Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveTo compare ultrasound- (US), fluoroscopy- (FL), and palpation-guided contrast injection techniques used for dorsal radio-carpal wrist MRA.Materials and methodsPatients with chronic wrist pain were randomized as to which injection technique they underwent into three groups of 50 participants. Dorsal radio-carpal contrast injection was performed under US, FL guidance (one radiologist for each), or palpation guidance by an orthopedic surgeon. The three techniques were compared by procedure time, success rate, number of attempts needed, frequency and grade of extravasation, joint distension, and MRA image quality. Additionally, any change from baseline wrist pain was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at five time points (immediately, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week) after injection.ResultsOne hundred and fifty patients (83 males and 67 females; mean age 29 ± 6.5 years) were included. Success rates for US- and FL-guided injections were 100%, while palpation-guided approach was significantly less successful (72%) (P = 0.02) with significantly more frequent extravasation (56%)(P < 0.001). US guidance was the least time-consuming (6.5 ± 1.6 min) compared to FL guidance (12.5 ± 1.9 min) and palpation guidance (8 ± 1.2 min) (all P < 0.001). The mean number of joint puncture attempts was significantly lower with imaging-guided techniques (1.1 ± 0.24 and 1.2 ± 0.4 for US and FL, P = 0.23) compared to palpation-guided one (1.6 ± 0.8) (P = 0.007). The largest increases in baseline-pain were 8-h post-injection, and US guidance was the least painful at all-time points (all P < 0.05). Joint distension and image quality were significantly better with imaging-guided techniques (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003).ConclusionsUS-guided radio-carpal injection is a less time-consuming, more tolerable, and successful radiation-free method when compared to FL guidance. Palpation-guided injections require multiple attempts to enter the joint with high failure rates and frequent extravasation.

Objective. To determine whether arthrographic distention combined with manipulation for frozen shoulder provides additional benefits. Methods. A total of 180 participants from five clinical centers with pain and stiffness in predominantly 1 shoulder for >3 months entered the study, and 165 completed the study. The control group was treated with arthrographic distention alone, and the treatment group underwent manipulation after resting for 5 minutes following arthrographic distention. Patients were followed up at the one and two weeks and at three and six months. For the clinical evaluation, shoulder-specific disability measure (SPADI) score, the visual analog scales (VASs) for pain, and range of active motion were used. Results. 83 patients out of 90 in the treatment group and 82 out of 90 in the control finished the entire study period. SPADI, VAS, Constant-Murley (CM), and range of motion (ROM) were improved after treatments in both groups. The statistical differences were not observed in the CM, adduction, internal rotation, and posterior extension function between groups (P>.05) after the first treatment. And the statistical differences were not observed in the internal rotation, the extorsion, and posterior extension function (P>.05) after the second treatment. Conclusion. Distention arthrography plus manual therapy provided faster pain relief, a higher level of patient satisfaction, and an earlier improvement in AROM of the shoulder than distention arthrography alone in patients with frozen shoulder.

Background The iliocapsularis muscle is a little known muscle overlying the anterior hip capsule postulated to function as a stabilizer of dysplastic hips. Theoretically, this muscle would be hypertrophied in dysplastic hips and, conversely, atrophied in stable and well-constrained hips. However, these observations have not been confirmed and the true function of this muscle remains unknown. Questions/purposes We quantified the anatomic dimensions and degree of fatty infiltration of the iliocapsularis muscle and compared the results for 45 hips with deficient acetabular coverage (Group I) with 40 hips with excessive acetabular coverage (Group II). Patients and Methods We used MR arthrography to evaluate anatomic dimensions (thickness, width, circumference, cross-sectional area [CSA], and partial volume) and the amount of fatty infiltration. Results We observed increased thickness, width, circumference, CSA, and partial volume of the iliocapsularis muscle in Group I when compared with Group II. Additionally, hips in Group I had a lower prevalence of fatty infiltration compared with those in Group II. The iliocapsularis muscle typically was hypertrophied, and there was less fatty infiltration in dysplastic hips compared with hips with excessive acetabular coverage. Conclusion These observations suggest the iliocapsularis muscle is important for stabilizing the femoral head in a deficient acetabulum. This muscle serves as an anatomic landmark when performing a periacetabular osteotomy. Additionally, preoperative evaluation of morphologic features of the muscle can be used as an adjunct for decision making when treating patients with borderline hip dysplasia or femoroacetabular impingement.

Objective To compare three approaches via the anterior and posterior glenohumeral joints, and the rotator interval in fluoroscopy-guided shoulder arthrography according to the experience of the practitioners. Materials and methods This prospective randomized study was originally designed to have 34 subjects for each approach, and finally evaluated 98 patients (mean age: 51.5 years; 55 men) from July to December 2014, who had shoulder arthrography via the anterior ( n = 41) or posterior glenohumeral joint ( n = 27) approaches, or via the rotator interval approach ( n = 30) by residents ( n =76) or fellows ( n =22). The success rate, number of punctures, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and complications of the three methods were compared, and according to the practitioners. Results The success rate was 100% for the anterior glenohumeral joint approach (34 out of 34), 90.0% for the posterior glenohumeral joint approach (23 out of 30), and 88.2% for the rotator interval approach (30 out of 34; p = 0.013). There was no difference in the success rate according to the practitioners’ experience. Fluoroscopy time was longest for the posterior glenohumeral joint approach (mean: 95.44 s) and shortest for the rotator interval approach (mean: 31.57 s, p = 0.006). Radiation dose was larger by 1st- or 2nd-year residents ( p = 0.014), with no difference among the three approaches. Only one patient who underwent arthrography using the posterior glenohumeral joint approach complained about post-procedural pain. Conclusion Fluoroscopy-guided shoulder arthrography via the posterior glenohumeral joint or rotator interval approach may be difficult for trainees, and the posterior glenohumeral joint approach may need a long fluoroscopy time.

Objectives To devise a new protocol for targeted CT scanning of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with minimal radiation exposure to patients. We also aimed to correlate the reduction of the syndesmosis as seen on CT scans with the functional outcome of patients. Materials and methods Prospective study. Forty adults undergoing surgical stabilisation of an acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury were recruited. A targeted five-cut computerised tomography scan protocol was developed. The radiation exposure to the patient with this protocol was only 0.002 mSv. Scans were performed 12 weeks after surgery. The contralateral ankle of every patient was used as a control to determine the accuracy of the reduction of the syndesmosis for that individual patient. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were obtained at a minimum of 1 year after surgery. Results After considering the exclusions, 36 patients formed the study group. A wide variation was observed in the anatomy of the normal syndesmosis. If we considered a difference of more than 2 mm between the normal and injured syndesmosis relationship as significant, 15 (41.6 %) of our patients had a significant difference between the injured and normal sides. AOFAS scores were available for 13 of these patients and were good to excellent in 11(84.6 %). Conclusion Our study describes a reliable new CT scanning technique for the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis using only five cuts and a low-radiation-dose protocol. Clinical correlation of the findings on the scan with functional outcomes suggests that routine post-operative CT of the syndesmosis is probably not justified.

•Using the DSA radiation tube could help to improve positioning of denervation.•Improved denervation was effective than lumbar facet joint injection at 6 months.•Improved X-rays-guided denervation is an effective, minimally invasive method. This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy and feasibility of improved X-rays-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation denervation for treating low back pain secondary to lumbar facet joint syndrome (LFJS). Eighty LFJS patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the denervation group (n=40), treated with percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation denervation on the lumbar facet joint, and the control group (n=40), injected with betamethasone and lidocaine into the lumbar facet joint. All patients underwent pain scoring using the visual analogous scale (VAS) before treatment, and again at 30 min, 1 d, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after treatment. The Schober index was also evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after treatment. The efficacy and adverse effects were also recorded. The denervation group had significantly lower VAS scores at each time point than before treatment (P<0.01). The VAS scores in the control group at 30min, 1d, 1 week, and 1 month after treatment were also significantly lower, but they returned to the pre-treatment level at 6 months after treatment. The VAS scores in the denervation group were significantly lower than that in the control group at 1 month and at 6 months after treatment (P<0.05 and P<0.01), whereas the Schober index was significantly higher (P<0.01). Moreover, the excellent to good efficacy rate in the denervation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01). The patients in both treatments had no side effects. Improved X-rays-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation denervation is an effective, minimally invasive and convenient method for treating low back pain secondary to lumbar facet syndrome.

Background Posttraumatic osteoarthritis can develop after an intra-articular extremity fracture, leading to pain and loss of function. According to international guidelines, anatomical reduction and fixation are the basis for an optimal functional result. In order to achieve this during fracture surgery, an optimal view on the position of the bone fragments and fixation material is a necessity. The currently used 2D-fluoroscopy does not provide sufficient insight, in particular in cases with complex anatomy or subtle injury, and even an 18-26% suboptimal fracture reduction is reported for the ankle and foot. More intra-operative information is therefore needed. Recently the 3D-RX-system was developed, which provides conventional 2D-fluoroscopic images as well as a 3D-reconstruction of bony structures. This modality provides more information, which consequently leads to extra corrections in 18-30% of the fracture operations. However, the effect of the extra corrections on the quality of the anatomical fracture reduction and fixation as well as on patient relevant outcomes has never been investigated. The objective of this study protocol is to investigate the effectiveness of the intra-operative use of the 3D-RX-system as compared to the conventional 2D-fluoroscopy in patients with traumatic intra-articular fractures of the wrist, ankle and calcaneus. The effectiveness will be assessed in two different areas: 1) the quality of fracture reduction and fixation, based on the current golden standard, Computed Tomography. 2) The patient-relevant outcomes like functional outcome range of motion and pain. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of the 3D-RX-scan will be determined in a clinical setting and a cost-effectiveness as well as a cost-utility analysis will be performed. Methods/design In this protocol for an international multicenter randomized clinical trial, adult patients (age > 17 years) with a traumatic intra-articular fracture of the wrist, ankle or calcaneus eligible for surgery will be subjected to additional intra-operative 3D-RX. In half of the patients the surgeon will be blinded to these results, in the other half the surgeon may use the 3D-RX results to further optimize fracture reduction. In both randomization groups a CT-scan will be performed postoperatively. Based on these CT-scans the quality of fracture reduction and fixation will be determined. During the follow-up visits after hospital discharge at 6 and 12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively the patient relevant outcomes will be determined by joint specific, health economic and quality of life questionnaires. In addition a follow up study will be performed to determine the patient relevant outcomes and prevalence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Discussion The results of the study will provide more information on the effectiveness of the intra-operative use of 3D-imaging during surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of the wrist, ankle and calcaneus. A randomized design in which patients will be allocated to a treatment arm during surgery will be used because of its high methodological quality and the ability to detect incongruences in the reduction and/or fixation that occur intra-operatively in the blinded arm of the 3D-RX. An alternative, pragmatic design could be to randomize before the start of the surgery, then two surgical strategies would be compared. This resembles clinical practice better, but introduces more bias and does not allow the assessment of incongruences that would have been detected by 3D-RX in the blinded arm. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR 1902

ObjectiveDirect magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) is often considered the most accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of intra-articular structures, but utilization and performance vary widely without consensus. The purpose of this white paper is to develop consensus recommendations on behalf of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) based on published literature and expert opinion.Materials and methodsThe Standards and Guidelines Committee of the SSR identified guidelines for utilization and performance of dMRA as an important topic for study and invited all SSR members with expertise and interest to volunteer for the white paper panel. This panel was tasked with determining an outline, reviewing the relevant literature, preparing a written document summarizing the issues and controversies, and providing recommendations.ResultsTwelve SSR members with expertise in dMRA formed the ad hoc white paper authorship committee. The published literature on dMRA was reviewed and summarized, focusing on clinical indications, technical considerations, safety, imaging protocols, complications, controversies, and gaps in knowledge. Recommendations for the utilization and performance of dMRA in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot regions were developed in group consensus.ConclusionAlthough direct MR arthrography has been previously used for a wide variety of clinical indications, the authorship panel recommends more selective application of this minimally invasive procedure. At present, direct MR arthrography remains an important procedure in the armamentarium of the musculoskeletal radiologist and is especially valuable when conventional MRI is indeterminant or results are discrepant with clinical evaluation.

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate accuracy, time-saving, radiation doses and pain relief of ultrasound-guided (US) facet joint injections versus Computed Tomography (CT)-controlled interventions in the cervical spine. Forty adult patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to the US- or CT group. US-guided facet joint injections were performed on a standard ultrasound device using a broadband linear-array transducer. The corresponding comparison group underwent CT-guided instillations which were performed under standardized procedures using the CT-positioning laser function. The accuracy of ultrasound-guided interventions was 100%. The mean time (min:sec) to final needle placement in the US group was 04:46 versus 11:12 (p<0.05) in the CT group for one injected level, and 05:49 in the US group versus 14:32 (p<0.05) in the CT group for two injected levels. The mean dose-length product (DLP, mGy*cm) radiation dose, including CT confirmation for study purposes only, was 27.6 for the US group versus 88.2 in the CT group (p<0.05) for one injected level, and 32.5 in the US group versus 205.0 in the CT group (p<0.05) for two injected levels. Both groups showed the same significant visual-analog-scale (VAS) relief in pain (p<0.05), without any \"inter-methodic\" differences (p>0.05). US-guided intra-articular injections show the same therapeutic effect as CT-guided intra-articular injections and result in a significant reduction of procedure duration without any exposure to radiation.

To determine whether femoral implant position can be reproducibly measured on plain digital radiographs, we prospectively studied 40 patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Three observers performed double blinded randomized analysis of calibrated digital radiographs meeting strict quality criteria. The implant stem–shaft angle and femoral anteversion angle were measured by the trapezoid method of axis determination using OsiriX software. The upper and lower offset and the anterior and posterior offset were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation tests (intra-observer reproducibility) and Fisher F tests (inter-observer reproducibility). Intra-observer reproducibility was very good for all parameters and all observers. Inter-observer reproducibility was excellent except for superior offset measurement. Thus, this study validates a radiographic method for assessing the femoral implant position in hip resurfacing. We believe this could be useful for future studies on hip resurfacing devices.