Explore the vast range of titles available.

Intravenous valproate, levetiracetam, and fosphenytoin stopped status epilepticus that was resistant to initial treatment with lorazepam in approximately half the patients and did not differ significantly in effectiveness. Hypotension was numerically — but not significantly — more frequent with fosphenytoin.

The addition of olanzapine to a neurokinin receptor blocker, a serotonin receptor blocker, and dexamethasone markedly improved the control of nausea and vomiting in previously untreated patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life and are perceived by patients as major adverse effects of cancer treatment. 1 The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT 3 ) receptor antagonists, 2 dexamethasone, 2 and neurokinin-1 (NK 1 ) receptor antagonists 3 – 9 has significantly improved the control of this troublesome side effect. International guidelines 10 – 12 recommend combinations of these agents to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Nonetheless, nausea remains a major problem for many patients. 1 , 2 Olanzapine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an . . .

In a randomized trial involving patients with high-risk vascular disease, the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib had favorable effects on established lipid biomarkers but was not associated with a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo. Pharmacologic reduction of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level with statins substantially decreases the risks of death and complications from cardiovascular causes. 1 , 2 Considerable interest has focused on the identification of approaches that might further reduce cardiovascular-event rates among high-risk patients. 3 Epidemiologic studies have shown inverse associations between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and cardiovascular outcomes, 4 – 6 a correlation that persists despite treatment with statins. 7 Nevertheless, therapeutic interventions that raise the HDL cholesterol level have not been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) modulates the transfer of esterified cholesterol from HDL to apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins. 8 Two . . .

Background Remimazolam besylate is a newer benzodiazepine with characteristics of quick onset of effects, short maintenance and recovery times without accumulation in tissues. This trial was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy. Methods Patients undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P). Group R was administered an induction dose of 0.2 mg/kg and a maintenance dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/h. In Group P, propofol was started at 1.5–2.0 mg/kg and then maintained at 3.0–6.0 mg/kg/h. After remimazolam besylate or propofol induction, remifentanil was infused using a target-controlled infusion system with a target concentration of 1.5 ng/ml and titrated during the procedure. The incidence rates of injection pain, low oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) and adverse effects in both groups were compared. Results Eighty-two patients were included in this study. The incidence of adverse events in Group R (3.7%) was significantly lower than that in Group P (36.6%) ( p  < 0.001). The incidence of injection pain in Group P (80.5%) was much higher than that in Group R (2.4%) ( p  < 0.001). The incidence of other adverse events, such as low SpO 2 , bradycardia, and hypotension in Group R was lower than that in Group P ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions Remimazolam besylate proves to be a safer alternative for anesthesia during hysteroscopy. Moreover, adverse events caused by propofol, such as low SpO 2 and injection pain, are largely avoided. Trial registration This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Mengcheng County No. 1 People’s Hospital (2020MYL20003) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (15/09/2020, ChiCTR-2000038252 ). The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines.

This study compared the effectiveness of four second-generation antipsychotic agents (olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone) with that of an older agent, perphenazine, in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Olanzapine was the most effective agent but was associated with greater weight gain and more adverse metabolic changes. Perphenazine was as effective as risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. This study compared the effectiveness of four second-generation antipsychotic agents (olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone) with that of an older agent, perphenazine, in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Antipsychotic drugs have become the cornerstone of treatment for schizophrenia. The first-generation “conventional” antipsychotic drugs are high-affinity antagonists of dopamine D2 receptors that are most effective against psychotic symptoms but have high rates of neurologic side effects, such as extrapyramidal signs and tardive dyskinesia. 1 The introduction of second-generation, or “atypical,” antipsychotic drugs promised enhanced efficacy and safety. 2 The atypical agents differ pharmacologically from previous antipsychotic agents in their lower affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and greater affinities for other neuroreceptors, including those for serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine 1A , 2A , 2C , 3 , 6 , and 7 ) and norepinephrine . . .

Second-generation antipsychotic drugs were introduced over a decade ago for the treatment of schizophrenia; however, their purported clinical effectiveness compared with first-generation antipsychotic drugs is still debated. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotic drugs with that of a low dose of haloperidol, in first-episode schizophrenia. We did an open randomised controlled trial of haloperidol versus second-generation antipsychotic drugs in 50 sites, in 14 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18–40 years, and met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. 498 patients were randomly assigned by a web-based online system to haloperidol (1–4 mg per day; n=103), amisulpride (200–800 mg per day; n=104), olanzapine (5–20 mg per day; n=105), quetiapine (200–750 mg per day; n=104), or ziprasidone (40–160 mg per day; n=82); follow-up was at 1 year. The primary outcome measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. Patients and their treating physicians were not blinded to the assigned treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN68736636. The number of patients who discontinued treatment for any cause within 12 months was 63 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 72%) for haloperidol, 32 (40%) for amisulpride, 30 (33%) for olanzapine, 51 (53%) for quetiapine, and 31 (45%) for ziprasidone. Comparisons with haloperidol showed lower risks for any-cause discontinuation with amisulpride (hazard ratio [HR] 0·37, [95% CI 0·24–0·57]), olanzapine (HR 0·28 [0·18–0·43]), quetiapine (HR 0·52 [0·35–0·76]), and ziprasidone (HR 0·51 [0·32–0·81]). However, symptom reductions were virtually the same in all the groups, at around 60%. This pragmatic trial suggests that clinically meaningful antipsychotic treatment of first-episode of schizophrenia is achievable, for at least 1 year. However, we cannot conclude that second-generation drugs are more efficacious than is haloperidol, since discontinuation rates are not necessarily consistent with symptomatic improvement. AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis.

In this randomized trial of atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with Alzheimer's disease and psychosis, aggression, or agitation, effectiveness (as measured by the time to drug discontinuation) was similar for olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and placebo. Patients were more likely to stop taking placebo because of lack of efficacy and were likely to stop taking antipsychotic medications because of intolerability. In this trial of atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with Alzheimer's disease, effectiveness was similar for olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and placebo. Patients were more likely to stop taking placebo because of lack of efficacy and to stop taking antipsychotic medications because of intolerability. Delusions, hallucinations, aggression, and agitation affect more than half of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. 1 – 4 Antipsychotic drugs are used to treat these behaviors and symptoms and are among the most frequently used psychotropic drugs in Alzheimer's disease. 5 , 6 Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs have been considered to be at least as effective as conventional antipsychotic agents such as haloperidol, with a lower risk of most adverse effects, 7 and are used as first-line pharmacologic treatments for patients with dementia. 5 , 8 However, there is a dearth of placebo-controlled and active-drug–controlled, randomized trials and longer-term data from controlled trials regarding the . . .

The optimal sedation strategy for gastrointestinal endoscopy remains debated. This study compared the efficacy and safety of remimazolam combined with etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. This single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed from March 2024 to April 2024. A total of 262 patients scheduled to undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remimazolam-etomidate (RE) or remimazolam-propofol (RP). The primary outcome was the incidence of respiratory depression. Secondary outcomes included the results of sedation and recovery. The safety results mainly include the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, painful injection and muscular tremor. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ² tests for group comparisons, with subgroup analyses and multivariable logistic regression to assess the robustness of primary outcome. Respiratory depression occurred in 20.0% (25/125) of RE patients versus 32.3% (40/124) of RP patients (OR=0.52; 95% CI = 0.29-0.93; p = 0.028). There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the number of airway interventions between the two groups (p = 0.043), with 18 patients (14.5%) in the RP group requiring three airway interventions and only seven patients (5.6%) in the RE group. Hypoxemia occurred in three patients (2.4%) in the RE group and in five patients (4.0%) in the RP group. Hypotension was observed in 23.2% of patients sedated with RE versus 36.3% of patients sedated with RP (p = 0.024). Remimazolam-etomidate demonstrated a superior safety profile, with reduced respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability compared to remimazolam-propofol, suggesting its potential as a safer alternative for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation. This trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400085904) prior to patient enrollment.

High rates of placebo response are increasingly implicated in failed autism spectrum disorder (ASD) clinical trials. Despite this, there are limited investigations of placebo response in ASD. We sought to identify baseline predictors of placebo response and quantify their influence on clinical scales of interest for three harmonized randomized clinical trials of balovaptan, a V1a receptor antagonist. We employed a two-step approach to identify predictors of placebo response on the Vineland-II two-domain composite (2DC) (primary outcome and a caregiver measure) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale (secondary outcome and a clinician measure). The initial candidate predictor set of variables pertained to participant-level, site-specific, and protocol-related factors. Step 1 aimed to identify influential predictors of placebo response using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, while Step 2 quantified the influence of predictors via linear regression. Results were validated through statistical bootstrapping approaches with 500 replications of the analysis dataset. The pooled participant-level dataset included individuals with ASD aged 5 to 62 years (mean age 21 [SD 10]), among which 263 and 172 participants received placebo at Weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Although no influential predictors were identified for CGI, findings for Vineland-II 2DC are robust and informative. Decreased placebo response was predicted by higher baseline Vineland-II 2DC (i.e., more advanced adaptive function), longer trial duration, and European (vs United States) sites, while increased placebo response was predicted by commercial (vs academic) sites, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression. Identification of these factors may be useful in anticipating and mitigating placebo response in drug development efforts in ASD and across developmental and psychiatric conditions.

Patients with prolonged seizures that do not respond to intravenous benzodiazepines and a second-line anticonvulsant suffer from refractory status epilepticus and those with seizures that do not respond to continuous intravenous anesthetic anticonvulsants suffer from super-refractory status epilepticus. Both conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A strict pharmacological treatment regimen is urgently required, but the level of evidence for the available drugs is very low. Refractory complex focal status epilepticus generally does not require anesthetics, but all intravenous non-anesthetizing anticonvulsants may be used. Most descriptive data are available for levetiracetam, phenytoin and valproate. Refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency, and long-term clinical consequences are eminent. Administration of intravenous anesthetics is mandatory, and drugs acting at the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor such as midazolam, propofol and thiopental/pentobarbital are recommended without preference for one of those. One in five patients with anesthetic treatment does not respond and has super-refractory status epilepticus. With sustained seizure activity, excitatory N -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are increasingly expressed post-synaptically. Ketamine is an antagonist at this receptor and may prove efficient in some patients at later stages. Neurosteroids such as allopregnanolone increase sensitivity at GABA A receptors; a Phase 1/2 trial demonstrated safety and tolerability, but randomized controlled data failed to demonstrate efficacy. Adjunct ketogenic diet may contribute to termination of difficult-to-treat status epilepticus. Randomized controlled trials are needed to increase evidence for treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, but there are multiple obstacles for realization. Hitherto, prospective multicenter registries for pharmacological treatment may help to improve our knowledge.