Explore the vast range of titles available.

Almost a third of patients with epilepsy have a treatment-resistant form, which is associated with severe morbidity and increased mortality. Cannabis-based treatments for epilepsy have generated much interest, but scientific data are scarce. We aimed to establish whether addition of cannabidiol to existing anti-epileptic regimens would be safe, tolerated, and efficacious in children and young adults with treatment-resistant epilepsy. In this open-label trial, patients (aged 1–30 years) with severe, intractable, childhood-onset, treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs before study entry, were enrolled in an expanded-access programme at 11 epilepsy centres across the USA. Patients were given oral cannabidiol at 2–5 mg/kg per day, up-titrated until intolerance or to a maximum dose of 25 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg per day (dependent on study site). The primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol and the primary efficacy endpoint was median percentage change in the mean monthly frequency of motor seizures at 12 weeks. The efficacy analysis was by modified intention to treat. Comparisons of the percentage change in frequency of motor seizures were done with a Mann-Whitney U test. Between Jan 15, 2014, and Jan 15, 2015, 214 patients were enrolled; 162 (76%) patients who had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after the first dose of cannabidiol were included in the safety and tolerability analysis, and 137 (64%) patients were included in the efficacy analysis. In the safety group, 33 (20%) patients had Dravet syndrome and 31 (19%) patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The remaining patients had intractable epilepsies of different causes and type. Adverse events were reported in 128 (79%) of the 162 patients within the safety group. Adverse events reported in more than 10% of patients were somnolence (n=41 [25%]), decreased appetite (n=31 [19%]), diarrhoea (n=31 [19%]), fatigue (n=21 [13%]), and convulsion (n=18 [11%]). Five (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Serious adverse events were reported in 48 (30%) patients, including one death—a sudden unexpected death in epilepsy regarded as unrelated to study drug. 20 (12%) patients had severe adverse events possibly related to cannabidiol use, the most common of which was status epilepticus (n=9 [6%]). The median monthly frequency of motor seizures was 30·0 (IQR 11·0–96·0) at baseline and 15·8 (5·6–57·6) over the 12 week treatment period. The median reduction in monthly motor seizures was 36·5% (IQR 0–64·7). Our findings suggest that cannabidiol might reduce seizure frequency and might have an adequate safety profile in children and young adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy. Randomised controlled trials are warranted to characterise the safety profile and true efficacy of this compound. GW Pharmaceuticals, Epilepsy Therapy Project of the Epilepsy Foundation, Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures.

Patients and clinicians share concerns that generic drug substitution might lead to loss of efficacy or emergence of adverse events. In this trial, we assessed US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioequivalence standards by studying the effects of switching between two disparate generic immediate-release lamotrigine products in patients with epilepsy. The Equivalence among Generic Antiepileptic Drugs (EQUIGEN) chronic-dose study was a randomised, double-blind, crossover study that enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with epilepsy from six epilepsy centres at academic institutions across the USA who were receiving immediate-release lamotrigine dosed at 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, or 400 mg twice daily. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two treatment sequences (sequence 1 or sequence 2), comprising four study periods of 14 days each. During each 14-day treatment period, patients received balanced doses of an oral generic lamotrigine product every 12 h (200–800 mg total, identical to lamotrigine dose prior to study enrolment); after each 14-day period, patients were crossed over to receive the other generic product. Computer-based randomisation was done using random permuted blocks of size two or four for each site to prevent sequence predictability. Both patients and study personnel were masked to the generic products selected, their predicted exposure (ie, “high” vs “low”), and their group allocation. The primary outcome of this trial was bioequivalence between the generic products, which was assessed at the end of the study through a comparison of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for each product in the analysis population (all patients who completed all four treatment periods). Bioequivalence was established if the 90% CIs of the ratios of these two parameters for the two products were within equivalence limits (80–125%) in the analysis population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov\\, number NCT01713777. Between April 25, 2013, and Aug 12, 2014, 35 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment sequence 1 (n=15) or treatment sequence 2 (n=20). 33 patients completed all four treatment periods and were included in the primary outcome analysis. The 90% CIs of the ratios of both Cmax and AUC were within equivalence limits (AUC 90% CI 98–103, Cmax 90% CI 99–105), showing that lamotrigine exposures were equivalent between the generic products. No significant changes in seizure frequency or adverse events were recorded. No deaths, study-related serious adverse events, or changes in clinical laboratory values or vital signs occurred during this study. Disparate generic lamotrigine products in patients with epilepsy showed bioequivalence with no detectable difference in clinical effects, confirming that US Food and Drug Administration bioequivalence standards are appropriate. American Epilepsy Society, Epilepsy Foundation, and US Food and Drug Administration.

Neuroimaging studies of the psychedelic state offer a unique window onto the neural basis of conscious perception and selfhood. Despite well understood pharmacological mechanisms of action, the large-scale changes in neural dynamics induced by psychedelic compounds remain poorly understood. Using source-localised, steady-state MEG recordings, we describe changes in functional connectivity following the controlled administration of LSD, psilocybin and low-dose ketamine, as well as, for comparison, the (non-psychedelic) anticonvulsant drug tiagabine. We compare both undirected and directed measures of functional connectivity between placebo and drug conditions. We observe a general decrease in directed functional connectivity for all three psychedelics, as measured by Granger causality, throughout the brain. These data support the view that the psychedelic state involves a breakdown in patterns of functional organisation or information flow in the brain. In the case of LSD, the decrease in directed functional connectivity is coupled with an increase in undirected functional connectivity, which we measure using correlation and coherence. This surprising opposite movement of directed and undirected measures is of more general interest for functional connectivity analyses, which we interpret using analytical modelling. Overall, our results uncover the neural dynamics of information flow in the psychedelic state, and highlight the importance of comparing multiple measures of functional connectivity when analysing time-resolved neuroimaging data.

Background: Lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug (AED) with a different pharmacological action that enhances sodium channel slow inactivation, is approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Previous analyses of pooled phase II/III trials have demonstrated that lacosamide provides additional efficacy when added to a broad range of AEDs. Objective: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide by grouping patients based upon the sodium channel-blocking properties of their concomitant AEDs. Study Design: Post hoc exploratory analyses were performed on pooled data in which patients were grouped based upon inclusion or non-inclusion of at least one ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking AED (defined as carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin derivatives) as part of their concomitant AED regimen. Setting: Data pooled from previously conducted phase II/III clinical trials of lacosamide. Patients: Adult patients with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization (N = 1308). Intervention: Four- to six-week Titration Phase followed by 12-week maintenance treatment with adjunctive lacosamide (Vimpat®) [200, 400 or 600 mg/day] or placebo. Main Outcome Measure: Efficacy variables included change in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responder rate) from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase. The proportion of patients experiencing a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase (75% responder rate) was also assessed. Safety parameters assessed were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuation due to TEAEs. Additional safety assessments were changes in ECG and laboratory parameters as well as vital signs (including bodyweight). Results: Of 1308 patients in the pooled phase II/III population, the majority (82%) were using at least one ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking concomitant AED. In this subgroup of patients, adjunctive lacosamide showed significant reductions in seizure frequency (p<0.01, all dosages) and significantly greater 50% and 75% responder rates (p < 0.01 for 400 mg/day; p < 0.01 [50% responder rate] and p<0.05 [75% responder rate] for 600 mg/day) compared with placebo; these effects were similar to the results seen in the pooled phase II/III population. TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs in this subgroup were dose related and similar to the pooled phase II/III population. In the remaining subgroup of patients, i.e. those not taking ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking AEDs as part of their concomitant AED regimen (n = 231; 18%), a pronounced, dose-related seizure reduction was observed with lacosamide (p<0.01, 400 and 600mg/day for median percent seizure reduction and 50% or 75% responder rates). Also in this group, incidences of TEAEs were low, and discontinuations due to TEAEs did not appear to increase with dose. Analyses of ECG, laboratory and vital signs (including bodyweight) assessments did not identify abnormalities in either subgroup that were outside of the known safety profile of lacosamide observed in the pooled phase II/III population. Conclusion: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, adjunctive lacosamide demonstrated significant seizure reduction over placebo regardless of the inclusion of ‘traditional’ sodium channel blockers in the concomitant AED regimen. Future prospective studies evaluating single AED combinations (e.g. lacosamide plus one other drug) are needed to better evaluate the potential for additive or synergistic effects of lacosamide in combination with AEDs not considered ‘traditional’ sodium channel blockers.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography is a powerful tool to probe human cortical excitability. The EEG response to TMS stimulation is altered by drugs active in the brain, with characteristic “fingerprints” obtained for drugs of known mechanisms of action. However, the extraction of specific features related to drug effects is not always straightforward as the complex TMS-EEG induced response profile is multi-dimensional. Analytical approaches can rely on a-priori assumptions within each dimension or on the implementation of cluster-based permutations which do not require preselection of specific limits but may be problematic when several experimental conditions are tested. We here propose an alternative data-driven approach based on PARAFAC tensor decomposition, which provides a parsimonious description of the main profiles underlying the multidimensional data. We validated reliability of PARAFAC on TMS-induced oscillations before extracting the features of two common anti-epileptic drugs (levetiracetam and lamotrigine) in an integrated manner. PARAFAC revealed an effect of both drugs, significantly suppressing oscillations in the alpha range in the occipital region. Further, this effect was stronger under the intake of levetiracetam. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that PARAFAC can easily disentangle the effects of subject, drug condition, frequency, time and space in TMS-induced oscillations.

A thorough QT study was conducted to assess the proarrhythmic potential of clobazam and its active metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). In this Phase I, single-site, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, healthy participants were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: clobazam 40 mg/d (maximum therapeutic dosage), clobazam 160 mg/d (supratherapeutic dosage), placebo, or moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control). Of 280 enrolled participants (n = 70 per treatment arm), 250 (92%) completed the study; 194 were included in the pharmacokinetics population (clobazam 40 mg/d, n = 66; clobazam 160 mg/d, n = 62; and moxifloxacin, n = 66). Mean changes from baseline in QT interval placebo-corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (primary end point), Bazett formula, and individual correction method (QTcF, QTcB, and QTcI, respectively) with clobazam 40 and 160 mg/d revealed no effect on QTc. No clinically relevant or treatment-related arrhythmias were observed, and there were no instances of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block. Given that clobazam is primarily demethylated to N-CLB by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP3A4, the mean plasma time–concentration profile of clobazam was unchanged with the exclusion of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. As N-CLB is metabolized by CYP2C19, the exclusion of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers resulted in slightly decreased mean plasma time–concentration profiles of N-CLB. Using a linear mixed-effects model, the effects of the clobazam and N-CLB Cmax values on the placebo-corrected changes from baseline in QTcF, QTcI, and QTcB were near zero or slightly negative, and are not considered clinically important. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was greatest in the clobazam groups (number of moderate AEs experienced by patients: PBO, 3/70; MOXI, 5/70; CLB 40 mg/d, 18/70; CLB 160 mg/d, 21/70; severe AEs: PBO, MOXI, & CLB 160 mg/d, 0; CLB 40 mg/d, 2/70); there were no serious AEs in any treatment group. A total of 10% of participants experienced benzodiazepine-withdrawal symptoms (16%, 23%, and 3% in the clobazam 40 and 160 mg/d groups and the moxifloxacin group, respectively). The findings from this thorough QT study are consistent with existing clinical data and support the lack of proarrhythmic potential with clobazam.

Background Lorazepam is one of the preferred agents used for intravenous treatment of status epilepticus (SE). We combined data from two pediatric clinical trials to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of intravenous lorazepam in infants and children aged 3 months to 17 years with active SE or a history of SE. Methods We developed a population pharmacokinetic model for lorazepam using the NONMEM software. We then assessed exploratory exposure–response relationships using the overall efficacy and safety study endpoints, and performed dosing simulations. Results A total of 145 patients contributed 439 pharmacokinetic samples. The median (range) age and dose were 5.4 years (0.3–17.8) and 0.10 mg/kg (0.02–0.18), respectively. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with allometric scaling described the data well. In addition to total body weight (WT), younger age was associated with slightly higher weight-normalized clearance (CL). The following relationships characterized the typical values for the central compartment volume ( V 1), CL, peripheral compartment volume ( V 2), and intercompartmental CL ( Q ), using individual subject WT (kg) and age (years): V 1 (L) = 0.879*WT; CL (L/h) = 0.115*(Age/4.7) 0.133 *WT 0.75 ; V 2 (L) = 0.542* V 1; Q (L/h) = 1.45*WT 0.75 . No pharmacokinetic parameters were associated with clinical outcomes. Simulations suggest uniform pediatric dosing (0.1 mg/kg, to a maximum of 4 mg) can be used to achieve concentrations of 50–100 ng/mL in children with SE, which have been previously associated with effective seizure control. Conclusions The population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam were successfully described using a sparse sampling approach and a two-compartment model in pediatric patients with active SE.

Background A pharmaceutical grade formulation of cannabidiol (CBD) has been approved for the treatment of Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; however, this formulation is not yet available to patients outside the USA. In addition, CBD is thought to have broad anti-seizure properties that may be beneficial for other types of intractable epilepsy. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of artisanal medical CBD oil in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) at the tertiary epilepsy center of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital in Rome, Italy. Methods This was a single-center, prospective, open-label study. Patients aged from 1 to 18 years with DEE and seizures refractory to appropriate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and other alternative treatments (i.e., vagal nerve stimulator and ketogenic diet) were included. Crystalline extract CBD powder (98–99% pure) in an oil artisanal formulation was added to the baseline AED regimen at a dosage of 2–5 mg/kg/day divided for twice-daily administration, then up-titrated until intolerance or a maximum dosage of 25 mg/kg/day was reached. Patients were treated for at least 6 months. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of CBD treatment were assessed through the evaluation of seizure frequency and reports of adverse effects. Results Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study (41.4% male). The mean duration of exposure to artisanal CBD was 11.2 months [range 6–25 months; standard deviation (SD) ± 4.4 months]. Mean age at study enrollment was 9.3 years (range 1.9–16.3 years; SD ± 4.7 years). Eleven out of 29 patients (37.9%) had a ≥ 50% improvement in seizure frequency; one patient became seizure free. None of the patients reported worsening seizure frequency; however, 18 patients (62.1%) experienced no beneficial effect regarding seizure frequency. Adverse effects were reported in seven patients (24.14%), most commonly somnolence, decreased appetite and diarrhea. Adverse events were mild and transient, and no dose modification of CBD or other AEDs was required. Conclusions These data suggest that CBD may have beneficial effects in patients with DEE and an acceptable safety profile. Placebo-controlled randomized trials should be conducted to formally assess the safety and efficacy of CBD in patients with DEE.

Objective The study evaluated the effectiveness of combination therapy with vigabatrin and prednisolone versus vigabatrin alone for treating infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). Methods This single‐center, single‐blind, randomized trial enrolled infants aged 2–14 months with new‐onset IESS, randomly assigned them (1:1) to receive either combination therapy with vigabatrin (100–150 mg/kg/day) and prednisolone (40–60 mg/day) or vigabatrin alone. The primary outcome was sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42. The trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) was terminated early due to an interim analysis revealing a significant difference between treatment groups. Results In all, 17 infants were assigned to combination therapy and 24 to vigabatrin alone. The median lead time to treatment for combination therapy was 30 days, compared to 60 days for the vigabatrin group (p = 0.442). Sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42 occurred in 13 (77%) of 17 infants on combination therapy and in 8 (33%) of 24 infants on vigabatrin alone (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7, 29.6, p = 0.009). Combination therapy was more effective in achieving an electroclinical response by day 14 (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.0, 54.3, p = 0.006) but not by day 42 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.5, 7.1, p = 0.351). Hospitalization occurred in six (35%) infants in the combination therapy group and two (8%) in the vigabatrin alone group (p = 0.05). One death was reported in the vigabatrin group. Interpretation Despite early termination, this study showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective in achieving clinical remission of spasms and an electroclinical response by day 14. Trial Registration NCT04302116

Epileptiform EEG discharges are not confined to people with epilepsy, and their frequency is only weakly related to severity. A fundamental principle of EEG practice is, therefore, to avoid overinterpretation of epileptiform activity. Epileptiform discharges not accompanied by obvious clinical events are generally regarded as subclinical or interictal. However, in many patients sensitive methods of observation, notably continuous psychological testing, show brief episodes of impaired cognitive function during such discharges. This phenomenon of transitory cognitive impairment (TCI) is found in about 50% of patients who show discharges during testing. TCI is not simple inattention. The effects are material and site specific: lateralised discharges are associated with deficits of functions mediated by the hemisphere in which the discharges occur. Conversely, specific tasks can activate or suppress focal discharges over the brain regions that mediate the cognitive activity in question. TCI clearly contributes to the cognitive problems of some people with epilepsy and may cause deficits that pass unrecognised. TCI is demonstrable in many cases of benign partial epilepsy of childhood, a disorder once thought to have no adverse psychological effects. TCI can contribute to abnormalities of psychological test profiles and interferes with daily tasks, such as reading and driving. In children it may be associated with behavioural disorders. An important practical issue is whether TCI materially impairs psychosocial function and, if so, whether drug treatment is desirable or effective. Uncontrolled reports and two preliminary randomized controlled trials of antiepileptic treatment of TCI have suggested that suppression of discharges is associated with significant improvement in psychosocial function.