Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (c-TBNA) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are both valuable diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal lesions. Although a superiority of EBUS-TBNA over c-TBNA may be expected, evidence-based data on a direct comparison between these 2 procedures are still lacking. Objectives: We aimed to test the superiority of EBUS-TBNA over c-TBNA in a randomized trial and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness profile of a staged strategy, including c-TBNA as initial test followed by EBUS-TBNA, in case of inconclusive results at rapid on-site evaluation. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to either the EBUS-TBNA or c-TBNA group. The primary endpoint was to test the superiority of EBUS-TBNA sensitivity over c-TBNA. The secondary endpoints included the sensitivity of the staged strategy, as well as costs and safety related to each procedure and to their sequential combination. Results: A total of 253 patients were randomized to either EBUS-TBNA (n = 127) or c-TBNA (n = 126), and 31 patients of the c-TBNA group subsequently underwent EBUS-TBNA. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was higher, but not significantly superior to that of c-TBNA (respectively. 92% [95% CI 87-97] and 82% [95% CI 75-90], p > 0.05). The sensitivity of the staged strategy was 94% (95% CI 89-98). No major adverse events occurred. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA was the single best diagnostic tool, although not significantly superior to c-TBNA. Due to the favorable cost-effectiveness profile of their sequential combination, in selected scenarios with a high probability of success from the standard procedure, these should not be necessarily intended as competitive and the staged strategy could be considered in clinical practice.

The use of two quality-of-life questionnaires in a single clinical trial with an economic component can be challenging due to the associated workload in terms of data collection and an increased risk of missing data. The aim of our study was to determine whether the questionnaire chosen to measure health status, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), could be administered on its own without adding the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) for economic evaluation in emphysema studies. Data were prospectively collected during the REVOLENS trial assessing endobronchial coil treatment in severe emphysema. To quantify the association between the two questionnaires, correlations between the EQ-5D and the SGRQ were first tested and the concordance was then studied in order to know whether the two questionnaires were interchangeable. Finally, the Starkie et al algorithm predicting EQ-5D utility values from the SGRQ was used on REVOLENS's individual patient data. The Student's -test, correlation and concordance between EQ-5D individual value (from the REVOLENS study) and predicted value (from the Starkie et al algorithm) were studied to test this algorithm. Results showed a strong correlation but no concordance between the EQ-5D and the SGRQ, demonstrating that the two questionnaires are not interchangeable. Moreover, the algorithm predicting EQ-5D utilities from the SGRQ did not provide utility values comparable to those observed in the REVOLENS study. Indeed, our study demonstrated a strong correlation between predicted and individual EQ-5D values but no concordance. The use of both the EQ-5D and the SGRQ in a clinical study with an economic component is justified. Based on our results, the SGRQ should not be used to obtain a utility score to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and conclude on the efficiency of an intervention in emphysema patients.

Background: Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is an innovative treatment that has been shown to be safe and effective in selected subgroups of patients with severe emphysema. Objectives: The objective of our study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of EBV therapy compared to the medical management of patients with high heterogeneity, complete fissures and lobar exclusion in the context of the German health-care system. Methods: Clinical data from a subset of VENT (Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial) provided information about clinical events, health-related quality of life, and disease staging for 12 months. This information was subsequently used to project long-term disease progression, mortality, and health resource utilization. We computed the 5- and 10-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in euros per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Costs and effects were discounted at 3% per year. Results: EBV therapy led to clinically meaningful disease restaging at 12 months (37.8% of the cohort improved staging, compared to 0% in the controls). Over 5 years, EBV therapy was projected to increase survival from 66.4 to 70.7%, and to add 0.22 QALYs. Costs were estimated to increase by EUR 10,299, resulting in an ICER of EUR 46,322 per QALY. Over 10 years, 0.41 QALYs were gained at an additional cost of EUR 10,425, yielding an ICER of EUR 25,142 per QALY. Conclusions: Our model-based analysis suggests that EBV therapy leads to clinically meaningful changes in disease staging and progression when compared to medical management, with resulting gains in unadjusted and quality-adjusted life expectancy. Our results indicate that EBV therapy is cost-effective in the German health-care system.

Abstract Rationale Patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy (IML) are a common presentation to physicians, and mediastinoscopy is traditionally considered the “gold standard” investigation when a pathological diagnosis is required. Endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as an alternative to mediastinoscopy in patients with lung cancer. Objective To determine the efficacy and health care costs of EBUS-TBNA as an alternative initial investigation to mediastinoscopy in patients with isolated IML. Methods Prospective multicenter single-arm clinical trial of 77 consecutive patients with IML from 5 centers between April 2009 and March 2011. All patients underwent EBUS-TBNA. If EBUS-TBNA did not provide a diagnosis, then participants underwent mediastinoscopy. Measurements and Main Results EBUS-TBNA prevented 87% of mediastinoscopies (95% confidence interval [CI], 77–94%; P < 0.001) but failed to provide a diagnosis in 10 patients (13%), all of whom underwent mediastinoscopy. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA in patients with IML were 92% (95% CI, 83–95%) and 40% (95% CI, 12–74%), respectively. One patient developed a lower respiratory tract infection after EBUS-TBNA, requiring inpatient admission. The cost of the EBUS-TBNA procedure per patient was £1,382 ($2,190). The mean cost of the EBUS-TBNA strategy was £1,892 ($2,998) per patient, whereas a strategy of mediastinoscopy alone was significantly more costly at £3,228 ($5,115) per patient (P < 0.001). The EBUS-TBNA strategy is less costly than mediastinoscopy if the cost per EBUS-TBNA procedure is less than £2,718 ($4,307) per patient. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA is a safe, highly sensitive, and cost-saving initial investigation in patients with IML. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00932854).

Background Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has emerged as a widely used minimally invasive method for mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling. However, in newly established centers, its economic sustainability is questioned due to the learning curve, equipment costs, and procedural requirements. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance, procedure duration, and cost-effectiveness of EBUS compared to conventional methods in a beginner center. Methods This retrospective study included 200 patients treated between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 100 underwent EBUS and 100 underwent conventional procedures (mediastinoscopy, VATS, thoracotomy). Demographic data, diagnosis rates, procedure times, number of sampled nodes, hospitalization duration, and overall costs were compared. Learning curve assessment was based on changes in procedure time and diagnostic accuracy. Statistical analyses were performed. Results There were no significant differences in age or sex between the EBUS and conventional groups. Primary malignancy rate was significantly lower in the EBUS group (49% vs 74%, p  = 0.001). EBUS was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (20.8 min vs 47.9 min, p  = 0.001), hospital stay (2.0 days vs 2.98 days, p  = 0.001), and procedure cost ($222 vs $467, p  = 0.001). The learning curve showed a significant breakpoint at the 40th case, with improvements in diagnostic accuracy and reductions in duration. However, in the first 40 EBUS cases, higher rates of inadequate biopsies, increased need for additional surgical interventions, and two major device failures significantly elevated the average cost to $829 in this subgroup. When device repair and additional surgery costs were included, the mean total cost per patient was similar between the EBUS and conventional groups ($477 vs $467). Conclusion Although EBUS may initially seem more costly in newly established centers, the learning curve improves efficiency and diagnostic yield over time, ultimately leading to cost-effectiveness. Considering its minimally invasive nature, outpatient feasibility, and lower complication rates, EBUS should be encouraged in clinical practice, even during the early adoption phase.

Some critically ill patients have difficulty in mobilizing their respiratory secretions. These patients can develop pulmonary atelectasis that may result in hypoxemia. There are some data to show that atelectasis may be prevented by turning a patient from side to side utilizing special beds. To determine the role of kinetic therapy (KT) combined with mechanical percussion (P) in the resolution of established atelectasis of the lungs and hypoxemia in critically ill, hospitalized patients. (KT was defined as rotation of a patient along the longitudinal axis of ≥ 40° to each side continuously.) Prospective and randomized study (2:1 test to control group). Twenty-four patients with respiratory failure, either mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing, who demonstrated segmental, lobar, or unilateral entire lung atelectasis were studied. Medical ICU and adult respiratory ward in a county hospital in New York. Seventeen patients were treated with KT combined with mechanical P using a KT system (Triadyne Kinetic Therapy System; KCI; San Antonio, TX). Seven patients received manual repositioning and manual P every 2 h. Both groups received similar conventional therapy with inhaled bronchodilators and suctioning. Partial or complete resolution of atelectasis was seen in 14 of 17 patients (82.3%) in the test group as compared with 1 of 7 patient (14.3%) in the control group. The median duration to resolution of atelectasis was 4 days in the test group. Bronchoscopy was performed in 3 of 7 patients in the control group, but in none of the patients in the test group. A cost of $720 was incurred per patient for utilizing the specialty beds for a mean duration of 4 days. An improvement in oxygenation index occurred in the test group (change in baseline Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen from 207.4 ± 106.7 mm Hg to 318 ± 100.7 mm Hg) at the end of therapy, while the control group showed a reduction over a similar duration of time (181.3 ± 96.3 mm Hg to 112 ± 21.2 mm Hg). KT and mechanical P therapy resulted in significantly greater partial or complete resolution of atelectasis as compared with conventional therapy. There was a generalized trend toward statistical significance in the improvement of oxygenation and a reduced need for bronchoscopy in the group receiving KT and P therapy.

Proponents of the endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) propose that in this era of EBUS-TBNA, training for conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) should be abandoned. The authors of this editorial provide the opposing view. C-TBNA has a short and a steep learning curve and adds to the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in a cost-effective fashion. Considering its simplicity, availability, affordability, safety, and several unique indications, C-TBNA continues to contribute to the welfare of patients worldwide. It should remain as an integral part of pulmonary fellowship training programs.

BACKGROUND Fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the usual initial investigation of choice in patients with suspected endobronchial carcinoma, but it is often non-diagnostic. Once a positive diagnosis has been made, many patients undergo staging by computed tomographic (CT) scanning to assess the extent of the disease and its suitability for radical treatment. To determine whether initial CT scanning before FOB is a cost effective way of reducing subsequent unnecessary or unhelpful invasive diagnostic procedures, a study was undertaken in 171 patients with suspected endobronchial carcinoma. METHODS A randomised two group study was performed with all patients undergoing an initial CT staging scan. In group A the CT scans were reviewed before FOB, allowing cancellation or a change to an alternative invasive procedure if considered appropriate. In group B all patients proceeded to FOB with the bronchoscopist blinded to the result of the CT scan until after the procedure. RESULTS In group A six of 90 patients (7%) required no further investigations as the CT scan was either normal, consistent with benign disease, or consistent with widespread metastatic disease. Of the remainder, bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 50 of 68 (73%) in group A compared with 44 of 81 (54%) in group B (p = 0.015). Overall, a positive diagnosis was made after a single invasive investigation in 64 of 84 patients (76%) in group A compared with only 45 of 81 patients (55%) in group B (p = 0.005). Only seven of 90 patients (8%) in group A required more than one invasive investigation compared with 15 of 81 patients (18.5%) in group B. In patients with malignancy, bronchoscopy was more likely to be diagnostic in group A (50 of 56 patients (89%)) than in group B (44 of 62 (71%); p = 0.012), and the diagnosis was more frequently made on the initial invasive investigation (group A, 63 of 70 (90%); group B, 44 of 62 (71%); p = 0.004). Because of the lower number of invasive procedures performed in group A than in group B, the cost of performing CT scans before FOB in all patients in group A would have equated to a projected cost of performing CT scans in 60% of patients after FOB in group B. CONCLUSIONS Performing initial CT thoracic scans before bronchoscopy in patients with suspected endobronchial malignancy is a cost effective way of improving diagnostic yield from invasive diagnostic procedures and occasionally may obviate the need for any further investigation.

Background. Prolonged air leak is defined as an ongoing air leak for more than 5 days. Intrabronchial valve (IBV) treatment is approved for the treatment of air leaks. Objective. To analyze our experience with IBV and valuate its cost-effectiveness. Methods. Retrospective analysis of IBV from June 2013 to October 2014. We analyzed direct costs based on hospital and operating room charges. We used average costs in US dollars for the analysis not individual patient data. Results. We treated 13 patients (9 M/4 F), median age of 60 years (38 to 90). Median time from diagnosis to IBV placement was 9.8 days, time from IBV placement to chest tube removal was 3 days, and time from IBV placement to hospital discharge was 4 days. Average room and board costs were $14,605 including all levels of care. IBV cost is $2750 per valve. The average number of valves used was 4. Total cost of procedure, valves, and hospital stay until discharge was $13,900. Conclusion. In our limited experience, the use of IBV to treat prolonged air leaks is safe and appears cost-effective. In pure financial terms, the cost seems justified for any air leak predicted to last greater than 8 days.

Background: Previous studies suggest that bronchoscopy and a single induced sputum sample are equally effective for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: In a prospective study of subjects with possibly active pulmonary tuberculosis, the diagnostic yield of three induced sputum tests was compared with that of bronchoscopy. Subjects either produced no sputum or (acid fast) smear negative sputum. Bronchoscopy was only performed if at least two induced sputum samples were smear negative. Results: Of 129 subjects who completed all tests, 27 (21%) had smear negative and culture positive specimens, 14 (52%) on bronchoscopy and 26 (96%) on induced sputum (p<0.005). One patient was culture positive on bronchoscopy alone compared with 13 on induced sputum alone; 13 were culture positive on both tests. Induced sputum positivity was strikingly more prevalent when chest radiographic appearances showed any features of active tuberculosis (20/63, 32%) than when appearances suggested inactivity (1/44, 2%; p<0.005). Induced sputum costs were about one third those of bronchoscopy, and the ratio of costs of the two tests per case of tuberculosis diagnosed could be as much as 1:6. Conclusions: In subjects investigated for possibly active or inactive tuberculosis who produce no sputum or have smear negative sputum, the most cost effective strategy is to perform three induced sputum tests without bronchoscopy. Induced sputum testing carries a high risk of nosocomial tuberculosis unless performed in respiratory isolation conditions. The cost benefits shown could be lost if risk management measures are not observed.