Explore the vast range of titles available.

B-cell receptor (BCR) is a B cell hallmark surface complex regulating multiple cellular processes in normal as well as malignant B cells. Igα (CD79a)/Igβ (CD79b) are essential components of BCR that are indispensable for its functionality, signal initiation, and signal transduction. CD79a/CD79b-mediated BCR signaling is required for the survival of normal as well as malignant B cells via a wide signaling network. Recent studies identified the great complexity of this signaling network and revealed the emerging role of CD79a/CD79b in signal integration. In this review, we have focused on functional features of CD79a/CD79b, summarized signaling consequences of CD79a/CD79b post-translational modifications, and highlighted specifics of CD79a/CD79b interactions within BCR and related signaling cascades. We have reviewed the complex role of CD79a/CD79b in multiple aspects of normal B cell biology and how is the normal BCR signaling affected by lymphoid neoplasms associated CD79A/CD79B mutations. We have also summarized important unresolved questions and highlighted issues that remain to be explored for better understanding of CD79a/CD79b-mediated signal transduction and the eventual identification of additional therapeutically targetable BCR signaling vulnerabilities.

CLL is characterized by autonomous B cell receptor (BCR) signaling. CLL subsets are empirically defined by sequence similarities of the BCR heavy chain. However, in the unfavorable subset 2, an acquired mutation (termed R110) in the light chain stimulates autonomous BCR signaling. This study demonstrates that the oncogenic R110 mutation dictates the unfavorable prognosis and is not restricted to the conventional subset 2. Interestingly, carriers of a particular light-chain allele ( IGLV3-21 * 01 ) are predisposed to develop CLL because this allele enables autonomous BCR signaling by R110 as a single-point mutation. Monoclonal antibodies permit convenient screening for R110-expressing CLL, showing that it is the largest immunologically defined CLL subset and an example of functional rather than empirical CLL subclassification. The prognosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) depends on different markers, including cytogenetic aberrations, oncogenic mutations, and mutational status of the immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy-chain variable (IGHV) gene. The number of IGHV mutations distinguishes mutated (M) CLL with a markedly superior prognosis from unmutated (UM) CLL cases. In addition, B cell antigen receptor (BCR) stereotypes as defined by IGHV usage and complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) classify ∼30% of CLL cases into prognostically important subsets. Subset 2 expresses a BCR with the combination of IGHV3-21–derived heavy chains (HCs) with IGLV3-21–derived light chains (LCs), and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Importantly, the subset 2 LC carries a single-point mutation, termed R110, at the junction between the variable and constant LC regions. By analyzing 4 independent clinical cohorts through BCR sequencing and by immunophenotyping with antibodies specifically recognizing wild-type IGLV3-21 and R110-mutated IGLV3-21 (IGLV3-21 R110 ), we show that IGLV3-21 R110 –expressing CLL represents a distinct subset with poor prognosis independent of IGHV mutations. Compared with other alleles, only IGLV3-21 * 01 facilitates effective homotypic BCR–BCR interaction that results in autonomous, oncogenic BCR signaling after acquiring R110 as a single-point mutation. Presumably, this mutation acts as a standalone driver that transforms IGLV3-21 * 01 –expressing B cells to develop CLL. Thus, we propose to expand the conventional definition of CLL subset 2 to subset 2L by including all IGLV3-21 R110 –expressing CLL cases regardless of IGHV mutational status. Moreover, the generation of monoclonal antibodies recognizing IGLV3-21 or mutated IGLV3-21 R110 facilitates the recognition of B cells carrying this mutation in CLL patients or healthy donors.

BCR‐ABL1 gene fusion associated with additional DNA lesions involves the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) from a chronic phase (CP) to a blast crisis of B lymphoid (CML‐LBC) lineage and BCR‐ABL1+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCR‐ABL1+ ALL). The recombination‐activating gene RAG1 and RAG2 (collectively, RAG) proteins that assemble a diverse set of antigen receptor genes during lymphocyte development are abnormally expressed in CML‐LBC and BCR‐ABL1+ ALL. However, the direct involvement of dysregulated RAG in disease progression remains unclear. Here, we generate human wild‐type (WT) RAG and catalytically inactive RAG‐expressing BCR‐ABL1+ and BCR‐ABL1− cell lines, respectively, and demonstrate that BCR‐ABL1 specifically collaborates with RAG recombinase to promote cell survival in vitro and in xenograft mice models. WT RAG‐expressing BCR‐ABL1+ cell lines and primary CD34+ bone marrow cells from CML‐LBC samples maintain more double‐strand breaks (DSB) compared to catalytically inactive RAG‐expressing BCR‐ABL1+ cell lines and RAG‐deficient CML‐CP samples, which are measured by γ‐H2AX. WT RAG‐expressing BCR‐ABL1+ cells are biased to repair RAG‐mediated DSB by the alternative non–homologous end joining pathway (a‐NHEJ), which could contribute genomic instability through increasing the expression of a‐NHEJ‐related MRE11 and RAD50 proteins. As a result, RAG‐expressing BCR‐ABL1+ cells decrease sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) by activating BCR‐ABL1 signaling but independent of the levels of BCR‐ABL1 expression and mutations in the BCR‐ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain. These findings identify a surprising and novel role of RAG in the functional specialization of disease progression in BCR‐ABL1+ leukemia through its endonuclease activity. BCR‐ABL1 associates with RAG to promote BCR‐ABL1+ cell survival in vitro and in vivo. The endonuclease activity of RAG drives BCR‐ABL1+ cells to choose the a‐NHEJ pathway in response to DNA damage. RAG stimulates BCR‐ABL1 signaling to reduce TKI therapeutic efficacy, albeit independently of BCR‐ABL1 expression and mutations in the BCR‐ABL1 kinase domain.

Forkhead box (FOX) class O (FOXO) proteins are a dynamic family of transcription factors composed of four family members: FOXO1, FOXO3, FOXO4 and FOXO6. As context-dependent transcriptional activators and repressors, the FOXO family regulates diverse cellular processes including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, metabolism, longevity and cell fate determination. A central pathway responsible for negative regulation of FOXO activity is the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signalling pathway, enabling cell survival and proliferation. FOXO family members can be further regulated by distinct kinases, both positively (e.g., JNK, AMPK) and negatively (e.g., ERK-MAPK, CDK2), with additional post-translational modifications further impacting on FOXO activity. Evidence has suggested that FOXOs behave as ‘ bona fide ’ tumour suppressors, through transcriptional programmes regulating several cellular behaviours including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, an alternative paradigm has emerged which indicates that FOXOs operate as mediators of cellular homeostasis and/or resistance in both ‘normal’ and pathophysiological scenarios. Distinct FOXO family members fulfil discrete roles during normal B cell maturation and function, and it is now clear that FOXOs are aberrantly expressed and mutated in discrete B-cell malignancies. While active FOXO function is generally associated with disease suppression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia for example, FOXO expression is associated with disease progression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, an observation also seen in other cancers. The opposing functions of the FOXO family drives the debate about the circumstances in which FOXOs favour or hinder disease progression, and whether targeting FOXO-mediated processes would be effective in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Here, we discuss the disparate roles of FOXO family members in B lineage cells, the regulatory events that influence FOXO function focusing mainly on post-translational modifications, and consider the potential for future development of therapies that target FOXO activity.

XBP‐1, a transcription factor that drives the unfolded protein response (UPR), is activated in B cells when they differentiate to plasma cells. Here, we show that in the B cells, whose capacity to secrete IgM has been eliminated, XBP‐1 is induced normally on induction of differentiation, suggesting that activation of XBP‐1 in B cells is a differentiation‐dependent event, but not the result of a UPR caused by the abundant synthesis of secreted IgM. Without XBP‐1, B cells fail to signal effectively through the B‐cell receptor. The signalling defects lead to aberrant expression of the plasma cell transcription factors IRF4 and Blimp‐1, and altered levels of activation‐induced cytidine deaminase and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate receptor. Using XBP‐1‐deficient/Blimp‐1‐GFP transgenic mice, we find that XBP‐1‐deficient B cells form antibody‐secreting plasmablasts in response to initial immunization; however, these plasmablasts respond ineffectively to CXCL12. They fail to colonize the bone marrow and do not sustain antibody production. These findings define the role of XBP‐1 in normal plasma cell development and have implications for management of B‐cell malignancies.

MYD88/CD79B-mutated (MCD) genotype is a genetic subgroup of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with the co-occurrence of MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutations. MCD genotype is characterized by poor prognosis and extranodal involvement especially in immune-privileged sites. MCD model is dominated by activated B-cell (ABC)-like subtype of DLBCLs. It is generally accepted that the pathogenesis of MCD DLBCL mainly includes chronic active B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and oncogenic MYD88 mutations, which drives pathological nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation in MCD lymphoid malignancies. CD79B and MYD88 L265P mutations are frequently and contemporaneously founded in B-cell malignancies. The collaboration of the two mutations may explain the unique biology of MCD. Meanwhile, standard immunochemotherapy combine with different targeted therapies worth further study to improve the prognosis of MCD, according to genetic, phenotypic, and clinical features of MCD type. In this review, we systematically described mechanism, clinical characteristics, and targeted therapy of MCD DLBCL.

B cell antigen receptor (BCR) signalling competence is critical for the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Defining key proteins that facilitate these networks aid in the identification of targets for therapeutic exploitation. We previously demonstrated that reduced PKCα function in mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HPSCs) resulted in PKCβII upregulation and generation of a poor-prognostic CLL-like disease. Here, prkcb knockdown in HSPCs leads to reduced survival of PKCα-KR-expressing CLL-like cells, concurrent with reduced expression of the leukemic markers CD5 and CD23. SP1 promotes elevated expression of prkcb in PKCα-KR expressing cells enabling leukemogenesis. Global gene analysis revealed an upregulation of genes associated with B cell activation in PKCα-KR expressing cells, coincident with upregulation of PKCβII: supported by activation of key signalling hubs proximal to the BCR and elevated proliferation. Ibrutinib (BTK inhibitor) or enzastaurin (PKCβII inhibitor) treatment of PKCα-KR expressing cells and primary CLL cells showed similar patterns of Akt/mTOR pathway inhibition, supporting the role for PKCβII in maintaining proliferative signals in our CLL mouse model. Ibrutinib or enzastaurin treatment also reduced PKCα-KR-CLL cell migration towards CXCL12. Overall, we demonstrate that PKCβ expression facilitates leukemogenesis and identify that BCR-mediated signalling is a key driver of CLL development in the PKCα-KR model.

B cell antigen receptor (BCR) engagement can lead to many different physiologic outcomes. To achieve an appropriate response, the BCR signal is interpreted in the context of other stimuli and several additional receptors on the B cell surface participate in the modulation of the signal. Two members of the Siglec (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin) family, CD22 and Siglec-G have been shown to inhibit the BCR signal. Recent findings indicate that the ability of these two receptors to bind sialic acids might be important to induce tolerance to self-antigens. Sialylated glycans are usually absent on microbes but abundant in higher vertebrates and might therefore provide an important tolerogenic signal. Since the expression of the specific ligands for Siglec-G and CD22 is tightly regulated and since Siglecs are not only able to bind their ligands in trans but also on the same cell surface this might provide additional mechanisms to control the BCR signal. Although both Siglec-G and CD22 are expressed on B cells and are able to inhibit BCR mediated signaling, they also show unique biological functions. While CD22 is the dominant regulator of calcium signaling on conventional B2 cells and also seems to play a role on marginal zone B cells, Siglec-G exerts its function mainly on B1 cells and influences their lifespan and antibody production. Both Siglec-G and CD22 have also recently been linked to toll-like receptor signaling and may provide a link in the regulation of the adaptive and innate immune response of B cells.

B cell receptor-associated protein 31 (BAP31) is a transmembrane protein that is widely expressed and primarily located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). B cells play a crucial role in the immune system, and BAP31 significantly contributes to the functions of various immune cells. However, the specific role of BAP31 in B lymphocytes development remains unknown. In this study, we utilized a mouse model with BAP31 deleted from B cells to investigate its effects. Our findings reveal a block in early B cell development in the bone marrow and a significant decrease in the number of B cells in peripheral lymphoid organs taken from BAP31 B cell conditional knockout (BAP31-BCKO) mice. B cell receptor (BCR) signaling is crucial for the normal development and differentiation of B lymphocytes. BAP31, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein, directly regulates the BCR signaling pathway and was shown to be significantly positively correlated with B cell activation and proliferation. These findings establish BAP31 as a crucial regulator of early B cell development.

As an important chemokine receptor, the role of CX3CR1 has been studied extensively on the migration of lymphocytes including T and B cells. Although CX3CR1 + B cells have immune suppressor properties, little is known about its role on the regulation of BCR signaling and B cell differentiation as well as the underlying molecular mechanism. We have used CX3CR1 KO mice to study the effect of CX3CR1 deficiency on BCR signaling and B cell differentiation. Interestingly, we found that proximal BCR signaling, such as the activation of CD19, BTK and SHIP was reduced in CX3CR1 KO B cells upon antigenic stimulation. However, the activation of mTORC signaling was enhanced. Mechanistically, we found that the reduced BCR signaling in CX3CR1 KO B cells was due to reduced BCR clustering, which is caused by the enhanced actin accumulation by the plasma membrane via increased activation of WASP. This caused an increased differentiation of MZ B cells in CX3CR1 KO mice and an enhanced generation of plasma cells (PC) and antibodies. Our study shows that CX3CR1 regulates BCR signaling via actin remodeling and affects B cell differentiation and the humoral immune response.