Explore the vast range of titles available.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is classified into 5 clinical subgroups: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), PH due to left-sided heart disease, PH due to chronic lung disease, chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), and PH with an unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms. A range of underlying conditions can lead to these disorders. Overall, PH affects approximately 1% of the global population, and over half of patients with heart failure may be affected. Cardiologists are therefore likely to encounter PH in their practice. Routine tests in patients with symptoms and physical findings suggestive of PH include electrocardiography, chest radiography, and pulmonary function tests. Transthoracic echocardiography is used to estimate the probability of PH. All patients with suspected or confirmed PH, without confirmed left-sided heart or lung diseases, should have a ventilation-perfusion scan to exclude CTEPH. Right-sided heart catheterization is essential for accurate diagnosis and classification. All patients with PAH or CTEPH must be referred to a specialist center. Surgical pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for eligible patients with CTEPH. Targeted treatments (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists) are licensed for patients with PAH. The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is the only licensed targeted therapy for patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH. Management of PH resulting from left-sided heart disease primarily involves treatment of the underlying condition.

Bcr-Abl inhibitors paved the way of targeted therapy epoch. Imatinib was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be discovered with high specificity for Bcr-Abl protein resulting from t(9, 22)-derived Philadelphia chromosome. Although the specific targeting of that oncoprotein, several Bcr-Abl-dependent and Bcr-Abl-independent mechanisms of resistance to imatinib arose after becoming first-line therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) treatment. Consequently, new specific drugs, namely dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib, were rationally designed and approved for clinic to override resistances. Imatinib fine mechanisms of action had been elucidated to rationally develop those second- and third-generation inhibitors. Crystallographic and structure-activity relationship analysis, jointly to clinical data, were pivotal to shed light on this topic. More recently, preclinical evidence on bafetinib, rebastinib, tozasertib, danusertib, HG-7-85-01, GNF-2, and 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives lay promising foundations for better inhibitors to be approved for clinic in the near future. Notably, structural mechanisms of action and drug design exemplified by Bcr-Abl inhibitors have broad relevance to both break through resistances in CML treatment and develop inhibitors against other kinases as targeted chemotherapeutics.

There is still a lack of reliable molecular predictors to achieve major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1 ≤ 0.1% IS) within the first year of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the therapeutic management of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Employing a proprietary fluorogenic flow cytometry assay, we recently identified separase proteolytic activity as a potential marker of molecular response and BCR::ABL1 positivity of CD34+ cells in TKI-treated CML patients. Here, we analyzed the expression and predictive value of ESPL1/Separase, PTTG1/Securin and PTTG1IP/Securin interacting protein transcript levels in white blood cells of CML patients (n = 97) at the time of diagnosis by means of qRT-PCR. We establish a novel distance (cut-off) score based on ESPL1, PTTG1 and PTTG1IP gene expression levels that can serve as predictors of TKI non-response in about 10% of analyzed non-responding patients and may have potential benefit for the risk stratification of CML patients. The achievement of major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1 ≤ 0.1% IS) within the first year of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is a milestone in the therapeutic management of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed the predictive value of gene expression levels of ESPL1/Separase, PTTG1/Securin and PTTG1IP/Securin interacting protein for MMR achievement within 12 months. Relative expression levels (normalized to GUSB) of ESPL1, PTTG1 and PTTG1IP in white blood cells of patients (responders n = 46, non-responders n = 51) at the time of diagnosis were comparatively analyzed by qRT-PCR. 3D scatter plot analysis combined with a distance analysis performed with respect to a commonly calculated centroid center resulted in a trend to larger distances for non-responders compared to the responder cohort (p = 0.0187). Logistic regression and analysis of maximum likelihood estimates revealed a positive correlation of distance (cut-off) with non-achieving MMR within 12 months (p = 0.0388, odds ratio 1.479, 95%CI: 1.020 to 2.143). Thus, 10% of the tested non-responders (cut-off ≥ 5.9) could have been predicted already at the time of diagnosis. Future scoring of ESPL1, PTTG1 and PTTG1IP transcript levels may be a helpful tool in risk stratification of CML patients before initiation of TKI first = line treatment.

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant, commonly used for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, alter cytochrome P450 activity and consequently have the potential for numerous drug-drug interactions. However, there has been no comprehensive, systematic assessment of the literature describing these interactions to date. The primary objective was to describe the pharmacokinetic disposition of drugs co-administered with aprepitant or fosaprepitant using a standard definition of clinical significance. Our secondary objective was to describe adverse events ascribed to a drug interaction with aprepitant or fosaprepitant. We systematically reviewed the literature to September 11, 2016 to identify articles evaluating drug interactions involving aprepitant/ fosaprepitant. The clinical significance of each reported pharmacokinetic drug interaction was evaluated based on the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance document on conducting drug interaction studies. The probability of an adverse event reported in case reports being due to a drug interaction with aprepitant/fosaprepitant was determined using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale. 4377 publications were identified. Of these, 64 met inclusion eligibility criteria: 34 described pharmacokinetic drug interactions and 30 described adverse events ascribed to a drug interaction. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and bosutinib PO, cabazitaxel IV, cyclophosphamide IV, dexamethasone PO, methylprednisolone IV, midazolam PO/IV, oxycodone PO and tolbutamide PO were identified as were adverse events resulting from an interaction between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and alcohol, anthracyclines, ifosfamide, oxycodone, quetiapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/ serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and warfarin. The potential for a drug interaction with aprepitant and fosaprepitant should be considered when selecting antiemetic therapy.

The 5-year survival rate for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved to more than 90% in high-income countries. However, further increases in the intensity of conventional chemotherapy would be associated with significant adverse effects; therefore, novel approaches are necessary. The last decade has seen significant advances in targeted therapy with immunotherapy and molecular therapeutics, as well as advances in risk stratification for therapy based on somatic and germline genetic analysis and monitoring of minimal residual disease. For immunotherapy, the approval of antibody-based therapy (with blinatumomab in 2014 and inotuzumab ozogamicin in 2017) and T cell–based therapy (with tisagenlecleucel in 2017) by the US Food and Drug Administration has significantly improved the response rate and outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. These strategies have also been tested in the frontline setting, and immunotherapy against a new ALL-associated antigen has been developed. Incorporating effective immunotherapy into ALL therapy would enable the intensity of conventional chemotherapy to be decreased and thereby reduce associated toxicity, leading to further improvement in survival and quality of life for patients with ALL.