Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To investigate the effectiveness of sagittal deformity angular distance ratio (S-DADR; sagittal Cobb angle divided by the distance, in centimeters, between the midpoint of the upper endplate of the upper end vertebrae and the midpoint of the lower endplate of the lower end vertebrae) in evaluating neurological risks in patients with post-tuberculous kyphosis (PTK). Methods A consecutive series of 102 patients with PTK who underwent corrective surgery between September 2010 and June 2024 were included. Measurements derived from preoperative radiographs were utilized to compute S-DADR. Potential risk factors of postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs) were assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses. Binary logistic regression was used to model the relationship between identified independent risk factors and PNDs, and the model was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results The mean age of the 102 patients was 49.5 ± 12.1 years, and the incidence of PNDs was 22.5%. Univariate logistic regression revealed a positive correlation between the incidence of PNDs and S-DADR (OR = 1.103, P  = 0.003), preoperative sagittal Cobb angle (OR = 1.025, P  = 0.007), number of vertebrae resected (OR = 1.661, P  = 0.024), operative time (OR = 1.005, P  = 0.048) and total instrumented vertebrae (OR = 1.391, P  = 0.014). Multivariate logistic regression identified S-DADR (OR = 1.091, P  = 0.025) as an independent factor of PNDs. Patients with S-DADR ≥ 21.4 exhibited a 30% incidence of PNDs, which increased to 50% with an S-DADR of 30.0. The overall predictive performance of S-DADR (AUC = 0.720) for PNDs was deemed satisfactory. Conclusions S-DADR can be used to quantify the severity of the deformity in patients with PTK, which is an independent risk factor for PNDs during corrective surgery. Patients with S-DADR ≥ 21.4 face a 30% incidence of developing PNDs after corrective surgery.

Objective Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (TH) is a very common technique for coronal angular deformity of the knee in children, especially non‐idiopathic. However, there is currently a dearth of comparative research on the hinge eight‐plate (HEP) and traditional eight‐plate (TEP). This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and implant‐related complication rates of TH using TEP and HEP for non‐idiopathic coronal angular deformity, as well as to identify clinical factors affecting correction velocity. Methods We retrospectively observed a consecutive series of patients with non‐idiopathic coronal angular deformity of the knee who underwent TH using HEP or TEP and completed the deformity correction process from July 2016 to July 2022. According to the kind of eight plates, we divided those patients into the HEP group and the TEP treatment group. Relevant clinical factors, including the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), screw divergence angle (SDA), angle of plate and screw (APS), hinge angle of HEP (HA), and the knee zone location of the lower extremity mechanical axis, were documented. Additionally, deformity correction velocity, complications, and clinical efficacy were assessed. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐squared test, Fisher exact test, or Wilcoxon test, while continuous variables were evaluated using the t‐test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results There were 29 patients in the HEP treatment group (seven girls and 22 boys) and 33 patients (12 girls and 21 boys) in the TEP treatment group. In all, 91.86% (79/86 knees) of the genu angular deformities were completely corrected, 6.98% (6/86 knees) had the overcorrection condition, and 10.47% (9/86 knees) had screw loosening. The swayback HEP rate was 11.29% (7/62 HEPs), which was related to the screw loosening in the HEP group (p < 0.001). The overall correction velocities and screw divergence angle change speeds in the HEP group were all significantly faster than those in the TEP group (p < 0.05). The initial APS of the HEP implanted was higher than that of TEP (p < 0.01), and multisite changes of APS during deformity correction of the HEP group were smaller than that of the TEP group. Conclusion HEP proved to be an appropriate device for TH for non‐idiopathic coronal angular deformities of the knee with high correction velocity in children. Avoiding the occurrence of the swayback phenomenon may reduce the complications of HEP. Flow diagram of patient selection and exclusion. In this study, hinge eight‐plate (HEP) proved to be an appropriate device for temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for non‐idiopathic coronal angular deformities of the knee with high correction velocity in children.

Purpose To examine if coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) serves as a predictor for progression to surgical magnitude in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) treated with thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO). Methods Patients with AIS, prescribed a full-time TLSO, Cobb angle 20–40°, Risser 0–2, who wore the brace ≥ 12.9 h and reached skeletal maturity/surgery were included retrospectively. C-DAR was defined as the Cobb angle divided by the number of vertebrae in the curve, yielding a larger value in short curves. The association between C-DAR and the risk of progression to surgical magnitude (> 45°) was assessed. Secondly, we evaluated the association between pre-treatment Cobb angle and in-brace correction on the risk of progression to > 45°. Results We included 165 patients with a mean Cobb angle of 30 ± 6°. Of these, 46/165 (28%) progressed ≥ 6° and 26/165 (16%) reached surgical magnitude at the end of treatment. C-DAR was a significant predictor for risk of progression to surgical magnitude with an OR of 1.9 (CI 1.2–2.9) per unit increase in C-DAR. A threshold value of 5.15 was established and demonstrated an OR 5.9 (CI 2.1–17.9) for curve progression to a surgical magnitude. Likewise, pre-treatment Cobb angle showed a significant OR 1.3(CI 1.2–1.4) per degree increase in Cobb, whereas in-brace % correction showed OR 0.96 (CI 0.93–0.98). Conclusion C-DAR is an independent predictor for progression to a surgical magnitude in AIS patients treated with bracing. Patients with a higher C-DAR should be counseled to help set realistic expectations regarding the likelihood of curve progression despite compliance with brace wear.

Background This study was performed to evaluate the rebound phenomenon after the correction of coronal angular deformity by hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plate in children and to identify its risk factors. Methods We reviewed 50 children (mean age, 11.0 ± 2.5 years) with 94 physes who had undergone hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plate due to coronal angular deformity of the lower limb. Patients’ demographic data including sex, age at initial surgery and plate removal, affected bone (distal femur or proximal tibia), affected side, and body mass index were collected. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured from the teleradiogram, Physes were divided into rebound and non-rebound group, and rebound group was defined as the physes which had  ≥  5° of mLDFA or mMPTA returning to its original deformity. Generalized estimating equation based multivariable analysis was used to identify the risk factors for the rebound phenomenon after the deformity correction. Results A total of 41 physes classified into rebound group and 53 physes into non-rebound group. There were significant differences in the age at initial surgery ( p  = 0.004), the age at implant removal ( p  = 0.002), the amount of correction ( p  = 0.001), and the rate of correction ( p  < 0.001) between two groups. The rate of correction was significantly associated with the rebound phenomenon ( p  = 0.044). The risk of rebound phenomenon was 1.2-fold higher as the rate of correction increased by 1° per year. The cutoff values of the correction rate between the two groups were 6.9°/year ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions This study showed that the rebound group had younger age and faster correction rate than those in the non-rebound group. In addition, the correction rate for deformity was a significant risk factor for the rebound phenomenon after hemiepiphysiodesis using the tension band plate. Close monitoring after implant removal is required for children who have a rapid correction rate over 7°/year.

Background Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (TH) using an eight-Plate implant is one of the most common surgeries used for the correction of coronal angular deformities around the knee in adolescents. However, few studies have focused on children aged less than 10 years treated with TH using an eight-Plate implant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy, correction velocity, and complications of TH with an eight-Plate implant as well as the occurrence of rebound and risk factors in this population. Methods This retrospective study included a total of 135 physes (101 knees) from 66 children (mean age of 4.69 years old, range from 1 to 10 years old) who underwent TH with an eight-Plate implant to correct coronal genu angular deformities in our hospital. Related clinical factors were recorded and analysed by multivariable linear and logistic regression models. Results The mean deformity correction period was 13.26 months, and the mean follow-up after eight-Plate removal was 12.71 months. In all, 94.06% (95/101 knees) of the genu angular deformities were completely corrected. Non-idiopathic genu angular deformity was found to be an independent risk factor for deformity correction failure (odds ratio (OR) = 2.47). The femoral correction velocity was significantly higher than the tibial correction velocity (1.28° vs. 0.83° per month, p  < 0.001). After adjustment for other factors, younger children had higher correction velocities in the distal femur; however, genu valgum and idiopathic deformities were associated with higher correction velocities in the proximal tibia. In addition, we found three (3/101, 2.97%) knees with genu valgum that experienced rebound after removal of the eight-Plate, while five (5/101, 4.95%) knees with non-idiopathic genu angular deformity experienced screw loosening. No other complications were found, and non-idiopathic deformity was the only risk factor for complications (OR = 3.96). No risk factor was found for rebound in our study. Conclusions TH using an eight-Plate implant is an effective procedure for coronal genu angular deformities with a low incidence of complications and rebound in patients younger than 10 years old. For this population, TH using an eight-Plate should be considered as soon as the deformity stops responding to conservative treatments. The parents of children younger than 10 years of age with non-idiopathic deformities should be informed preoperatively that the deformity may be prone to correction failure or screw loosening after eight-Plate implantation.

Background Angular deformity in the lower extremity can result in pain, gait disturbance, cosmetic deformity and joint degeneration. Up until the introduction of guided growth, which has since become the widely accepted treatment for frontal plane angular angular deformity around the knee in skeletally immature patients, treatment consisted of staples, corrective osteotomy or an angular epiphysiodesis. Guided growth modulation uses the tension band principle with the goal of treatment being to normalise the lower limb mechanical axis resulting in lower morbidity than previous treatments. In order to assess the success of this procedure we reviewed our results in an attempt to identify patients who may not benefit from this elegant procedure. Methods We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected surgical records and diagnostic imaging in our paediatric tertiary national referral centre to identify all patients who had guided growth surgery for coronal plane angular deformity of the knee from 2007 to 2023. We noted the patient demographics, diagnosis, peri-operative experience and outcome. All patients were followed until skeletal maturity, until their hardware was removed or at least 2 years. Results Two hundred thirty-six patients were assessed for eligibility. Of the 282 treated knees which met the criteria for final assessment 55 (19.5%) were unsuccessful. Complications were few but included infection and metal-work prominence. Procedures that were less likely to be successfully included growth disturbances following trauma (18.8% failure) or infection (40%), tumour (66.6%), mucopolysaccharidoses type I (15.7%), spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (25%) or Blount’s disease (60%). Idiopathic angular deformity showed an 89.5% success rate with guided growth. Conclusion In our hands, guided growth had an 80.5% success rate when all diagnoses were considered. We continue to advocate the use of guided growth as a successful treatment option for skeletally immature patients with limb deformity however caution should be employed when considering its use in certain patient groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Ensuring precise angle measurement during surgical correction of orientation-related deformities is crucial for optimal postoperative outcomes, yet there is a lack of an ideal commercial solution. Current measurement sensors and instrumentation have limitations that make their use context-specific, demanding a methodical evaluation of the field. A systematic review was carried out in March 2023. Studies reporting technologies and validation methods for intraoperative angular measurement of anatomical structures were analyzed. A total of 32 studies were included, 17 focused on image-based technologies (6 fluoroscopy, 4 camera-based tracking, and 7 CT-based), while 15 explored non-image-based technologies (6 manual instruments and 9 inertial sensor-based instruments). Image-based technologies offer better accuracy and 3D capabilities but pose challenges like additional equipment, increased radiation exposure, time, and cost. Non-image-based technologies are cost-effective but may be influenced by the surgeon’s perception and require careful calibration. Nevertheless, the choice of the proper technology should take into consideration the influence of the expected error in the surgery, surgery type, and radiation dose limit. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable guide for surgeons seeking precise angle measurements intraoperatively. It not only explores the performance and application of existing technologies but also aids in the future development of innovative solutions.

Background Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts are critical concerns for surgeons performing spinal deformity corrective surgeries, as they indicate a heighteded risk of postoperative neurological deficits. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with large Cobb angle or elevated deformity angular ratio (DAR) are at an increased risk of IONM alerts. However, spinal curves with similar Cobb angles and DARs may exhibit significantly different risks of IONM alerts during surgery. Current methods for evaluating spinal deformity fail to comprehensively and accurately reflect its severity. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the deformity angular distance ratio (DADR) serves as an independent predictor of IONM alerts during corrective surgery for spinal deformity. Methods This study analyzed a consecutive series of 404 patients undergoing corrective surgery at a single academic center. Preoperative radiographs were used to calculate the DAR and DADR. Twelve clinically relevant candidate variables were selected for univariable analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then conducted to identify independent predictors of IONM alerts. Results The incidence of IONM alerts in this cohort was 25.2%. Univariable analysis identified several factors potentially associated with IONM alerts, including older age, type-III spinal cord morphology, location of apex, etiological diagnosis, preoperative sagittal Cobb angle, sagittal DAR, sagittal DADR, coronal DADR, total DAR, total DADR, three-column osteotomy, and preoperative neurological deficits. Multivariable analysis revealed that an apex location at C7-T4, preoperative neurological deficits, sagittal DADR, and total DADR were independent predictors of IONM alerts. Conclusions Among patients undergoing corrective surgeries for spinal deformities, the DADR is a robust measure of spinal deformity severity and is strongly correlated with the risk of IONM alerts. Compared to other deformity parameters, DADR is an independent predictor of IONM alerts. Additional independent predictors include the location of the apex and the presence of preoperative neurological deficits.

Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of distal femoral, proximal tibial, and distal tibial physeal bar resection combined with or without the Hemi-Epiphysiodesis procedure and provide a better understanding of the application of physeal bar resection combined with Hemi-Epiphysiodesis procedure in the treatment of physeal bar growth arrest. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the patients who suffered physeal bar and underwent physeal bar resection with or without the Hemi-Epiphysiodesis technique during 2010–2020. All were followed up for at least 2 years or to maturity. A modified mapping method was used to determine the area of a physeal bar by CT data. The aLDFA, aMPTA, aLDTA, MAD, and LLD were measured to assess the deformity of the lower limb. Results In total, 19 patients were included in this study. The average age was 8.9 years (range 4.4 to 13.3 years old). During the follow-up, 4 (21.1%) patients had an angular change < 5°; 12 (63.2%) patients had angular deformity improvement > 5° averaging 10.0° (range 5.3° to 23.2°), and 3 (15.8%) patients had improvement of the angular deformity averaging 16.8° (range 7.4° to 27.1°). Eleven patients (57.9%) had significant MAD improvement. After surgery, we found that 7 (36.8%) patients had an LLD change of < 5 mm and were considered unchanged. Only 2 (15%) patients had an LLD improvement > 5 mm averaging 1.0 cm (range 0.7 to 1.3 cm), and 7 (36.8%) patients had increasing of LLD > 5 mm averaging 1.3 cm (range 0.5 to 2.5 cm). There were no postoperative fractures, infections, or intraoperative complications such as neurovascular injury. Conclusion Physeal bar resection combined with Hemi-epiphysiodesis is helpful for partial epiphysis growth arrest. Without statistically verifying, we still believe that patients with limited growth ability could benefit more from physeal bar resection combined with Hemi-epiphysiodesis.

Background Temporary epiphysiodesis (tED) around the knee is a well-established treatment approach for leg length discrepancies (LLD) in skeletally immature patients. Moreover, it may be conducted bilaterally to reduce height in tall stature. However, secondary changes in the bony morphology of the tibial plateau after tED have been reported. This study thus aimed to evaluate secondary alterations in knee joint morphology following tED around the knee. Methods Radiographs of 81 skeletally immature patients aged 7-15 years were retrospectively analysed. 10/81 patients underwent bilateral tED with RigidTacks TM (RT) to reduce growth in tall stature, whereas 71/81 patients (35 with eight-Plates TM (EP), 36 with RT) received unilateral treatment for LLD. To assess changes in knee joint morphology, following radiographic parameters were evaluated: femoral floor angle (FFA), tibial roof angle (TRA), width at femoral physis (WFP), and femoral notch-intercondylar distance (FNID). Furthermore, mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint line convergence angle were measured to analyse coronal alignment. All parameters were assessed prior to implantation, prior to device removal, and at last follow-up. Results Mean treatment duration was 2.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 1.1). Statistically relevant changes were observed in WFP (p=0.025), FNID (p=0.008), and MAD (p=0.002) after tED using EP, and in FNID (p=0.043) using RT. Compared with reference values for untreated healthy children, these relevant changes remained within one SD. Mean absolute MAD change using EP was 3.9 mm (SD 7.1) compared to 1.9 mm (SD 8.8) using RT. Secondary coronal malalignment with need for revision surgery was found in 11/81 patients (4/35 with EP, 7/46 with RT). Conclusions Statistically relevant changes in bony morphology after tED were only observed in the distal femur. However, there was no evidence of intra-articular knee deformities as all measured femoral and tibial parameters remained within physiological margins and were considered clinically inconsequential. Nevertheless, there was a considerable number of patients with secondary coronal malalignment among both implant groups, necessitating further elucidation.