Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study evaluated the diagnostic value of a rapid whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach, combining Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) PET with an optimised β value and abbreviated MRI (abb-MRI). The study compares the diagnostic performance of this approach with the standard PET/MRI that utilises ordered subsets expectation maximisation (OSEM) PET and standard MRI (std-MRI). The optimal β value was determined by evaluating the noise-equivalent count (NEC) phantom, background variability, contrast recovery, recovery coefficient, and visual scores (VS) for OSEM and BPL with β100–1000 at 2.5-, 1.5-, and 1.0-min scans, respectively. Clinical evaluations were conducted for NECpatient, NECdensity, liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion maximum standardised uptake value, lesion signal-to-background ratio, lesion SNR, and VS in 49 patients. The diagnostic performance of BPL/abb-MRI was retrospectively assessed for lesion detection and differentiation in 156 patients using VS. The optimal β values were β600 for a 1.5-min scan and β700 for a 1.0-min scan. BPL/abb-MRI at these β values was equivalent to OSEM/std-MRI for a 2.5-min scan. By combining BPL with optimal β and abb-MRI, rapid whole-body PET/MRI could be achieved in ≤1.5 min per bed position, while maintaining comparable diagnostic performance to standard PET/MRI.

Purpose To adopt the merits of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm (incl. improved contrast recovery), a deep learning ResNet model was trained to estimate BPL-like images using the non-attenuation, non-scatter corrected PET images (PET-nonAC) as inputs. Methods Images of 112 patients were used for model training (79 patients), validation (13 patients) and testing (20 patients). The ResNet model used PET-nonAC images as input and predicted corresponding BPL-like images. The model performance regarding image quality was evaluated using metrics such as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Results The CNR of the reference BPL images was 2.40, while estimated BPL-like images using the deep learning model have a CNR value of 2.42 indicative of comparable performance. Conclusion The estimated BPL-like images of the deep learning model offer comparable quality to the reference BPL images especially regarding the CNR metric. This deep learning model can be used to improve the image quality PET-nonAC by adopting the characteristics of the BPL images.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging after 90Y liver radioembolization is used for both lesion identification and dosimetry. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms are an alternative to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with improved image quality and lesion detectability. The investigation of optimal parameters for 90Y image reconstruction of Q.Clear, a commercial BPL algorithm developed by General Electric (GE), in PET/MR is a field of interest and the subject of this study. The NEMA phantom was filled at an 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio. Acquisitions were performed on a PET/MR scanner for clinically relevant activities between 0.7 and 3.3 MBq/ml. Reconstructions with Q.Clear were performed varying the β penalty parameter between 20 and 6000, the acquisition time between 5 and 20 min and pixel size between 1.56 and 4.69 mm. OSEM reconstructions of 28 subsets with 2 and 4 iterations with and without Time-of-Flight (TOF) were compared to Q.Clear with β = 4000. Recovery coefficients (RC), their coefficient of variation (COV), background variability (BV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and residual activity in the cold insert were evaluated. Increasing β parameter lowered RC, COV and BV, while CNR was maximized at β = 4000; further increase resulted in oversmoothing. For quantification purposes, β = 1000–2000 could be more appropriate. Longer acquisition times resulted in larger CNR due to reduced image noise. Q.Clear reconstructions led to higher CNR than OSEM. A β of 4000 was obtained for optimal image quality, although lower values could be considered for quantification purposes. An optimal acquisition time of 15 min was proposed considering its clinical use.

Introduction:Since the Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) and Q.Clear algorithm each have advantages and disadvantages, we aimed to determine the optimal values of reconstruction protocols to achieve the best diagnostic parameters for the neurological PET brain images of BGO-based PET/CT scanners. Methods: Images of point sources, as well as Hoffman and Carlson phantoms filled with [18F]FDG radiopharmaceutical, were acquired using a PET/CT scanner. In OSEM, images were reconstructed with multiple iterations and subsets, applying 3.2 mm or 6.4 mm Gaussian filters, with PSF recovery enabled. For comparison, one reconstruction was done without PSF recovery using Iteration-Subset=12–12. In Q.Clear, β values from 50 to 500 in 50-step increments were used for reconstruction. Parameters such as FWHM, COV and modified RC were evaluated. A cost function identified the best results, which were blindly assessed by two nuclear medicine experts for noise, contrast, and overall image quality. Results: Quantitatively, β=50-200 and Iteration-Subset=20-12 were the parameters whose Cost Function values were higher than Iteration-Subset =12-12, which was routinely used to reconstruct brain images in our center. Visual evaluations show that β=200 has the lowest noise and the lowest contrast and evaluators gave the highest score for overall image quality to β=200 and β=150. This study has evaluated β=200 and β=150 as optimal for reconstructing brain images. Conclusions: This study investigated the different reconstruction algorithms to obtain the optimal parameters. The Q.clear algorithm with penalty function of β=200 and β=150 is recommended for brain neurological images of GE Healthcare PET/CT scanner.

BackgroundRecently, a Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm was introduced for a commercial PET/CT with the potential to improve image quality. We compared the performance of this BPL algorithm with conventional reconstruction algorithms under realistic clinical conditions such as daily practiced at many European sites, i.e. low 18F-FDG dose and short acquisition times.ResultsTo study the performance of the BPL algorithm, regular clinical 18F-FDG whole body PET scans were made. In addition, two types of phantoms were scanned with 4-37 mm sized spheres filled with 18F-FDG at sphere-to-background ratios of 10-to-1, 4-to-1, and 2-to-1. Images were reconstructed using standard ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with point spread function (PSF), and the BPL algorithm using β-values of 450, 550 and 700. To quantify the image quality, the lesion detectability, activity recovery, and the coefficient of variation (COV) within a single bed position (BP) were determined. We found that when applying the BPL algorithm both smaller lesions in clinical studies as well as spheres in phantom studies can be detected more easily due to a higher SUV recovery, especially for higher contrast ratios. Under standard clinical scanning conditions, i.e. low number of counts, the COV is higher for the BPL (β=450) than the OSEM+PSF algorithm. Increase of the β-value to 550 or 700 results in a COV comparable to OSEM+PSF, however, at the cost of contrast, though still better than OSEM+PSF. At the edges of the axial field of view (FOV) where BPs overlap, COV can increase to levels at which bands become visible in clinical images, related to the lower local axial sensitivity of the PET/CT, which is due to the limited bed overlap of 23% such as advised by the manufacturer.ConclusionsThe BPL algorithm performs better than the standard OSEM+PSF algorithm on small lesion detectability, SUV recovery, and noise suppression. Increase of the percentage of bed overlap, time per BP, administered activity, or the β-value, all have a direct positive impact on image quality, though the latter with some loss of small lesion detectability. Thus, BPL algorithms are very interesting for improving image quality, especially in small lesion detectability.

BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) imaging of 90Y following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is possible, but image quality is poor, and therefore, accurate quantification and dosimetry are challenging. This study aimed to quantitatively optimise 90Y PET imaging using a new Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear, GE Healthcare). The length of time per bed was also investigated to study its impact on quantification accuracy.MethodsA NEMA IQ phantom with an 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio was scanned overnight on a GE Discovery 710 PET/CT scanner. Datasets were rebinned into varying lengths of time (5–60 min); the 15-min rebins were reconstructed using BPL reconstruction with a range of noise penalisation weighting factors (beta values). The metrics of contrast recovery (CR), background variability (BV), and recovered activity percentage (RAP) were calculated in order to identify the optimum beta value. Reconstructions were then carried out on the rest of the timing datasets using the optimised beta value; the same metrics were used to assess the quantification accuracy of the reconstructed images.ResultsA beta value of 1000 produced the highest CR and RAP (76% and 73%, 37 mm sphere) without overly accentuating the noise (BV) in the image. There was no statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in either the CR or RAP for scan times of > 15 min. For the 5-min acquisitions, there was a statistically significant decrease in RAP (28 mm sphere, p < 0.01) when compared to the 15-min acquisition.ConclusionOur results indicate that an acquisition length of 15 min and beta value of 1000 (when using Q.Clear reconstruction) are optimum for quantitative 90Y PET imaging. Increasing the acquisition time to more than 15 min reduces the image noise but has no significant impact on image quantification.

BackgroundBayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithm is an effective way to suppress noise in the process of positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction by incorporating a smooth penalty. The strength of the smooth penalty is controlled by the penalization factor. The aim was to investigate the impact of different penalization factors and acquisition times in a new BPL algorithm, HYPER Iterative, on the quality of 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT images. A phantom and 25 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms who underwent 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT were included. The PET data were acquired in a list-mode with a digital PET/CT scanner and reconstructed by ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and the HYPER Iterative algorithm with seven penalization factors between 0.03 and 0.5 for acquisitions of 2 and 3 min per bed position (m/b), both including time-of-flight and point of spread function recovery. The contrast recovery (CR), background variability (BV) and radioactivity concentration ratio (RCR) of the phantom; The SUVmean and coefficient of variation (CV) of the liver; and the SUVmax of the lesions were measured. Image quality was rated by two radiologists using a five-point Likert scale.ResultsThe CR, BV, and RCR decreased with increasing penalization factors for four “hot” spheres, and the HYPER Iterative 2 m/b groups with penalization factors of 0.07 to 0.2 had equivalent CR and superior BV performance compared to the OSEM 3 m/b group. The liver SUVmean values were approximately equal in all reconstruction groups (range 5.95–5.97), and the liver CVs of the HYPER Iterative 2 m/b and 3 m/b groups with the penalization factors of 0.1 to 0.2 were equivalent to those of the OSEM 3 m/b group (p = 0.113–0.711 and p = 0.079–0.287, respectively), while the lesion SUVmax significantly increased by 19–22% and 25%, respectively (all p < 0.001). The highest qualitative score was attained at a penalization factor of 0.2 for the HYPER Iterative 2 m/b group (3.20 ± 0.52) and 3 m/b group (3.70 ± 0.36); those scores were comparable to or greater than that of the OSEM 3 m/b group (3.09 ± 0.36, p = 0.388 and p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThe HYPER Iterative algorithm with a penalization factor of 0.2 resulted in higher lesion contrast and lower image noise than OSEM for 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT, allowing the same image quality to be achieved with less injected radioactivity and a shorter acquisition time.

Purpose This study aims to provide a detailed investigation on the noise penalization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)‐based algorithm, with the utilization of partial volume effect correction (PVC), so as to offer the suitable beta value and optimum standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters in clinical practice for small pulmonary nodules. Methods A National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image‐quality phantom was scanned and images were reconstructed using BPL with beta values ranged from 100 to 1000. The recovery coefficient (RC), contrast recovery (CR), and background variability (BV) were measured to assess the quantification accuracy and image quality. In the clinical assessment, lesions were categorized into sub‐centimeter (<10 mm, n = 7) group and medium size (10–30 mm, n = 16) group. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were measured to evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability. With PVC was performed, the impact of beta values on SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak) of small pulmonary nodules was evaluated. Subjective image analysis was performed by two experienced readers. Results With the increasing of beta values, RC, CR, and BV decreased gradually in the phantom work. In the clinical study, SNR and CNR of both groups increased with the beta values (P < 0.001), although the sub‐centimeter group showed increases after the beta value reached over 700. In addition, highly significant negative correlations were observed between SUVs and beta values for both lesion‐size groups before the PVC (P < 0.001 for all). After the PVC, SUVpeak measured from the sub‐centimeter group was no significantly different among different beta values (P = 0.830). Conclusion Our study suggests using SUVpeak as the quantification parameter with PVC performed to mitigate the effects of beta regularization. Beta values between 300 and 400 were preferred for pulmonary nodules smaller than 30 mm.

Background PSMA PET/CT is a predictive and prognostic biomarker for determining response to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Thresholds defined to date may not be generalizable to newer image reconstruction algorithms. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm is a novel reconstruction algorithm that may improve contrast whilst preventing introduction of image noise. The aim of this study is to compare the quantitative parameters obtained using BPL and the Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithms. Methods Fifty consecutive patients with mCRPC who underwent [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using OSEM reconstruction to assess suitability for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy were selected. BPL algorithm was then used retrospectively to reconstruct the same PET raw data. Quantitative and volumetric measurements such as tumour standardised uptake value (SUV)max, SUVmean and Molecular Tumour Volume (MTV-PSMA) were calculated on both reconstruction methods. Results were compared (Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation coefficient) including subgroups with low and high-volume disease burdens (MTV-PSMA cut-off 40 mL). Results The SUVmax and SUVmean were higher, and MTV-PSMA was lower in the BPL reconstructed images compared to the OSEM group, with a mean difference of 8.4 (17.5%), 0.7 (8.2%) and − 21.5 mL (-3.4%), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the calculated SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV-PSMA values in the OSEM and BPL reconstructed images (Pearson r values of 0.98, 0.99, and 1.0, respectively). No patients were reclassified from low to high volume disease or vice versa when switching from OSEM to BPL reconstruction. Conclusions [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT quantitative and volumetric parameters produced by BPL and OSEM reconstruction methods are strongly correlated. Differences are proportional and small for SUVmean, which is used as a predictive biomarker. Our study suggests that both reconstruction methods are acceptable without clinical impact on quantitative or volumetric findings. For longitudinal comparison, committing to the same reconstruction method would be preferred to ensure consistency.