Explore the vast range of titles available.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) following primary immunization (breakthrough infection) has been reported in hemodialysis patients; however, their post-infection immune status remains unclear. We evaluated the humoral and cellular immunity of hemodialysis patients after breakthrough infection. Hemodialysis patients who had received primary immunization against COVID-19 at least six months prior to the study but developed mild/moderate COVID-19 before a booster dose (breakthrough infection group) and hemodialysis patients who were not infected with COVID-19 but received a booster dose (booster immunization group) were recruited. In both groups, SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific cytokines and IgG levels were measured three weeks after infection or three weeks after receiving a booster dose. Memory T and B cells were also counted in the breakthrough infection group using flow cytometry three weeks after infection. Significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific IgG, IFN-γ, IL-5, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels occurred in the breakthrough infection group compared to the booster immunization group (p = 0.013, 0.039, 0.024, 0.017, and 0.039, respectively). The SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific IgG and cytokine levels were not significantly different between the two groups. The breakthrough infection group had significantly higher percentages of central and effector memory T cells and regulatory T cells than the comparison group (p = 0.008, 0.031, and 0.026, respectively). Breakthrough infections may induce stronger cellular and humoral immune responses than booster immunizations in hemodialysis patients.

Globally, vaccine hesitancy is a growing public health problem. It is detrimental to the consolidation of immunization program achievements and elimination of vaccine-targeted diseases. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China and explore its contributing factors. A national cross-sectional online survey among Chinese adults (≥18 years old) was conducted between August 6, 2021 and August 9 via a market research company. We collected sociodemographic information; lifestyle behavior; quality of life; the knowledge, awareness, and behavior of COVID-19; the knowledge, awareness, and behavior of COVID-19 vaccine; willingness of COVID-19 vaccination; accessibility of COVID-19 vaccination services; skepticism about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine; doctor and vaccine developer scale; and so on. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the associations by using logistic regression models. A total of 29,925 residents (48.64% men) were enrolled in our study with mean age of 30.99 years. We found an overall prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at 8.40% (95% CI, 8.09–8.72) in primary vaccination and 8.39% (95% CI, 8.07–8.70) in booster vaccination. In addition, after adjusting for potential confounders, we found that women, higher educational level, married residents, higher score of health condition, never smoked, increased washing hands, increased wearing mask, increased social distance, lower level of vaccine conspiracy beliefs, disease risks outweigh vaccine risk, higher level of convenient vaccination, and higher level of trust in doctor and developer were more willing to vaccinate than all others (all p < 0.05). Age, sex, educational level, marital status, chronic disease condition, smoking, healthy behaviors, the curability of COVID-19, the channel of accessing information of COVID-19 vaccine, endorsement of vaccine conspiracy beliefs, weigh risks of vaccination against risks of the disease, making a positive influence on the health of others around you, and lower trust in healthcare system may affect the variation of willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine (all  p  < 0.05). The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was modest in China, even with the slight resulting cascade of changing vaccination rates between the primary and booster vaccination. Urgent action to address vaccine hesitancy is needed in building trust in medical personnel and vaccine producers, promoting the convenience of vaccination services, and spreading reliable information of COVID-19 vaccination via the Internet and other media.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose for all persons >18 years of age. We analyzed data from the National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module collected during February 27-March 26, 2022 to assess COVID-19 booster dose vaccination coverage among adults. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess factors associated with vaccination. COVID-19 booster dose coverage among fully vaccinated adults increased from 25.7% in November 2021 to 63.4% in March 2022. Coverage was lower among non-Hispanic Black (52.7%), and Hispanic (55.5%) than non-Hispanic White adults (67.7%). Coverage was 67.4% among essential healthcare personnel, 62.2% among adults who had a disability, and 69.9% among adults who had medical conditions. Booster dose coverage was not optimal, and disparities by race/ethnicity and other factors are apparent in coverage uptake. Tailored strategies are needed to educate the public and reduce disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage.

•Data are needed to understand responses to primary and booster COVID-19 vaccinations during pregnancy.•mRNA vaccines during pregnancy elicited robust binding and nAb responses.•Booster vaccination during pregnancy elicited significantly higher Ab levels at delivery and in cord blood than 2-dose primary series, including against Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants.•COVID-19 vaccines, including booster doses, should continue to be strongly recommended during pregnancy. The immune response to COVID-19 booster vaccinations during pregnancy for mothers and their newborns and the functional response of vaccine-induced antibodies against Omicron variants are not well characterized. We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study of participants vaccinated during pregnancy with primary or booster mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from July 2021 to January 2022 at 9 academic sites. We determined SARS-CoV-2 binding and live virus and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers pre- and post-vaccination, and at delivery for both maternal and infant participants. Immune responses to ancestral and Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 strains were compared between primary and booster vaccine recipients in maternal sera at delivery and in cord blood, after adjusting for days since last vaccination. A total of 240 participants received either Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccine during pregnancy (primary 2-dose series: 167; booster dose: 73). Booster vaccination resulted in significantly higher binding and nAb titers, including to the Omicron BA.1 variant, in maternal serum at delivery and in cord blood compared to a primary 2-dose series (range 0.44–0.88 log10 higher, p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Live virus nAb to Omicron BA.1 were present at delivery in 9 % (GMT ID50 12.7) of Pfizer and 22 % (GMT ID50 14.7) of Moderna primary series recipients, and in 73 % (GMT ID50 60.2) of mRNA boosted participants (p < 0.0001), although titers were significantly lower than to the D614G strain. Transplacental antibody transfer was efficient for all regimens with median transfer ratio range: 1.55–1.77 for IgG, 1.00–1.78 for live virus nAb and 1.79–2.36 for pseudovirus nAb. COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during pregnancy elicited robust immune responses in mothers and efficient transplacental antibody transfer to the newborn. A booster dose during pregnancy significantly increased maternal and cord blood binding and neutralizing antibody levels, including against Omicron BA.1. Findings support the use of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy.

The COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate is notably high among the Chinese population; however, as China eased its zero-COVID policy in November 2022, the pandemic outbreak has imposed a substantial burden on Chinese society. This study aims to analyze real-world vaccination effectiveness and waning effects among community-based COVID-19 infection-naive individuals in China and among different sub-groups. An online questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, from January 13th to February 9th, 2023 and a total of 45,344 eligible respondents were included in the analysis. Vaccination and infection status among different groups classified by age (under 18, 18–59, and over 60) and health conditions (having underlying disease, allergy, cancer, immune deficiency or organ transplant) were analyzed. Propensity score matching and ordered logistic regression were used to examine the effectiveness of different COVID-19 vaccine types, vaccination strategies and the waning effects. The infection rate was 82.42 % among sampled population. The vaccination rate was 94.70 %, with 23.73 % of them completed primacy vaccination series, 68.54 % completed homogenous booster vaccination and 2.43 % completed heterogenous booster vaccination; however, the high-risk population had a lower vaccination coverage. Results showed that real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) of homogenous and heterogenous booster vaccination against infection were 11 % and 23 %, respectively, and the elderly benefited the most. Adolescents had a lower booster vaccination coverage and no significant VE was identified. No significant differences were observed among different vaccine types, and waning effects were identified in the booster vaccination group 12 months post-vaccination. Low vaccination coverage among high-risk and vulnerable may lead to a huge disease and societal burden, thus improving vaccine coverage of these groups should be prioritized. In addition, due to waning immunity, regular booster vaccination should be scheduled within 12 months. •What is already known on this topic? The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in avoiding severe cases and deaths has been proven worldwide. However, the evidence among COVID-19 infection-naive population is limited.•What this study adds? This is a community-based retrospective cohort study in China, and found the vaccination and booster vaccination coverage among the high-risk groups and adolescents were lower than the other groups.•Waning immunity was identified after 12 months of vaccine injection.•No significant differences were identified between different vaccines in avoiding infection and disease progression.•What do the new findings imply?•Receiving booster vaccination in time is more important than waiting for a certain type of vaccine.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccination has been proposed in response to the new challenges of highly contagious variants, yet few studies have examined public acceptance of boosters. This study examined public acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination and its influencing factors by using the data from a self-administered online cross-sectional survey conducted in June 2021 in China. Multiple logistic analysis was used to examine the influencing factors of booster acceptance based on the health belief model (HBM). Among 1145 respondents, 84.80% reported to accept COVID-19 booster vaccination. Having COVID-19 vaccination history, perceiving high benefits and low barriers to booster vaccination, being younger (18–30 vs. 41–50), having a lower education level, being employed, and belonging to priority groups for vaccination were associated with increased odds of booster acceptance. The primary reason for refusing booster vaccination was concern about vaccine safety. The vast majority (92.8%) of respondents reported an annual willingness to pay between 0 and 300 CNY (0–46.29 USD) if the booster was not free. Our findings suggest that the acceptance rate of booster vaccination is relatively high in China, and the HBM-based analysis reveals that more efforts are needed to increase perceived benefits and reduce perceived barriers of vaccination to design effective and proper vaccination extension strategies when boosters become widely recommended.

This study aims to evaluate the safety of a new inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine (Sabin strains) (sIPV) for large-scale use in primary and booster immunizations, whether simultaneously administered with other vaccines or not and to explore the persistence of all vaccines at approximately six months after vaccination. A total of 3200 infants were recruited into this study, including 2000 infants aged 2–3 months randomly assigned (1:1) into the “sIPV basic” or the “sIPV+DTaP” group for primary immunization of sIPV. Another 1200 children aged 18 months old and above were randomly assigned (2:2:1:1) into the “sIPV booster,” “sIPV+HepA-I,” “sIPV+MMR”, or “sIPV+HepA-L\" group for booster immunization of sIPV. Adverse events within 30 days of each vaccination dose in all participants were self-reported by guardians using a WeChat mini-program. Approximately 200 blood samples were collected at 5–7 months after the final vaccination to test for antibodies against poliovirus and other viruses. 3198 participants in total were included in the safety study, including 1999 infants aged 2–3 months old and 1199 children aged 18–26 months old. For primary immunization, the incidence of adverse reactions in the “sIPV basic” and the “sIPV+DTaP” group were 3.19 and 6.21% (P = 0.001), respectively. For booster immunization, the incidences of adverse reaction for the “sIPV booster” group were 2.25%, while the incidence for the “sIPV +others” group in total was 2.50% (P = 0.788). Most adverse reactions were mild. Fever was the most common symptom in all groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed in this study. The seropositivity rates of antibodies in the “sIPV basic” and the “sIPV+DTaP” group were 92.31 and 100% against type 1 poliovirus (P = 0.031); 96.15% and 98.57% against type 2 poliovirus (P = 0.575); 98.08% and 91.43% against type 3 poliovirus (P = 0.237), respectively. Regarding booster vaccination with sIPV, whether co-administered with other vaccines or not, the seropositivity rates of antibodies against the three types of polioviruses were all 100%. Seropositivity rates of antibodies against hepatitis A, measles, mumps, and rubella were all no <77%, except for pertussis, which was <30%. sIPV demonstrated good safety and immune persistence for primary and booster vaccinations, whether administered singly or simultaneously. Antibodies against hepatitis A, measles, mumps and rubella were not disrupted by the co-vaccination. However, the seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies against pertussis indicate the necessity for a booster dose.

The primary vaccination program for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) proceeded amid concerns about vaccine hesitancy and a plethora of internet information. However, research is lacking on the association between internet information and vaccination intention during the period when booster shots were recommended. In particular, among studies covering this timespan, there is a dearth of long-term associations between the content of internet information and its impact on beliefs and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 594 Japanese adults (25–64 years old, mean age, 47.54 years, SD: 9.40) were surveyed about their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. An online survey was administered at two points (February and June 2022) each lasting five days, when booster shots were available. Applying integrative health behavior theory and using structural equation modeling, we analyzed the association between factors related to beliefs, attitudes, and vaccination intention toward COVID-19 vaccines and internet information during the period when booster shots were recommended. Among content on the internet about COVID-19 vaccines, gathering information on vaccine availability for individuals increased self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and positive attitudes, which in turn enhanced vaccination intention. However, gathering information on vaccine expertise (covering both benefits and risks) negatively affected beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Greater vaccination intention had a cyclical effect by increasing information gathering on the internet at the next time point and influencing vaccine beliefs. The influence of internet information on attitudes toward vaccines and vaccination intention could vary, being either positive or negative depending on its content, even during the availability period of COVID-19 booster shots. Furthermore, the results suggest that information about vaccine availability should continue to be provided during booster vaccination campaigns. Finally, we discuss ways of using the internet to disseminate information appropriately and effectively in order to promote vaccination. Clinical trial registration •Booster vaccination in Japan, with high hesitancy, was influenced differently by internet information.•The vaccination intention positively correlated with information on the availability of the vaccines.•Intention negatively correlated with information on vaccine expertise covering both benefits and risks.•Internet information gathering showed a long-term mutual cycle with vaccine beliefs and intentions.

•HB vaccination plays a significant role in controlling HBV infection.•Different immune mechanisms govern anti-HBs acquisition, titer, and maintenance.•Host pre-vaccination immunological status could be targeted for vaccine efficacy. The World Health Organization recommends the implementation of universal hepatitis B (HB) vaccination, and global coverage for this vaccine reached 84% in 2015. In Japan, the policy aimed at preventing mother-to-child transmission of HB virus (HBV) initially commenced as a specific vaccination program for infants born to mothers who were positive for HB surface antigen. In 2016, universal HB vaccination was implemented in this country to cover unvaccinated individuals at risk of horizontal HBV transmission. Although HB vaccination has been shown to be highly efficacious and safe, the issues of vaccine non-responders and of the loss of antibodies directed against HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) in HB vaccine recipients remain. To gain better insight into these problems, we previously performed an immunological analysis on adult vaccine recipients after they received an initial HB vaccination. We found that the course of successful HB vaccination is composed of the following distinct phases: 1) acquisition of anti-HBs antibody, 2) attainment of high anti-HBs antibody titers, and 3) maintenance of acquired anti-HBs antibody levels. In this review, we describe the significance of HB vaccination and suggest a potential means of improving the impact of HB vaccination based on our immunological analysis.

Individuals with secondary immunodeficiencies belong to the most vulnerable groups to succumb to COVID-19 and thus are prioritized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However, knowledge about the persistence and anamnestic responses following SARS-CoV-2-mRNA vaccinations is limited in these patients. In a prospective, open-label, phase four trial we analyzed S1-specific IgG, neutralizing antibodies and cytokine responses in previously non-infected patients with cancer or autoimmune disease during primary mRNA vaccination and up to one month after booster. 263 patients with solid tumors (SOT, n=63), multiple myeloma (MM, n=70), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD, n=130) and 66 controls were analyzed. One month after the two-dose primary vaccination the highest non-responder rate was associated with lower CD19 B-cell counts and was found in MM patients (17%). S1-specific IgG levels correlated with IL-2 and IFN-γ responses in controls and IBD patients, but not in cancer patients. Six months after the second dose, 18% of patients with MM, 10% with SOT and 4% with IBD became seronegative; no one from the control group became negative. However, in IBD patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors, antibody levels declined more rapidly than in controls. Overall, vaccination with mRNA-1273 led to higher antibody levels than with BNT162b2. Importantly, booster vaccination increased antibody levels >8-fold in seroresponders and induced anamnestic responses even in those with undetectable pre-booster antibody levels. Nevertheless, in IBD patients with TNF-α inhibitors even after booster vaccination, antibody levels were lower than in untreated IBD patients and controls. Immunomonitoring of vaccine-specific antibody and cellular responses seems advisable to identify vaccination failures and consequently establishing personalized vaccination schedules, including shorter booster intervals, and helps to improve vaccine effectiveness in all patients with secondary immunodeficiencies. EudraCT Number: 2021-000291-11.