Explore the vast range of titles available.

Preclinical models of stroke have shown that intravenous glyburide reduces brain swelling and improves survival. We assessed whether intravenous glyburide (RP-1127; glibenclamide) would safely reduce brain swelling, decrease the need for decompressive craniectomy, and improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with a large hemispheric infarction. For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients (aged 18–80 years) with a clinical diagnosis of large anterior circulation hemispheric infarction for less than 10 h and baseline diffusion-weighted MRI image lesion volume of 82–300 cm3 on MRI at 18 hospitals in the USA. We used web-based randomisation (1:1) to allocate patients to the placebo or intravenous glyburide group. Intravenous glyburide was given as a 0·13 mg bolus intravenous injection for the first 2 min, followed by an infusion of 0·16 mg/h for the first 6 h and then 0·11 mg/h for the remaining 66 h. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–4 at 90 days without undergoing decompressive craniectomy. Analysis was by per protocol. Safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients who received the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01794182. Between May 3, 2013, and April 30, 2015, 86 patients were randomly assigned but enrolment was stopped because of funding reasons. The funder, principal investigators, site investigators, patients, imaging core, and outcomes personnel were masked to treatment. The per-protocol study population was 41 participants who received intravenous glyburide and 36 participants who received placebo. 17 (41%) patients in the intravenous glyburide group and 14 (39%) in the placebo group had an mRS score of 0–4 at 90 days without decompressive craniectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·32–2·32; p=0·77). Ten (23%) of 44 participants in the intravenous glyburide group and ten (26%) of 39 participants in the placebo group had cardiac events (p=0·76), and four of 20 had serious adverse events (two in the intravenous glyburide group and two in the placebo group, p=1·00). One cardiac death occurred in each group (p=1·00). Intravenous glyburide was well tolerated in patients with large hemispheric stroke at risk for cerebral oedema. There was no difference in the composite primary outcome. Further study is warranted to assess the potential clinical benefit of a reduction in swelling by intravenous glyburide. Remedy Pharmaceuticals.

No treatment is available to prevent brain oedema, which can occur after a large hemispheric infarction. Glibenclamide has previously been shown to improve functional outcome and reduce neurological or oedema-related death in patients younger than 70 years who were at risk of brain oedema after an acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess whether intravenous glibenclamide could improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with large hemispheric infarction. CHARM was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial conducted across 143 acute stroke centres in 21 countries. We included patients aged 18–85 years with a large stroke, defined either by an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 1–5 or by an ischaemic core lesion volume of 80–300 mL on CT perfusion or MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either intravenous glibenclamide (8·6 mg over 72 h) or placebo. The study drug was started within 10 h of stroke onset. The primary efficacy outcome was the shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at day 90, as a measure of functional outcome. The primary efficacy outcome was analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients aged 18–70 years. The safety population comprised all randomly assigned patients who received a dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02864953). The trial was stopped early by the sponsor for strategic and operational reasons (slow enrolment because of COVID-19), before any unblinding or knowledge of the trial results. Between Aug 29, 2018, and May 23, 2023, 535 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 518 received a dose (safety population) and 431 were aged 18–70 years and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (217 were assigned glibenclamide and 214 placebo). The mean age of patients was 58·7 (SD 9·0) years in the placebo group and 58·0 (9·5) years in the glibenclamide group; the median US National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 19 (IQR 16–23) in the placebo group and 19 (IQR 16–22) in the glibenclamide group; and the mean time from stroke onset to study drug start was 8·9 h (SD 2·1) in the placebo group and 9·2 h (2·1) in the glibenclamide group. Intravenous glibenclamide was not associated with a favourable shift in the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (common odds ratio [OR] 1·17 [95% CI 0·80–1·71], p=0·42). 90-day mortality was 29% (61 of 214) in the placebo group and 32% (70 of 217) in the glibenclamide group (hazard ratio 1·20 [0·85–1·70]; p=0·30). Serious adverse events in the prespecified safety population were consistent with the known safety profile of glibenclamide and included hypoglycaemia in 15 (6%) of 259 patients in the glibenclamide group and in four (2%) of 259 patients in the placebo group, leading to dose interruption or reduction in seven (3%) patients in the glibenclamide group and in one (<1%) in the placebo group. Intravenous glibenclamide did not improve functional outcome in patients aged 18–70 years after large hemispheric infarction, although the trial was underpowered to make definitive conclusions because it was stopped early. Future prospective evaluation could be warranted to identify a possible benefit of intravenous glibenclamide in specific subgroups. Biogen.

BackgroundGlibenclamide has garnered attention due to its multifaceted neuroprotective effects in cases of acute central nervous system injury. We initiated a trial to explore the effectiveness and safety of a high dose of glibenclamide in the management of cerebral oedema following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH).MethodsThis trial constituted a single-centre, randomised clinical study. Half of the 56 patients assigned to the glibenclamide group received 15 mg of glibenclamide tablets daily for 10 days (5 mg, three times/day). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving the subarachnoid haemorrhage early brain oedema score dichotomy (defined as Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Early Brain Oedema Score 0–2) at the 10-day postmedication. The secondary outcome of cerebral oedema was the concentration of sulfonylurea receptor 1-transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (SUR1-TRPM4) in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.ResultsWe enrolled 56 patients diagnosed with aSAH, who were admitted to the neurosurgery intensive care unit between 22 August 2021 and 25 April 2023. The primary outcome revealed that the glibenclamide group exhibited a notably higher proportion of mild cerebral oedema in comparison to the placebo group (60.7% vs 42.9%, adjusted OR: 4.66, 95% CI 1.14 to 19.10, p=0.032). Furthermore, the concentration of SUR1-TRPM4 in the cerebrospinal fluid of the glibenclamide group was significantly higher than the placebo group (p=0.0002; p=0.026), while the plasma TRPM4 concentration in the glibenclamide group was significantly lower than the placebo group (p=0.001).ConclusionOral administration of high-dose glibenclamide notably reduced radiological assessment of cerebral oedema after 10 days of medication. Significant alterations were also observed in the concentration of SUR1-TRPM4 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. However, it is worth noting that glibenclamide was associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia. Larger trials are warranted to evaluate the potential benefits of glibenclamide in mitigating swelling and then improving neurological function.Trial registration numberChiCTR2100049908.

Cerebral oedema is associated with morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI) 1 . Noradrenaline levels are increased after TBI 2 – 4 , and the amplitude of the increase in noradrenaline predicts both the extent of injury 5 and the likelihood of mortality 6 . Glymphatic impairment is both a feature of and a contributor to brain injury 7 , 8 , but its relationship with the injury-associated surge in noradrenaline is unclear. Here we report that acute post-traumatic oedema results from a suppression of glymphatic and lymphatic fluid flow that occurs in response to excessive systemic release of noradrenaline. This post-TBI adrenergic storm was associated with reduced contractility of cervical lymphatic vessels, consistent with diminished return of glymphatic and lymphatic fluid to the systemic circulation. Accordingly, pan-adrenergic receptor inhibition normalized central venous pressure and partly restored glymphatic and cervical lymphatic flow in a mouse model of TBI, and these actions led to substantially reduced brain oedema and improved functional outcomes. Furthermore, post-traumatic inhibition of adrenergic signalling boosted lymphatic export of cellular debris from the traumatic lesion, substantially reducing secondary inflammation and accumulation of phosphorylated tau. These observations suggest that targeting the noradrenergic control of central glymphatic flow may offer a therapeutic approach for treating acute TBI. Acute oedema after traumatic brain injury is accompanied by the suppression of glymphatic and lymphatic fluid flow due to excessive systemic release of noradrenaline.

Pre-clinical studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI) show that glyburide reduces edema and hemorrhagic progression of contusions. We conducted a small Phase II, three-institution, randomized placebo-controlled trial of subjects with TBI to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) glyburide. Twenty-eight subjects were randomized and underwent a 72-h infusion of IV glyburide or placebo, beginning within 10 h of trauma. Of the 28 subjects, 25 had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 6–10, and 14 had contusions. There were no differences in adverse events (AEs) or severe adverse events (ASEs) between groups. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) percent change at 72–168 h from screening/baseline was compared between the glyburide and placebo groups. Analysis of contusions (7 per group) showed that lesion volumes (hemorrhage plus edema) increased 1036% with placebo versus 136% with glyburide (p = 0.15), and that hemorrhage volumes increased 11.6% with placebo but decreased 29.6% with glyburide (p = 0.62). Three diffusion MRI measures of edema were quantified: mean diffusivity (MD), free water (FW), and tissue MD (MDt), corresponding to overall, extracellular, and intracellular water, respectively. The percent change with time for each measure was compared in lesions (n = 14) versus uninjured white matter (n = 24) in subjects receiving placebo (n = 20) or glyburide (n = 18). For placebo, the percent change in lesions for all three measures was significantly different compared with uninjured white matter (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p < 0.02), consistent with worsening of edema in untreated contusions. In contrast, for glyburide, the percent change in lesions for all three measures was not significantly different compared with uninjured white matter. Further study of IV glyburide in contusion TBI is warranted.

A phase 2 trial of donanemab, an antibody that targets amyloid deposited in the brain, showed a better composite score for cognition and for the ability to perform activities of daily living than placebo at 76 weeks in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Results for secondary outcomes were generally similar in the two trial groups.

Background Perihematomal edema (PHE) after post-intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has complex pathophysiological mechanisms that are poorly understood. The complicated immune response in the post-ICH brain constitutes a crucial component of PHE pathophysiology. In this study, we aimed to characterize the transcriptional profiles of immune cell populations in human PHE tissue and explore the microscopic differences between different types of immune cells. Methods 9 patients with basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage (hematoma volume 50-100 ml) were enrolled in this study. A multi-stage profile was developed, comprising Group1 ( n  = 3, 0–6 h post-ICH, G1), Group2 ( n  = 3, 6–24 h post-ICH, G2), and Group3 ( n  = 3, 24–48 h post-ICH, G3). A minimal quantity of edematous tissue surrounding the hematoma was preserved during hematoma evacuation. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to map immune cell populations within comprehensively resected PHE samples collected from patients at different stages after ICH. Results We established, for the first time, a comprehensive landscape of diverse immune cell populations in human PHE tissue at a single-cell level. Our study identified 12 microglia subsets and 5 neutrophil subsets in human PHE tissue. What’s more, we discovered that the secreted phosphoprotein-1 (SPP1) pathway served as the basis for self-communication between microglia subclusters during the progression of PHE. Additionally, we traced the trajectory branches of different neutrophil subtypes. Finally, we also demonstrated that microglia-produced osteopontin (OPN) could regulate the immune environment in PHE tissue by interacting with CD44-positive cells. Conclusions As a result of our research, we have gained valuable insight into the immune-microenvironment within PHE tissue, which could potentially be used to develop novel treatment modalities for ICH.

Key Points Secondary injury following intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is caused by perihaemorrhagic inflammation, toxic products of blood breakdown, and perihaematomal oedema (PHO) Secondary injury contributes to neurological deterioration over an extended period of hours to days and, therefore, offers a long therapeutic window PHO forms in three stages in accordance with Starling's principle: stage 1 is characterized by ionic oedema, and stages 2 and 3 by progressive vasogenic oedema PHO is a pathophysiological marker of secondary injury that could provide a useful surrogate end point for testing novel neuroprotective agents PHO might also be clinically relevant, as it augments the mass effect of haemorrhage; further studies could identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from therapies that ameliorate PHO Combination treatment regimens that target different stages of PHO formation might be most effective to reduce swelling Perihaematomal oedema (PHO) is an important pathophysiological marker of secondary injury following intracerebral haemorrhage. In this Review, the authors consider PHO in a novel framework and highlight the clinical relevance of the condition, both as a therapeutic target and as a surrogate marker for novel interventions that target secondary injury. Perihaematomal oedema (PHO) is an important pathophysiological marker of secondary injury in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In this Review, we describe a novel method to conceptualize PHO formation within the framework of Starling's principle of movement of fluid across a capillary wall. We consider progression of PHO through three stages, characterized by ionic oedema (stage 1) and progressive vasogenic oedema (stages 2 and 3). In this context, possible modifiers of PHO volume and their value in identifying patients who would benefit from therapies that target secondary injury are discussed; the practicalities of using neuroimaging to measure PHO volume are also considered. We examine whether PHO can be used as a predictor of neurological outcome following ICH, and we provide an overview of emerging therapies. Our discussion emphasizes that PHO has clinical relevance both as a therapeutic target, owing to its augmentation of the mass effect of a haemorrhage, and as a surrogate marker for novel interventions that target secondary injury.

It has been shown that 3 days of 62 mg/kg/day deferoxamine infusion (maximum dose not to exceed 6000 mg/day) is safe and tolerated by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of deferoxamine mesylate for edema resolution and hematoma absorption after ICH. From February 2013 to May 2014, spontaneous ICH patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) within 18 hours of onset were evaluated. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group. The treatment of the two groups was similar except that the experimental group received deferoxamine mesylate. Patients were evaluated by CT and neurology scale at the time of admission, and on the fourth, eighth, and fifteenth day (or at discharge) after admission. Patients were followed up for the first 30 days and clinical data of the two groups were compared. Forty-two patients completed 30 days of follow-up by May 2014; 21 cases in the experimental group and 21 cases in the control group. The control group's relative edema volume on the fifteenth day (or discharge) was 10.26 ± 17.54, which was higher than the experimental group (1.91 ± 1.94; P < 0.05). The control group's 1-8 day and 8-15 day relative hematoma absorption were greater than the experimental group (P < 0.05).The control group's relative edema volume on the fourth, eighth, and fifteenth day (or discharge) was higher than the experimental group (P < 0.05). Neurological scores between the two groups were not statistically different on the fifteenth day (or discharge) or on the thirtieth day. Deferoxamine mesylate may slow hematoma absorption and inhibit edema after ICH, although further investigation is required to form definitive conclusions. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-14004979.

The purpose of the current study was to detect the effect of salidroside (Sal) on cerebral ischemia and explore its potential mechanism. Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) was performed to investigate the effects of Sal on cerebral ischemia. The rats were randomly divided into five groups: sham group, vehicle group, clopidogrel (7.5 mg/kg) group, Sal (20 mg/kg) group, and Sal (40 mg/kg) group. SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury to verify the protective effect of Sal in vitro. We also built the stable receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP140)-overexpressing SH-SY5Y cells. The results showed that Sal significantly reduces brain infarct size and cerebral edema. Sal could effectively decrease the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum of the MCAO rats and supernatant of I/R-induced SH-SY5Y cells. Immunohistochemical and Western blot results demonstrated that Sal inhibited RIP140-mediated inflammation and apoptosis in the MCAO rats and SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, we further confirmed that RIP140/NF-κB signaling plays a crucial role by evaluating the protein expression in RIP140-overexpressing SH-SY5Y cells. Our findings suggested that Sal could be used as an effective neuroprotective agent for cerebral ischemia due to its significant effect on preventing neuronal cell injury after cerebral ischemia both in vivo and in vitro by the inhibitions of RIP140-mediated inflammation and apoptosis.