Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
818 result(s) for "Band selection"
Sort by:
Multiple Band Prioritization Criteria-Based Band Selection for Hyperspectral Imagery
Band selection (BS) is an effective pre-processing way to reduce the redundancy of hyperspectral data. Specifically, the band prioritization (BP) criterion plays an essential role since it can judge the importance of bands from a particular perspective. However, most of the existing methods select bands according to a single criterion, leading to incomplete band evaluation and insufficient generalization against different data sets. To address this problem, this work proposes a multi-criteria-based band selection (MCBS) framework, which innovatively treats BS as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. First, a decision matrix is constructed based on several typical BPs, so as to evaluate the bands from different focuses. Then, MCBS defines the global positive and negative idea solutions and selects bands according to their relative closeness to these solutions. Since each BP has a different capability to discriminate the bands, two weight estimation approaches are developed to adaptively balance the contributions of various criteria. Finally, this work also provides an extended version of MCBS, which incorporates the subspace partition strategy to reduce the correlation of the selected bands. In this paper, the classification task is used to evaluate the performance of the selected band subsets. Extensive experiments on three public data sets verify that the proposed method outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
Underwater Hyperspectral Target Detection with Band Selection
Compared to multi-spectral imagery, hyperspectral imagery has very high spectral resolution with abundant spectral information. In underwater target detection, hyperspectral technology can be advantageous in the sense of a poor underwater imaging environment, complex background, or protective mechanism of aquatic organisms. Due to high data redundancy, slow imaging speed, and long processing of hyperspectral imagery, a direct use of hyperspectral images in detecting targets cannot meet the needs of rapid detection of underwater targets. To resolve this issue, a fast, hyperspectral underwater target detection approach using band selection (BS) is proposed. It first develops a constrained-target optimal index factor (OIF) band selection (CTOIFBS) to select a band subset with spectral wavelengths specifically responding to the targets of interest. Then, an underwater spectral imaging system integrated with the best-selected band subset is constructed for underwater target image acquisition. Finally, a constrained energy minimization (CEM) target detection algorithm is used to detect the desired underwater targets. Experimental results demonstrate that the band subset selected by CTOIFBS is more effective in detecting underwater targets compared to the other three existing BS methods, uniform band selection (UBS), minimum variance band priority (MinV-BP), and minimum variance band priority with OIF (MinV-BP-OIF). In addition, the results also show that the acquisition and detection speed of the designed underwater spectral acquisition system using CTOIFBS can be significantly improved over the original underwater hyperspectral image system without BS.
Genetic Algorithm Captured the Informative Bands for Partial Least Squares Regression Better on Retrieving Leaf Nitrogen from Hyperspectral Reflectance
Nitrogen is a major nutrient regulating the physiological processes of plants. Although various partial least squares regression (PLSR) models have been proposed to estimate the leaf nitrogen content (LNC) from hyperspectral data with good accuracies, they are unfortunately not robust and are often not applicable to novel datasets beyond which they were developed. Selecting informative bands has been reported to be critical to refining the performance of the PLSR model and improving its robustness for general applications. However, no consensus on the optimal band selection method has yet been reached because the calibration and validation datasets are very often limited to a few species with small sample sizes. In this study, we address the question based on a relatively comprehensive joint dataset, including a simulation dataset generated from the recently developed leaf scale radiative transfer model (PROSPECT-PRO) and two public online datasets, for assessing different informative band selection techniques on the informative band selection. The results revealed that the goodness-of-fit of PLSR models to estimate LNC could be greatly improved by coupling appropriate band-selection methods rather than using full bands instead. The PLSR models calibrated from the simulation dataset with informative bands selected by genetic algorithm (GA) and uninformative variable elimination (UVE) method were reliable for retrieving the LNC of the two independent field-measured datasets as well. Particularly, GA was more effective to capture the informative bands for retrieving LNC from hyperspectral data. These findings should provide valuable insights for building robust PLSR models for retrieving LNC from hyperspectral remote sensing data.
Band-Selection of a Portal LED-Induced Autofluorescence Multispectral Imager to Improve Oral Cancer Detection
This aim of this study was to find effective spectral bands for the early detection of oral cancer. The spectral images in different bands were acquired using a self-made portable light-emitting diode (LED)-induced autofluorescence multispectral imager equipped with 365 and 405 nm excitation LEDs, emission filters with center wavelengths of 470, 505, 525, 532, 550, 595, 632, 635, and 695 nm, and a color image sensor. The spectral images of 218 healthy points in 62 healthy participants and 218 tumor points in 62 patients were collected in the ex vivo trials at China Medical University Hospital. These ex vivo trials were similar to in vivo because the spectral images of anatomical specimens were immediately acquired after the on-site tumor resection. The spectral images associated with red, blue, and green filters correlated with and without nine emission filters were quantized by four computing method, including summated intensity, the highest number of the intensity level, entropy, and fractional dimension. The combination of four computing methods, two excitation light sources with two intensities, and 30 spectral bands in three experiments formed 264 classifiers. The quantized data in each classifier was divided into two groups: one was the training group optimizing the threshold of the quantized data, and the other was validating group tested under this optimized threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each classifier were derived from these tests. To identify the influential spectral bands based on the area under the region and the testing results, a single-layer network learning process was used. This was compared to conventional rules-based approaches to show its superior and faster performance. Consequently, four emission filters with the center wavelengths of 470, 505, 532, and 550 nm were selected by an AI-based method and verified using a rule-based approach. The sensitivities of six classifiers using these emission filters were more significant than 90%. The average sensitivity of these was about 96.15%, the average specificity was approximately 69.55%, and the average accuracy was about 82.85%.
Adaptive feature selection for hyperspectral image classification based on Improved Unsupervised Mayfly optimization Algorithm
Hyperspectral imaging has appeared as a vital tool in remote sensing science for its efficacy in effectively delineating regions of interest. However, the classification of hyperspectral images (HSI) encounters notable challenges, including the high dimensionality of highly correlated bands and the scarcity of training samples. Addressing these challenges is very essential by determining the most relevant bands, as well as the utilization of unlabelled training samples. In response to these issues, this study presents an unsupervised framework based on an enhanced Mayfly Optimization Algorithm (MOA) in order to select the most informative spectral bands. The enhanced MOA effectively identifies informative bands by leveraging the random solutions to explore the global search space, and enhance the solution diversity. On the other hand, leveraging the best experiences to boost the local search, efficiently attaining optimal solutions. This balanced exploration-exploitation strategy ensures the algorithm’s robustness and effectiveness in addressing the optimization problem. Ultimately, the proposed approach is demonstrated at the pixel-level hyperspectral image classification using two machine learning classifiers: Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. Thorough experimentation carried out on three benchmark hyperspectral datasets consistently confirms the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fusion of Various Band Selection Methods for Hyperspectral Imagery
This paper presents an approach to band selection fusion (BSF) which fuses bands produced by a set of different band selection (BS) methods for a given number of bands to be selected, nBS. Since each BS method has its own merit in finding the desired bands, various BS methods produce different band subsets with the same nBS. In order to take advantage of these different band subsets, the proposed BSF is performed by first finding the union of all band subsets produced by a set of BS methods as a joint band subset (JBS). Due to the fact that a band selected by one BS method in JBS may be also selected by other BS methods, in this case each band in JBS is prioritized by the frequency of the band appearing in the band subsets to be fused. Such frequency is then used to calculate the priority probability of this particular band in the JBS. Because the JBS is obtained by taking the union of all band subsets, the number of bands in the JBS is at least equal to or greater than nBS. So, there may be more than nBS bands, in which case, BSF uses the frequency-calculated priority probabilities to select nBS bands from JBS. Two versions of BSF, called progressive BSF and simultaneous BSF, are developed for this purpose. Of particular interest is that BSF can prioritize bands without band de-correlation, which has been a major issue in many BS methods using band prioritization as a criterion to select bands.
A Band Subset Selection Approach Based on Sparse Self-Representation and Band Grouping for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Band subset selection (BSS) is one of the ways to implement band selection (BS) for a hyperspectral image (HSI). Different from conventional BS methods, which select bands one by one, BSS selects a band subset each time and preserves the best one from the collection of the band subsets. This paper proposes a BSS method, called band grouping-based sparse self-representation BSS (BG-SSRBSS), for hyperspectral image classification. It formulates BS as a sparse self-representation (SSR) problem in which the entire bands can be represented by a set of informatively complementary bands. The BG-SSRBSS consists of two steps. To tackle the issue of selecting redundant bands, it first applies band grouping (BG) techniques to pre-group the entire bands to form multiple band groups, and then performs band group subset selection (BGSS) to find the optimal band group subset. The corresponding representative bands are taken as the BS result. To efficiently find the nearly global optimal subset among all possible band group subsets, sequential and successive iterative search algorithms are adopted. Land cover classification experiments conducted on three real HSI datasets show that BG-SSRBSS can improve classification accuracy by 4–20% compared to the existing BSS methods and requires less computation time.
Spatial Spectral Band Selection for Enhanced Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Classification Applications
Despite the numerous band selection (BS) algorithms reported in the field, most if not all have exhibited maximal accuracy when more spectral bands are utilized for classification. This apparently disagrees with the theoretical model of the ‘curse of dimensionality’ phenomenon, without apparent explanations. If it were true, then BS would be deemed as an academic piece of research without real benefits to practical applications. This paper presents a spatial spectral mutual information (SSMI) BS scheme that utilizes a spatial feature extraction technique as a preprocessing step, followed by the clustering of the mutual information (MI) of spectral bands for enhancing the efficiency of the BS. Through the SSMI BS scheme, a sharp ’bell’-shaped accuracy-dimensionality characteristic that peaks at about 20 bands has been observed for the very first time. The performance of the proposed SSMI BS scheme has been validated through 6 hyperspectral imaging (HSI) datasets (Indian Pines, Botswana, Barrax, Pavia University, Salinas, and Kennedy Space Center (KSC)), and its classification accuracy is shown to be approximately 10% better than seven state-of-the-art BS schemes (Saliency, HyperBS, SLN, OCF, FDPC, ISSC, and Convolution Neural Network (CNN)). The present result confirms that the high efficiency of the BS scheme is essentially important to observe and validate the Hughes’ phenomenon in the analysis of HSI data. Experiments also show that the classification accuracy can be affected by as much as approximately 10% when a single ‘crucial’ band is included or missed out for classification.
MIMO Self-Heterodyne OFDM Using Band Selection Technique
The 5G technology is a promising technology to cope with the increasing demand for higher data rate and quality of service. In this paper, two proposed techniques are implemented for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) self-heterodyne OFDM system to enhance data rate and minimize the bit error rate (BER). In both of the two proposed techniques, Band Selection (BS) approach is used, once with Space Time Block Coded (STBC) for the first proposed technique (BS- STBC), and once again with Frequency Space Time Block Coded (FSTBC) for the second proposed technique (BS-FSTBC). The use of the BS in the proposed techniques helps to choose the sub-band with better subchannels gains for sending the information and consequently, minimize the BER. Moreover, the use of the FSTBC instead of STBC helps to use the spectral efficiently and hence increase data rate. The simulation results show that the proposed techniques BS-STBC and BS-FSTBC, for the MIMO self-heterodyne OFDM system, provide a great enhancement in the BER performance when compared to the conventional techniques. Moreover, the simulation results show that the first proposed technique BS-FSTBC outperform the second propose technique BS-STBC in term of the BER performance.
Band Subset Selection for Hyperspectral Image Classification
This paper develops a new approach to band subset selection (BSS) for hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) which selects multiple bands simultaneously as a band subset, referred to as simultaneous multiple band selection (SMMBS), rather than one band at a time sequentially, referred to as sequential multiple band selection (SQMBS), as most traditional band selection methods do. In doing so, a criterion is particularly developed for BSS that can be used for HSIC. It is a linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) derived from adaptive beamforming in array signal processing which can be used to model misclassification errors as the minimum variance. To avoid an exhaustive search for all possible band subsets, two numerical algorithms, referred to as sequential (SQ) and successive (SC) algorithms are also developed for LCMV-based SMMBS, called SQ LCMV-BSS and SC LCMV-BSS. Experimental results demonstrate that LCMV-based BSS has advantages over SQMBS.