Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
173 result(s) for "Antigens, Fungal - adverse effects"
Sort by:
The efficacy and safety of intralesional Candida vaccine versus topical diphencyproprobenone in immunotherapy of verruca vulgaris: A randomized comparative study
Various therapeutic options are available for verruca. While physical destruction may be associated with scarring, immunotherapy may be effective in treating warts through stimulating body immune response. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and outcome of Candida antigen vs diphencyprone (DPCP) in the treatment of warts. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive either intralesional Candida antigen every 3 weeks or weekly DPCP application. Both treatments were applied only to the mother wart. Lesions’ clearance and associated side effects were observed up to 4 weeks after treatment. Two blinded physicians evaluated photos of warts before and 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Both modalities granted wart clearance and/or improvement with no statistically significant difference; however, Candida antigen was significantly better in clearing adjacent untreated warts ( p  = 0.046). Fewer side effects were observed among the Candida antigen group. The response was duration associated in the Candida groups only. Intralesional Candida antigen injection and DPCP treatments for warts yielded improvement with superiority of Candida injection in eradicating distant lesions and fewer side effects. A shorter wart duration may be associated with a better therapeutic response with Candida antigen.
Intralesional Candida albicans antigen versus intralesional zinc sulfate in treatment of cutaneous warts
Immunotherapy represents a promising therapeutic option for treatment of warts. Different concentrations of Candida antigen (1/100 and 1/1000) and zinc sulfate 2% were not previously compared regarding their efficacy in treatment of cutaneous warts. The present study compared the safety and efficacy of intralesional candida antigen versus intralesional 2% zinc sulfate for treatment of cutaneous warts. This prospective controlled clinical trial included one hundred and five patients presented with common, plantar, and plane warts. Patients were divided randomly into three groups, each group included 35 patients. Group 1 were treated with intralesional candida antigen (Ag) 1/100, Group 2 were treated with intralesional candida Ag 1/1000, and Group 3 were treated with intralesional zinc sulfate 2%. This study found that target warts of group 1 displayed higher rate of complete clearance compared to group 2 and group 3 (94.3%, 77.1, 74.2%), respectively. The present study concluded that intralesional immunotherapy with Candida antigen was more effective than Intralesional 2% zinc sulfate in treatment of cutaneous warts and less painful . Clinical trial registration number is (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT03158168).
Safety of immunotherapy with Alternaria alternata glutaraldehyde–polymerized allergen extract in adults and children
Background: Allergies to fungi, such as Alternaria alternata, are significant contributors to respiratory conditions like asthma and rhinitis. Immunotherapy with native A. alternata extracts often results in high rates of adverse reactions. This study evaluates the safety of immunotherapy using glutaraldehyde-polymerized A. alternata extracts in both pediatric and adult populations. Methods: This observational real-world study involved 738 patients (435 children and 303 adults) monosensitized to A. alternata or polysensitized together to other allergens. Patients received personalized immunotherapy containing polymerized A. alternata extract, either alone or in combination with other polymerized allergens. The concentration of each polymerized allergen in the therapeutic vaccine was 10,000 TU/mL. Side reactions were classified and recorded based on immediate and delayed onset, and their severity was graded according to the EAACI guidelines. Results: All side reactions were expected and related to the intrinsic properties of allergens. The number of injections administered was 7392, with 4137 to children and 3255 to adults. Thirteen relevant local reactions (0.24% in children, 0.09% in adults) and seven systemic reactions (0.09% overall) were observed. Systemic reactions included mild to moderate symptoms, such as mild bronchospasm and rhinitis. Severe reactions were not reported. Conclusion: Immunotherapy with glutaraldehyde-polymerized A. alternata, alone or in combination with other polymerized allergens, is safe and well-tolerated in both children and adults. The polymerized extracts allow for higher concentrations and faster administration schedules, providing an effective treatment option for patients with fungal allergies, including those polysensitized to multiple allergens.
Sensitisation to airborne moulds and severity of asthma: cross sectional study from European Community respiratory health survey
Abstract Objective: To assess whether the severity of asthma is associated with sensitisation to airborne moulds rather than to other seasonal or perennial allergens. Design: Multicentre epidemiological survey in 30 centres. Setting: European Community respiratory health survey. Participants: 1132 adults aged 20-44 years with current asthma and with skin prick test results. Main outcome measure: Severity of asthma according to score based on forced expiratory volume in one second, number of asthma attacks, hospital admissions for breathing problems, and use of corticosteroids in past 12 months. Results: The frequency of sensitisation to moulds (Alternaria alternata or Cladosporium herbarum, or both) increased significantly with increasing asthma severity (odds ratio 2.34 (95% confidence interval 1.56 to 3.52) for either for severe v mild asthma). This association existed in all of the study areas (gathered into regions), although there were differences in the frequency of sensitisation. There was no association between asthma severity and sensitisation to pollens or cats. Sensitisation to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was also positively associated with severity. In multivariable logistic regressions including sensitisation to moulds, pollens, D pteronyssinus, and cats simultaneously, the odds ratios for sensitisation to moulds were 1.48 (0.97 to 2.26) for moderate v mild asthma and 2.16 (1.37 to 3.35) for severe v mild asthma (P<0.001 for trend). Conclusions: Sensitisation to moulds is a powerful risk factor for severe asthma in adults. This should be taken into account in primary prevention, management, and patients' education.
Clinical Comparison of Two Mexican Coccidioidins
Coccidioidin, an extract from the saprophytic mycelial form of Coccidioides spp., has been a very useful antigen preparation both for skin and serological tests for coccidioidomycosis. Unfortunately, coccidioidin is not currently available for skin testing in the United States. Coccidioidin has been produced commercially in Mexico by a vaccine and reagents laboratory of the Mexican Federal Government. It also has been produced at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México exclusively as an antigen for research projects. The objective of the study was to compare both coccidioidins in their reactivity and safety when applied in humans. One hundred and eighty-four volunteers were tested; median age was 33 (range 14-82). When the cutoff point is set in 5 mm, 88 subjects (47.8%) had a positive test for the commercial coccidioidin and 76 (41.3%; CI₉₅% 0.50, 1.15; P = 0.20) were positive with the research antigen. Seventy-five subjects were positive for both antigens and 96 were negative for both. Fifty-nine subjects (31.3%) reported an adverse reaction after the application of the antigen; they were mostly very mild local reactions. Mexican research coccidioidin is a safe and reliable antigen that can be used for the detection of coccidioidomycosis infection in mammals.
Immunotherapy in fungal allergy
For decades airborne fungal spores have been implicated as causative factors in respiratory allergy. Exposure to high atmospheric spore counts and sensitization to specific fungal allergens have been associated with severe asthma, mainly in young adults. Although the prevalence of sensitization to commercial fungal extracts is approximately 3% in epidemiologic studies, in selected patients, particularly with asthma, the sensitization rate might increase to 30%. Of the estimated number of more than 1 million of different fungal species, approximately 80 fungi have been connected with respiratory allergy. Currently, diagnosis and specific therapy of fungal allergy is hampered by the poor quality of most of the commercially available extracts. Clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy with fungal extracts has been shown in 79 actively treated patients in four controlled trials, with only two fungal species, namely Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium herbarum. The use of recombinant fungal allergens might create new prospects in diagnosis and specific immunotherapy for fungal allergy.
TA-19, a Novel Protein Antigen of Trichosporon asahii, in Summer-type Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
Abstract The most common form of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in Japan is summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis (SHP), which is caused by the inhalation of Trichosporon asahii or Trichosporon mucoides. To seek protein antigens relevant to the immunopathogenesis of SHP, we constructed a cDNA expression library of T. asahii, a major causative yeast species of SHP. Using the immunoscreening method, we identified and cloned a novel gene encoding a 19-kD protein, named TA-19, which proved to be specifically recognized in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids and sera of patients with SHP. IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies to the recombinant TA-19 protein were significantly elevated in the sera as well as in the BAL fluids from SHP patients compared with those from non-SHP groups. This protein also induced SHP-specific proliferation of the mononuclear cells from both the peripheral blood and BAL. These results reveal that TA-19 derived from T. asahii may play a relevant role in specific cellular and humoral immune responses in patients with SHP.
Churg-Strauss syndrome triggered by hyposensitization to Alternaria fungus
Churg-Strauss syndrome is a systemic vasculitis of unknown ethiology. Exposure to putative triggers have been described. We report a case of Churg-Strauss syndrome developing after specific immunotherapy with Alternaria fungus.
Toxic and other non-IgE-mediated effects of fungal exposures
There are more than 100000 recognized species of fungi, comprising 25% of the biomass of the earth. Allergic, IgE-induced, manifestations of airborne fungi are common, whereas non-IgE manifestations are rare. Recently, much focus has been placed on the non-IgE-mediated effects of various molds, including hypersensitivity pneumonitis, infectious disease, and mycotoxicoses. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a clinical syndrome associated with systemic and interstitial lung disease that occurs in susceptible individuals following fungal inhalation. Most fungi are not pathogenic to man; however, certain fungi are capable of infecting immunocompetent individuals. Although mycotoxins and exposure to mycotoxins (\"toxic mold syndrome\") are implicated in causing numerous, nonspecific, systemic symptoms, currently, there is no scientific evidence to support the allegation that human health is affected by inhaled mycotoxins. However, if mold is discovered in a home, school, or office setting, the source should be investigated and appropriate remediation undertaken to minimize structural damage and potential allergic sensitization.