Explore the vast range of titles available.

Deletion of p53 and pRB leads to gene instability and replication errors that contribute to oncogenesis. [...]given the very unfavourable prognosis of these tumours, it seems legitimate to perform surgery and completely stop immunosuppression. Conflict of interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Background BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after kidney transplantation can lead to serious complications such as BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and graft loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of BKPyVAN after implementing a BKPyV screening program, to map the distribution of BKPyV genotypes and subtypes in the Uppsala-Örebro region and to identify host and viral risk factors for clinically significant events. Methods This single-center prospective cohort study included kidney transplant patients aged ≥ 18 years at the Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden between 2016 and 2018. BKPyV DNA was analyzed in plasma and urine every 3 months until 18 months after transplantation. Also genotype and subtype were determined. A logistic regression model was used to analyze selected risk factors including recipient sex and age, AB0 incompatibility and rejection treatment prior to BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. Results In total, 205 patients were included. Of these, 151 (73.7%) followed the screening protocol with 6 plasma samples, while184 (89.8%) were sampled at least 5 times. Ten (4.9%) patients developed biopsy confirmed BKPyVAN and 33 (16.1%) patients met criteria for high-level BKPyV DNAemia. Male sex (OR 2.85, p  = 0.025) and age (OR 1.03 per year, p  = 0.020) were identified as significant risk factors for developing BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. BKPyVAN was associated with increased viral load at 3 months post transplantation (82,000 vs. < 400 copies/mL; p  = 0.0029) and with transient, high-level DNAemia ( n  = 7 (27%); p  < 0.0001). The most common genotypes were subtype Ib2 ( n  = 50 (65.8%)) and IVc2 ( n  = 20 (26.3%)). Conclusions Male sex and increasing age are related to an increased risk of BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. BKPyVAN is associated with transient, high-level DNAemia but no differences related to viral genotype were detected.

Despite the high prevalence of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) and the associated risk for BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant (KTX) recipients, many details on viral processes such as replication, maturation, assembly and virion release from host cells have not been fully elucidated. VP1 is a polyomavirus-specific protein that is expressed in the late phase of its replicative cycle with important functions in virion assembly and infectious particle release. This study investigated the localization and time-dependent changes in the distribution of VP1-positive viral particles and their association within the spectrum of differing cell morphologies that are observed in the urine of KTX patients upon active BKPyV infection. We found highly differing recognition patterns of two anti-VP1 antibodies with respect to intracellular and extracellular VP1 localization, pointing towards independent binding sites that were seemingly associated with differing stages of virion maturation. Cells originating from single clones were stably cultured out of the urine sediment of KTX recipients with suspected BKPyVAN. The cell morphology, polyploidy, virus replication and protein production were investigated by confocal microscopy using both a monoclonal (mAb 4942) and a polyclonal rabbit anti-VP1-specific antibody (RantiVP1 Ab). Immunoblotting was performed to investigate changes in the VP1 protein. Both antibodies visualized VP1 and the mAb 4942 recognized VP1 in cytoplasmic vesicles exhibiting idiomorphic sizes when released from the cells. In contrast, the polyclonal antibody detected VP1 within the nucleus and in cytoplasm in colocalization with the endoplasmic reticulum marker CNX. At the nuclear rim, VP1 was recognized by both antibodies. Immunoblotting revealed two smaller versions of VP1 in urinary decoy cell extracts, potentially from different translation start sites as evaluated by in silico analysis. Oxford Nanopore sequencing showed integration of BKPyV DNA in chromosomes 3, 4 and 7 in one of the five tested primary cell lines which produced high viral copies throughout four passages before transcending into senescence. The different staining with two VP1-specific antibodies emphasizes the modification of VP1 during the process of virus maturation and cellular exit. The integration of BKPyV into the human genome leads to high virus production; however, this alone does not transform the cell line into a permanently cycling and indefinitely replicating one.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) generally establishes a persistent subclinical infection in healthy individuals but can cause severe disease in transplant recipients. While an in vitro model to study acute replication exists, no practical model with which to study BKPyV persistence is currently available. BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a small nonenveloped DNA virus that establishes a ubiquitous, asymptomatic, and lifelong persistent infection in at least 80% of the world's population. In some immunosuppressed transplant recipients, BKPyV reactivation causes polyomavirus-associated nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis. We report a novel in vitro model of BKPyV persistence and reactivation using a BKPyV natural host cell line. In this system, viral genome loads remain constant for various times after establishment of persistent infection, during which BKPyV undergoes extensive random genome recombination. Certain recombination events result in viral DNA amplification and protein expression, resulting in production of viruses with enhanced replication ability. IMPORTANCE BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) generally establishes a persistent subclinical infection in healthy individuals but can cause severe disease in transplant recipients. While an in vitro model to study acute replication exists, no practical model with which to study BKPyV persistence is currently available. We established a BKPyV persistence model in cell culture. Our model reveals that the virus can persist for various periods of time before random recombination of the viral genome leads to enhanced replication.

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a widespread pathogen in humans. Polymorphism of the region encoding the VP1 protein of BKPyV provides the basis for classifying the virus into types and subtypes, whose frequency varies depending on geographic location. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of BKPyV in the Polish population and to assess its variation by analysing polymorphism in the typing region. The study was conducted on 168 healthy, Polish volunteers, whose blood (plasma) and urine were sampled. The virus was detected using PCR, products, sequenced and subjected to bioinformatic analysis. In addition, viral load was assessed by qPCR. The presence of the genetic material of the BK virus was noted in 61/168 urine samples but in none of the plasma sample. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the BKPyV isolates were of types I and IV, dominant in Europe (63.93% and 36.07%, respectively). All isolates from genotype I belonged to subtype Ib-2, showing polymorphism at position 1809 with a frequency of 61.54% (G1809A) and 38.46% (G1809C). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this magnitude on the genetic variation of BKPyV among healthy volunteers in Poland.

Kidney transplant recipients require a lifelong protocol of immunosuppressive therapy to prevent graft rejection. However, these same medications leave them susceptible to opportunistic infections. One pathogen of particular concern is human polyomavirus 1, also known as BK virus (BKPyV). This virus attacks kidney tubule epithelial cells and is a direct threat to the health of the graft. Current standard of care in BK virus-infected transplant recipients is reduction in immunosuppressant therapy, to allow the patient’s immune system to control the virus. This requires a delicate balance; immune suppression must be strong enough to prevent rejection, yet weak enough to allow viral clearance. We seek to model viral and immune dynamics with the ultimate goal of applying optimal control methods to this problem. In this paper, we begin with a previously published model and make simplifying assumptions that reduce the number of parameters from 20 to 14. We calibrate our model using newly available patient data and a detailed sensitivity analysis. Numerical results for multiple patients are given to show that the newer model reflects observed dynamics well.

Human Polyomavirus (HPyV) infections are common, ranging from 60% to 100%. In kidney transplant (KTx) recipients, HPyVs have been associated with allograft nephropathy, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and skin cancer. Whether such complications are caused by viral reactivation or primary infection transmitted by the donor remains debated. This study aimed to investigate the replication pattern and genomic characterization of BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV), JC Polyomavirus (JCPyV), and Merkel Cell Polyomavirus (MCPyV) infections in KTx. Urine samples from 57 KTx donor/recipient pairs were collected immediately before organ retrieval/transplant and periodically up to post-operative day 540. Specimens were tested for the presence of BKPyV, JCPyV, and MCPyV genome by virus-specific Real-Time PCR and molecularly characterized. HPyVs genome was detected in 49.1% of donors and 77.2% of recipients. Sequences analysis revealed the archetypal strain for JCPyV, TU and Dunlop strains for BKPyV, and IIa-2 strain for MCPyV. VP1 genotyping showed a high frequency for JCPyV genotype 1 and BKPyV genotype I. Our experience demonstrates that after KTx, HPyVs genome remains stable over time with no emergence of quasi-species. HPyVs strains isolated in donor/recipient pairs are mostly identical, suggesting that viruses detected in the recipient may be transmitted by the allograft.

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has pathogenic relevance especially in immunocompromised patients. No causal therapy has been established yet. Therefore, new therapeutic targets need to be identified in experimental studies. A 3D organotypic cell culture model with primary urothelial cells and fibroblasts was used as infection model. The detection of virus replication was performed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also used for analysis. Interleukin levels were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Interestingly, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway seems to be activated during infection with BKPyV, for example phosphorylated STAT3 is significantly (P < 0.0001) elevated on day 6 following infection. Therefore, we performed ELISAs for involved interleukins in STAT3 pathway. Interleukin 11 (IL‐11) was significantly (P = 0.026) elevated at day 9. Subsequently, 3D cultures were treated with IL‐11 neutralizing antibody. At day 9 following infection, the median virus replication rate is 4.4 × 106 copies/ml. The difference to replication rate without treatment was significantly lower at day 6 (P < 0.0001) and at day 9 (P < 0.0001), respectively. STAT3 pathways seem to be involved during BKPyV infection and need further investigation in experimental studies. A very promising target for treatment might be IL‐11.

In relation to the comment by Henriksen and Rinaldo, the authors intend to emphasize that before every experiment with SVGp12 cells they routinely test the cells for the absence of BKPyV contamination. The scientists can state that the SVGp12 cells used in their laboratory were not infected by BKPyV and that their results were also validated on the COS-7 cell line, which is permissive for JCPyV infection. Therefore, the overall findings of the study and its conclusions remain authentic. The authors recommend the necessity of carefully testing SVGp12 cells for BKPyV infection before use or, alternatively, in case of a first purchase; moreover, it is possible to choose different cell lines to avoid running into this unpleasant situation.

Purpose BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection manifests as renal inflammation and can cause kidney damage. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is increased in renal inflammation and injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TNF-α blockade on BKPyV infection. Methods Urine specimens from 22 patients with BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVN) and 35 non-BKPyVN kidney transplant recipients were analyzed. Results We demonstrated increased urinary levels of TNF-α and its receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, in BKPyVN patients. Treating BKPyV-infected human proximal tubular cells (HRPTECs) with TNF-α stimulated the expression of large T antigen and viral capsid protein-1 mRNA and proteins and BKPyV promoter activity. Knockdown of TNFR1 or TNFR2 expression caused a reduction in TNF-α-stimulated viral replication. NF-κB activation induced by overexpression of constitutively active IKK2 significantly increased viral replication and the activity of the BKPyV promoter containing an NF-κB binding site. The addition of a NF-κB inhibitor on BKPyV-infected cells suppressed viral replication. Blockade of TNF-α functionality by etanercept reduced BKPyV-stimulated expression of TNF-α, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and IL-8 and suppressed TNF-α-stimulated viral replication. In cultured HRPTECs and THP-1 cells, BKPyV infection led to increased expression of TNF-α, interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), IL-6 and TNFR1 and TNFR2 but the stimulated magnitude was far less than that induced by poly(I:C). This may suggest that BKPyV-mediated autocrine effect is not a major source of TNFα. Conclusion TNF-α stimulates BKPyV replication and inhibition of its signal cascade or functionality attenuates its stimulatory effect. Our study provides a therapeutic anti-BKPyV target.