Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a trial of patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), addition of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib to gemcitabine improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to gemcitabine alone but biomarkers predictive of treatment are lacking. Here we report a candidate biomarker of response to gemcitabine versus combined gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor therapy in HGSOC ovarian cancer. Patients with replication stress (RS)-high tumors (n = 27), defined as harboring at least one genomic RS alteration related to loss of RB pathway regulation and/or oncogene-induced replication stress achieve significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.38, 90% CI, 0.17–0.86) on gemcitabine monotherapy compared to those with tumors without such alterations (defined as RS-low, n = 30). However, addition of berzosertib to gemcitabine benefits only patients with RS-low tumors (gemcitabine/berzosertib HR 0.34, 90% CI, 0.13–0.86) and not patients with RS-high tumors (HR 1.11, 90% CI, 0.47–2.62). Our findings support the notion that the exacerbation of RS by gemcitabine monotherapy is adequate for lethality in RS-high tumors. Conversely, for RS-low tumors addition of berzosertib-mediated ATR inhibition to gemcitabine is necessary for lethality to occur. Independent prospective validation of this biomarker is required. A randomized phase 2 study recently showed that the addition of ATR inhibitor berzosertib to gemcitabine improved PFS compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with ovarian cancer. In this preplanned exploratory study, the authors demonstrate that a genomic biomarker of replication-stress is associated with outcome to gemcitabine alone and may predict which patients benefit from addition of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib.

Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have deleterious mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair of DNA damage. The use of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in such patients was associated with longer progression-free survival and a longer time to pain progression than control therapy.

The PROfound trial showed that olaparib prolonged imaging-based progression-free survival among patients whose tumors contained defects in the homologous recombination repair genes BRCA1 , BRCA2 , or ATM . With longer follow-up, the trial now shows that olaparib prolonged overall survival in these patients. Toxic effects included anemia, nausea, and asthenia.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi, olaparib) impairs the repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), resulting in double-strand breaks (DSBs) that cannot be repaired efficiently in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient cancers such as BRCA1/2-mutant cancers, leading to synthetic lethality. Despite the efficacy of olaparib in the treatment of BRCA1/2 deficient tumors, PARPi resistance is common. We hypothesized that the combination of olaparib with anticancer agents that disrupt HRR by targeting ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) or checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) may be an effective strategy to reverse ovarian cancer resistance to olaparib. Here, we evaluated the effect of olaparib, the ATR inhibitor AZD6738, and the CHK1 inhibitor MK8776 alone and in combination on cell survival, colony formation, replication stress response (RSR) protein expression, DNA damage, and apoptotic changes in BRCA2 mutated (PEO-1) and HRR-proficient BRCA wild-type (SKOV-3 and OV-90) cells. Combined treatment caused the accumulation of DNA DSBs. PARP expression was associated with sensitivity to olaparib or inhibitors of RSR. Synergistic effects were weaker when olaparib was combined with CHK1i and occurred regardless of the BRCA2 status of tumor cells. Because PARPi increases the reliance on ATR/CHK1 for genome stability, the combination of PARPi with ATR inhibition suppressed ovarian cancer cell growth independently of the efficacy of HRR. The present results were obtained at sub-lethal doses, suggesting the potential of these inhibitors as monotherapy as well as in combination with olaparib.

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the dense stroma rich in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and the immunosuppressive microenvironment confer resistance to treatments. To overcome such resistance, we tested the combination of FOLFIRINOX (DNA damage-inducing chemotherapy drugs) with VE-822 (an ataxia-telangiectasia and RAD3-related inhibitor that targets DNA damage repair). PDAC spheroid models and organoids were used to assess the combination effects. Tumour growth and the immune and fibrotic microenvironment were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, single-cell analysis and spatial proteomics in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and orthotopic immunocompetent KPC mouse models. The FOLFIRINOX and VE-822 combination had a strong synergistic effect in several PDAC cell lines, whatever their BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM mutation status and resistance to standard chemotherapy agents. This was associated with high DNA damage and inhibition of DNA repair signalling pathways, leading to increased apoptosis. In immunocompetent and PDX mouse models of PDAC, the combination inhibited tumour growth more effectively than FOLFIRINOX alone. This was associated with tumour microenvironment remodelling, particularly decreased proportion of fibroblast activated protein-positive CAFs and increased anti-tumorigenic immune cell infiltration and interaction. The FOLFIRINOX and VE-822 combination is a promising strategy to improve FOLFIRINOX efficacy and overcome drug resistance in PDAC.

IntroductionThe moderate-penetrance germline mutations ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 are implicated in an increased risk of the development of breast cancer. Whether these mutations provide clinical utility to guide treatment strategies and prognosis remains unknown.MethodsA retrospective case–control study from a tertiary institution compared patients with stage 0–III breast cancer, and positive for ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 mutations, with a matched cohort selected by randomization and negative for mutations. Data acquisition included demographics, histopathologic, treatment, and clinical outcome variables.ResultsA total of 145 patients with breast cancer (144 female and 1 male) were analyzed—74 mutation-positive patients (24 ATM, 26 CHEK2, 24 PALB2) and 71 mutation-negative patients. Mutation-positive patients compared with mutation-negative patients had increased family history of breast cancer (79.7 vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001) and tumor size > 2.0 cm (63.1% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.015). Patients with prior knowledge of mutational status were more likely to proceed with total mastectomy and prophylactic mastectomy (74.5% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.02; and 65.5% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). The unadjusted recurrence rate was higher in mutation-positive patients compared with mutation-negative patients (24.3 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.01), although mutation status was not predictive for recurrence in Cox regression analysis.ConclusionsPatients positive for ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 mutations had increased tumor size and were more likely to undergo extensive surgeries. Mutation status was not predictive of recurrence, although this lack of effect may have been mitigated by lower rates of recurrence in those who pursued total mastectomy. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Background The National Cancer Institute-Children’s Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) precision oncology platform trial enrolled children aged 1-21 years with treatment-refractory solid tumors and predefined actionable genetic alterations. Patients with tumors harboring alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes were assigned to receive olaparib. Methods Tumor and blood samples were submitted for centralized molecular testing. Tumor and germline sequencing were conducted in parallel. Olaparib was given twice daily for 28-day cycles starting at a dose 30% lower than the adult recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint was the objective response. Results Eighteen patients matched (1.5% of those screened) based on the presence of a deleterious gene alteration in BRCA1/2, RAD51C/D, or ATM detected by tumor sequencing without germline subtraction or analysis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Eleven (61%) harbored a germline mutation, with only one exhibiting LOH. Six patients enrolled and received the olaparib starting dose of 135 mg/m2/dose. Two participants were fully evaluable; 4 were inevaluable because <85% of the prescribed dose was administered during cycle 1. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or responses. Minimal hematologic toxicity was observed. Conclusion Most DDR gene alterations detected in Pediatric MATCH were germline, monoallelic, and unlikely to confer homologous recombination deficiency predicting sensitivity to olaparib monotherapy. The study closed due to poor accrual. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03233204. IRB approved: initial July 24, 2017. This article reports clinical trial results of the National Cancer Institute-Children’s Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice precision oncology platform trial, which enrolled patients aged 1-21 years with treatment-refractory solid tumors and predefined actionable genetic alterations. Those with tumors harboring alterations in DNA damage repair genes were assigned to receive olaparib.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third among the most frequent malignancies and represents the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. By interfering with the DNA replication process of cancer cells, several chemotherapeutic molecules used in CRC therapy induce replication stress (RS). At the cellular level, this stress is managed by the ATR-CHK1 pathway, which activates the replication checkpoint. In recent years, the therapeutic value of targeting this pathway has been demonstrated. Moreover, MSI + (microsatellite instability) tumors frequently harbor a nonsense, heterozygous mutation in the ATR gene. Using isogenic HCT116 clones, we showed that this mutation of ATR sensitizes the cells to several drugs, including SN-38 (topoisomerase I inhibitor) and VE-822 (ATR inhibitor) and exacerbates their synergistic effects. We showed that this mutation bottlenecks the replication checkpoint leading to extensive DNA damage. The combination of VE-822 and SN-38 induces an exhaustion of RPA and a subsequent replication catastrophe. Surviving cells complete replication and accumulate in G2 in a DNA-PK-dependent manner, protecting them from cell death. Together, our results suggest that RPA and DNA-PK represent promising therapeutic targets to optimize the inhibition of the ATR-CHK1 pathway in oncology. Ultimately, ATR frameshift mutations found in patients may also represent important prognostic factors.

Personalized medicine in treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still in its infancy, albeit PDAC-related deaths are projected to rise over the next decade. Only recently, maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib showed improved progression-free survival in germline BRCA1/2-mutated PDAC patients after platinum-based induction for the first time. Transferability of such a concept to other DNA damage response (DDR) genes remains unclear. Here, we conducted a placebo-controlled, three-armed preclinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of multi-DDR interference (mDDRi) as maintenance therapy vs. continuous FOLFIRINOX treatment, implemented with orthotopically transplanted ATM-deficient PDAC cell lines. Kaplan–Meier analysis, cross-sectional imaging, histology, and in vitro analysis served as analytical readouts. Median overall survival was significantly longer in the mDDRi maintenance arm compared to the maintained FOLFIRINOX treatment. This survival benefit was mirrored in the highest DNA-damage load, accompanied by superior disease control and reduced metastatic burden. In vitro analysis suggests FOLFIRINOX-driven selection of invasive subclones, erased by subsequent mDDRi treatment. Collectively, this preclinical trial substantiates mDDRi in a maintenance setting as a novel therapeutic option and extends the concept to non-germline BRCA1/2-mutant PDAC.

Background In high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), there is a spectrum of sensitivity to first line platinum‐based chemotherapy. This study molecularly characterizes HGSOC patients from two distinct groups of chemotherapy responders (good vs. poor). Methods Following primary debulking surgery and intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel, women with stage III–IV HGSOC were grouped by response. Patients in the good response (GR) and poor response (PR) groups respectively had a progression‐free intervals (PFI) of ≥12 and ≤6 months. Analysis of surgical specimens interrogated genomic and immunologic features using whole exome sequencing. RNA‐sequencing detected gene expression outliers and inference of immune infiltrate, with validation by targeted NanoString arrays. PD‐L1 expression was scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results A total of 39 patient samples were analyzed (GR = 20; PR = 19). Median PFI for GR and PR patient cohorts was 32 and 3 months, respectively. GR tumors were enriched for loss‐of‐function BRCA2 mutations and had a significantly higher nonsynonymous mutation rate compared to PR tumors (p = 0.001). Samples from the PR cohort were characterized by mutations in MGA and RAD51B and trended towards a greater rate of amplification of PIK3CA, MECOM, and ATR in comparison to GR tumors. Gene expression analysis by NanoString correlated increased PARP4 with PR and increased PD‐L1 and EMSY with GR. There was greater tumor immune cell infiltration and higher immune cell PD‐L1 protein expression in the GR group. Conclusions Our research demonstrates that tumors from HGSOC patients responding poorly to first line chemotherapy have a distinct molecular profile characterized by actionable drug targets including PARP4. In patients with suboptimally‐debulked, advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the spectrum of responses to first line platinum‐based chemotherapy (PtC) vary from durable to non‐existent, highlighting an unmet medical need for those with poor responses. Our study molecularly characterizes a cohort of HGSOC patients with distinct responses, either good or poor, to PtC. The good and poor responders have median progression‐free intervals of 32 and 3 months, respectively, and molecular analysis of tumors identifies differences in DNA damage response pathways and immunity, namely, tumors from poor responders to first line PtC have a distinct molecular profile characterized by actionable drug targets including PARP4.