Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this randomized trial, the discontinuation of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease did not lead to a significant between-group difference in the long-term rate of decline in the eGFR.

In a multicenter placebo-controlled study, patiromer, a nonabsorbable potassium binder, led to a reduction in serum potassium levels in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia who were receiving renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Hyperkalemia is associated with life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and increased mortality. 1 Patients at the highest risk for hyperkalemia are those with stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease, with or without diabetes or heart failure, who are being treated with drugs that inhibit renal potassium excretion, particularly inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). 1 – 4 Outpatient treatment of hyperkalemia is limited by the lack of effective agents. 4 Sodium polystyrene sulfonate and calcium polystyrene sulfonate may cause serious gastrointestinal adverse events 5 – 8 as well as less serious gastrointestinal side effects that may be difficult for patients to tolerate, which together typically limit their . . .

This study aimed to determine whether early administration of drugs that block the renin–angiotensin system slows the progression of change in glomerular mesangial fractional volume and retinopathy progression of two steps or more, according to the retinopathy severity scale. Early blockade of the renin–angiotensin system did not modify nephropathy progression in patients with type 1 diabetes but had important effects in slowing retinopathy. Early blockade of the renin–angiotensin system did not modify nephropathy progression in patients with type 1 diabetes but had important effects in slowing retinopathy. Diabetic nephropathy, responsible for more than 45% of cases of end-stage renal disease in the United States, 1 may be structurally advanced once albuminuria becomes detectable. 2 , 3 Blockers of the renin–angiotensin system are more effective than other antihypertensive agents in slowing nephropathy progression in patients who have proteinuria, diabetes mellitus, and a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 4 – 6 and such blockers can also decrease proteinuria in patients with diabetes. 7 Although the reduction of proteinuria in patients with diabetes has been associated with a reduction in the rate of decline in GFR in small studies, 8 this association has not been systematically tested; . . .

Activation of the immune system is implicated in the Post-Acute Sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) but the mechanisms remain unknown. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) cleaves angiotensin II (Ang II) resulting in decreased activation of the AT1 receptor and decreased immune system activation. We hypothesized that autoantibodies against ACE2 may develop after SARS-CoV-2 infection, as anti-idiotypic antibodies to anti-spike protein antibodies. We tested plasma or serum for ACE2 antibodies in 67 patients with known SARS-CoV-2 infection and 13 with no history of infection. None of the 13 patients without history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1 of the 20 outpatients that had a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 had levels of ACE2 antibodies above the cutoff threshold. In contrast, 26/32 (81%) in the convalescent group and 14/15 (93%) of patients acutely hospitalized had detectable ACE2 antibodies. Plasma from patients with antibodies against ACE2 had less soluble ACE2 activity in plasma but similar amounts of ACE2 protein compared to patients without ACE2 antibodies. We measured the capacity of the samples to inhibit ACE2 enzyme activity. Addition of plasma from patients with ACE2 antibodies led to decreased activity of an exogenous preparation of ACE2 compared to patients that did not have antibodies. Many patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection have antibodies specific for ACE2. Patients with ACE2 antibodies have lower activity of soluble ACE2 in plasma. Plasma from these patients also inhibits exogenous ACE2 activity. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that ACE2 antibodies develop after SARS-CoV-2 infection and decrease ACE2 activity. This could lead to an increase in the abundance of Ang II, which causes a proinflammatory state that triggers symptoms of PASC.

In a randomized trial, 5661 patients with acute myocardial infarction and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both were assigned to receive either sacubitril–valsartan or ramipril. At a median of 22 months, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure.

The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 was compared with the ACE inhibitor enalapril in patients with advanced heart failure. LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in all outcomes. Neprilysin inhibition may replace ACE inhibition for the treatment of heart failure. Angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been the cornerstone of the treatment for heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction for nearly 25 years, since enalapril was shown to reduce the risk of death in two trials. 1 , 2 Long-term treatment with enalapril decreased the relative risk of death by 16% among patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. 2 The effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on mortality has been inconsistent, 3 , 4 and thus, these drugs are recommended primarily for patients who have unacceptable side effects (primarily cough) while receiving ACE inhibitors. Subsequent studies showed that the use of beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists, when added to ACE . . .

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to reduce proteinuria. Their combination might be more effective than either treatment alone, but long-term data for comparative changes in renal function are not available. We investigated the renal effects of ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), telmisartan (an ARB), and their combination in patients aged 55 years or older with established atherosclerotic vascular disease or with diabetes with end-organ damage. The trial ran from 2001 to 2007. After a 3-week run-in period, 25 620 participants were randomly assigned to ramipril 10 mg a day (n=8576), telmisartan 80 mg a day (n=8542), or to a combination of both drugs (n=8502; median follow-up was 56 months), and renal function and proteinuria were measured. The primary renal outcome was a composite of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101. 784 patients permanently discontinued randomised therapy during the trial because of hypotensive symptoms (406 on combination therapy, 149 on ramipril, and 229 on telmisartan). The number of events for the composite primary outcome was similar for telmisartan (n=1147 [13·4%]) and ramipril (1150 [13·5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·00, 95% CI 0·92–1·09), but was increased with combination therapy (1233 [14.5%]; HR 1·09, 1·01–1·18, p=0·037). The secondary renal outcome, dialysis or doubling of serum creatinine, was similar with telmisartan (189 [2·21%]) and ramipril (174 [2·03%]; HR 1·09, 0·89–1·34) and more frequent with combination therapy (212 [2·49%]: HR 1·24, 1·01–1·51, p=0·038). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined least with ramipril compared with telmisartan (−2·82 [SD 17·2] mL/min/1·73 m 2 vs −4·12 [17·4], p<0·0001) or combination therapy (−6·11 [17·9], p<0·0001). The increase in urinary albumin excretion was less with telmisartan (p=0·004) or with combination therapy (p=0·001) than with ramipril. In people at high vascular risk, telmisartan's effects on major renal outcomes are similar to ramipril. Although combination therapy reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than monotherapy, overall it worsens major renal outcomes. Boehringer-Ingelheim.

The renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) regulates systemic and cerebral blood flow and is dysregulated in dementia. The major aim of this study was to determine if RAS signalling is dysregulated in vascular dementia. We measured markers of RAS signalling in white matter underlying the frontal and occipital cortex in neuropathologically confirmed cases of vascular dementia (n = 42), Alzheimer's disease (n = 50), mixed AD/VaD (n = 50) and age‐matched controls (n = 50). All cases were stratified according to small vessel disease (SVD) severity across both regions. ACE‐1 and ACE‐2 protein and activity was measured by ELISA and fluorogenic peptide assays respectively, and angiotensin peptide (Ang‐II, Ang‐III and Ang‐(1–7)) levels were measured by ELISA. ACE‐1 protein level and enzyme activity, and Ang‐II and Ang‐III, were elevated in the white matter in vascular dementia in relation to SVD severity. ACE‐1 and Ang‐II protein levels were inversely related to MAG:PLP1 ratio, a biochemical marker of brain tissue oxygenation that when reduced indicates cerebral hypoperfusion, in a subset of cases. ACE‐2 level was elevated in frontal white matter in vascular dementia. Ang‐(1–7) level was elevated across all dementia groups compared to age‐matched controls but was not related to SVD severity. RAS signalling was not altered in the white matter in Alzheimer's disease. In the overlying frontal cortex, ACE‐1 protein was reduced and ACE‐2 protein increased in vascular dementia, whereas angiotensin peptide levels were unchanged. These data indicate that RAS signalling is dysregulated in the white matter in vascular dementia and may contribute to the pathogenesis of small vessel disease. Renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) signalling in altered in white matter in vasculkar dementia. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme‐1 (ACE‐1), a regulator of disease‐associated classical‐RAS signalling, is elevated specifically in vascular dementia in frontal (FWM) and occipital (OWM) white matter and is related to the severity of small vessel disease.

Despite emergence of new systemic therapies, metastatic melanoma remains a challenging and often fatal form of skin cancer. The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is a major physiological regulatory pathway controlling salt–water equilibrium, intravascular volume and blood pressure. Biological effects of the RAS are mediated by the vasoactive hormone angiotensin II (AngII) via two receptor subtypes, AT1R (encoded by AGTR1 ) and AT2R (encoded by AGTR2 ). We report decreasing expression and increasing CpG island methylation of AGTR1 in metastatic versus primary melanoma and detection in serum of methylated genomic DNA from the AGTR1 CpG island in metastatic melanoma implying that AGTR1 encodes a tumour suppressor function in melanoma. Consistent with this hypothesis, antagonism of AT1R using losartan or shRNA-mediated knockdown in melanoma cell lines expressing AGTR1 resulted in acquisition of the ability to proliferate in serum-free conditions. Conversely, ectopic expression of AGTR1 in cell lines lacking endogenous expression inhibits proliferation irrespective of the presence of AngII implying a ligand-independent suppressor function for AT1R. Treatment of melanoma cell lines expressing endogenous AT2R with either AngII or the AT2R-selective agonist Y6AII induces proliferation in serum-free conditions whereas the AT2R-specific antagonists PD123319 and EMA401 inhibit melanoma growth and angiogenesis and potentiate inhibitors of BRAF and MEK in cells with BRAF V600 mutations. Our results demonstrate that the RAS has both oncogenic and tumour suppressor functions in melanoma. Pharmacological inhibition of AT2R may provide therapeutic opportunities in melanomas expressing this receptor and AGTR1 CpG island methylation in serum may serve as a novel biomarker of metastatic melanoma.

Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with dementia and cognitive decline. We investigated the effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade on cognitive function in patients aged 55 years and older with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or diabetes with end-organ damage in two clinical trials. In the main study, ONTARGET, a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial, the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of standard doses of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ramipril), an angiotensin-receptor blocker (telmisartan), and a combination of the drugs were evaluated in 25 620 participants. In the parallel TRANSCEND trial, the effects of telmisartan were compared with those of placebo in 5926 participants intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Secondary outcomes included cognitive impairment (defined by investigator-reported diagnosis of dementia or significant cognitive dysfunction, or a score of ≤23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) and cognitive decline (a decrease of ≤3 points on the MMSE from baseline during follow-up). Analyses were by intention to treat. We pooled data from these studies to identify baseline predictors of cognitive impairment and its frequency according to mean systolic blood pressure during follow-up. These studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101. During a median duration of 56 months (IQR 51–64) of follow-up in ONTARGET, cognitive impairment occurred in 652 (8%) of 7865 patients allocated ramipril, 584 (7%) of 7797 allocated telmisartan, and 618 (8%) of 7807 allocated combination treatment (combination vs ramipril, odds ratio [OR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·85–1·07, p=0·39; telmisartan vs ramipril, OR 0·90, 0·80–1·01, p=0·06). Corresponding figures for cognitive decline were 1314 (17%), 1279 (17%), and 1240 (17%) in each of the groups, respectively (telmisartan vs ramipril, OR 0·97, 0·89–1·06, p=0·53; combination vs ramipril, OR 0·95, 0·88–1·04, p=0·28). In TRANSCEND, cognitive impairment occurred in 239 (9%) of 2694 participants allocated telmisartan compared with 245 (9%) of 2689 allocated placebo (OR 0·97, 0·81–1·17, p=0·76). The corresponding figures for cognitive decline were 454 (17%) and 412 (16%; OR 1·10, 0·95–1·27, p=0·22). In patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes, different approaches to blocking of the renin-angiotensin system had no clear effects on cognitive outcomes. Although patients with the lowest systolic blood pressure had the greatest preservation of cognitive function, meta-regression analyses did not show any benefits of blood-pressure lowering on cognition over several years of treatment. Boehringer-Ingelheim.