Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study aimed to assess the potential antifibrotic impact of zinc sulfate in chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) patients receiving direct-acting antiviral therapy. This randomized controlled study included 50 chronic HCV-infected patients with fibrosis stage (F1 & F2). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1 (Control group, n = 25) received standard direct-acting antiviral therapy for 3 months, while Group 2 (Zinc group, n = 25) received 50 mg/day of zinc sulfate in addition to the standard direct-acting antiviral therapy for the same duration. Baseline and 3-month post-intervention assessments included evaluating serum levels of hyaluronic acid, transforming growth factor beta-1, and fibronectin. Furthermore, indices of liver fibrosis, such as the Fibrosis Index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4) and the Aspartate Transaminase-to-Platelet-Ratio Index (APRI), were calculated during these assessments. At baseline, the two studied groups had no statistical difference in demographic and laboratory data. After treatment, serum zinc levels significantly increased in the zinc-treated group compared to the control group. Additionally, serum fibronectin and hyaluronic acid levels were significantly reduced in group 2 (zinc group) compared to group 1 (control group). Moreover, zinc group showed lower APRI scores than the control group after a 3-month follow-up period, but there was non-significant difference in FIB-4 scores between the two groups after treatment. Furthermore, total bilirubin levels were reduced after zinc therapy for 3 months. Administering zinc sulfate could potentially serve as a safe and efficient therapeutic strategy for the management of hepatic fibrosis in individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05465434, On 19/7/2022.

What is this summary about? This plain language summary shares results from a clinical study called INTEGRIS-IPF that was published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine in 2024. This study looked at a medicine called bexotegrast (beck-so-teh-grast) as a possible treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (i-dee-uh-pa-thick pul-muh-ner-ee fie-bro-sis; IPF). Bexotegrast is an investigational medicine, which means that it is being studied and has not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for people with IPF to take as a treatment. IPF is a chronic, progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe and gets worse over time. There is no cure for IPF, treatment includes symptom management and consideration for the use of nintedanib or pirfenidone, which may decrease the pace of disease progression. The study compared bexotegrast to a placebo (a treatment that looks identical to the medicine but has no medicinal effect) to look at how well it works and how safe it is in treating people with IPF. Most people in the study also took one of two medicines that are already approved by the FDA for IPF, pirfenidone or nintedanib.

Background Research questions To compare the efficacy of nintedanib and pirfenidone in the treatment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis; and to compare the efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy (grouping nintedanib and pirfenidone together) in patients with IPF versus patients with progressive lung fibrosis not classified as IPF. Study design and methods A search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone or nintedanib in adult patients with IPF or non-IPF patients, and with extractable data on mortality or decline in forced vital capacity (FVC). Random effects meta-analyses were performed on changes in FVC and where possible on mortality in the selected studies. Results 13 trials of antifibrotic therapy were pooled in a meta-analysis (with pirfenidone and nintedanib considered together as anti-fibrotic therapy). The change in FVC was expressed as a standardised difference to allow pooling of percentage and absolute changes. The mean effect size in the IPF studies was − 0.305 (SE 0.043) ( p  < 0.001) and in the non-IPF studies the figures were − 0.307 (SE 0.063) ( p  < 0.001). There was no evidence of any difference between the two groups for standardised rate of FVC decline ( p  = 0.979). Pooling IPF and non-IPF showed a significant reduction in mortality, with mean risk ratio of 07.01 in favour of antifibrotic therapy ( p  = 0.008). A separate analysis restricted to non-IPF did not show a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio 0.908 (0.547 to 1.508), p  = 0.71. Interpretation Anti-fibrotic therapy offers protection against the rate of decline in FVC in progressive lung fibrosis, with similar efficacy shown between the two anti-fibrotic agents currently in clinical use. There was no significant difference in efficacy of antifibrotic therapy whether the underlying condition was IPF or non-IPF with progressive fibrosis, supporting the hypothesis of a common pathogenesis. The data in this analysis was insufficient to be confident about a reduction in mortality in non-IPF with anti-fibrotic therapy. Trial Registration PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021266046.

Background Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). Methods A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. Results We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. Conclusion Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account.

The therapeutic role of antifibrotic therapy has been well-established in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its efficacy and safety for interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF are not fully understood. We updated a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies on antifibrotic drug (nintedanib or pirfenidone) vs other intervention (placebo, no intervention or conventional treatment) in non-IPF ILDs. The primary outcomes were absolute change in forced vital capacity (FVC), all-cause mortality and serious adverse events (SAEs). The risk of bias was rated with the RoB2 tool and certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. 17 studies with 1908 patients were included. For the primary outcomes, pooled analyses of four trials with low risk of bias showed that antifibrotic drugs significantly ameliorated FVC decline (mean difference 86.21; 95% CI 49.38 to 123.03; I2 = 64%; TSA-adjusted CI 40.86 to 131.56). Based on five trials with low risk of bias, no difference was observed in all-cause mortality (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.43; I2 = 0%; TSA-adjusted CI 0.12 to 6.53) and SAEs (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.13; I2 = 0%; TSA-adjusted CI 0.74 to 1.28) between groups. However, based on two studies with 324 patients, benefit of antifibrotic drugs in FVC was not shown in the subgroup taking mycophenolate (mean difference 17.08; 95% CI -56.22 to 90.37), which also had higher risk of SAEs (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.70), although both were contested by TSA. Our study suggests that antifibrotic drugs are beneficial for patients with non-IPF ILDs in slowing disease progression, whereas may not correlate to all-cause mortality and SAEs. However, for patients taking mycophenolate, antifibrotic drugs may do more harm than good. More investigations are warranted to validate current findings.

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition or EMT is an extremely dynamic process involved in conversion of epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells, stimulated by an ensemble of signaling pathways, leading to change in cellular morphology, suppression of epithelial characters and acquisition of properties such as enhanced cell motility and invasiveness, reduced cell death by apoptosis, resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs etc. Significantly, EMT has been found to play a crucial role during embryonic development, tissue fibrosis and would healing, as well as during cancer metastasis. Over the years, work from various laboratories have identified a rather large number of transcription factors (TFs) including the master regulators of EMT, with the ability to regulate the EMT process directly. In this review, we put together these EMT TFs and discussed their role in the process. We have also tried to focus on their mechanism of action, their interdependency, and the large regulatory network they form. Subsequently, it has become clear that the composition and structure of the transcriptional regulatory network behind EMT probably varies based upon various physiological and pathological contexts, or even in a cell/tissue type-dependent manner.

•Nintedanib maintained lung function in early-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.•Diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide declined despite stable forced vital capacity.•Acute exacerbation and mortality rates were both 4.7%.•Adverse events led to discontinuation in 21.9% cases. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive lung disease with a poor prognosis. Nintedanib, an antifibrotic agent, has been shown in clinical trials to slow the decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) and reduce acute exacerbations (AE-IPF). Long-term studies confirm its continued effectiveness, though side effects like diarrhea may affect adherence. Despite real-world data supporting nintedanib’s benefits, no prospective study has assessed its efficacy in early-stage IPF. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nintedanib in patients with early-stage IPF to assess its effectiveness outside randomized control trials. A 1-year interim analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational study was conducted in Kyushu and Okinawa, Japan. This study included 215 patients with early-stage IPF (stage I/II per the Japanese IPF severity system) who were followed up for 52 weeks. Changes in FVC and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco); incidence of adverse events, acute exacerbations, and death; and factors associated with FVC decline and nintedanib discontinuation were evaluated. The percentage of predicted FVC (%FVC) remained stable, from 83.2% at baseline to 83.7% at 52 weeks, while %DLco decreased from 70.8% to 64.2%. Incidences of acute exacerbation and death were both 4.7%. Nintedanib was discontinued due to adverse events in 21.9% of the patients. Risk factors for FVC decline (>5%) included female sex, GAP stage II/III, low oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT), and elevated biomarkers (KL-6). Significant factors for nintedanib discontinuation were advanced age, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade I or higher, GAP stage II/III, low %FVC, low SpO2 in the 6 MWT, short 6 MWT distance, and low albumin levels. The findings of this interim analysis indicate that nintedanib has good efficacy, safety, and tolerability for early-stage IPF in real-world settings, outside randomized control trials.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a lethal, progressive, and irreversible condition that has become a significant focus of medical research due to its increasing incidence. This rising trend presents substantial challenges for patients, healthcare providers, and researchers. Despite the escalating burden of pulmonary fibrosis, the available therapeutic options remain limited. Currently, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved two drugs for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis—nintedanib and pirfenidone. However, their therapeutic effectiveness is limited, and they cannot reverse the fibrosis process. Additionally, these drugs are associated with significant side effects. Myofibroblasts play a central role in the pathophysiology of pulmonary fibrosis, significantly contributing to its progression. Consequently, strategies aimed at inhibiting myofibroblast differentiation or promoting their dedifferentiation hold promise as effective treatments. This review examines the regulation of myofibroblast dedifferentiation, exploring various signaling pathways, regulatory targets, and potential pharmaceutical interventions that could provide new directions for therapeutic development.

Aims/hypothesis Appropriate management of blood glucose levels and the prevention of complications are important in the treatment of diabetes. We have previously reported on a compound named HPH-15 that is not only antifibrotic but also AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-activating. In this study, we evaluated whether HPH-15 is useful as a therapeutic medication for diabetes. Methods We examined the effects of HPH-15 on AMPK activation, glucose uptake, fat accumulation and lactic acid production in L6-GLUT4, HepG2 and 3T3-L1 cells, as a model of muscle, liver and fat tissue, respectively. Additionally, we investigated the glucose-lowering, fat-accumulation-suppressing, antifibrotic and AMPK-activating effect of HPH-15 in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). Results HPH-15 at a concentration of 10 µmol/l increased AMPK activation, glucose uptake and membrane translocation of GLUT4 in each cell model to the same extent as metformin at 2 mmol/l. The production of lactic acid (which causes lactic acidosis) in HPH-15-treated cells was equal to or less than that observed in metformin-treated cells. In HFD-fed mice, HPH-15 lowered blood glucose from 11.1±0.3 mmol/l to 8.2±0.4 mmol/l (10 mg/kg) and 7.9±0.4 mmol/l (100 mg/kg) and improved insulin resistance. The HPH-15 (10 mg/kg) group showed the same level of AMPK activation as the metformin (300 mg/kg) group in all organs. The HPH-15-treated HFD-fed mice also showed suppression of fat accumulation and fibrosis in the liver and fat tissue; these effects were more significant than those obtained with metformin. Mice treated with high doses of HPH-15 also exhibited a 44% reduction in subcutaneous fat. Conclusions/interpretation HPH-15 activated AMPK at lower concentrations than metformin in vitro and in vivo and improved blood glucose levels and insulin resistance in vivo. In addition, HPH-15 was more effective than metformin at ameliorating fatty liver and adipocyte hypertrophy in HFD-fed mice. HPH-15 could be effective in preventing fatty liver, a common complication in diabetic individuals. Additionally, in contrast to metformin, high doses of HPH-15 reduced subcutaneous fat in HFD-fed mice. Presumably, HPH-15 has a stronger inhibitory effect on fat accumulation and fibrosis than metformin, accounting for the reduction of subcutaneous fat. Therefore, HPH-15 is potentially a glucose-lowering medication that can lower blood glucose, inhibit fat accumulation and ameliorate liver fibrosis. Graphical Abstract

Before the introduction of antifibrotic therapy, patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) were reported to have a higher mortality risk than those with sporadic disease. Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The 2023 European Respiratory Society consensus statement defined FPF and recommended antifibrotic drugs for treatment; however, their efficacy in FPF remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective multicohort study of 280 patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy (exploratory cohort, n = 141; validation cohort, n = 139). FPF was defined as fibrotic ILD in at least two first- or second-degree relatives. We examined tolerability, causes of drug discontinuation, incidence of acute exacerbation (AE), and mortality. Among all patients, 45 (16.1%) had FPF–IPF. These patients were younger and included a lower proportion of men compared with sporadic IPF. No significant differences were observed between groups in drug tolerability, discontinuation causes, AE incidence, or mortality. Multivariate analyses adjusting for gender–age–physiology index confirmed that FPF was not associated with increased mortality. In conclusion, under antifibrotic therapy, FPF–IPF and sporadic IPF demonstrated comparable tolerability, risk of AE, and mortality.