Explore the vast range of titles available.

Warfarin can prevent recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, but the intensity of anticoagulation is an unsettled matter. In this randomized trial, patients with the syndrome were assigned to moderate- or high-intensity warfarin. The high-intensity regimen was no more effective than the moderate-intensity regimen. Moderate- versus high-intensity warfarin in the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Antiphospholipid antibodies, which include anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, are associated with both arterial and venous thrombosis. 1 After a first episode of thrombosis, patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis than do patients without antiphospholipid antibodies. 1 Retrospective studies suggest that patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis while receiving moderate-intensity warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR], 2.0 to 3.0) and that this risk is lower with a higher intensity of anticoagulant therapy (target INR, 3.1 to 4.5). 2 – 4 However, these results must be interpreted with caution, because the studies were retrospective case . . .

ObjectivesSevere thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) frequently affects the kidney, heart, and central nervous system. The precise frequency, clinical picture, differential diagnoses, and outcome of APS-related hematological involvement are lacking, especially in patients requiring ICU admission. This study aimed to describe the hematological manifestations associated with critically ill thrombotic APS patients and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.MethodsThis French, national, multicenter, retrospective study, conducted, from January 2000 to September 2018, included all APS patients admitted to 24 participating centers’ ICUs with any new thrombotic manifestation. The prevalence of hematological manifestations and their associated outcomes were studied.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-four patients, female 72%, median [IQR] age 45 [34–56] years, with 152 episodes were included. Anemia was present in 95% of episodes and thrombocytopenia in 93%. The lowest values for hemoglobin and platelets were 7.1 [6.3–8.8] g/dL and 38 [21–60] g/L, respectively. The lowest platelet count below 20 g/L was significantly associated with a higher in-ICU mortality rate (50%, p < 0.0001). A thrombotic microangiopathy syndrome (TMA) syndrome was seen in 16 patients (12%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (p = 0.05). Median ADAMTS-13 levels were 44% [27–74]. Anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies were tested in 11 patients and found negative in all. A suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was raised in 66 patients but only four patients were classified as definite HIT. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was seen in 51% of patients.ConclusionThrombocytopenia is very frequent in severe APS patients and may be related to TMA, HIT, or DIC. Deciphering the mechanisms of thrombocytopenia is decisive in CAPS patients.Key Points• Thrombocytopenia is the hallmark laboratory finding in CAPS.• A complete thrombotic microangiopathy pattern is infrequent in CAPS patients.• Alternate diagnoses of CAPS, especially heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, need to be adequately investigated.

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia characterized by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and the presence of characteristic antibodies. Current therapy for patients having APS with a history of thrombosis necessitates anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, a challenging drug to manage. Apixaban, approved for the treatment and prevention of venous thrombosis with a low rate of bleeding observed, has never been studied among patients with APS. Aims and Methods: We report study rationale and design of Apixaban for the Secondary Prevention of Thrombosis Among Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome (ASTRO-APS), a prospective randomized open-label blinded event pilot study that will randomize patients with a clinical diagnosis of APS receiving therapeutic anticoagulation to either adjusted-dose warfarin or apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day. We aim to report our ability to identify, recruit, randomize, and retain patients with APS randomized to apixaban compared with warfarin. We will report clinically important outcomes of thrombosis and bleeding. All clinical outcomes will be adjudicated by a panel blinded to the treatment arm. A unique aspect of this study is the enrollment of patients with an established clinical diagnosis of APS. Also unique is our use of electronic medical record interrogation techniques to identify patients who would likely meet our inclusion criteria and use of an electronic portal for follow-up visit data capture. Conclusion: ASTRO-APS will be the largest prospective study to date comparing a direct oral anticoagulant with warfarin among patients with APS for the secondary prevention of thrombosis. Our inclusion criteria assure that outcomes obtained will be clinically applicable to the routine management of patients with APS receiving indefinite anticoagulation.

Introduction The current mainstay of the treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include rivaroxaban, have been shown to be effective and safe compared with warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in major phase III prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but the results may not be directly generalizable to patients with APS. Aims The primary aim is to demonstrate, in patients with APS and previous VTE, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), that the intensity of anticoagulation achieved with rivaroxaban is not inferior to that of warfarin. Secondary aims are to compare rates of recurrent thrombosis, bleeding and the quality of life in patients on rivaroxaban with those on warfarin. Methods Rivaroxaban in antiphospholipid syndrome (RAPS) is a phase II/III prospective non-inferiority RCT in which eligible patients with APS, with or without SLE, who are on warfarin, target international normalized ratio (INR) 2.5 for previous VTE, will be randomized either to continue warfarin (standard of care) or to switch to rivaroxaban. Intensity of anticoagulation will be assessed using thrombin generation (TG) testing, with the primary outcome the percentage change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) from randomization to day 42. Other TG parameters, markers of in vivo coagulation activation, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin antithrombin complex and D-dimer, will also be assessed. Discussion If RAPS demonstrates i) that the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban is not inferior to that of warfarin and ii) the absence of any adverse effects that cause concern with regard to the use of rivaroxaban, this would provide sufficient supporting evidence to make rivaroxaban a standard of care for the treatment of APS patients with previous VTE, requiring a target INR of 2.5.

The objective was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in adults. Based on evidence from a systematic literature review and expert opinion, overarching principles and recommendations were formulated and voted. High-risk antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile is associated with greater risk for thrombotic and obstetric APS. Risk modification includes screening for and management of cardiovascular and venous thrombosis risk factors, patient education about treatment adherence, and lifestyle counselling. Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for asymptomatic aPL carriers, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without prior thrombotic or obstetric APS, and non-pregnant women with a history of obstetric APS only, all with high-risk aPL profiles. Patients with APS and first unprovoked venous thrombosis should receive long-term treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) with a target international normalised ratio (INR) of 2–3. In patients with APS with first arterial thrombosis, treatment with VKA with INR 2–3 or INR 3–4 is recommended, considering the individual’s bleeding/thrombosis risk. Rivaroxaban should not be used in patients with APS with triple aPL positivity. For patients with recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis despite adequate treatment, addition of LDA, increase of INR target to 3–4 or switch to low molecular weight heparin may be considered. In women with prior obstetric APS, combination treatment with LDA and prophylactic dosage heparin during pregnancy is recommended. In patients with recurrent pregnancy complications, increase of heparin to therapeutic dose, addition of hydroxychloroquine or addition of low-dose prednisolone in the first trimester may be considered. These recommendations aim to guide treatment in adults with APS. High-quality evidence is limited, indicating a need for more research.

BackgroundReports of severe COVID-19 being associated with thrombosis, antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA), and antiphospholipid syndrome have yielded disparate conclusions. Studies comparing patients with COVID-19 with contemporaneous controls of similar severity are lacking.Methods22 COVID-19+ and 20 COVID-19– patients with respiratory failure admitted to intensive care were studied longitudinally. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the day of admission. APLA testing included anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2glycoprotien 1 (β2GP1), antidomain 1 β2GP1 and antiphosphatidyl serine/prothrombin complex. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) were detected by immunofluorescence and antibodies to cytokines by a commercially available multiplexed array. Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables with α=0.05 and the false discovery rate at q=0.05.ResultsAPLAs were predominantly IgG aCL (48%), followed by IgM (21%) in all patients, with a tendency towards higher frequency among the COVID-19+. aCL was not associated with surrogate markers of thrombosis but IgG aCL was strongly associated with worse disease severity and higher ANA titres regardless of COVID-19 status. An association between aCL and anticytokine autoantibodies tended to be higher among the COVID-19+.ConclusionsPositive APLA serology was associated with more severe disease regardless of COVID-19 status.Trial registration number NCT04747782

IntroductionSystemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome (SLE-APS) represents a challenging SLE endotype whose molecular basis remains unknown.MethodsWe analysed whole-blood RNA-sequencing data from 299 patients with SLE (108 SLE-antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-positive, including 67 SLE-APS; 191 SLE-aPL-negative) and 72 matched healthy controls (HC). Pathway enrichment analysis, unsupervised weighted gene coexpression network analysis and machine learning were applied to distinguish disease endotypes.ResultsPatients with SLE-APS demonstrated upregulated type I and II interferon (IFN) pathways compared with HC. Using a 100-gene random forests model, we achieved a cross-validated accuracy of 75.6% in distinguishing these two states. Additionally, the comparison between SLE-APS and SLE-aPL-negative revealed 227 differentially expressed genes, indicating downregulation of IFN-α and IFN-γ signatures, coupled with dysregulation of the complement cascade, B-cell activation and neutrophil degranulation. Unsupervised analysis of SLE transcriptome identified 21 gene modules, with SLE-APS strongly linked to upregulation of the ‘neutrophilic/myeloid’ module. Within SLE-APS, venous thromboses positively correlated with ‘neutrophilic/myeloid’ and ‘B cell’ modules, while arterial thromboses were associated with dysregulation of ‘DNA damage response (DDR)’ and ‘metabolism’ modules. Anticardiolipin and anti-β2GPI positivity—irrespective of APS status—were associated with the ‘neutrophilic/myeloid’ and ‘protein-binding’ module, respectively.ConclusionsThere is a hierarchical upregulation and—likely—dependence on IFN in SLE with the highest IFN signature observed in SLE-aPL-negative patients. Venous thrombotic events are associated with neutrophils and B cells while arterial events with DDR and impaired metabolism. This may account for their differential requirements for anticoagulation and provide rationale for the potential use of mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and the direct fIIa inhibitor dabigatran in SLE-APS.

Background Over the last few years, accumulating data have implicated a role for ferritin as a signaling molecule and direct mediator of the immune system. Hyperferritinemia is associated with a multitude of clinical conditions and with worse prognosis in critically ill patients. Discussion There are four uncommon medical conditions characterized by high levels of ferritin, namely the macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), adult onset Still’s disease (AOSD), catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (cAPS) and septic shock, that share a similar clinical and laboratory features, and also respond to similar treatments, suggesting a common pathogenic mechanism. Ferritin is known to be a pro-inflammatory mediator inducing expression of pro-inflammatory molecules, yet it has opposing actions as a pro-inflammatory and as an immunosuppressant. We propose that the exceptionally high ferritin levels observed in these uncommon clinical conditions are not just the product of the inflammation but rather may contribute to the development of a cytokine storm. Summary Here we review and compare four clinical conditions and the role of ferritin as an immunomodulator. We would like to propose including these four conditions under a common syndrome entity termed “Hyperferritinemic Syndrome”.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was suggested to play a role in lowering antiphospholipid antibody titers and preventing thrombotic recurrences in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, but few data are available in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS). In this retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study, we evaluated the impact of HCQ on aPL titers and the incidence of thrombotic events in 57 exposed patients compared to 57 not exposed patients. These were matched for sex/type of disease onset/follow-up duration, age at the beginning of the follow-up ±10 years and initial date of the follow-up ±5 years. At baseline, no significant differences in demographical, clinical and serological features were observed between the two groups except for positive anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (21 % in HCQ exposed vs 0 % in HCQ not exposed, P  = 0.001). Both the levels of IgG anti-cardiolipin and IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) were significantly reduced at end of follow-up compared to the baseline in HCQ-exposed patients, while there were no differences in the other group. Moreover, anti-β2GPI IgG titers were significantly decreased when the end of follow-up was compared between the two groups ( P  < 0.002). Among patients with a history of thrombosis, the annual incidence of recurrence was 1.16 % in HCQ exposed and 1.71 % in not exposed patients, with a significant reduction in the incidence of arterial events (0 vs 1.14 %). This study shows a strong reduction in aPL titers together with an apparent decrease in the incidence of arterial thrombosis recurrence in PAPS patients treated with HCQ.

In 2023, international rheumatology societies issued new classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The criteria require scoring antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) titers as moderate or high using the traditional thresholds of 40U or 80U determined by \"standardized\" ELISA. With current popularity of non-standardized aPL assays (non-ELISA), we aimed to broaden the application of the criteria by estimating equivalent thresholds for them. Four types of aPLs (aCL/aβ2GPI-IgG/IgM) were measured using six reagents in 50 APS and 50 non-APS patients. By regression analysis of measurements between standardized ELISA and non-ELISA assays, thresholds equivalent to 10, 20, 40 and 80U were estimated for each assay. Data points below the detection limit of each assay were excluded from the regression. The diagnostic thresholds were also evaluated using \"specificity-based\" method described by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). This approach allegedly estimates diagnostic thresholds that attain predefined specificities of 0.975 and 0.995 in distinguishing APS from non-APS cases, respectively corresponding to moderate and high titers. The between-assay concordance of diagnostic classification using the estimated thresholds was calculated as kappa coefficient (κ). Using major-axis regression, thresholds equivalent to the traditional units (10 - 80U) were estimated for non-ELISA assays, which led to harmonized semi-quantitative classification with high κ values. Conversely, the specificity-based method yielded thresholds that dissociated from the traditional ones, particularly for IgG-isotype assays, resulting in lower κ values than regression-based method (P = 0.0039 - 0.0098). The regression-based conversion of diagnostic thresholds is practical in harmonizing diagnostic classification across major aPL assays. The specificity-based method may need adjusted predefined-specificities to estimate thresholds that are equivalent to the traditional thresholds.