Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Although an association between elevated blood pressure and risk of aortic aneurysm is established, few studies have investigated the association with aortic aneurysm subtypes. We investigated the association between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and hypertension status with the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank. Methods The analysis included 495,542 men and women aged 37–73 years at recruitment between 2006 and 2010. Aortic aneurysm cases were identified by linkage to hospitalization and mortality records. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between blood pressure and hypertension and risk of aortic aneurysm overall and for subtypes. Results During a mean follow-up of 12.3 years, 3,346 incident aortic aneurysm cases were identified. Hypertension vs. no hypertension was associated with increased risk (HR, 95% CI) of aortic aneurysm (1.17, 1.08–1.27), and for thoracic (1.23, 1.04–1.46), abdominal (1.16, 1.04–1.30), and non-ruptured (1.18, 1.08–1.28) aortic aneurysm, and suggestively with unspecified site aortic aneurysm (1.18, 0.96–1.46) and aortic aneurysm mortality (1.26, 0.87–1.82), but not ruptured aortic aneurysm (1.02, 0.67–1.58). Systolic blood pressure was not associated with risk of aortic aneurysm overall or for any subtype. Diastolic blood pressure was positively associated with aortic aneurysm (1.74, 1.26–2.41, p trend <0.0001) for ≥ 110 vs. <80 mmHg, abdominal aortic aneurysm (1.95, 1.28–2.96, p trend <0.0001), unspecified site aortic aneurysm (2.02, 0.94–4.33, p trend =0.005), non-ruptured aortic aneurysm (1.79, 1.29–2.47), and aortic aneurysm mortality (2.32, 0.56–9.58, p trend <0.0001), and with ruptured aortic aneurysm (2.48, 1.22–5.03, p trend <0.0001 for 100–109 vs. <80 mmHg), while the association with thoracic aortic aneurysm was less clear (1.30, 0.64–2.63). These associations were strengthened and positive associations emerged for systolic blood pressure and abdominal and non-ruptured aortic aneurysm in sensitivity analyses when excluding participants with prevalent ischemic heart disease, stroke, those using hypertension medications and the first 3 years of follow-up. Conclusion We found that hypertension status and higher diastolic blood pressure were associated with increased risk of aortic aneurysm overall and most aortic aneurysm subtypes. No association was observed for systolic blood pressure. Although further studies are needed on aortic aneurysm subtypes, these findings provide strong support that controlling blood pressure is important for reducing the risk of aortic aneurysm.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is often followed by aneurysm recurrence. Alginate oligosaccharide (AOS) has potential antitumor properties as a natural product while the related mechanisms remain unclear. Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling is associated with inflammatory activity of aneurysm and may be affected by miR-29b. Thus, inhibitory function of AOS on aneurysms was explored by measuring the important molecules in TLR4 signaling. After EVAR, a total of 248 aortic aneurysm patients were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups: AOS group (AG, oral administration 10-mg AOS daily) and control group (CG, placebo daily). The size of residual aneurysms, aneurysm recurrence, and side effects were investigated. Aneurysm recurrence was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. After 2 years, eight and two patients died in the CG and AG, respectively. The sizes of residual aneurysms were significantly larger in the CG than in the AG ( <0.05). The incidence of aneurysm recurrence was also significantly higher in the CG than in the AG ( <0.05). AOS treatment reduced the levels of miR-29b, TLR4, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B), interleukin 1 (IL-1) beta, and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Overexpression and silence of miR-29b increased and reduced the level of TLR4, phospho-p65 NF-kappa B, phospho-p38 MAPK, IL-1 beta, and IL-6. Spearman's rank correlation analysis shows that the level of miR-29b is positively related to the levels of TLR4, NF-kappa B, IL-1 beta, and IL-6 ( <0.05). Thus, AOS represses aneurysm recurrence by indirectly affecting TLR signaling via miR-29b.

An intimal tear is responsible for the development of aortic dissection (AD). Plaque rupture is thought to progress to a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). However, the influences of mechanical stress and atherosclerosis on the intimal tear of AD and plaque rupture of PAU have not been fully understood. We enrolled 27 patients with AD [67.6 ± 11.2 years, female/male (F/M) 12/15] and 10 patients with PAU (71.0 ± 8.64 years, F/M 2/8) who underwent aortic reconstructive surgery in our hospital between 2007 and 2011. We analyzed the clinical data and morphological features of these patients and discuss the role of mechanical stress in the initial event. On clinical examination, hypertension was frequently observed in the patients of both the AD (77.8 %) and PAU groups (90.0 %), while hypercholesterolemia was significantly more prevalent in the PAU group (90.0 %) than in the AD (22.2 %) group. Most lesions of AD (96.3 %) were found in the ascending aorta up to the aortic arch, while those of PAU (90.0 %) were found in the descending and abdominal aortas. On pathological examination, the entrance tear was found in 21 (77.8 %) of the 27 patients with AD, and histologically comprised nonatherosclerotic intima and media. In contrast, the entrance tear was considered as plaque ulcer in 8 (80.0 %) of the 10 patients with PAU. The patients with PAU showed a significantly higher prevalence of soft plaque, complicated lesions, and medial fibrosis than those with AD, whereas patients with AD showed no complicated lesions and had a significantly higher prevalence of cystic medial necrosis than those with PAU. The present study suggests that less atherosclerosis and impairment of media could proceed to intimal tear formation in AD and that the disruption of the fibrous cap could cause the plaque ulcer of PAU.

Background The prevalence of acute aortic dissection (AAD) has been gradually increasing in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the circadian variations of AAD onset in a northwest Chinese population and provide scientific insights for AAD prevention. Methods The clinical data of 1,145 AAD patients admitted to our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected, and the periodic features of AAD were analyzed. Results Stanford type A and type B AAD were present in 58.43% (669 cases) and 41.57% (476 cases) of the patients, respectively. The incidence rate was highest in the winter (358 cases, 31.27%) and lowest in the summer (225 cases, 19.65%). AAD occurred at the highest rate between 19:00–24:00 (321 cases, 28.03%) and the lowest rate between 1:00–6:00 (247 cases, 21.57%). Stanford type A AAD was most prevalent in the winter and the least prevalent in the spring, whereas Stanford type B AAD was most prevalent in the winter and the least prevalent in the summer. The difference between type A and type B in seasonal distribution was significant in spring (χ 2  = 17.666, P  < 0.001) and summer (χ 2  = 6.228, P  = 0.013). Stanford type A cases appeared most during 19:00–24:00 (236 cases, 35.28%) and least during 13:00–18:00 (73 cases, 10.91%), while Stanford type B cases appeared most during 13:00–18:00 (239 cases, 50.21%) and least during 1:00–6:00 (60 cases, 12.61%). The difference between type A and type B in period distribution was significant in all periods of time. Conclusions AAD onset followed a chronobiological pattern in patients from northwest China, with winter and 19:00–24:00 being the peak season and time period of AAD occurrence, respectively.

BackgroundThe specific relationship between different blood pressure measures and the risk of aortic aneurysms (AA) remains unclear. Elucidating these associations would be conducive to identifying high-risk individuals and developing more effective screening strategies, potentially reducing AA incidence. This study aimed to investigate the association between various blood pressure measures or subtypes of hypertension and the risk of AA.MethodsUsing data from the UK biobank study, we performed multivariable Cox regression analysis to estimate HRs for baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP) with risk of AA. The associations of isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic and combined systolic-diastolic hypertension for AA were also assessed.ResultsOur analysis included 397 019 participants without antihypertensive medication at baseline (mean age, 55.4 (SD 8.1) years; 56.6% female). We identified 1782 cases of AA during a median follow-up period of 12 years. The association between SBP and AA was weak (per-SD HR=1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.08). The association between DBP and AA (per-SD HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.33) was significant when DBP reached 80 mm Hg and higher. Lower PP was linearly associated with increasing AA risk (per-SD HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83). These patterns were consistent when comparing abdominal AA with overall cases. Compared with the normal group, the HRs of isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic hypertension and combined hypertension on AA were 1.01 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.13), 1.67 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.18) and 1.35 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.52), respectively.ConclusionsElevated DBP and reduced PP, but not SBP, were independently associated with a higher risk of incident AA, highlighting their potential to refine clinical risk stratification.

The spatial distributions of both wall stress and wall strength are required to accurately evaluate the rupture potential for an individual abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study was to develop a statistical model to non-invasively estimate the distribution of AAA wall strength. Seven parameters--namely age, gender, family history of AAA, smoking status, AAA size, local diameter, and local intraluminal thrombus (ILT) thickness--were either directly measured or recorded from the patients hospital chart. Wall strength values corresponding to these predictor variables were calculated from the tensile testing of surgically procured AAA wall specimens. Backwards-stepwise regression techniques were used to identify and eliminate insignificant predictors for wall strength. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to derive a final statistical model for AAA wall strength, from which 95% confidence intervals on the model parameters were formed. The final statistical model for AAA wall strength consisted of the following variables: sex, family history, ILT thickness, and normalized transverse diameter. Demonstrative application of the model revealed a unique, complex wall strength distribution, with strength values ranging from 56 N/cm2 to 133 N/cm2. A four-parameter statistical model for the noninvasive estimation of patient-specific AAA wall strength distribution has been successfully developed. The currently developed model represents a first attempt towards the noninvasive assessment of AAA wall strength. Coupling this model with our stress analysis technique may provide a more accurate means to estimate patient-specific rupture potential of AAA.

Background. The associations of diabetes and obesity with the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are inconclusive in previous studies. Subjects/Methods. We conducted prospective analysis in the Physicians’ Health Study. Among 25,554 male physicians aged ≥ 50 years who reported no AAA at baseline, 471 reported a newly diagnosed AAA during a mean of 10.4 years’ follow-up. Results. Compared with men who had baseline body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2, the multivariable hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]) of newly diagnosed AAA was 1.30 [1.06–1.59] for BMI 25–<30 kg/m2 and 1.69 [1.24–2.30] for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. The risk of diagnosed AAA was significantly higher by 6% with each unit increase in baseline BMI. This association was consistent regardless of the other known AAA risk factors and preexisting vascular diseases. Overall, baseline history of diabetes tended to be associated with a lower risk of diagnosed AAA (HR = 0.79 [0.57–1.11]); this association appeared to vary by follow-up time (HR = 1.56 and 0.63 during ≤ and >2 years’ follow-up, resp.). Conclusion. In a large cohort of middle-aged and older men, obesity was associated with a higher risk, while history of diabetes tended to associate with a lower risk of diagnosed AAA, particularly over longer follow-up.

Screening patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is associated with reduced AAA-related mortality, but population screening is poorly implemented. Opportunistic screening during imaging for other indications might be efficient. Single-center series reported AAA rates of 0.8% to 6.5% in patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), with disparities due to selection bias. In this first multicenter study, we aimed to assess the feasibility and criteria for screening AAA during TTE in real-life practice. During a week of May 2011, 79 centers participated in a nationwide survey. All patients aged ≥65 years requiring TTE for any indication were eligible, except for those with operated abdominal aorta. We defined AAA by an anteroposterior diameter of the infrarenal aorta ≥30 mm. Of 1,382 consecutive patients, abdominal aorta imaging was feasible in 96.7%, with a median delay of 1.7 minutes (>3 minutes in 3.6% of cases). We found AAA in 50 patients (3.7%). Unknown AAA (2.7%) was more frequent in men than women (3.7% vs 1.3%, respectively, p = 0.007) and increased by age at 2.2%, 2.5%, and 5.8% in age bands of 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ years, respectively. None of the female participants aged <75 years had AAA. Smoking status and family history of AAA were significantly more frequent among patients with AAA. The ascending aorta was larger in those with AAA (36.2 ± 4.7 vs 34.0 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.006), and bicuspid aortic valve and/or major aortic regurgitation were also more frequent (8% vs 2.6%, p = 0.017). In conclusion, rapid AAA screening during TTE is feasible and should be limited to men ≥65 years and women ≥75 years. •This is the first multicenter study assessing the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients undergoing echocardiography and the feasibility of its screening right after cardiac imaging.•The imaging quality was satisfactory in 96.7%. The abdominal aorta imaging was performed in <3 minutes in 96.4% of cases.•Among patients ≥65 years undergoing echocardiography, the prevalence of AAA was found to be 3.7%, with higher rates in men (5.4%) than women (1.4%).•The screening for AAA at the end of echocardiography is highly feasible and should be advocated, especially in men.

Aortic dilatation and aortic dissection are increasingly recognised in patients with Turner syndrome (TS). Risk factors for aortic dissection include aortic dilatation, bicuspid aortic valves, coarctation of aorta and pregnancy. The risk of death due to aortic dissection in pregnancy in TS is 2%, which is approximately 100 times higher than the general population, as maternal mortality is extremely low. Ongoing cardiovascular monitoring is recommended, although there remain several unanswered questions in relation to cardiovascular imaging especially the choice of modality for detection of vascular, valvular abnormalities and measurements of aortic dimensions. Due to the relative short stature of patients with TS, aortic dimensions need to be defined by aortic measurements adjusted for body surface area, known as aortic sized index (ASI). The relationship of ASI and other risk factors with aortic dissection is only beginning to be clarified. Clinical management and monitoring of such patients should be delivered by a group of clinicians familiar with the issues unique to TS patients in a multidisciplinary fashion. All clinicians including the non-specialists need to have a low threshold of suspecting aortic dissection in these adolescents and young adults. This up to date review, including a summary of all 122 published cases of TS patients with aortic dissection, aims to provide a summary of recent publications on characteristics of aortic dissection and aortic dilatation in TS to highlight gaps in knowledge and propose possible clinical monitoring pathway of cardiovascular health in children and adults with TS. Cardiovascular assessment and risk counselling is especially crucial during the period of transition of adolescents with TS, although life long monitoring by expert cognizant to the issues specific in TS is essential.

IntroductionDiabetes mellitus is a well-defined risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD), but protects against the development and growth of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Diabetes mellitus is associated with arterial stiffening and peripheral arterial media sclerosis. Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are increased in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. AGEs are known to form cross-links between proteins and are associated with arterial stiffness. Whether AGEs contribute to the protective effects of diabetes mellitus in AAA is unknown. Therefore, the ARTERY (Advanced glycation end-pRoducts in patients with peripheral arTery disEase and abdominal aoRtic aneurYsm) study is designed to evaluate the role of AGEs in the diverging effects of diabetes mellitus on AAA and PAD.Methods and analysisThis cross-sectional multicentre study will compare the amount, type and location of AGEs in the arterial wall in a total of 120 patients with AAA or PAD with and without diabetes mellitus (n=30 per subgroup). Also, local and systemic vascular parameters, including pulse wave velocity, will be measured to evaluate the association between arterial stiffness and AGEs. Finally, AGEs will be measured in serum, urine, and assessed in skin with skin autofluorescence using the AGE Reader.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by the Medical Ethics committees of University Medical Center Groningen, Martini Hospital and Medisch Spectrum Twente, the Netherlands. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific events.Trial registration numbertrialregister.nl NTR 5363.