Explore the vast range of titles available.

Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and a high risk of fracture, treatment with the monoclonal antibody romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate resulted in a significantly lower risk of fracture than alendronate for 12 months followed by alendronate.

Romosozumab binds sclerostin, increases bone formation, and decreases bone resorption. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were assigned to romosozumab or placebo for 1 year, followed by 1 year of denosumab. Romosozumab was associated with lower vertebral and clinical fracture risk. Osteoporosis can lead to fragility fractures, which result in clinical burden and increased mortality. 1 , 2 Even after a fracture, fewer than 25% of patients receive pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis. 3 – 5 After the discovery that sclerostin deficiency causes rare genetic conditions that are characterized by high bone mass and resistance to fracture, 6 , 7 sclerostin became a therapeutic target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Sclerostin, a negative regulator of bone formation that is secreted by osteocytes, 8 inhibits Wnt signaling, down-regulating this stimulus for osteoblast development and function. 9 Romosozumab (Amgen and UCB Pharma) is a monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin, with . . .

Summary We used bone turnover markers to identify women who responded to bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis. Response was more likely with alendronate and ibandronate than risedronate. There was a greater decrease in bone markers if baseline bone turnover markers were higher and if the patient took more than 80 % of her medication. Introduction Biochemical response to bisphosphonate therapy can be assessed using either a decrease in bone turnover marker beyond the least significant change (LSC) or a reduction to within a reference interval (RI). We compared the performance of these target responses and determined whether response was related to the type of bisphosphonate, compliance and baseline bone turnover markers. Methods Biochemical responses to three oral bisphosphonates were assessed in an open, controlled trial comprising 172 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (age 53–84 years), randomised to alendronate, ibandronate or risedronate, plus calcium and vitamin D supplementation for 2 years. The LSC for each marker was derived within the study population, whereas RIs were obtained from a control group of healthy premenopausal women (age 35–40 years). Results Over 70 % of women achieved a target response for serum CTX and PINP, irrespective of the approach used. The percentage decrease at 12 weeks was greater for women with baseline PINP above the RI −63 % (difference 13 %, 95 % CI 0 to 27.1, P  = 0.049) and good compliance −67 % (difference 15.9 %, 95 % CI 6.3 to 25.5, P  = 0.001). Responders had a greater increase in spine bone density compared to nonresponders; for example 6.2 vs. 2.3 % (difference 3.9 %, 95 % CI 1.6 to 6.3, P  = 0.0011) for PINP LSC. The magnitude of change in bone markers was greater with ibandronate and alendronate than risedronate. Conclusions Both approaches to response identified similar proportions of women as responders. Nonresponders had smaller increases in BMD, and we suggest that biochemical assessment of response is a useful tool for the management of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In this randomized trial, women 65 years of age or older who had osteopenia received four infusions of zoledronate or normal saline at 18-month intervals. Zoledronate was associated with a significantly lower risk of fragility fractures than placebo.

Summary Thyrotoxicosis leads to loss of bone mass. Vitamin D is important to bone health. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we showed that bone restoration did not improve when adding vitamin D supplementation to standard care of Graves’ disease thyrotoxicosis. Bone density and microarchitecture improved markedly with treatment of thyrotoxicosis. Purpose Vitamin D is important to skeletal health and ensuring a replete vitamin D status is recommended. In thyrotoxicosis, bone turnover is increased and bone mass density (BMD) reduced. We examined whether vitamin D supplementation improves bone recovery in thyrotoxicosis caused by Graves’ disease (GD). Methods Using a double-blinded design, hyperthyroid patients with GD were randomized to vitamin D3 70 µg/day (2800 IU) or similar placebo as add-on to antithyroid drugs (ATD). At baseline and 9 months, we measured BMD and bone architecture using DXA and high resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography. Bone turnover markers (BTM) were measured at 3 months also. Effect of vitamin D versus placebo and the response to ATD treatment were analyzed using linear mixed modelling. Results Eighty-six GD patients were included (age 41 ± 14 years, 86% females). Compared to placebo, vitamin D3 did not improve BMD or microarchitecture. In response to ATD, BMD increased in the hip by 2% (95%CI: 1–4%). Cortical porosity decreased in tibia (− 7% [95%CI: − 12 to − 2%]) and radius [− 14% [95%CI: − 24 to − 3%]), and trabecular thickness increased (tibia (5% [95%CI: 2 − 9%]) and radius (4% [95%CI: 1–7%]). Changes in BTM, but not thyroid hormones, were associated with changes in BMD by DXA and with changes in the cortical compartment. Conclusion In newly diagnosed GD, 9 months of high dose vitamin D3 supplementation does not offer benefit by improving skeletal health. Treatment of thyrotoxicosis is associated with the recovery of BMD and microarchitecture. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT02384668

This study shows that in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the monoclonal antibody romosozumab, which binds to sclerostin, an osteoblast-activity inhibitor, was associated with increased bone mineral density and bone formation and decreased bone resorption. Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and defects in microarchitecture that are responsible for decreased bone strength and increased risk of fracture. 1 Antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis increase bone mineral density and prevent the progression of structural damage but may not restore bone structure. Stimulation of bone formation is necessary to achieve improvements in bone mass, architecture, and strength. Sclerostin, encoded by the gene SOST, is an osteocyte-secreted glycoprotein that has been identified as a pivotal regulator of bone formation. By inhibiting the Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways, sclerostin impedes osteoblast proliferation and function, thereby decreasing bone formation. . . .

SummaryEarly PINP changes correlate with 18-month lumbar spine BMD changes and the correlation was greater with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. The uncoupling index was similar between the two agents.IntroductionWe evaluated the relationship between early PINP changes and subsequent changes in spine BMD following abaloparatide and teriparatide treatments. We also explored the use of an “uncoupling index” (UI), the balance between bone formation and bone resorption, which we hypothesised would be similar in response to these treatment groups.MethodsBlood samples were taken for measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs) s-PINP and s-CTX at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months from 189 abaloparatide patients and 227 teriparatide patients randomly selected from all participants who completed the study. BMD was measured by DXA at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Correlations were calculated between log ratio of BTMs from baseline to 3 months and percent change from baseline in BMD at 18 months. A UI was calculated using log transformation and subtraction of the standard deviate for s-CTX from the standard deviate for s-PINP for each patient.ResultsEarly BTM changes were associated with subsequent BMD changes for both treatments. Pearson correlations for the log ratio of PINP over baseline at 3 months and BMD percent change from baseline at 18 months were larger (P < 0.0001) with abaloparatide (r = 0.561) than teriparatide (r = 0.198). The mean UI at 1 month was greater for abaloparatide versus teriparatide (1.743 and 1.493, respectively; P = 0.03) but was similar at 3 months or later time points.ConclusionsEarly s-PINP changes correlate with percentage change in lumbar spine BMD 18 months after treatment with both abaloparatide and teriparatide, though the correlation with abaloparatide was greater. The UI was similar between abaloparatide and teriparatide suggesting that the balance between formation and resorption markers was similar.

Osteoporosis is a bone disease characterized by reduced bone mass, which leads to increased risk of bone fractures, and poses a significant risk to public health, especially in the elderly population. The traditional Chinese medicinal herb Epimedii has been utilized for centuries to treat bone fracture and bone loss. Icariin is a prenylated flavonol glycoside isolated from Epimedium herb, and has been shown to be the main bioactive component. This review provides a comprehensive survey of previous studies on icariin, including its structure and function, effect on bone metabolism, and potential for clinical application. These studies show that icariin promotes bone formation by stimulating osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs (bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells), while inhibiting osteoclastogenic differentiation and the bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. Furthermore, icariin has been shown to be more potent than other flavonoid compounds in promoting osteogenic differentiation and maturation of osteoblasts. A 24-month randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial reported that icariin was effective in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis with relatively low side effects. In conclusion, icariin may represent a class of flavonoids with bone-promoting activity, which could be used as potential treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Summary When denosumab is discontinued, antiresorptive therapy is critical to reduce high-turnover bone loss. The ideal duration of antiresorptive therapy after denosumab is uncertain. This study demonstrates that both 1 and 2 years of alendronate maintained bone density gains achieved with 1 year of denosumab. Background When denosumab is discontinued, antiresorptive therapy is critical to attenuate high-turnover bone loss. The ideal choice and duration of antiresorptive therapy are not yet defined, however. In the Comparison of Alendronate or Raloxifene following Denosumab (CARD) study, we demonstrated that 12 months of alendronate was better able to maintain the bone mineral density (BMD) gains achieved with 12 months of denosumab versus 12 months of raloxifene. In this extension, we wished to determine if 12 months of alendronate would be sufficient in maintaining these denosumab-induced BMD gains. Methods In the CARD study, postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 60–79 at high fracture risk received 12 months of denosumab 60-mg SC every 6 months followed by 12 months of either alendronate 70 mg weekly ( N  = 26) or raloxifene ( N  = 25). All subjects in the alendronate arm were then offered participation in a 1-year extension in which they were randomized to continue alendronate for an additional 12 months ( N  = 10) or to receive calcium and vitamin D alone ( N  = 8). The primary outcome was change in spine BMD between months 24 and 36. Exploratory endpoints included changes in areal BMD (aBMD) at other anatomic sites as well as changes in serum bone turnover markers. Results The CARD study demonstrated the effectiveness of 12 months alendronate in preserving denosumab-induced BMD gains. In the extension, aBMD was maintained at the spine, total hip, and femoral neck in both those randomized to an additional year of alendronate and those randomized to calcium/vitamin D alone. We did, however, observe a transient comparative decrease between months 24–30 in the calcium/vitamin D group at the total hip ( P  = 0.008) and femoral neck ( P  = 0.040). At the end of 24 months of the CARD study, bone turnover markers serum c-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen N-propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) were suppressed in both groups and then increased more between months 24–36 in the calcium/vitamin D group than the alendronate group ( P  = 0.051 for CTX, P  = 0.030 for P1NP). Both CTX and PINP remained below the month 0 baseline in both groups ( P  < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions With the limitations of our small sample size, these data suggest that both 1 and 2 years of alendronate effectively maintain BMD gains achieved with 1 year of denosumab and prevented any rebound in bone turnover marker levels above pre-denosumab baseline. This is the first randomized trial to assess minimum duration of bisphosphonate after short-term denosumab and may be helpful to guide clinical care. Similar studies performed after longer durations of denosumab would be helpful to further define optimal management. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03623633

SummaryRomosozumab is a therapy that stimulates bone formation and reduces bone resorption. In this study of postmenopausal women with low BMD, a second course of romosozumab following a period off treatment or on denosumab increased or maintained BMD, respectively, and was well tolerated, providing insight into treatment sequence options.IntroductionIn patients with high fracture risk, therapies that stimulate bone formation provide rapid BMD gains; currently available agents, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, are limited to a 2-year lifetime exposure and generally used for a single treatment course. However, for long-term osteoporosis management, a second treatment course may be appropriate. Romosozumab, a therapy with the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, reduces fracture risk within 12 months. Here, we report efficacy and safety of a second romosozumab course.MethodsIn this phase 2, dose-finding study, postmenopausal women with low bone mass (T-score ≤ − 2.0 and ≥ − 3.5) received romosozumab or placebo (month 0–24) followed by placebo or denosumab (month 24–36); participants then received a year of romosozumab (month 36–48).ResultsOf 167 participants who entered the month 36–48 period, 35 had been initially randomized to romosozumab 210 mg monthly. In participants who received romosozumab 210 mg monthly followed by placebo, a second romosozumab course (n = 19) increased BMD by amounts similar to their initial treatment (month 0–12) at the lumbar spine (12.4%; 12.0%, respectively) and total hip (6.0%; 5.5%, respectively). Following denosumab, a second romosozumab course (n = 16) increased BMD at the lumbar spine (2.3%) and maintained BMD at the total hip. Safety profiles were similar between first and second romosozumab courses.ConclusionsAfter 12 months off-treatment, a second romosozumab course again led to rapid and large BMD gains. Following denosumab, BMD gains with romosozumab were smaller than with initial treatment. No new safety findings were observed during the second course.