Explore the vast range of titles available.

Farrah Fawcett's best friend shares her personal diaries from the three years she was at her friend's side as she bravely battled cancer, which took Fawcett's life on June 25, 2009.

Like cervical cancer, anal cancer is often caused by a human papillomavirus and has a premalignant stage called high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or anal intraepithelial neoplasia. A randomized trial showed that treating HSIL led to a 57% reduction in progression to anal cancer as compared with active surveillance.

Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) serotypes 16 and 18 in men who have sex with men is a cause of considerable morbidity associated with anal intraepithelial neoplasia. This study shows that the HPV vaccine decreases the risk of HPV-associated anal disease. Anal cancer is biologically similar to cervical cancer, including having a causal relationship with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. 1 Although HPV type 6 (HPV-6) or HPV type 11 (HPV-11) alone is rarely causal, the proportion of anal cancers associated with infection with HPV type 16 (HPV-16) or HPV type 18 (HPV-18) is as high as or higher than the proportion of cervical cancers. 1 Just as cervical cancer is preceded by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (grade ≥2), anal cancer is preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or 3). 2 – 4 Although not yet formally demonstrated, prevention or treatment of high-grade anal . . .

V-Y flap for reconstruction after perianal resection of CISPerianal CIS should be resected if the lesion is large, invasion cannot be ruled out or if it extends into the anal canal. Split thickness skin grafts do not take well around the anus and strictures may occur.The V-Y advancement flap is ideal as it can be advanced 2–3 cm with an excellent blood supply.This video will show the technique of resection of a large perianal CIS extending into the anal canal, preservation of the anal sphincter and reconstruction with V-Y flap.

Localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is treated with radical chemoradiotherapy. Cure rates are high, but treatment can result in substantial acute and long-term morbidity. We aimed to assess whether lower dose chemoradiotherapy maintains high local control rates in patients with early-stage disease, with the secondary aim of reducing toxicity. ACT4 is a phase 2, prospective, multicentre, open-label, two-arm non-comparative, randomised, controlled trial, investigating reduced-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (rd-IMRT: 41·4 Gy in 23 fractions) in patients with early-stage anal cancer; T1–2 (≤4 cm) N0–NxM0. Eligible patients were at least 16 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. The primary outcome is 3-year loco-regional failure rates. Patients were randomly assigned 1:2 (with stratification by T stage, N stage, gender, HIV status, and randomising site) to standard-dose IMRT (sd-IMRT: 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions) or rd-IMRT with concurrent mitomycin and capecitabine chemotherapy. Here, we report the pre-planned, modified intention-to-treat analysis of secondary endpoints 6 months after treatment end—complete clinical response, compliance, patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ANL27), and safety data. The trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN88455282) and is ongoing but no longer recruiting. 163 patients were recruited from 28 UK tertiary centres between April 24, 2017, and Dec 1, 2020. 160 patients were included in the primary analysis (sd-IMRT n=55; dr-IMRT n=105). Data on ethnicity were not collected. The median patient age was 66 years (IQR 58–72 years); 117 (73%) were female and 43 (27%) male; and 129 (94%) of 138 evaluable samples were p16 positive. Complete clinical responses at 6 months were 87% (46 of 53) for sd-IMRT and 92% (89 of 97) for rd-IMRT. Radiotherapy interruptions of 3 days or more occurred in 14 (26%) of 55 patients in sd-IMRT and 16 (15%) of 105 patients in rd-IMRT. Chemotherapy modifications occurred in 27 (49%) of 55 patients in sd-IMRT and 39 (37%) of 105 patients in rd-IMRT. Grade 3 or worse acute toxicity was reported in 25 (46%) of 55 patients in sd-IMRT and 37 (35%) of 105 patients in rd-IMRT. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were radiation dermatitis (seven [13%] of 55 in sd-IMRT and ten [10%] of 105 in rd-IMRT), and diarrhoea (four [7%] of 55 in sd-IMRT and nine [9%] of 105 in rd-IMRT). Serious adverse events occurred in eight (15%) of 55 patients in sd-IMRT and ten (10%) of 105 patients in rd-IMRT. Patient-reported outcomes for most issues deteriorated at the end of treatment and resolved to baseline by 6 weeks in both groups. Poorer sexual function for men and women was observed at 6 months following sd-IMRT. Good 6-month complete clinical responses rates were seen in both groups. Early results suggest rd-IMRT is well tolerated with oncological outcomes maintained. 3-year locoregional failure rates are awaited. Cancer Research UK and Stand Up to Cancer.

Chemoradiation became the standard of care for anal cancer after the ACT I trial. However, only two-thirds of patients achieved local control, with 5-year survival of 50%; therefore, better treatments are needed. We investigated whether replacing mitomycin with cisplatin in chemoradiation improves response, and whether maintenance chemotherapy after chemoradiation improves survival. In this 2×2 factorial trial, we enrolled patients with histologically confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups, to receive either mitomycin (12 mg/m2 on day 1) or cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); with or without two courses of maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin at weeks 11 and 14). The random allocation was generated by computer and patients assigned by telephone. Randomisation was done by minimisation and stratified by tumour site, T and N stage, sex, age, and renal function. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to assignment. Primary endpoints were complete response at 26 weeks and acute toxic effects (for chemoradiation), and progression-free survival (for maintenance). The primary analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, number 26715889. We enrolled 940 patients: 472 were assigned to mitomycin, of whom 246 were assigned to no maintenance, 226 to maintenance; 468 were assigned to cisplatin, of whom 246 were assigned to no maintenance, 222 to maintenance. Median follow-up was 5·1 years (IQR 3·9–6·9). 391 of 432 (90·5%) patients in the mitomycin group versus 386 of 431 (89·6%) in the cisplatin group had a complete response at 26 weeks (difference −0·9%, 95% CI −4·9 to 3·1; p=0·64). Overall, toxic effects were similar in each group (334/472 [71%] for mitomycin vs 337/468 [72%] for cisplatin). The most common grade 3–4 toxic effects were skin (228/472 [48%] vs 222/468 [47%]), pain (122/472 [26%] vs 135/468 [29%]), haematological (124/472 [26%] vs 73/468 [16%]), and gastrointestinal (75/472 [16%] vs 85/468 [18%]). 3-year progression-free survival was 74% (95% CI 69–77; maintenance) versus 73% (95% CI 68–77; no maintenance; hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·75–1·21; p=0·70). The results of our trial—the largest in anal cancer to date—show that fluorouracil and mitomycin with 50·4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 daily fractions should remain standard practice in the UK. Cancer Research UK.

Anal cancer is an increasing issue in HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). Screening for its precursor, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), is subject of discussion. Current treatment options are suboptimum and have not been compared in a prospective trial. We compared efficacy and side-effects of imiquimod, topical fluorouracil, and electrocautery for the treatment of AIN. In this open-label randomised trial, we included HIV-positive MSM older than 18 years visiting the HIV outpatient clinic of the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Patients with histologically confirmed AIN were randomly assigned to receive either 16 weeks of imiquimod (three times a week), 16 weeks of topical fluorouracil (twice a week), or monthly electrocautery for 4 months. Randomisation was done with random block sizes of three and six, stratified for AIN grade (AIN grades 1, 2, or 3) and AIN location (peri-anal or intra-anal). Participants were assessed by high-resolution anoscopy 4 weeks after treatment. Responding patients returned for follow-up 24 weeks, 48 weeks, and 72 weeks after treatment. The primary endpoint was histological resolution of AIN measured 4 weeks after treatment and AIN recurrence at week 24, week 48, and week 72 after treatment. The primary analysis was done in a modified intention-to-treat population, including all patients who had received their assigned treatment at least once. The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1236. Between Aug 12, 2008, and Dec 1, 2010, we screened 388 HIV-positive MSM for AIN by high resolution anoscopy. Of the 246 (63%) patients who had AIN, 156 (63%) were randomly assigned to either receive imiquimod (54 patients), topical fluorouracil (48 patients), or electrocautery (46 patients) following withdrawing of consent by eight patients. Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed a complete response in 13 (24%, 95% CI 15–37) patients in the imiquimod group, eight (17%, 8–30) of patients in the fluorouracil group, and 18 (39%, 26–54) of patients in the electrocautery group (p=0·027). At week 24, 11 (22%) of 50 responders had recurrence; at week 48, 22 (46%) of 48 had recurred; and at week 72, 30 (67%) of 45 had recurred. Recurrence was observed at 72 weeks in 10 (71%) of 14 patients treated with imiquimod, seven (58%) of 12 patients treated with fluorouracil, and 13 (68%) of 19 patients treated with electrocautery. Grade 3–4 side-effects were noted in 23 (43%) of 53 patients in the imiquimod group, 13 (27%) of 48 patients in the fluorouracil group, and eight (18%) patients in the electrocautery group (p=0·019). The most common side-effects were pain, bleeding, and itching. Seven serious adverse events occurred, all not related to the study. Electrocautery is better than imiquimod and fluorouracil in the treatment of AIN, but recurrence rates are substantial. Anna Maurits de Cock foundation provided funding for the video colposcope.

Retifanlimab has activity in programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC) that has progressed on platinum chemotherapy. We aimed to prospectively assess the benefit of adding retifanlimab to initial carboplatin–paclitaxel for this disease. This global, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 70 centres in 12 countries across the EU, Australia, Japan, the UK, and the USA. Patients aged ≥18 years with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic SCAC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, no previous systemic therapy, and well controlled HIV (ie, CD4+ count >200/μL and undetectable viral load) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to retifanlimab (500 mg intravenous) or placebo every 4 weeks with standard carboplatin–paclitaxel for up to 1 year. Patients in the placebo group could cross over to retifanlimab monotherapy on confirmed disease progression. The primary endpoint was independently assessed progression-free survival (ie, time from date of randomisation to date of first documented progressive disease or death due to any cause) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Efficacy was assessed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04472429) and EUDRA-CT (2020–000826–24) and is active but closed to enrolment. Between Nov 12, 2020, and July 3, 2023, 376 patients were assessed for eligibility and 308 were randomly assigned to retifanlimab plus carboplatin–paclitaxel (n=154) or placebo plus carboplatin–paclitaxel (n=154). 222 (72%) of 308 patients were female and 86 (28%) were male. Median progression-free survival was 9·3 months (95% CI 7·5–11·3) in the retifanlimab group and 7·4 months (7·1–7·7) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·47–0·84]; one-sided p=0·0006). Serious and grade 3 or worse adverse events were more frequent in the retifanlimab plus carboplatin–paclitaxel group compared with the placebo plus carboplatin–paclitaxel group (47·4% vs 38·8% and 83·1% vs 75·0%, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (35·1% for retifanlimab plus carboplatin–paclitaxel vs 29·6% for placebo plus carboplatin–paclitaxel) and anaemia (19·5% vs 20·4%). Four fatal adverse events occurred in the retifanlimab plus carboplatin–paclitaxel group, only one (pancytopenia) of which was treatment related. One fatal adverse event occurred in the placebo plus carboplatin–paclitaxel group and was not treatment related. Retifanlimab provides clinical benefit, with a manageable safety profile, when added to first-line chemotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. These results suggest retifanlimab with carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered as the new standard of care for patients with advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma. Incyte.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is a rare malignancy associated with infection by human papillomavirus (HPV). No consensus treatment approach exists for the treatment of metastatic disease. Because intratumoral HPV oncoproteins upregulate immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-1 to evade immune-mediated cytotoxicity, we did a trial of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab for patients with metastatic SCCA. We did this single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial at ten academic centres in the USA. We enrolled patients with treatment-refractory metastatic SCCA, who were given nivolumab every 2 weeks (3 mg/kg). The primary endpoint was response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, in the intention-to-treat population. At the time of data cutoff, the study was ongoing, with patients continuing to receive treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314169. We screened 39 patients, of whom 37 were enrolled and received at least one dose of nivolumab. Among the 37 patients, nine (24% [95% CI 15–33]) had responses. There were two complete responses and seven partial responses. Grade 3 adverse events were anaemia (n=2), fatigue (n=1), rash (n=1), and hypothyroidism (n=1). No serious adverse events were reported. To our knowledge, this is the first completed phase 2 trial of immunotherapy for SCCA. Nivolumab is well tolerated and effective as a monotherapy for patients with metastatic SCCA. Immune checkpoint blockade appears to be a promising approach for patients with this orphan disease. National Cancer Institute/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, the HPV and Anal Cancer Foundation, the E B Anal Cancer Fund, The University of Texas MD Anderson Moon Shots Program, and an anonymous philanthropic donor.