Explore the vast range of titles available.

Early conversion to everolimus was assessed in kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP), a population in whom data are lacking. The SENATOR multicenter study enrolled 207 kidney transplant recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal at week 2 post-transplant (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00956293]). At week 7, patients were randomized (1:2 ratio) to continue the previous calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclosporine or switch to a CNI-free regimen with MPA, everolimus (5-10 ng/mL) and basiliximab at weeks 7 and 12, then followed for 18 weeks to month 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was estimated GFR (eGFR). At week 7, 77/207 (37.2%) patients were randomized (53 everolimus, 24 control). At month 6, eGFR was comparable: 36.5±10.8ml/min with everolimus versus 42.0±13.0ml/min in the control group (p = 0.784). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 27.8% of everolimus-treated patients and 0.0% of control patients (p = 0005). Efficacy profiles showed no difference. In conclusion, eGFR, safety and efficacy outcomes at month 6 post-transplant showed no difference between groups. The everolimus group experienced a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. However, the high rate of non-randomization is highly relevant, indicating this to be a somewhat unstable patient population regardless of treatment.

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD52 and causes depletion of T and B lymphocytes, monocytes, and NK cells. Alemtuzumab is registered for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is also used in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab is used off-label in kidney transplantation as induction and anti-rejection therapy. The objective of this review is to present a review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and use of alemtuzumab in kidney transplantation. A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials. No pharmacokinetic or dose-finding studies of alemtuzumab have been performed in kidney transplantation. Although such studies were conducted in patients with CLL and MS, these findings cannot be directly extrapolated to transplant recipients, because CLL patients have a much higher load of CD52-positive cells and, therefore, target-mediated clearance will differ between these two indications. Alemtuzumab used as induction therapy in kidney transplantation results in a lower incidence of acute rejection compared to basiliximab therapy and comparable results as compared with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG). Alemtuzumab used as anti-rejection therapy results in a comparable graft survival rate compared with rATG, although infusion-related side effects appear to be less. There is a need for pharmacokinetic and dose-finding studies of alemtuzumab in kidney transplant recipients to establish the optimal balance between efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials with sufficient follow-up are necessary to provide further evidence for the treatment of severe kidney transplant rejection.

In this study, we aimed to analyze the association among the timing of tacrolimus initiation, time required to reach the target blood concentration, and early acute kidney injury (AKI) after tacrolimus administration in heart transplant recipients who received basiliximab induction therapy. 88 patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Induction therapy was administered to 52 patients. AKI was evaluated within 7 days of tacrolimus administration. The rate of increase in tacrolimus trough concentration to the target trough concentration of 10 µg/mL early after its administration was set to be similar in the basiliximab induction and non-induction group; 8 and 2 patients developed AKI in the induction and non-induction group, respectively. In the induction group, there was no significant difference in the timing of tacrolimus initiation and the time required to reach the target concentration between patients who developed and did not develop AKI. In contrast, the cumulative incidence of AKI was significantly different between patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate above 43 mL/min/1.73m at the start of tacrolimus administration (37.5% and 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.045). In patients receiving basiliximab induction therapy, the timing of tacrolimus initiation and the time to reach the target concentration are unlikely to be associated with early AKI after tacrolimus administration. However, the recovery of sufficient renal function after heart transplantation is important for determining the start time of tacrolimus.

Synthetic mRNA provides a template for the synthesis of any given protein, protein fragment or peptide and lends itself to a broad range of pharmaceutical applications, including different modalities of cancer immunotherapy. With the ease of rapid, large scale Good Manufacturing Practice-grade mRNA production, mRNA is ideally poised not only for off-the shelf cancer vaccines but also for personalized neoantigen vaccination. The ability to stimulate pattern recognition receptors and thus an anti-viral type of innate immune response equips mRNA-based vaccines with inherent adjuvanticity. Nucleoside modification and elimination of double-stranded RNA can reduce the immunomodulatory activity of mRNA and increase and prolong protein production. In combination with nanoparticle-based formulations that increase transfection efficiency and facilitate lymphatic system targeting, nucleoside-modified mRNA enables efficient delivery of cytokines, costimulatory receptors, or therapeutic antibodies. Steady but transient production of the encoded bioactive molecule from the mRNA template can improve the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties as compared to the respective recombinant proteins. This may be harnessed for applications that benefit from a higher level of expression control, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified adoptive T-cell therapies. This review highlights the advancements in the field of mRNA-based cancer therapeutics, providing insights into key preclinical developments and the evolving clinical landscape.

There is extensive literature with comparisons between Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) and Basiliximab (BSX) as induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. The purpose of our benchmarking study was to describe the consequences in terms of practices in 6 transplantation centers of a French prospective cohort. We included adult patients who received a first or second kidney graft between 2013 and 2019 (n = 4157). We used logistic regressions to identify characteristics associated with the use of ATG or BSX. Use of ATG between the centers ranged from 41% to 75%. We observed different factors associated with the treatment decision. Compared to a first transplant, performing a second graft was the only factor significantly associated with the choice of ATG in all centers. The AUC ranged from 0.67 to 0.91, indicating that the centers seemed to define their own rules. As a result, for patients with the same low immunological risk, the probability of receiving ATG varied from 7% to 36%. We stratified the analyses according to two periods, from 2013 to 2015 and from 2016 to 2019. A similar heterogeneity was observed, and in some cases ATG indications between the centers were inverted. The heterogeneity of induction therapy practices did not decrease in France, even if the reated literature is prolific. This illustrates the necessity to improve the literature by using meta-analyses of recent studies stratified by graft and patient profiles.

Autoimmune encephalitis represents a potentially treatable immune-mediated condition that is being more frequently recognized. Prompt immunotherapy is a key factor for the management of autoimmune encephalitis. First-line treatments include intravenous steroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins, which can be combined in most severe cases. Rituximab and cyclophosphamide are administered as second-line agents in unresponsive cases. A minority of patients may still remain refractory, thus representing a major clinical challenge. In these cases, treatment strategies are controversial, and no guidelines exist. Treatments proposed for refractory autoimmune encephalitis include (1) cytokine-based drugs (such as tocilizumab, interleukin-2/basiliximab, anakinra, and tofacitinib); (2) plasma cell-depleting agents (such as bortezomib and daratumumab); and (3) treatments targeting intrathecal immune cells or their trafficking through the blood–brain barrier (such as intrathecal methotrexate and natalizumab). The efficacy evidence of these drugs is mostly based on case reports or small case series, with few reported controlled studies or systematic reviews. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence and related methodological issues in the use of these drugs for the treatment of refractory autoimmune encephalitis.

Minimization in immunosuppression could contribute to the appearance the donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and graft failure. The objective was to compare the incidence of DSA in renal transplantation (RT) in recipients with immunosuppression with and without steroids. A prospective cohort from March 1st, 2013 to March 1st, 2014 and follow-up (1 year), ended in March 2015, was performed in living donor renal transplant (LDRT) recipients with immunosuppression and early steroid withdrawal (ESW) and compared with a control cohort (CC) of patients with steroid-sustained immunosuppression. All patients were negative cross-matched and for DSA pre-transplant. The regression model was used to associate the development of DSA antibodies and acute rejection (AR) in subjects with immunosuppressive regimens with and without steroids. Seventy-seven patients were included (30 ESW and 47 CC). The positivity of DSA class I (13% vs 2%; P < 0.05) and class II (17% vs 4%, P = 0.06) antibodies were higher in ESW versus CC. The ESW tended to predict DSA class II (RR 5.7; CI (0.93–34.5, P = 0.06). T-cell mediated rejection presented in 80% of patients with DSA class I (P = 0.07), and 86% with DSA II (P = 0.03), and was associated with DSA class II, (RR 7.23; CI (1.2–44), P = 0.03). ESW could favor the positivity of DSA. A most strictly monitoring the DSA is necessary for the early stages of the transplant to clarify the relationship between T-cell mediated rejection and DSA.

Table 1 Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Clinical data of patients before pred+CsA treatment Age at diagnosis (years) 54 46 54 51 Sex Female Female Female Male Disease duration of IP (weeks) 3 2 2 3 Cutaneous manifestation - - - - Heliotrope rash Positive Positive Positive Positive Gottron's papule Positive Positive Positive Positive Skin ulceration Negative Negative Negative Negative Electromyography (EMG) Negative Negative Negative Negative Peripheral blood - - - - WBC (/μl) 6600 9200 7400 6890 Creatine (mg/dl) 38.7 57.4 33.0 38.6 ALT (U/l) 118 45 372 26 LDH (U/l) 273 253 637 338 CRP (mg/dl) 0.17 3.30 3.45 5.2 CK (U/l) 59 116 288 63 ANA antibody (â[per thousand]¥1:80) 1:80 Negative Negative Negative Anti-Jo-1 antibody Negative Negative Negative Negative Anti-MDA5 antibody Positive Positive Positive Positive Ferritin (mg/dl) 634 1780 1920 2217 Arterial blood gas - - - - PH 7.39 7.441 7.478 7.43 P/F ratio 357 387 376 404 PCO2 (mm Hg) 38.7 41.6 30.6 35.2 HCO3- (mEq/l) 24.1 23.6 22.8 23.4 mMRC 2 2 3 2 HRCT score 110.8 156.7 185.8 143.3 Pulmonary function FVC 64 63 59 58 TLC 67 58 57 53 DLCO 55 45 44 39 Basic treatment Pred (mg) 80 80 100 100 CsA (mg) 150 175 180 150 Response to pred+CsA Progressed time after pred+CsA treatment 5th week 9th week 2nd week 4th week Time of IVIg treatment 5th week 9th week / / Time of basiliximab treatment 6th week 10th week 2nd week 4th week Cumulative dose of basiliximab 40 40 20 40 CsA, ciclosporin A; IP, interstitial pneumonia; FVC, forced vital capacity, IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; P/F, PaO2/FiO2; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; Pred, prednisone; TLC, total lung capacity.

A multispecies outbreak of Nocardia occurred among heart transplant recipients (HTR), but not lung transplant recipients (LTR), in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, during 2018-2019. We performed a retrospective review of 23 HTR and LTR who had Nocardia spp. infections during June 2015-March 2021, compared risk factors for Nocardia infection, and evaluated climate conditions before, during, and after the period of the 2018-2019 outbreak. Compared with LTR, HTR had a shorter median time from transplant to Nocardia diagnosis, higher prevalence of diabetes, greater use of induction immunosuppression with basiliximab, and increased rates of cellular rejection before Nocardia diagnosis. During the outbreak, Sydney experienced the lowest monthly precipitation and driest surface levels compared with time periods directly before and after the outbreak. Increased immunosuppression of HTR compared with LTR, coupled with extreme weather conditions during 2018-2019, may explain this outbreak of Nocardia infections in HTR.

Introduction: Reversible and irreversible nephrotoxicity are known complications of tacrolimus. Approaches to reduce the incidence of nephrotoxicity include the reduction or avoidance of tacrolimus but must be weighed against risk of rejection. Infrequently, basiliximab has been used outside of the induction period to facilitate temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). Objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe renal recovery after temporary tacrolimus cessation with non-induction basiliximab (NIB) compared to a matched cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center study of adult cardiothoracic transplant recipients that received basiliximab beyond post-operative day 7 for temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of AKI between January 2019 and November 2023 and matched them to acontrol cohort. Results: Twelve patients underwent temporary tacrolimus cessation with NIB. In total, 7 (58%) patients achieved initial renal recovery at tacrolimus resumption compared to 15 (42%) patients in the matched cohort at an equivalent time point. No difference between treated rejection (17% vs. 19%, p = 0.80) or infection (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.32) was observed between tacrolimus cessation and its matched cohort. Conclusions: The use of NIB for tacrolimus cessation can allow for potential renal recovery after an AKI or in patients at risk of AKI. This approach does not appear to significantly increase the risk of rejection but may increase the risk of infection in the long term.