Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background In all societies, the burden and cost of allergic and chronic respiratory diseases are increasing rapidly. Most economies are struggling to deliver modern health care effectively. There is a need to support the transformation of the health care system into integrated care with organizational health literacy. Main body As an example for chronic disease care, MASK (Mobile Airways Sentinel NetworK), a new project of the ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) initiative, and POLLAR (Impact of Air POLLution on Asthma and Rhinitis, EIT Health), in collaboration with professional and patient organizations in the field of allergy and airway diseases, are proposing real-life ICPs centred around the patient with rhinitis, and using mHealth to monitor environmental exposure. Three aspects of care pathways are being developed: (i) Patient participation, health literacy and self-care through technology-assisted “patient activation”, (ii) Implementation of care pathways by pharmacists and (iii) Next-generation guidelines assessing the recommendations of GRADE guidelines in rhinitis and asthma using real-world evidence (RWE) obtained through mobile technology. The EU and global political agendas are of great importance in supporting the digital transformation of health and care, and MASK has been recognized by DG Santé as a Good Practice in the field of digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care. Conclusion In 20 years, ARIA has considerably evolved from the first multimorbidity guideline in respiratory diseases to the digital transformation of health and care with a strong political involvement.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects over 6 million people over the age of 65. The advent of new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies as treatment for early Alzheimer’s disease these immunotherapeutics may slow disease progression but also pose significant risks. Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) identified on MRI following administration of these new monoclonal antibodies can cause both brain edema (ARIA-E) and hemorrhage (ARIA-H). While most ARIA is asymptomatic, some patients can develop headache, confusion, nausea, dizziness, seizures and in rare cases death. By analyzing lecanemab, aducanumab, gantenerumab, donanemab, and bapineuzumab clinical trials; risk factors for developing ARIA can be identified to mitigate some of the ARIA risk. Risk factors for developing ARIA-E are a positive Apoε4 carrier status and prior multiple cerebral microhemorrhages. Risk factors for ARIA-H are age, antithrombotic use, and history of prior strokes. With lecanemab, ARIA-E and ARIA-H were seen at lower rates 12 and 17%, respectively, compared to aducanumab (ARIA-E 35% and ARIA-H 19%) in treated patients. ARIA risk factors have impacted inclusion and exclusion criteria, determining who can receive lecanemab. In some clinics, almost 90% of Alzheimer’s patients are excluded from receiving these new anti-amyloid therapeutics. This review aims to discuss risk factors of ARIA and highlight important areas for further research. With more anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies approved by the Food and Drug Administration, considering patient risk factors for developing ARIA is important to identify to minimize patient’s risk while receiving these new therapies.

Introduction Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities–edema (ARIA‐E) is associated with anti‐amyloid beta monoclonal antibody treatment. ARIA‐E severity may be assessed using the Barkhof Grand Total Scale (BGTS) or the 3‐ or 5‐point Severity Scales of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3/SSAE‐5). We assessed inter‐ and intra‐reader correlations between SSAE‐3/5 and BGTS. Methods Magnetic resonance imaging scans were collected from 75 participants in the SCarlet RoAD and Marguerite RoAD studies. Three neuroradiologists reviewed scans at baseline and at follow‐up. Concordance in dichotomized ARIA‐E ratings was assessed for a range of BGTS thresholds. Results SSAE‐3/5 scores correlated with BGTS scores, with high inter‐reader intraclass correlation coefficients across all scales. There was high agreement in dichotomized ratings for SSAE‐3 > 1 versus BGTS > 3 for all readers (accuracy 0.85–0.93) and between pairs of readers. Discussion SSAE‐3/5 showed high degrees of correlation with BGTS, potentially allowing seamless transition from the BGTS to SSAE‐3/5 for ARIA‐E management.

Since the 2021 FDA approval of the first monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD), treatment has progressed from symptom management to targeting and reducing amyloid β plaque burden. While these therapies offer hope of altering the disease course, they come with risks, such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), which include ARIA-E (edema and effusion) and ARIA-H (hemorrhage). This report details the case of a 64-year-old woman undergoing donanemab treatment who developed severe ARIA, characterized by extensive vasogenic edema and multiple microhemorrhages. The increasing use of MABs necessitates heightened awareness and expertise among emergency radiologists to identify findings of ARIA effectively, ensuring timely and appropriate care for patients undergoing these novel therapies.

Introduction Amyloid related imaging abnormalities effusion/edema (ARIA‐E) is seen in patients treated with antiamyloid antibodies. It resembles cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) related inflammation (CAA‐ri) caused by an inflammatory response to amyloid deposition in the walls of cortical and leptomeningeal vessels in patients with sporadic CAA. Recently, temporary inflammatory imaging findings that remained clinically silent have been described in patients with iatrogenic CAA (iCAA). Results We describe a case of probable iatrogenic CAA (iCAA), which demonstrated radiological features of CAA‐ri that remained clinically silent and spontaneously resolved before the inaugural intracranial hemorrhage. Clinical and radiological features resembled ARIA‐E. Discussion This case adds to the clinical and radiological spectrum of iCAA and suggests an immune‐mediated response to amyloid deposition.

INTRODUCTION Increased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume is a common but non‐specific finding in AD. This study investigates the effect of baseline WMH volume and APOE ε4 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐visible hemorrhagic lesion emergence. METHODS We included A4 participants with 0/1 hemorrhagic lesion at baseline and >1 post‐baseline MRI. We examined age, sex, amyloid, WMH, APOEε4, and cardiovascular risk as predictors of whether people would accrue ≥2 hemorrhagic lesions by their last MRI. RESULTS Among 1097 individuals with 0/1 baseline lesion, 120 had at least two hemorrhagic lesions on their last MRI. Elevated baseline WMH (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3, p = 0.002) and APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 (OR = 4.8, p < 0.001) independently predicted membership to this group. Both hetero‐ and homozygous APOE ɛ4 carriers with low WMH volume had a low risk of accumulating hemorrhagic lesions. DISCUSSION These results support the independent consideration of WMH and APOE ɛ4 in the natural history of hemorrhagic lesion accumulation and suggest that individuals with low WMH volume have a low short‐term risk, irrespective of APOE genotype. Trial Registration: NCT02008357 Highlights Elevated baseline white matter lesion volume is related to the risk of ARIA‐H emergence. The effects of white matter lesion volume and APOE ɛ4 on ARIA‐H are independent. APOE ɛ4 carriers with low white matter lesion volume had a low risk of ARIA‐H emergence.

Aducanumab is a monoclonal antibody selective for amyloid β (Aβ) aggregates. In June 2021, aducanumab became the first drug underlying the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the accelerated approval pathway. The decision was based on the ability of aducanumab to remove Aβ plaques, without any evidence that the Aβ clearance is correlated with less cognitive or functional decline. This decision has generated a considerable debate in the scientific community, especially because the results from the two Phase 3 trials, EMERGE and ENGAGE, were divergent and, even after the post hoc analysis, the data were insufficient to prove aducanumab efficacy. Moreover, some researchers think that this approval will be an obstacle to the progress and also demonstrated concerns about aducanumab cost and its safety profile. The European Medicines Agency's rejection of aducanumab in December 2021 just brought more controversy over FDA's decision. Now, Biogen is designing the FDA's required confirmatory study, named ENVISION, which should be complete in 2026. Despite the controversy, the aducanumab showed to affect downstream tau pathology, which could open doors for a combination therapy approach for AD (anti-tau and anti-amyloid drug). This review summarizes the clinical development of aducanumab until regulatory agencies' decisions, the available trials data and the controversy over aducanumab approval for AD.

Amyloid-ß (Aß) is best known as the misfolded peptide that is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and it is currently the primary therapeutic target in attempts to arrest the course of this disease. This notoriety has overshadowed evidence that Aß serves several important physiological functions. Aß is present throughout the lifespan, it has been found in all vertebrates examined thus far, and its molecular sequence shows a high degree of conservation. These features are typical of a factor that contributes significantly to biological fitness, and this suggestion has been supported by evidence of functions that are beneficial for the brain. The putative roles of Aß include protecting the body from infections, repairing leaks in the blood-brain barrier, promoting recovery from injury, and regulating synaptic function. Evidence for these beneficial roles comes from and studies, which have shown that the cellular production of Aß rapidly increases in response to a physiological challenge and often diminishes upon recovery. These roles are further supported by the adverse outcomes of clinical trials that have attempted to deplete Aß in order to treat AD. We suggest that anti-Aß therapies will produce fewer adverse effects if the known triggers of Aß deposition (e.g., pathogens, hypertension, and diabetes) are addressed first.

Background Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major health problem of aging, with tremendous burden on healthcare systems, patients, and families globally. Lecanemab, an FDA-approved amyloid beta (Aβ)-directed antibody indicated for the treatment of early AD, binds with high affinity to soluble Aβ protofibrils, which have been shown to be more toxic to neurons than monomers or insoluble fibrils. Lecanemab has been shown to be well tolerated in multiple clinical trials, although risks include an increased rate of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and infusion reactions relative to placebo. Methods Clarity AD was an 18-month treatment (Core study), multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with open-label extension (OLE) in participants with early AD. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 across 2 treatment groups (placebo and lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly). Safety evaluations included monitoring of vital signs, physical examinations, adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and 12-lead electrocardiograms. ARIA occurrence was monitored throughout the study by magnetic resonance imaging, read both locally and centrally. Results Overall, 1795 participants from Core and 1612 participants with at least one dose of lecanemab (Core + OLE) were included. Lecanemab was generally well-tolerated in Clarity AD, with no deaths related to lecanemab in the Core study. There were 9 deaths during the OLE, with 4 deemed possibly related to study treatment. Of the 24 deaths in Core + OLE, 3 were due to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH): 1 placebo in the Core due to ICH, and 2 lecanemab in OLE with concurrent ICH (1 on tissue plasminogen activator and 1 on anticoagulant therapy). In the Core + OLE, the most common adverse events in the lecanemab group (> 10%) were infusion-related reactions (24.5%), ARIA with hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H) microhemorrhages (16.0%), COVID-19 (14.7%), ARIA with edema (ARIA-E; 13.6%), and headache (10.3%). ARIA-E and ARIA-H were largely radiographically mild-to-moderate. ARIA-E generally occurred within 3–6 months of treatment, was more common in ApoE e4 carriers (16.8%) and most common in ApoE ε4 homozygous participants (34.5%). Conclusions Lecanemab was generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events being infusion-related reactions, ARIA-H, ARIA-E. Clinicians, participants, and caregivers should understand the incidence, monitoring, and management of these events for optimal patient care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: Clarity AD NCT03887455)