Explore the vast range of titles available.

Motor imagery (MI) based brain–computer interface (BCI) aims to provide a means of communication through the utilization of neural activity generated due to kinesthetic imagination of limbs. Every year, a significant number of publications that are related to new improvements, challenges, and breakthrough in MI-BCI are made. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the electroencephalogram (EEG) based MI-BCI system. It describes the current state of the art in different stages of the MI-BCI (data acquisition, MI training, preprocessing, feature extraction, channel and feature selection, and classification) pipeline. Although MI-BCI research has been going for many years, this technology is mostly confined to controlled lab environments. We discuss recent developments and critical algorithmic issues in MI-based BCI for commercial deployment.

Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a revolutionizing human-computer interaction with potential applications in both medical and non-medical fields, emerging as a cutting-edge and trending research direction. Increasing numbers of groups are engaging in BCI research and development. However, in recent years, there has been some confusion regarding BCI, including misleading and hyped propaganda about BCI, and even non-BCI technologies being labeled as BCI. Therefore, a clear definition and a definite scope for BCI are thoroughly considered and discussed in the paper, based on the existing definitions of BCI, including the six key or essential components of BCI. In the review, different from previous definitions of BCI, BCI paradigms and neural coding are explicitly included in the clear definition of BCI provided, and the BCI user (the brain) is clearly identified as a key component of the BCI system. Different people may have different viewpoints on the definition and scope of BCI, as well as some related issues, which are discussed in the article. This review argues that a clear definition and definite scope of BCI will benefit future research and commercial applications. It is hoped that this review will reduce some of the confusion surrounding BCI and promote sustainable development in this field.

Although brain-computer interface (BCI) is considered a revolutionary advancement in human-computer interaction and has achieved significant progress, a considerable gap remains between the current technological capabilities and their practical applications. To promote the translation of BCI into practical applications, the gold standard for online evaluation for classification algorithms of BCI has been proposed in some studies. However, few studies have proposed a more comprehensive evaluation method for the entire online BCI system, and it has not yet received sufficient attention from the BCI research and development community. Therefore, the qualitative leap from analyzing and modeling for offline BCI data to the construction of online BCI systems and optimizing their performance is elaborated, and then user-centred is emphasized, and then the comprehensive evaluation methods for translating BCI into practical applications are detailed and reviewed in the article, including the evaluation of the usability (including effectiveness and efficiency of systems), the evaluation of the user satisfaction (including BCI-related aspects, etc.), and the evaluation of the usage (including the match between the system and user, etc.) of online BCI systems. Finally, the challenges faced in the evaluation of the usability and user satisfaction of online BCI systems, the efficacy of online BCI systems, and the integration of BCI and artificial intelligence (AI) and/or virtual reality (VR) and other technologies to enhance the intelligence and user experience of the system are discussed. It is expected that the evaluation methods for online BCI systems elaborated in this review will promote the translation of BCI into practical applications.

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) is an exciting and emerging research area for researchers and scientists. It is a suitable combination of software and hardware to operate any device mentally. This review emphasizes the significant stages in the BCI domain, current problems, and state-of-the-art findings. This article also covers how current results can contribute to new knowledge about BCI, an overview of BCI from its early developments to recent advancements, BCI applications, challenges, and future directions. The authors pointed to unresolved issues and expressed how BCI is valuable for analyzing the human brain. Humans' dependence on machines has led humankind into a new future where BCI can play an essential role in improving this modern world.

The development and potential applications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are directly related to the human brain and may have adverse effects on the users’ physical and mental health. Ethical issues, particularly those associated with BCIs, including both non-medical and medical applications, have captured societal attention. This article initially reviews the application of three ethical frameworks in BCI technology: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Subsequently, it introduces the ethical standards under consideration within the medical objective framework for BCI medical applications. Finally, the paper discusses and forecasts the ethical standards for BCI medical applications. The paper emphasizes the necessity to differentiate between the ethical issues of implantable and non-implantable BCIs, to approach the research on BCI-based “controlling the brain” with caution, and to establish standardized operational procedures and efficacy evaluation methods for BCI medical applications. This paper aims to provide ideas for the establishment of ethical standards in BCI medical applications.

Motor imagery (MI) based brain-computer interface (BCI) has been developed as an alternative therapy for stroke rehabilitation. However, experimental evidence demonstrates that a significant portion (10-50%) of subjects are BCI-inefficient users (accuracy less than 70%). Thus, predicting BCI performance prior to clinical BCI usage would facilitate the selection of suitable end-users and improve the efficiency of stroke rehabilitation. In the current study, we proposed two physiological variables, i.e., laterality index (LI) and cortical activation strength (CAS), to predict MI-BCI performance. Twenty-four stroke patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited for this study. Each subject was required to perform two blocks of left- and right-hand MI tasks. Linear regression analyses were performed between the BCI accuracies and two physiological predictors. Here, the predictors were calculated from the electroencephalography (EEG) signals during paretic hand MI tasks (5 trials; approximately 1 min). LI values exhibited a statistically significant correlation with two-class BCI (left vs. right) performance (r = -0.732, < 0.001), and CAS values exhibited a statistically significant correlation with brain-switch BCI (task vs. idle) performance ( = 0.641, < 0.001). Furthermore, the BCI-inefficient users were successfully recognized with a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 85.7% in the two-class BCI. The brain-switch BCI achieved a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 87.5% in the discrimination of BCI-inefficient users. These results demonstrated that the proposed BCI predictors were promising to promote the BCI usage in stroke rehabilitation and contribute to a better understanding of the BCI-inefficiency phenomenon in stroke patients.

Existing brain-computer interface (BCI) research has made great progress in improving the accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) of BCI systems. However, the practicability of BCI is still difficult to achieve. One of the important reasons for this difficulty is that human factors are not fully considered in the research and development of BCI. As a result, BCI systems have not yet reached users’ expectations. In this study, we investigate a BCI system of motor imagery for lower limb synchronous rehabilitation as an example. From the perspective of human factors engineering of BCI, a comprehensive evaluation method of BCI system development is proposed based on the concept of human-centered design and evaluation. Subjects’ satisfaction ratings for BCI sensors, visual analog scale (VAS), subjects’ satisfaction rating of the BCI system, and the mental workload rating for subjects manipulating the BCI system, as well as interview/follow-up comprehensive evaluation of motor imagery of BCI (MI-BCI) system satisfaction were used. The methods and concepts proposed in this study provide useful insights for the design of personalized MI-BCI. We expect that the human factors engineering of BCI could be applied to the design and satisfaction evaluation of MI-BCI, so as to promote the practical application of this kind of BCI.

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) allow a user to control a computer application by brain activity as measured, e.g., by electroencephalography (EEG). After about 30years of BCI research, the success of control that is achieved by means of a BCI system still greatly varies between subjects. For about 20% of potential users the obtained accuracy does not reach the level criterion, meaning that BCI control is not accurate enough to control an application. The determination of factors that may serve to predict BCI performance, and the development of methods to quantify a predictor value from psychological and/or physiological data serve two purposes: a better understanding of the ‘BCI-illiteracy phenomenon’, and avoidance of a costly and eventually frustrating training procedure for participants who might not obtain BCI control. Furthermore, such predictors may lead to approaches to antagonize BCI illiteracy. Here, we propose a neurophysiological predictor of BCI performance which can be determined from a two minute recording of a ‘relax with eyes open’ condition using two Laplacian EEG channels. A correlation of r=0.53 between the proposed predictor and BCI feedback performance was obtained on a large data base with N=80 BCI-naive participants in their first session with the Berlin brain–computer interface (BBCI) system which operates on modulations of sensory motor rhythms (SMRs).

Motor imagery (MI) combined with real-time electroencephalogram (EEG) feedback is a popular approach for steering brain–computer interfaces (BCI). MI BCI has been considered promising as add-on therapy to support motor recovery after stroke. Yet whether EEG neurofeedback indeed targets specific sensorimotor activation patterns cannot be unambiguously inferred from EEG alone. We combined MI EEG neurofeedback with concurrent and continuous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to characterize the relationship between MI EEG neurofeedback and activation in cortical sensorimotor areas. EEG signals were corrected online from interfering MRI gradient and ballistocardiogram artifacts, enabling the delivery of real-time EEG feedback. Significantly enhanced task-specific brain activity during feedback compared to no feedback blocks was present in EEG and fMRI. Moreover, the contralateral MI related decrease in EEG sensorimotor rhythm amplitude correlated inversely with fMRI activation in the contralateral sensorimotor areas, whereas a lateralized fMRI pattern did not necessarily go along with a lateralized EEG pattern. Together, the findings indicate a complex relationship between MI EEG signals and sensorimotor cortical activity, whereby both are similarly modulated by EEG neurofeedback. This finding supports the potential of MI EEG neurofeedback for motor rehabilitation and helps to better understand individual differences in MI BCI performance. •Real-time EEG feedback during continuous fMRI is possible for motor imagery.•EEG feedback enhances task-related activity in EEG and the feedback independent fMRI.•BCI illiterates can be divided into real and pseudo BCI illiterates.

IntroductionThis study presents the ASME-speller, a novel 30-class auditory brain-computer interface (BCI) speller system that combines auditory stream segregation with the familiar QWERTY keyboard layout to facilitate intuitive and visionfree communication.MethodsIn the ASME-speller, three distinct auditory streams are presented simultaneously, each corresponding to a row on the QWERTY keyboard. The low-, middle-, and high-frequency streams represent the bottom, middle, and top rows, respectively. Within each stream, alphabet letters and selected symbols are repeatedly presented as spoken voice stimuli. Users are instructed to focus exclusively on the stream corresponding to the row containing the target letter and to selectively attend to that letter within the stream. By leveraging the QWERTY layout and auditory stream segregation, the proposed approach enables users to restrict their attentional focus to a subset of letters by directing selective attention to auditory streams, while the mapping between QWERTY rows and stream pitch facilitates intuitive letter selection. We conducted online experiments with ten healthy participants to evaluate system performance.ResultsThe ASME-speller achieved an average classification accuracy of 0.76 and an average information transfer rate (ITR) of 2.16 bits/min. Excluding one participant whose EEG data contained excessive artifacts, these values improved to 0.84 and 2.40 bits/min, respectively. Post-hoc analyses further examined the effects of preprocessing parameters, classification pipelines, and early stopping strategies. Among four pipelines tested, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) combined with dynamic stopping demonstrated the most robust performance across participants (accuracy of 0.80 and ITR of 4.76 bits/min). For the best participant, a deep learning model (EEGNet4,2) with dynamic stopping achieved accuracy of 1.0 with ITR of 14.44 bits/min.DiscussionCompared to previous auditory BCI spellers, the ASME-speller demonstrates performance comparable to existing systems, while offering advantages in terms of simplicity, requiring only standard headphones and no visual support. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of the ASME-speller and pave the way toward practical auditory BCI applications for communication.