Explore the vast range of titles available.

Appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency abdominal surgery. The appendix can also be the site of a variety of neoplasms and unusual inflammatory conditions. A retrospective review was performed to determine the pathological diagnoses in appendicectomy specimens. This study is a retrospective analysis of 2660 appendicectomies performed from 1997 to 2003. The reports were analyzed for the following parameters: age-related incidence of acute appendicitis, seasonal variation in presentation, perforation rate, rate of negative and incidental appendicectomy, and the incidence of other pathologies encountered. Of the 2660 appendicectomy specimens, acute appendicitis was seen in 1718 patients (64.58%), with a peak in patients in their second decade (35.09% of cases of acute appendicitis). The perforation rate was 13.9% and was significantly higher in patients aged 70 years or more (P < 0.001). The negative appendicectomy rate was 28.8%, and was significantly higher in female patients (P < 0.001) and in the 11-30 year age group (P < 0.001). Other pathologies include carcinoid (0.52%), adenocarcinoma (0.39%), and mucinous cystadenoma (0.60%). The high rate of negative appendicectomy among female patients and the increased incidence of perforation in elderly patients reinforce the validity of the judicious use of laparoscopy in these populations. There are still a number of unusual histologies found in appendicectomy specimens supporting the continued use of routine histology.

In a randomized trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in patients with appendicitis, antibiotics were noninferior on the basis of EQ-5D scores. In the antibiotics group, nearly 3 in 10 participants had undergone appendectomy by 90 days, and complications were more common, especially in those with an appendicolith.

Background Save for the contribution of Charles McBurney, who described his eponymous point and the appendicectomy incision, the history of appendicectomy is largely unknown among the medical profession. This review traces the history from the first anatomical depiction of the appendix to the development of open appendicectomy and the recent minimally invasive and non-operative methods. Methods Historical articles, monographs and books containing anatomical descriptions of the vermiform appendix and reports of appendicitis and its surgical treatment were retrieved after searching the PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases from their inception to 31 March 2022. Results The first inadvertent appendicectomy was performed during an operation for a groin hernia by Cookesley in 1731, and Mestivier was the first to drain a right iliac fossa abscess, due to appendicitis, in 1757. Krönlein performed the first appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in 1884 but his patient died. The first successful appendicectomy for acute appendicitis leading to patient survival was by Morton in 1887. In 1976, Wirschafter and Kaufman performed an inadvertent colonoscopic appendicectomy and, in 1980, Semm carried out the first laparoscopic appendicectomy. The first appendicectomy via a natural orifice (transgastric) appendicectomy was by Rao and Reddy in 2004. Conclusion This historical review charts the development of surgical knowledge concerning the management of appendicitis, from the first anatomical drawings of the appendix and descriptions of appendicitis to the development of surgical and conservative treatments up to the present day. It also corrects some inaccuracies of attribution in previous historical reviews.

Purpose Protrusion of the appendix within an inguinal hernia is termed an Amyand’s hernia. A systematic review of case reports and case series of Amyand’s hernia was performed, with emphasis on surgical decision-making. Methods The English literature (2000–2019) was reviewed, using PubMed and Embase, combining the terms “hernia”, “inguinal”, “appendix”, “appendicitis” and “Amyand”. Overall, 231 studies were included, describing 442 patients. Results Mean age of patients was 34 ± 32 years (adults 57.5%, children 42.5%). 91% were males, while a left-sided Amyand’s hernia was observed in 9.5%. Of 156 elective hernia repairs, 38.5% underwent appendectomy and 61.5% simple reduction of the appendix. 88% of the adult patients had a mesh repair, without complications. Of 281 acute cases, hernial complications (76%) and acute appendicitis (12%) were the most common preoperative surgical indications. Appendectomy was performed in 79%, more extensive operations in 8% and simple reduction in 13% of cases. A mesh was used in 19% of adult patients following any type of resection and in 81% following reduction of the appendix. Among acute cases, mortality was 1.8% and morbidity 9.2%. Surgical site infections were observed in 3.6%, all of which in patients without mesh implantation. Conclusion In elective Amyand’s hernia cases, appendectomy may be considered in certain patients, provided faecal spillage is avoided, to prevent mesh infection. In cases of appendicitis, prosthetic mesh may be used, if the surgical field is relatively clean, whereas endogenous tissue repairs are preferred in cases of heavy contamination.

Background Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common indication for laparoscopy to diagnose and treat appendicitis. When a macroscopically normal appendix is found, there is no standard consensus regarding excision. Some surgeons remove the appendix due to the risk of microscopic inflammation and to avoid a future, repeat laparoscopy for possible appendicitis. Alternatively, others leave the appendix in situ to avoid morbidity from a potentially unnecessary procedure. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with macroscopically normal appendices left in situ. Methods All emergency laparoscopies without appendicectomy between January 1st 2010- December 31st 2020 were identified from theatre records. All operative notes were individually evaluated and comments on the macroscopic appearance of the appendix and any intra-operative pathology were recorded. Only patients undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis with macroscopically normal appendices were included. Results A total of 120 patients [median age 21.68 (range 9–90.8) years] were included. The cohort was predominantly female ( n =105, 87.5%). Forty-eight patients (40.0%) had a positive finding during index laparoscopy. During a median duration of 94.5 (range 8–131) months’ follow-up, 16 patients (13.33%) underwent a repeat laparoscopy for recurrent RIF pain. Thirteen (10.8% of total cohort) subsequently underwent an appendicectomy. Histology confirmed acute appendicitis in six cases (4.17% of entire cohort). On subanalysis of smaller cohort, index laparoscopies with no positive findings ( n =72), nine patients (12.5%) underwent appendicectomy with two (2.7%) appendices demonstrating appendicitis on histological examination. Conclusion 87% of the total cohort with a normal appendix at laparoscopy for RIF pain did not undergo further laparoscopy. Less than 5% of the total cohort and 2.7% of subanalysis cohort had an appendicectomy for histologically-proven appendicitis within the follow-up period. From the evidence in this study, we conclude that leaving the appendix in situ unless macroscopically inflamed is a viable alternative to excision.

BackgroundRight hemicolectomy (RHC) for nodal staging is recommended for nonmucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix (NMACA), but it is unclear whether a subgroup of patients at low risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis exists who may be managed with a less extensive resection.Patients and MethodsPatients with NMACA without distant metastases who underwent margin negative resection via either RHC or appendectomy/partial colectomy (A/PC) were evaluated from the National Cancer Database (2004–2016). Patients at low risk for LN metastasis were identified. Multivariable survival analysis was performed, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated.ResultsOf the 2487 patients included, 652 [26.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.5–28.0%] had LN metastases. T4 T stage [odds ratio (OR) 4.2, p = 0.032], poorly/undifferentiated histology (OR 2.2, p = 0.004), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR 4.4, p < 0.001) were associated with LN positivity. One hundred and thirteen patients (4.5%) had tumors at low risk for LN metastasis (T1 T stage, well/moderately differentiated tumors without LVI), and the rate of LN metastasis for this group was 1.8% (95% CI 0.5–6.2%). Conversely, the LN metastasis rate among the 2374 non-low-risk patients was 27.4% (95% CI 25.6–29.2%). Performance of A/PC instead of RHC was associated with a survival disadvantage among all patients (hazards ratio 1.5, p = 0.049), but among the low-risk cohort, 5-year OS did not differ based on resection type (88.3% A/PC versus 92.7% RHC, p = 0.305).ConclusionsAlthough relatively uncommon, early, pathologically favorable NMACA is associated with a very low risk of LN metastasis. These select patients may be managed with a less extensive resection without compromising oncologic outcomes.

BackgroundAppendiceal orifice lesions are often managed operatively with limited or oncologic resections. The aim is to report the management of appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms using advanced endoscopic interventions.MethodsPatients with appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms who underwent advanced endoscopic resections between 2011 and 2021 with either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), hybrid ESD, or combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) were included from a prospectively collected dataset. Patient and lesion details and procedure outcomes are reported.ResultsOut of 1005 lesions resected with advanced endoscopic techniques, 41 patients (4%) underwent appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasm resection, including 39% by hybrid ESD, 34% by ESD, 15% by EMR, and 12% by CELS. The median age was 65, and 54% were male. The median lesion size was 20 mm. The dissection was completed piecemeal in 49% of patients. Post-procedure, one patient had a complication within 30 days and was admitted with post-polypectomy abdominal pain treated with observation for 2 days with no intervention. Pathology revealed 49% sessile-serrated lesions, 24% tubular adenomas, and 15% tubulovillous adenomas. Patients were followed up for a median of 8 (0–48) months. One patient with a sessile-serrated lesion experienced a recurrence after EMR which was re-resected with EMR.ConclusionAdvanced endoscopic interventions for appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms can be performed with a low rate of complications and early recurrence. While conventionally lesions at the appendiceal orifice are often treated with surgical resection, advanced endoscopic interventions are an alternative approach with promising results which allow for cecal preservation.

We investigate the number of autopsy reports that did or did not document the presence or absence of the gallbladder or appendix or document abdominal scars in patients following cholecystectomy or appendectomy. We also report gallbladder and appendix pathology at autopsy. Autopsy reports from patients 18 years or older autopsied at a community teaching hospital between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018 were reviewed. Nonabdominal autopsies were excluded. Histopathologic examination of the gallbladder and appendix was only performed if gross pathology was seen. Of the 385 autopsies studied, 48 (12.5%) had cholecystectomies, of which 6 (12.5%) did not document abdominal scars. Sixty-two (16.1%) had appendectomies, of which 12 (19.4%) did not document abdominal scars. The presence or absence of the gallbladder and appendix was not documented in 6 (1.6%) and 16 (4.2%) of reports, respectively. Pathology was seen in 87 (25.8%) gallbladders and 4 (1.2%) appendixes. Absence of the gallbladder or appendix is a relatively common autopsy finding. Auditing autopsy reports for documentation of their presence or absence, along with associated abdominal scars, are potential quality assurance indicators of autopsy reports. Documentation of these elements could be improved by changing the autopsy template or using synoptic reporting.

Background Histologically normal appendices resected for right iliac fossa pain in children demonstrate immunohistochemical markers of inflammation. We aimed to establish if subclinical inflammation was present in histologically normal appendices resected from adults with right iliac fossa pain. Methods Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded appendices for tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-2R and serotonin in four groups: Group I ( n  = 120): uncomplicated appendicitis, Group II ( n  = 118): complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene), Group III ( n  = 104): histologically normal appendices resected for right iliac fossa pain and Group IV ( n  = 106) appendices resected at elective colectomy. Expression was quantified using the H-scoring system. Results Median, interquartile range expression of TNF-α was increased in Groups I (5.9, 3.1–9.8), II (6.8, 3.6–12.1) and III (9.8, 6.2–15.2) when compared with Group IV (3.0, 1.4–4.7, p  < 0.01). Epithelial expression of IL-6 in Groups II (44.0, 8.0–97.0) and III (71.0, 18.5–130.0) was increased when compared with Group IV (9.5, 1.0–60.2, p  < 0.01). Expression of mucosal IL-2R in Groups I (47.4, 34.8–69.0), II (37.8, 25.4–60.4) and III (18.4, 10.1–34.7) was increased when compared with Group IV (2.8, 1.2–5.7, p  < 0.01). Serotonin content in Groups I (3.0, 0–30.0) and II (0, 0–8.5) was decreased when compared with Groups III (49.7, 16.7–107.5) and IV (43.5, 9.5–115.8, p  < 0.01). Conclusion Histologically normal appendices resected from symptomatic patients exhibited increased proinflammatory cytokine expression on immunohistochemistry suggesting the presence of an inflammatory process not detected on conventional microscopy.