rapid and durable symptom relief. Ecallantide was effective for all attack types, including potentially life-threatening laryngeal attacks. The main safety concern is potentially serious hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Ecallantide represents an important treatment option for the management of acute attacks of HAE.

Stressful physical or psychological events can trigger acute swelling attacks in patients with Hereditary Angioedema due to C1 Inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH), although the stress-disease relationship remains unclear. The Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test (SECPT) reliably induces acute stress under controlled conditions. This study aimed to compare perceived stress, inflammatory markers, and cardiovascular responses to SECPT between HAE-C1INH patients and healthy controls (HC). Twenty HAE-C1INH patients (9 males, 44 ± 14 years) and age and sex matched HC underwent a 3-minute SECPT. Participants completed questionnaires assessing anxiety and depression (HADS), pain catastrophizing (PCS), and subjective stress (0-100 scale) before and after SECPT. Heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (AP) were recorded. Blood samples for inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1ß, TNF-α) were collected at baseline, and 10 and 40 minutes after SECPT. Compared to HC, patients showed higher baseline HADS-A (7.3 ± 4.5 vs 4.7 ± 2.7), overall PCS (19.7 ± 12.6 vs 12.9 ± 8.7), and perceived stress during SECPT (60.6 ± 34.3 vs 34.6 ± 23.8). IL-6 levels were higher at baseline and 10 minutes post-test (2.63 ± 1.21 vs 1.84 ± 0.87; 2.78 ± 1.20 vs 1.91 ± 0.79 pg/ml), as were TNF-α levels across all phases (4.19 ± 1.38 vs 3.26 ± 1.55; 4.09 ± 1.39 vs 3.40 ± 1.48; 4.09 ± 1.28 vs 3.20 ± 1.57) while IL-1 ß remained unchanged. HR and AP variations were similar between groups. HAE-C1INH patients exhibited heightened perceived stress response to SECPT, and elevated baseline inflammation, despite comparable cardiovascular reactivity. These findings highlight a complex psychophysiological-inflammatory interplay in acute stress responses, suggesting the need to integrate psychological and biological frameworks in understanding HAE-C1INH triggers. NCT06414252.

Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) features clinical heterogeneity and stress-triggered attacks. Behavioral tolerance to acute stress may reveal vulnerability profiles beyond standard clinical descriptors. This study aimed to characterize stress response patterns and compare groups based on behavioral tolerance. HAE-C1INH patients underwent the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test (SECPT) and were stratified as Completers or Non-completers (early withdrawal). Stress appraisal, cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, HR; systolic/diastolic arterial pressure, SAP/DAP), and plasma cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) were assessed. Disease control and quality of life were measured via Angioedema Control Test (AECT) and Angioedema Quality of life (AE-QoL) questionnaires. Twenty patients were enrolled (15 Completers and 5 Non-completers). Non-completers showed poorer disease control (10.6 ± 5.5 vs 14.5 ± 2.2; p ≤ 0.05) and worse AE-QoL, particularly in the Functioning (8.6 ± 4.3 vs 4.7 ± 1.7; p ≤ 0.05) and Fatigue/Mood (13.6 ± 7.1 vs 10.5 ± 3.5; p ≤ 0.05) domains. They reported higher stress (91 ± 8.9 vs 50.5 ± 33.7; p ≤ 0.05), pain (87.8 ± 12.8 vs 50.1 ± 31.3; p ≤ 0.05) and unpleasantness (83 ± 19.9 vs 49.5 ± 30.5; p ≤ 0.05) during the SECPT. Non-completers displayed an attenuated SAP response relative to Completers (128.3 ± 18.0 vs 148.9 ± 18.3 mmHg; p ≤ 0.05). Inflammatory profiles also diverged: Non-completers showed higher IL-6 levels at 40 minutes after SECPT (3.5 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.7 pg/ml; p ≤ 0.05) and opposite TNF-α trajectories compared with Completers (0.9 ± 1.0 vs -0.5 ± 0.9 pg/ml; p ≤ 0.05). Early withdrawal during SECPT identifies a vulnerable HAE-C1INH subgroup with distinct psychological, cardiovascular, and inflammatory patterns.