Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
215
result(s) for
"Aristotle. Commentaries."
Sort by:
David the Invincible, Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics
2011,2010
This edition of David the Invincible's Commentary on the Prior Analytics, surviving only in an old Armenian translation from Greek, includes a revised critical text and the first English translation of the work, textual parallels with other commentaries, trilingual glossaries and other material useful to specialists.
Die Prinzipienlehre der Milesier
2014
Begleitend zu den Editionsbänden der Reihe Traditio Praesocratica, in der Texte frühgriechischer Naturphilosophen in kritischer Ausgabe mit Übersetzung erscheinen, werden in der Reihe Studia Praesocratica Kommentare, Monographien und Sammelbände zur frühgriechischen Philosophie und ihrer Doxographie veröffentlicht.
Die Prinzipienlehre der Milesier
This study analyzes the reception of the theories of the \"first principle\" of Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes (7th-6th century BC) among Aristotle and his commentators of the 2nd through 14th centuries AD. It includes a detailed discussion of 120 texts documenting this fascinating and, for the modern image of the Milesians, fundamental Wirkungsgeschichte of the earliest philosophical ideas of Europe.
ON ARISTOTLE'S PERI HERMENEIAS 16A1–18: THE CASE OF AN ANONYMOUS ARMENIAN COMMENTARY
2021
The anonymous Armenian commentary was transmitted together with the Armenian translation of Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias (sixth century or earlier). It was composed in the Hellenizing style and commonly associated with the figure of David the Invincible, a philosopher of the Neoplatonic School of Alexandria. This article presents a general structural analysis of the commentary followed by a comparative study and translation of its first chapter. It argues that the commentary was indeed written in the tradition of late antique Greek commentaries but was probably not associated with late Neoplatonism. The Armenian commentary shares many common features with Ammonius’ commentary, but also departs from it on many crucial aspects. From a philosophical standpoint, it has much more in common with Boethius’ and Alexander of Aphrodisias’ commentaries than with those of the Neoplatonic School of Alexandria, thus suggesting an early writing date.
Journal Article
Adam of Bockenfield, Glossae super de vegetabilibus et plantis : a critical edition with introduction
by
Long, R. James (Raymond James)
,
Adam, of Buckfield, ca.ca. 1294
in
Adam, of Buckfield, ca. 1220-ca. 1294. Glossae super de vegetabilibus et plantis
,
Adam,-of Buckfield,-approximately 1220-approximately 1294.-Glossae super de vegetabilibus et plantis
,
Aristotle -- Commentaries
2013,2012
R. James Long furnishes a critical edition of Adam of Bockenfield's widely influential commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian treatise on plants, which constituted the set text in university curricula at Oxford as well as Paris by mid-13th century.
Aristotle Poetics : editio maior of the Greek text with historical introductions and philological commentaries
by
Tarán, Leonardo
,
Gutas, Dimitri
,
Aristotle
in
Aristotle
,
Aristotle. Poetics -- Commentaries
,
Commentaries
2012
This important new editio maior of Aristotle's Poetics is based on all the primary sources and is accompanied by a details critical apparatus. The introductory chapters provide important new insights about the transmission of the text to the present day and especially the significance of the Syro-Arabic tradition.
Psychology and the Soul in Late Medieval Erfurt
2009
In the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries the University of Erfurt was one of the strongholds of the via moderna in Germany. The present article examines how this school's identity was manifested in discussions on the soul and its powers, engaged in by three Erfurtian philosophers: Johannes Carnificis de Lutrea, Jodocus Trutfetter and Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen. In the various forms of their expositions these authors reveal a rather uniform stance concerning doctrinal issues. Their positions are largely based on the tradition of the via moderna going back to the early fifteenth century, and their argumentation is deeply bound to the problems arising from this school's position. Comparisons with concurrent Thomist and Scotist sources show that the Erfurtians describe the positions of other schools in an appropriate manner, although the arguments for and against these positions are often borrowed from the authorities of their own school rather than from contemporaneous discussion.
Journal Article
Simplicius on the Relation between Quality and Qualified
2016
Simplicius claims in his Commentary on Aristotle's Categories that quality is prior to the qualified according to nature. However, in an interesting passage in the same commentary, Simplicius describes the relation between quality and qualified in such a way that it strongly suggests an ontological simultaneity. The aim of this paper is to clarify Simplicius' notion of natural priority and to investigate the extent to which the assumption of a natural priority of the quality over the qualified is compatible with the assumption of a co-existence of quality and qualified.
Journal Article