Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block inhibitory molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or its ligand, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) and enhance antitumor T-cell activity. ICIs provide clinical benefits in a percentage of patients with advanced cancers, but they are usually associated with a remarkable spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (e.g., rash, colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrine, cardiac and musculoskeletal dysfunctions). Particularly patients on combination therapy (e.g., anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1) experience some form of irAEs. Different mechanisms have been postulated to explain these adverse events. Host factors such as genotype, gut microbiome and pre-existing autoimmune disorders may affect the risk of adverse events. Fatal ICI-related irAEs are due to myocarditis, colitis or pneumonitis. irAEs usually occur within the first months after ICI initiation but can develop as early as after the first dose to years after ICI initiation. Most irAEs resolve pharmacologically, but some appear to be persistent. Glucocorticoids represent the mainstay of management of irAEs, but other immunosuppressive drugs can be used to mitigate refractory irAEs. In the absence of specific trials, several guidelines, based on data from retrospective studies and expert consensus, have been published to guide the management of ICI-related irAEs.

The advent of novel, innovative, and effective anti-cancer immunotherapies has engendered an era of renewed optimism among cancer specialists and their patients. Foremost among these successful immunotherapies are monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which target immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) molecules, most prominently cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its major ligand, PD-L1. These immunotherapeutic agents are, however, often associated with the occurrence of immune-mediated toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). The incidence of severe toxicities increases substantially when these agents are used together, particularly with CTLA-4 in combination with PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonists. Accordingly, dissociating the beneficial anti-tumor therapeutic activity of these agents from the emergence of IRAEs represents a significant challenge to attaining the optimum efficacy of ICI-targeted immunotherapy of cancer. This situation is compounded by an increasing awareness, possibly unsurprising, that both the beneficial and harmful effects of ICI-targeted therapies appear to result from an over-reactive immune system. Nevertheless, this challenge may not be insurmountable. This contention is based on acquisition of recent insights into the role of the gut microbiome and its products as determinants of the efficacy of ICI-targeted immunotherapy, as well as an increasing realization of the enigmatic involvement of Th17 cells in both anti-tumor activity and the pathogenesis of some types of IRAEs. Evidence linking the beneficial and harmful activities of ICI-targeted immunotherapy, recent mechanistic insights focusing on the gut microbiome and Th17 cells, as well as strategies to attenuate IRAEs in the setting of retention of therapeutic activity, therefore represent the major thrusts of this review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used for cancer immunotherapy; however, the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy is generally limited, highlighting the need to develop combination therapies. Dogs develop spontaneous tumors in immunocompetent settings, and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies exert similar clinical benefits. However, no clinically relevant anti-CTLA-4 antibody has been reported, limiting the value of canine tumors as comparative models for human ICI research. Here, canine CTLA-4 was molecularly characterized, and a caninized anti-CTLA-4 antibody (ca1C5) that blocks CTLA-4/ligand binding was developed. Treatment with ca1C5 increased cytokine production in canine immune cell cultures, and the immunostimulatory effect was enhanced when used in combination with the anti-PD-L1 antibody c4G12. As a proof-of-concept, a veterinary clinical study was conducted to demonstrate the safety and clinical efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 antibody as salvage combination therapy in dogs with advanced tumors refractory to prior c4G12 monotherapy. The combination treatment (c4G12 plus ca1C5) was well-tolerated, and evidence of antitumor activity was observed in one dog with oral malignant melanoma. Further studies are warranted to advance veterinary care for dogs and to better characterize canine ICI models for human onco-immunology research.

Adjuvant ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) both improve relapse-free survival of stage III melanoma patients 1 , 2 . In stage IV disease, the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab is superior to ipilimumab alone and also appears to be more effective than nivolumab monotherapy 3 . Preclinical work suggests that neoadjuvant application of checkpoint inhibitors may be superior to adjuvant therapy 4 . To address this question and to test feasibility, 20 patients with palpable stage III melanoma were 1:1 randomized to receive ipilimumab 3 mg kg −1 and nivolumab 1 mg kg −1 , as either four courses after surgery (adjuvant arm) or two courses before surgery and two courses postsurgery (neoadjuvant arm). Neoadjuvant therapy was feasible, with all patients undergoing surgery at the preplanned time point. However in both arms, 9/10 patients experienced one or more grade 3/4 adverse events. Pathological responses were achieved in 7/9 (78%) patients treated in the neoadjuvant arm. None of these patients have relapsed so far (median follow-up, 25.6 months). We found that neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab expand more tumor-resident T cell clones than adjuvant application. While neoadjuvant therapy appears promising, with the current regimen it induced high toxicity rates; therefore, it needs further investigation to preserve efficacy but reduce toxicity. Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma shows favorable activity over adjuvant treatment and warrants future evaluation with modified dosing schedules to reduce treatment-related adverse events.

Immune checkpoint therapy is being tested in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma 1 , 2 , with one study reporting data in cisplatin-ineligible patients who received anti-PD-L1 monotherapy 2 . The study reported that patients with bulky tumors, a known high-risk feature defined as greater than clinical T2 disease, had fewer responses, with pathological complete response rate of 17% 2 . Here we report on the first pilot combination neoadjuvant trial ( NCT02812420 ) with anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) plus anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) in cisplatin-ineligible patients, with all tumors identified as having high-risk features ( n  = 28). High-risk features were defined by bulky tumors, variant histology, lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis and/or high-grade upper tract disease 3 – 5 . The primary endpoint was safety and we observed 6 of 28 patients (21%) with grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events, consisting of asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities ( n  = 4), hepatitis and colitis ( n  = 2). We also observed pathological complete response of 37.5% and downstaging to pT1 or less in 58% of patients who completed surgery ( n  = 24). In summary, we provide initial safety, efficacy and biomarker data with neoadjuvant combination anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, which warrants further development for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma, especially cisplatin-ineligible patients with high-risk features who do not currently have an established standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant combination of immune checkpoint therapy in patients with cisplatin-ineligible bladder cancer achieves clinical efficacy and uncovers immune features as potential predictive biomarkers of treatment response.

Immune checkpoint therapy with antibodies targeting CTLA4 or PD1/PDL1 has led to durable regression of disease and cures for a subset of patients with cancer, which has led to increased efforts to develop combination immunotherapy strategies to benefit an even greater number of patients. However, questions remain as to which combinations should be used and in which population of patients. In 2019, several studies reported on the differential impact of targeting CTLA4 and/or PD1 on T cell responses, with clear evidence that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses are needed. These data highlight the complementary nature of targeting CTLA4 and PD1 to drive both CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cell responses, which should be considered in future treatment strategies. Furthermore, reverse translational studies, which provide immune response data from patients receiving immune checkpoint therapy, have revealed resistance mechanisms that indicate relevant targets for combination strategies. Taken together, future treatments will likely consist of anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 with addition of individualized therapy on the basis of tumour type and site of metastatic disease.Studies of immune checkpoint therapy for cancer in 2019 uncovered critical insights into the differences between targeting CTLA4 versus PD1 and the role of particular T cell subsets in immune responses to cancer. Moreover, reverse translational studies are informing our understanding of resistance and response mechanisms in patients.

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by the production of autoreactive lymphocytes, immune responses to self-antigens, and inflammation in related tissues and organs. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is majorly expressed in activated T cells and works as a critical regulator in the inflammatory response. In this review, we first describe the structure, expression, and how the signaling pathways of CTLA-4 participate in reducing effector T-cell activity and enhancing the immunomodulatory ability of regulatory T (Treg) cells to reduce immune response, maintain immune homeostasis, and maintain autoimmune silence. We then focused on the correlation between CTLA-4 and different ADs and how this molecule regulates the immune activity of the diseases and inhibits the onset, progression, and pathology of various ADs. Finally, we summarized the current progress of CTLA-4 as a therapeutic target for various ADs.

In the last decade, the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) directed against programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). In spite of these improvements, some patients do not achieve any benefit from ICI, and inevitably develop resistance to therapy over time. Tumor microenvironment (TME) might influence response to immunotherapy due to its prominent role in the multiple interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system. Studies investigating lung cancer from the perspective of TME pointed out a complex scenario where tumor angiogenesis, soluble factors, immune suppressive/regulatory elements and cells composing TME itself participate to tumor growth. In this review, we point out the current state of knowledge involving the relationship between tumor cells and the components of TME in NSCLC as well as their interactions with immunotherapy providing an update on novel predictors of benefit from currently employed ICI or new therapeutic targets of investigational agents. In first place, increasing evidence suggests that TME might represent a promising biomarker of sensitivity to ICI, based on the presence of immune-modulating cells, such as Treg, myeloid derived suppressor cells, and tumor associated macrophages, which are known to induce an immunosuppressive environment, poorly responsive to ICI. Consequently, multiple clinical studies have been designed to influence TME towards a pro-immunogenic state and subsequently improve the activity of ICI. Currently, the mostly employed approach relies on the association of “classic” ICI targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and novel agents directed on molecules, such as LAG-3 and TIM-3. To date, some trials have already shown promising results, while a multitude of prospective studies are ongoing, and their results might significantly influence the future approach to cancer immunotherapy.

Naturally arising regulatory CD4 + T (Treg) cells, which specifically express the transcription factor FoxP3 in the nucleus and CD25 and CTLA-4 on the cell surface, are a T-cell subpopulation specialized for immune suppression, playing a key role in maintaining immunological self-tolerance and homeostasis. FoxP3 is required for Treg function, especially for its suppressive activity. However, FoxP3 expression per se is not necessary for Treg cell lineage commitment in the thymus and insufficient for full Treg-type gene expression in mature Treg cells. It is Treg-specific epigenetic changes such as CpG demethylation and histone modification that can confer a stable and heritable pattern of Treg type gene expression on developing Treg cells in a FoxP3-independent manner. Anomalies in the formation of Treg-specific epigenome, in particular, Treg-specific super-enhancers, which largely include Treg-specific DNA demethylated regions, are indeed able to cause autoimmune diseases in rodents. Furthermore, in humans, single nucleotide polymorphisms in Treg-specific DNA demethylated regions associated with Treg signature genes, such as IL2RA (CD25) and CTLA4 , can affect the development and function of naïve Treg cells rather than effector T cells. Such genetic variations are therefore causative of polygenic common autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis via affecting endogenous natural Treg cells. These findings on the transcription factor network with FoxP3 at a key position as well as Treg-specific epigenetic landscape facilitate our understanding of Treg cell development and function, and can be exploited to prepare functionally stable FoxP3-expressing Treg cells from antigen-specific conventional T cells to treat autoimmune diseases.

Foxp3-expressing CD4⁺CD25⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) constitutively and highly express the immune checkpoint receptor cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), whose Treg-specific deficiency causes severe systemic autoimmunity. As a key mechanism of Treg-mediated suppression, Treg-expressed CTLA-4 down-regulates the expression of CD80/CD86 costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Here, we show that Treg-expressed CTLA-4 facilitated Treg-APC conjugation and immune synapse formation. The immune synapses thus formed provided a stable platform whereby Tregs were able to deplete CD80/CD86 molecules on APCs by extracting them via CTLA-4–dependent trogocytosis. The depletion occurred even with Tregs solely expressing a mutant CTLA-4 form lacking the cytoplasmic portion required for its endocytosis. The CTLA-4–dependent trogocytosis of CD80/CD86 also accelerated in vitro and in vivo passive transfer of other membrane proteins and lipid molecules from APCs to Tregs without their significant reduction on the APC surface. Furthermore, CD80 down-regulation or blockade by Treg-expressed membrane CTLA-4 or soluble CTLA-4-immunoglobulin (CTLA-4-Ig), respectively, disrupted cis-CD80/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) heterodimers and increased free PD-L1 on dendritic cells (DCs), expanding a phenotypically distinct population of CD80lo free PD-L1hi DCs. Thus, Tregs are able to inhibit the T cell stimulatory activity of APCs by reducing their CD80/CD86 expression via CTLA-4–dependent trogocytosis. This CD80/CD86 reduction on APCs is able to exert dual suppressive effects on T cell immune responses by limiting CD80/CD86 costimulation to naïve T cells and by increasing free PD-L1 available for the inhibition of programmed death-1 (PD-1)–expressing effector T cells. Blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 in combination may therefore synergistically hinder Treg-mediated immune suppression, thereby effectively enhancing immune responses, including tumor immunity.