Explore the vast range of titles available.

Key Points Thrombosis involves the pathological occlusion of blood vessels, which inhibits the blood supply to organs. It is the most frequent cause of mortality worldwide, as it directly causes myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, thrombotic microangiopathies and complications during sepsis as well as other diseases. Thrombosis is traditionally seen as a pathological form of blood vessel repair via haemostasis. Indeed, both thrombosis and haemostasis are induced by two core processes: blood coagulation, which leads to fibrin formation; and platelet activation. However, thrombosis is also supported by cellular mediators (for example, neutrophils) and molecular mediators (for example, intravascular tissue factor) that are largely irrelevant for haemostasis. Immune cells and thrombosis-specific molecular mediators induce a physiological type of thrombosis in microvessels (such as sinusoids in the liver and spleen). This form of thrombosis has been designated here as immunothrombosis. Immunothrombosis involves a local platform consisting of fibrin, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets, which together contribute to pathogen recognition. This process helps to suppress the tissue invasion and dissemination of pathogens and to reduce their survival. The local nature of immunothrombosis and its occurrence in only a restricted number of microvessels probably ensures that immunothrombosis does not seriously perturb overall organ perfusion. Together, these properties characterize immunothrombosis as an independent process of innate immunity that is specifically activated by blood-borne microorganisms and by circulating altered-self components. Pathological thrombosis in large veins and microvessels (such as venous thromboembolism and thrombotic macroangiopathies) shares similar triggers (namely, pathogens and altered-self components), the same evolutionary origin and identical molecular and cellular mediators with immunothrombosis. This suggests that together with haemostasis, immunothrombosis is the most relevant biological process underlying pathological thrombosis. Thrombosis is the most frequent cause of mortality worldwide. In this Review, the authors propose that thrombosis might also have a conserved physiological role in immune defence via a process termed immunothrombosis. However, if uncontrolled, immunothrombosis facilitates pathological clot formation. Thrombosis is the most frequent cause of mortality worldwide and is closely linked to haemostasis, which is the biological mechanism that stops bleeding after the injury of blood vessels. Indeed, both processes share the core pathways of blood coagulation and platelet activation. Here, we summarize recent work suggesting that thrombosis under certain circumstances has a major physiological role in immune defence, and we introduce the term immunothrombosis to describe this process. Immunothrombosis designates an innate immune response induced by the formation of thrombi inside blood vessels, in particular in microvessels. Immunothrombosis is supported by immune cells and by specific thrombosis-related molecules and generates an intravascular scaffold that facilitates the recognition, containment and destruction of pathogens, thereby protecting host integrity without inducing major collateral damage to the host. However, if uncontrolled, immunothrombosis is a major biological process fostering the pathologies associated with thrombosis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a clinical syndrome caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Patients with severe disease show hyperactivation of the immune system, which can affect multiple organs besides the lungs. Here, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a process known as immunothrombosis, in which activated neutrophils and monocytes interact with platelets and the coagulation cascade, leading to intravascular clot formation in small and larger vessels. Microthrombotic complications may contribute to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other organ dysfunctions. Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing immunothrombosis may therefore be useful. Several antithrombotic and immunomodulating drugs have been proposed as candidates to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The growing understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection pathogenesis and how it contributes to critical illness and its complications may help to improve risk stratification and develop targeted therapies to reduce the acute and long-term consequences of this disease.Here, the authors propose that SARS-CoV-2 induces a prothrombotic state, with dysregulated immunothrombosis in lung microvessels and endothelial injury, which drive the clinical manifestations of severe COVID-19. They discuss potential antithrombotic and immunomodulating drugs that are being considered in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

The interaction of coagulation factors with the perivascular environment affects the development of disease in ways that extend beyond their traditional roles in the acute hemostatic cascade. Key molecular players of the coagulation cascade like tissue factor, thrombin, and fibrinogen are epidemiologically and mechanistically linked with diseases with an inflammatory component. Moreover, the identification of novel molecular mechanisms linking coagulation and inflammation has highlighted factors of the coagulation cascade as new targets for therapeutic intervention in a wide range of inflammatory human diseases. In particular, a proinflammatory role for fibrinogen has been reported in vascular wall disease, stroke, spinal cord injury, brain trauma, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, bacterial infection, colitis, lung and kidney fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and several types of cancer. Genetic and pharmacologic studies have unraveled pivotal roles for fibrinogen in determining the extent of local or systemic inflammation. As cellular and molecular mechanisms for fibrinogen functions in tissues are identified, the role of fibrinogen is evolving from a marker of vascular rapture to a multi-faceted signaling molecule with a wide spectrum of functions that can tip the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis, coagulation and fibrosis, protection from infection and extensive inflammation, and eventually life and death. This review will discuss some of the main molecular links between coagulation and inflammation and will focus on the role of fibrinogen in inflammatory disease highlighting its unique structural properties, cellular targets, and signal transduction pathways that make it a potent proinflammatory mediator and a potential therapeutic target.

Evidence is growing that self-attacking ‘autoantibodies’ could be the key to understanding some of the worst cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Evidence is growing that self-attacking ‘autoantibodies’ could be the key to understanding some of the worst cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

IntroductionEmerging evidence points to an association between severe clinical presentation of COVID-19 and increased risk of thromboembolism. One-third of patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 develops macrovascular thrombotic complications, including venous thromboembolism, myocardial injury/infarction and stroke. Concurrently, the autopsy series indicate multiorgan damage pattern consistent with microvascular injury.Prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatmentCOVID-19 associated coagulopathy has distinct features, including markedly elevated D-dimers concentration with nearly normal activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and platelet count. The diagnosis may be challenging due to overlapping features between pulmonary embolism and severe COVID-19 disease, such as dyspnoea, high concentration of D-dimers, right ventricle with dysfunction or enlargement, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Both macro- and microvascular complications are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Therefore, early recognition of coagulation abnormalities among hospitalized COVID-19 patients are critical measures to identify patients with poor prognosis, guide antithrombotic prophylaxis or treatment, and improve patients’ clinical outcomes.Recommendations for cliniciansMost of the guidelines and consensus documents published on behalf of professional societies focused on thrombosis and hemostasis advocate the use of anticoagulants in all patients hospitalized with COVID-19, as well as 2-6 weeks post hospital discharge in the absence of contraindications. However, since there is no guidance for deciding the intensity and duration of anticoagulation, the decision-making process should be made in individual-case basis.ConclusionsHere, we review the mechanistic relationships between inflammation and thrombosis, discuss the macrovascular and microvascular complications and summarize the prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of thromboembolism in patients affected by COVID-19.

The parallel expression of activation products of the coagulation, fibrinolysis, and complement systems has long been observed in both clinical and experimental settings. Several interconnections between the individual components of these cascades have also been described, and the list of shared regulators is expanding. The co-existence and interplay of hemostatic and inflammatory mediators in the same microenvironment typically ensures a successful host immune defense in compromised barrier settings. However, dysregulation of the cascade activities or functions of inhibitors in one or both systems can result in clinical manifestations of disease, such as sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or ischemia–reperfusion injury, with critical thrombotic and/or inflammatory complications. An appreciation of the precise relationship between complement activation and thrombosis may facilitate the development of novel therapeutics, as well as improve the clinical management of patients with thrombotic conditions that are characterized by complement-associated inflammatory responses.

The complement system, originally classified as part of innate immunity, is a tightly self-regulated system consisting of liquid phase, cell surface, and intracellular proteins. In the blood circulation, the complement system, platelets, coagulation system, and fibrinolysis system form a close and complex network. They activate and regulate each other and jointly mediate immune monitoring and tissue homeostasis. The dysregulation of each cascade system results in clinical manifestations and the progression of different diseases, such as sepsis, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, C3 glomerulonephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or ischemia-reperfusion injury. In this review, we summarize the crosstalk between the complement system, platelets, and coagulation, provide integrative insights into how complement dysfunction leads to hemopathic progression, and further discuss the therapeutic relevance of complement in hemolytic and thrombotic diseases.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome–Coronavirus-2 is responsible for the current pandemic that has led to more than 10 million confirmed cases of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) and over 500,000 deaths worldwide (4 July 2020). Virus-mediated injury to multiple organs, mainly the respiratory tract, activation of immune response with the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and overactivation of the coagulation cascade and platelet aggregation leading to micro- and macrovascular thrombosis are the main pathological features of COVID-19. Empirical multidrug therapeutic approaches to treat COVID-19 are currently used with extremely uncertain outcomes, and many others are being tested in clinical trials. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has both anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects. In addition, a significant ASA-mediated antiviral activity against DNA and RNA viruses, including different human coronaviruses, has been documented. The use of ASA in patients with different types of infections has been associated with reduced thrombo-inflammation and lower rates of clinical complications and in-hospital mortality. However, safety issues related both to the risk of bleeding and to that of developing rare but serious liver and brain damage mostly among children (i.e., Reye’s syndrome) should be considered. Hence, whether ASA might be a safe and reasonable therapeutic candidate to be tested in clinical trials involving adults with COVID-19 deserves further attention. In this review we provide a critical appraisal of current evidence on the anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and antiviral effects of ASA, from both a pre-clinical and a clinical perspective. In addition, the potential benefits and risks of use of ASA have been put in the context of the adult-restricted COVID-19 population.

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by proteolytical cleavage of the amino-terminus and thereby act as sensors for extracellular proteases. While coagulation proteases activate PARs to regulate hemostasis, thrombosis, and cardiovascular function, PAR2 is also activated in extravascular locations by a broad array of serine proteases, including trypsin, tissue kallikreins, coagulation factors VIIa and Xa, mast cell tryptase, and transmembrane serine proteases. Administration of PAR2-specific agonistic and antagonistic peptides, as well as studies in PAR2 knockout mice, identified critical functions of PAR2 in development, inflammation, immunity, and angiogenesis. Here, we review these roles of PAR2 with an emphasis on the role of coagulation and other extracellular protease pathways that cleave PAR2 in epithelial, immune, and neuronal cells to regulate physiological and pathophysiological processes.

Severe COVID-19 is characterized by immune-coagulation dysregulation, yet the contribution of related autoantibodies remains poorly understood. We investigated relationships between plasma autoantibody reactivities, whole-blood transcriptomics, plasma proteomics, and clinical laboratory parameters in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that 42 curated coagulation and complement cascade genes were upregulated in severe cases compared to healthy controls, with 15 genes, including CR1L, ELANE, ITGA2B, ITGB3, VWF, TFPI, PROS1, MMRN1, and SELP (> 1.2 log2 fold-change), also significantly different from mild cases. Autoantibody profiling against eight coagulation-related proteins (ADAMTS13, Factor V, Protein S, SERPINC1, Apo-H, PROC1, Prothrombin, and PF4) showed reactivities below positivity thresholds across all groups. Using an exploratory approach, in severe cases, subthreshold autoantibody candidates (FDR < 0.25) showed negative correlation trends with select gene expressions and inflammatory markers (Factor V with IL-6 and CXCL10), suggesting potential disease-specific immunomodulatory associations. In contrast, while mild cases exhibited stronger gene-protein correlations, they showed limited associations with antigen reactivities or clinical laboratory parameters. Additionally, no correlations were observed between autoantibodies and platelet-counts or Fibrin-D-dimer levels. Age-associated increases in antigen reactivities were noted in severe disease, implying a role for immunosenescence. These findings support further investigation into the role of subthreshold autoantibody candidates in thromboinflammatory COVID-19 pathogenesis.