Explore the vast range of titles available.

Each year, millions of pulmonary nodules are identified incidentally or through lung cancer screening, and many involve biopsy to distinguish cancer from benign processes. Both navigational bronchoscopy and computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy are commonly used in patients undergoing biopsies of peripheral pulmonary nodules, but the relative diagnostic accuracy of these two approaches is unclear. In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority trial, we assigned patients with an intermediate-risk or high-risk peripheral pulmonary nodule measuring 10 to 30 mm in diameter to undergo navigational bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy at seven centers across the United States. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, which was defined as the percentage of patients with biopsies that showed a specific diagnosis (cancer or a specific benign condition) that was confirmed to be accurate through 12 months of clinical follow-up (nonferiority margin, 10 percentage points). Secondary outcomes included procedural complications such as the occurrence of pneumothorax. Among the 234 patients included in the primary-outcome analysis (5 of whom were lost to follow-up), biopsy resulted in a specific diagnosis that was confirmed to be accurate through month 12 in 94 of 119 patients (79.0%) in the navigational bronchoscopy group and in 81 of 110 patients (73.6%) in the transthoracic needle biopsy group (absolute difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to 17.2; P = 0.003 for noninferiority; P = 0.17 for superiority). Pneumothorax occurred in 4 of 121 patients (3.3%) in the navigational bronchoscopy group and in 32 of 113 patients (28.3%) in the transthoracic needle biopsy group and led to the placement of a chest tube, hospital admission, or both in 1 patient (0.8%) and 13 patients (11.5%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of navigational bronchoscopy was noninferior to that of transthoracic needle biopsy among patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules measuring 10 to 30 mm. (Funded by Medtronic and others; VERITAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04250194.).

Although remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a shorter elimination half-life and faster recovery time than midazolam, studies evaluating its safety and efficacy during bronchoscopy are limited. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam with those of midazolam for bronchoscopy. This prospective randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a single institution. The primary outcome was the time from the end of the procedure to full alertness. Other procedural time parameters, satisfaction profiles, and adverse effects were thoroughly evaluated. The time taken to reach peak sedation and the time from the end of the procedure to full alertness was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group than in the midazolam group (median [interquartile range], 2 min [1–4] vs. 3 min [2–5], P  = 0.006; and median, 2 min [1–5] vs. 5 min [1–12], P  = 0.035, respectively). In patients with non-biopsy procedures (n = 79), participant satisfaction was significantly higher in the remimazolam group than in the midazolam group (median rated scale, 10 vs. 7, P  = 0.042). Physician satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure were similar between groups. Although the incidence of adverse effects was similar between the groups and there was no significant difference, the midazolam group had a higher antidote administration rate than the remimazolam group (15.7% vs. 4.1%, P  = 0.092). Remimazolam is effective and safe for achieving adequate sedation, with a shorter onset time and faster neuropsychiatric recovery than midazolam. It may be a new option for sedation during bronchoscopy. Trial registration : The trial registration number is NCT05994547, and the date of first registration is 16/08/2023.

Remimazolam's benefits for patients undergoing painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy remain uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB). Randomized controlled trial. University hospital. Between April 2021 and September 2022, patients undergoing painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy were recruited. The patients were randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to remimazolam-remifentanil group (RR group) or dexmedetomidine-remifentanil group (DR group). The primary outcome was the procedure interruption rate during bronchoscopy. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes, resuscitation time, rescue medication usage rate and dose, satisfaction scores of patients and bronchoscopists, operation-related complications, and adverse events. A total of 363 patients were included for final analysis. The interruption rates of bronchoscopy were 8.2 % in the RR group and 39.2 % in the DR group (P < 0.05). The rescue medication usage rate (4.4 % vs. 38.7 %, P < 0.05) and dose (1.51 ± 8.15 mg vs. 13.17 ± 18.86 mg, P < 0.05) were lower in the RR group compared with the DR group. The incidence of oxygen desaturation was significantly lower in the RR group than in the DR group (14.3 % vs. 44.2 %, P < 0.05). Hemodynamic changes in patients in the DR group were significant, with longer recovery time and lower satisfaction scores for both inpatients and bronchoscopists (P < 0.05), compared with the RR group. However, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of operation-related complications (P > 0.05) except for postoperative dizziness, which was more common in the DR group (P < 0.05). Remimazolam is effective and safe in painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. It allows a lower procedure interruption rate and incidence of oxygen desaturation, providing better hemodynamic stability compared to dexmedetomidine. •Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, induced better sedation during bronchoscopy than dexmedetomidine.•Remimazolam had a better safety profile than that of dexmedetomidine.•Remimazolam anesthesia had higher bronchoscopist and patient satisfaction score.

Background Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is a complex procedure with the need for sufficient patient anesthesia/sedation while maintaining safety. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of HSK3486 during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Methods This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel-group phase 3 trial was conducted in patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Patients randomly received HSK3486 0.4 mg/kg ( N = 134) or propofol 2.0 mg/kg ( N = 133). The primary efficacy endpoint was the successful rate of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and secondary efficacy endpoints included successful induction of anesthesia/sedation, duration, time to being fully alert, and time to patient discharge. Safety assessments and drug concentrations were also measured. Results A total of 267 patients completed fiberoptic bronchoscopy, with a success rate of 100% and a 95% confidence interval of − 2.8 to 2.8% for the difference between the groups, which met the predesigned criteria of > − 8%, confirming the non-inferiority of anesthesia/sedation produced by HSK3486 compared to propofol. Among the secondary efficacy endpoints, only time to full alertness (median 8.50 vs. 6.00 min, P = 0.012) and time to discharge (median 13.00 vs. 9.87 min, P = 0.002) were slightly longer in the HSK3486 group. The incidence of adverse events was significant lower in the HSK3486 group (52.6 vs . 76.5%, P < 0.001) mainly because of less pain on injection (4.4 vs. 39.4%, P < 0.001) compared to the propofol group. HSK3486 had a similar terminal elimination half-life as propofol. Conclusions HSK3486 exhibited non-inferiority anesthesia/sedation compared to propofol in patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and had a good safety profile with a lower incidence of pain on injection. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04111159, registered on 1 October 2019

Although culture-independent techniques have refuted lung sterility in health, controversy about contamination during bronchoscope passage through the upper respiratory tract (URT) has impeded research progress. We sought to establish whether bronchoscopic sampling accurately reflects the lung microbiome in health and to distinguish between two proposed routes of authentic microbial immigration, (i) dispersion along contiguous respiratory mucosa and (ii) subclinical microaspiration. During bronchoscopy of eight adult volunteers without lung disease, we performed seven protected specimen brushings (PSB) and bilateral bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) per subject. We amplified, sequenced, and analyzed the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V4 regions by using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Rigorous attention was paid to eliminate potential sources of error or contamination, including a randomized processing order and the inclusion and analysis of exhaustive procedural and sequencing control specimens. Indices of mouth-lung immigration (mouth-lung community similarity, bacterial burden, and community richness) were all significantly greater in airway and alveolar specimens than in bronchoscope contamination control specimens, indicating minimal evidence of pharyngeal contamination. Ecological indices of mouth-lung immigration peaked at or near the carina, as predicted for a primary immigration route of microaspiration. Bacterial burden, diversity, and mouth-lung similarity were greater in BAL than PSB samples, reflecting differences in the sampled surface areas. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02392182.) IMPORTANCE This study defines the bacterial topography of the healthy human respiratory tract and provides ecological evidence that bacteria enter the lungs in health primarily by microaspiration, with potential contribution in some subjects by direct dispersal along contiguous mucosa. By demonstrating that contamination contributes negligibly to microbial communities in bronchoscopically acquired specimens, we validate the use of bronchoscopy to investigate the lung microbiome. This study defines the bacterial topography of the healthy human respiratory tract and provides ecological evidence that bacteria enter the lungs in health primarily by microaspiration, with potential contribution in some subjects by direct dispersal along contiguous mucosa. By demonstrating that contamination contributes negligibly to microbial communities in bronchoscopically acquired specimens, we validate the use of bronchoscopy to investigate the lung microbiome.

Background: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is an innovative method of obtaining samples from the parenchyma of patients with diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. However, the technique is not yet standardized, and uncertainty exists about the optimal protocol, including the number of samples, the biopsy size, and the choice of the biopsy site. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic yield and complications of cryobiopsy with different strategies adopted to sample lung tissue (number of samples, biopsy site, and sample size). Methods: We prospectively enrolled 46 patients with suspected diffuse parenchymal lung diseases for the diagnosis of which a biopsy was deemed useful. All patients underwent transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and they were randomly assigned to group A (4 samples obtained from the same segment) or group B (2 samples obtained from one segment and 2 samples obtained from a different segment of the same lobe). Analysis of the samples was performed sequentially (from the first to the last sample), and pathologists reformulated their histopathologic diagnosis with the addition of each sample. Results: The mean diagnostic yield of the procedure combining the 2 groups and performing only the first sampling was 69%. When a second biopsy was performed as well, the mean diagnostic yield improved, but this increase was significant only when the 2 samples were obtained from 2 different segments (96%, group B). Conclusions: This study suggests that the strategy of performing 2 biopsies with a cryoprobe may be associated with an increased diagnostic yield in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases if these samples are obtained from 2 different segments within the same lobe.

Objective The sedation protocol for flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy has long been a matter of inconclusiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and provide insights for optimizing clinical anesthesia strategies. Methods This study was a randomized, single-blind controlled trial. A total of 118 patients who underwent flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy were randomized into two groups (59 patients per group). Both groups received intravenous alfentanil 10 µg/kg 2 min before sedation treatment, followed by either 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam (Group R) or 2 mg/kg propofol (Group P). During the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the experimental drugs were administered in patients in each group as needed to maintain the depth of sedation (modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation score ≤ 3). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included other safety outcomes and effectiveness outcomes. Results A total of 115 participants completed the study. Compared with Group P, the incidence of severe hypoxemia in Group R was lower (3.4% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.029); the incidences of injection pain and hypotension in Group R were lower (10.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.003); and the incidences of hypotension, dizziness, and grade of cough in Group R were lower (P < 0.05). The sedation success rate and sedation success rate at an induced dose were similar between Groups R and P (P > 0.05). Compared with Group P, sedation recovery time in Group R was shorter, and the operator comfort scores and patient comfort scores in Group R were higher (P < 0.05). Conclusions Remimazolam, when combined with alfentanil, has shown excellent clinical potential in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Compared with propofol, it significantly reduced the incidence of severe hypoxemia, injection pain, hypotension, dizziness, and intraoperative coughing while maintaining comparable sedation success rates. It also shortened recovery time and improved both operator and patient comfort scores. These results support remimazolam plus alfentanil as a safe, effective, and well-tolerated alternative sedation regimen in this setting.

Introduction Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is increasingly used to diagnose interstitial lung disease (ILD). The 1.1-mm cryoprobe has recently been available in clinical practice. The diagnostic yield and safety of TBLC using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe need to be confirmed. Methods A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with suspected ILD and randomly assigned to 1.1-mm and 1.9-mm cryoprobe groups. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of multidisciplinary discussion. Secondary outcomes were sample quality and incidence of complications. The tension and stress effects during TBLC onto the target lobe caused by 1.1-mm and 1.9-mm cryoprobes were also evaluated using finite element analysis. Results A total of 224 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed in the diagnostic yield (80.4% vs. 79.5%, p  = 0.845) and sample quality scores (5.73 ± 0.64 vs. 5.66 ± 0.77; p  = 0.324) between the 1.9-mm cryoprobe group and 1.1-mm cryoprobe group. The average surface areas of samples in 1.1-mm cryoprobe group were smaller, while no difference in sample weights was observed. A decreased incidence of moderate bleeding was found in the 1.1-mm cryoprobe group (17.0% vs. 6.2%, p  = 0.027), while there was no difference in the incidence of the pneumothorax, there was a trend to higher rate of pneumothorax in 1.1-mm group. In finite element analysis, the 1.1-mm cryoprobe required the largest tension and produced the largest stress. Conclusion Compared with a 1.9-mm cryoprobe, there was no difference in specimen quality or diagnostic rate but smaller sample size with a 1.1-mm cryoprobe. There was a decreased risk of moderate bleeding, but a trend towards increased risk for pneumothorax with 1.1-mm cryoprobe. Trail Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04047667; registered August 4, 2019.

Background Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy has recently emerged as an alternative to electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy for the evaluation of peripheral pulmonary lesions. While robotic-assisted bronchoscopy is proposed to have several advantages, such as an easier learning curve, it is unclear if it has comparable diagnostic utility as electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy. Methods R obotic versus E lectromagnetic bronchoscopy for pulmonary L es I on A ssessme NT (RELIANT) is an investigator-initiated, single-center, open label, noninferiority, cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in two operating rooms at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Each operating room (OR) is assigned to either robotic-assisted or electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy each morning, with each OR day considered one cluster. All patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for evaluation of a peripheral pulmonary lesion in one of the two operating rooms are eligible. Schedulers, patients, and proceduralists are blinded to daily group allocations until randomization is revealed for each operating room each morning. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield defined as the proportion of cases yielding lesional tissue. Secondary and safety endpoints include procedure duration and procedural complications. Enrolment began on March 6, 2023, and will continue until 202 clusters have been accrued, with expected enrolment of approximately 400 patients by the time of completion in March of 2024. Discussion RELIANT is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial that will compare the diagnostic yield of the two most commonly used bronchoscopic approaches for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions. This will be the first known cluster randomized pragmatic trial in the interventional pulmonology field and the first randomized controlled trial of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration (NCT05705544) on January 30, 2023.

Background Acute lung injury and respiratory failure in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) present challenges owing to varied factors. Manual suctioning, which is the current standard, burdens healthcare professionals and poses risks. The Lmeca.A1000 automatic suction device offers an innovative solution to this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of this device. Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial compared automatic and manual suction in ICU patients. Mucosal injury and pneumonia were assessed using bronchoscopy and monitoring. Mechanical stability and adverse events were also evaluated. Results In total, 117 critically ill adults were screened: 56 in the experimental group and 53 in the control group completing the study. No significant difference in mucosal injury was found at 3 or 7 days after treatment ( p  = 0.871, and 0.750). The incidence of VAP over 2 weeks was 5.36% in the experimental group and 1.89% in the control group, not significantly different ( p  = 0.582). Adverse events occurred in 14.3 and 13.2%, respectively, with no significant difference ( p  = 0.870). The incidence of clinical trial device malfunction within 3 days of application was 0.03% and within 2 weeks of follow-up was 0.02%. Conclusions This study evidenced the non-inferiority of the automatic suction device to the manual method in terms of safety. The adoption of an automated system could alleviate the workload of healthcare professionals while maintaining effective airway management.