Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveInvestigate whether resuming physical activity (PA) at 72 hours post concussion is safe and reduces symptoms at 2 weeks, compared with resting until asymptomatic.MethodsReal-life conditions, multicentre, single-blinded randomised clinical trial, conducted in three Canadian paediatric emergency departments (ED). Children/youth aged 10–<18 years with acute concussion were recruited between March 2017 and December 2019, and randomly assigned to a 4-week stepwise return-to-PA protocol at 72 hours post concussion even if symptomatic (experimental group (EG)) or to a return-to-PA once asymptomatic protocol (control group (CG)). The primary outcome was self-reported symptoms at 2 weeks using the Health and Behaviour Inventory. Adherence was measured using accelerometers worn 24 hours/day for 14 days post injury. Adverse events (AE) (worsening of symptoms requiring unscheduled ED or primary care visit) were monitored. Multivariable intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses adjusting for prognostically important covariates were examined. Missing data were imputed for the ITT analysis.Results456 randomised participants (EG: N=227; mean (SD) age=13.3 (2.1) years; 44.5% women; CG: N=229; mean (SD) age=13.3 (2.2) years; 43.7% women) were analysed. No AE were identified. ITT analysis showed no strong evidence of a group difference at 2 weeks (adjusted mean difference=−1.3 (95% CI:−3.6 to 1.1)). In adherent participants, initiating PA 72 hours post injury significantly reduced symptoms 2 weeks post injury, compared with rest (adjusted mean difference=−4.3 (95% CI:−8.4 to –0.2)).ConclusionSymptoms at 2 weeks did not differ significantly between children/youth randomised to initiate PA 72 hours post injury versus resting until asymptomatic; however, many were non-adherent to the intervention. Among adherent participants, early PA was associated with reduced symptoms at 2 weeks. Resumption of PA is safe and may be associated with milder symptoms at 2 weeks.Level of evidence1b.Trial registration number NCT02893969.Registry namePediatric Concussion Assessment of Rest and Exertion (PedCARE).

To describe CONCUSS, a randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to compare the following: the effectiveness of immediate office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with movement (OBVAM) to delayed OBVAM as treatments for concussion-related convergence insufficiency (CONC-CI) to understand the impact of time (watchful waiting), the effect of OBVAM dosage (12 versus 16 therapy sessions), and to investigate the underlying neuro-mechanisms of OBVAM on CONC-CI participants. CONCUSS is an RCT indexed on https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05262361 enrolling 100 participants aged 11-25 years with medically diagnosed concussion, persistent post-concussive symptoms 4-24 weeks post-injury, and symptomatic convergence insufficiency. Participants will receive standard concussion care and will be randomized to either immediate OBVAM or delayed (by six weeks) OBVAM. At the Outcome 1 examination (week 7), clinical assessments of success as determined by changes in the near point of convergence (NPC), positive fusional vergence (PFV), and symptoms will be compared between the two treatment groups. After the Outcome 1 visit, those in the delayed group receive 16 visits of OBVAM, while those in the immediate OBVAM group receive four more therapy visits. Outcome 2 assessment will be used to compare both groups after participants receive 16 sessions of OBVAM. The primary measure is the between-group differences of the composite change in the NPC and PFV at the Outcome 1 visit. Secondary outcome measures include individual clinical measures, objective eye-tracking parameters, and functional brain imaging. Major features of the study design include formal definitions of conditions and outcomes, standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols, a delayed treatment arm, masked outcome examinations, and the incorporation of objective eye movement recording and brain imaging as outcome measures. CONCUSS will establish best practices in the clinical care of CONC-CI. The objective eye movement and brain imaging, correlated with the clinical signs and symptoms, will determine the neuro-mechanisms of OBVAM on CONC-CI.

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) history have high rates of performance validity test (PVT) failure. The study aimed to determine whether those with scores in the invalid versus valid range on PVTs show similar benefit from psychotherapy and if psychotherapy improves PVT performance. Veterans (N = 100) with PTSD, mild-to-moderate TBI history, and cognitive complaints underwent neuropsychological testing at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month post-treatment. Veterans were randomly assigned to cognitive processing therapy (CPT) or a novel hybrid intervention integrating CPT with TBI psychoeducation and cognitive rehabilitation strategies from Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Therapy (CogSMART). Performance below standard cutoffs on any PVT trial across three different PVT measures was considered invalid (PVT-Fail), whereas performance above cutoffs on all measures was considered valid (PVT-Pass). Although both PVT groups exhibited clinically significant improvement in PTSD symptoms, the PVT-Pass group demonstrated greater symptom reduction than the PVT-Fail group. Measures of post-concussive and depressive symptoms improved to a similar degree across groups. Treatment condition did not moderate these results. Rate of valid test performance increased from baseline to follow-up across conditions, with a stronger effect in the SMART-CPT compared to CPT condition. Both PVT groups experienced improved psychological symptoms following treatment. Veterans who failed PVTs at baseline demonstrated better test engagement following treatment, resulting in higher rates of valid PVTs at follow-up. Veterans with invalid PVTs should be enrolled in trauma-focused treatment and may benefit from neuropsychological assessment after, rather than before, treatment.

Sleep-wake disturbances frequently present in Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). These TBI-related sleep impairments confer significant burden and commonly exacerbate other functional impairments. Therapies to improve sleep following mTBI are limited and studies in Veterans are even more scarce. In our previous pilot work, morning bright light therapy (MBLT) was found to be a feasible behavioral sleep intervention in Veterans with a history of mTBI; however, this was single-arm, open-label, and non-randomized, and therefore was not intended to establish efficacy. The present study, LION (light vs ion therapy) extends this preliminary work as a fully powered, sham-controlled, participant-masked randomized controlled trial (NCT03968874), implemented as fully remote within the VA (target n = 120 complete). Randomization at 2:1 allocation ratio to: 1) active: MBLT (n = 80), and 2) sham: deactivated negative ion generator (n = 40); each with identical engagement parameters (60-min duration; within 2-hrs of waking; daily over 28-day duration). Participant masking via deception balanced expectancy assumptions across arms. Outcome measures were assessed following a 14-day baseline (pre-intervention), following 28-days of device engagement (post-intervention), and 28-days after the post-intervention assessment (follow-up). Primary outcomes were sleep measures, including continuous wrist-based actigraphy, self-report, and daily sleep dairy entries. Secondary/exploratory outcomes included cognition, mood, quality of life, circadian rhythm via dim light melatonin onset, and biofluid-based biomarkers. Participant drop out occurred in <10% of those enrolled, incomplete/missing data was present in <15% of key outcome variables, and overall fidelity adherence to the intervention was >85%, collectively establishing feasibility and acceptability for MBLT in Veterans with mTBI.

About half of the world population will suffer from a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during their lifetime, of which about 90% of cases are mild TBI. Although up to 40% of adults with mild TBI experience persistent functional deficits, there is no proven-effective treatment to facilitate recovery after it. This randomized placebo-controlled multi-centre study was aimed to examine the efficacy of herbal supplement MLC901 on complex attention following mild TBI at 6 months post-randomisation, as a primary outcome measured by CNS Vital signs (CNS-VS). Adults aged 18-65 years, who were 1-12-months post-mild TBI and experienced cognitive impairment, were randomly assigned to receive either MLC901 two capsules (0.4g/capsule) or placebo three times a day for 6 months using centralized stratified permuted block randomization. Secondary outcomes: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ; neurobehavioral sequelae); Health Related Quality of Life (QOLIBRI); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and safety. Mixed effects models of repeated measures with intention to treat analysis were employed. A Least Square Mean Difference (LSMD) from baseline to 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the analysis, 182 participants (47.8% females) were included. Multivariable mixed effects model analysis did not reveal significant improvements in complex attention (LSMD = -1.18 [95% CI -5.40; 3.03; p = 0.58]) and other cognitive domains at 6 months in the MLC901 group compared to the Placebo group. There were significant improvements in RPQ, QOLIBRI, anxiety and depression in the MLC901 group compared to the Placebo group at 6 and 9 months (LSMD -4.36 [-6.46; -2.26] and -4.07 [-6.22; -1.92], 4.84 [1.58; 8.10] and 3.74 [0.44; 7.03], -1.50 [-2.29; -0.71 and -0.96 [-1.84; -0.08], -1.14 [-1.92; -0.35] and -1.14 [-1.94; -0.34]), respectively. MLC901 tested was proven safe. Although the 6-month treatment with MLC901 did not result in a statistically significant difference with placebo for CNS-VS measurement of cognitive domains in individuals with mild TBI, the study showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in all clinical scales assessed by the investigators. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04861688.

Purpose of Review We evaluate evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI), comprising nearly 4% of all symptomatic headache disorders. Utilizing recent publications, we aim to inform clinicians of current treatment methods. Recent Findings There is limited research on PTH treatment. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of metoclopramide with diphenhydramine for acute PTH found that the treatment group (N = 81) experienced more significant pain improvement than placebo by 1.4 points. For persistent PTH, an open-label study of erenumab (N = 89) found that 28% of participants reported ≥ 50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days, but an RCT of fremanezumab showed a non-significant reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days. A randomized crossover study of 40 patients with persistent PTH found that onabotulinum toxin-A decreased cumulative number of headaches/week by 43.3% in the treatment group and increased by 35.1% among placebos. In a study of military veterans with severe posttraumatic stress disorder and persistent/delayed onset PTH (N = 193), patients who received Cognitive Behavioral Therapy reported significant improvements in headache-related disability compared to usual care (aggregate mean HIT-6, -3.4). A transcranial magnetic stimulation (N = 24) study found that 58% of participants with mild TBI-related headache experienced a 50% reduction in headache frequency. Summary New studies indicate promise in improving clinically important outcomes of PTH. However, more research is necessary to determine the optimal treatment and whether combining pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment versus a single modality is more effective.

Pituitary dysfunction with reduced growth hormone (GH) secretion is common in patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI), and these patients often develop chronic symptoms including fatigue and altered cognition. We examined 18 subjects with a history of mild TBI, fatigue, and insufficient GH secretion. Subjects received GH replacement in a year-long, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, and were assessed for changes in physical performance, body composition, resting energy expenditure, fatigue, sleep, mood, and neuropsychological status. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess changes in brain structure and resting state functional connectivity. GH replacement resulted in decreased fatigue, sleep disturbance, and anxiety, as well as increased resting energy expenditure, improved body composition, and altered perception of submaximal effort when performing exercise testing. Associated brain changes included increased frontal cortical thickness and gray matter volume and resting state connectivity changes in regions associated with somatosensory networks. GH replacement altered brain morphology and connectivity and reduced fatigue and related symptoms in mild TBI patients. Additional studies are needed to understand the mechanisms causing TBI-related fatigue and symptom relief with GH replacement.

Each year, millions of Americans experience mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Current research on the long-term effects of mTBI vary considerably. Several mechanisms linking mTBI to dementia have been proposed including amyloid plaque formation and cerebrovascular injury following mTBI. Veterans have higher rates of mTBI than non-Veterans. As efforts to increase Veteran enrollment in clinical trials and studies related to Alzheimer disease expand, it is critical to understand the potential impact of mTBI on cognitive ability and factors related to risk for AD. This study leveraged two cohorts to examine the association between history of mTBI and white matter hyperintensity lesion volume (WMLV), CSF pTau181, total tau, and Aβ42, and cognitive ability. The sample comprises, N = 131 VA eligible Veterans without memory impairment enrolled in the Brain Amyloid and Vascular Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid (BRAVE) clinical trial (NCT02719327) and N = 320 participants in the Wisconsin ADRC clinical core, including n = 36 identified as Veterans. BRAVE participants reported if they had experienced symptoms of mTBI (e.g. loss of consciousness, dizziness, headache). ADRC participants indicated if they had a recent or remote mTBI; participants with a recent mTBI were excluded (n = 6). CSF samples were assayed using elecsys® beta-Amyloid(1_42) CSF II, phopho-Tau (181P), and Total tau assays (Roche Diagnostics International, Switzerland) and log-transfomed prior to analyses. WMHLV adjusted for TIV was binarized to WMH presence or absence. Separate Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite scores were created for BRAVE and were analyzed separately. Regression models included gender, age at study visit, clinical status and education level (PACC only) as covariates. Demographics and study outcomes stratified by cohort and Veteran status are shown in Table 1 and 2. Veterans had higher rates of mTBI than non-Veterans. History of mild TBI status was unrelated to study outcomes (see Figure 1; WMH presence: p = .06; CSF biomarkers: ps = .50 to .88; BRAVE-PACC: p = .15, ADRC-PACC, p = .48). History of mild TBI had no long-term impact on cerebrovascular dysfunction, AD biomarkers or baseline cognitive performance. Further analyses will explore severity of TBI (with or without loss of consciousness) on study outcomes as well asexamine the impact of mTBIon change in cognitive performance and biomarkers of neuroinflammation.