Explore the vast range of titles available.

Cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Steroids suppress inflammatory responses and might improve outcomes in patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. We aimed to assess the effects of steroids in patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The Steroids In caRdiac Surgery (SIRS) study is a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. We used a central computerised phone or interactive web system to randomly assign (1:1) patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality from 80 hospital or cardiac surgery centres in 18 countries undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass to receive either methylprednisolone (250 mg at anaesthetic induction and 250 mg at initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass) or placebo. Patients were assigned with block randomisation with random block sizes of 2, 4, or 6 and stratified by centre. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible if they had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation of at least 6. Patients were excluded if they were taking or expected to receive systemic steroids in the immediate postoperative period or had a history of bacterial or fungal infection in the preceding 30 days. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing outcomes were masked to allocation. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of death and major morbidity (ie, myocardial injury, stroke, renal failure, or respiratory failure) within 30 days, both analysed by intention to treat. Safety outcomes were also analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427388. Patients were recruited between June 21, 2007, and Dec 19, 2013. Complete 30-day data was available for all 7507 patients randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (n=3755) and to placebo (n=3752). Methylprednisolone, compared with placebo, did not reduce the risk of death at 30 days (154 [4%] vs 177 [5%] patients; relative risk [RR] 0·87, 95% CI 0·70–1·07, p=0·19) or the risk of death or major morbidity (909 [24%] vs 885 [24%]; RR 1·03, 95% CI 0·95–1·11, p=0·52). The most common safety outcomes in the methylprednisolone and placebo group were infection (465 [12%] vs 493 [13%]), surgical site infection (151 [4%] vs 151 [4%]), and delirium (295 [8%] vs 289 [8%]). Methylprednisolone did not have a significant effect on mortality or major morbidity after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The SIRS trial does not support the routine use of methylprednisolone for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

PurposeData on the benefit or or harmful effects of oxygen level on ischemic reperfusion injuries in cardiac surgery are insufficient. We hypothesized that hyperoxia during cardiopulmonary bypass decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and ventricular fibrillation, and therefore decreases cardiovascular morbidity (CARDIOX study).MethodsAn open-label, randomized clinical trial including adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery, i.e. cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) randomized 1:1 to an intervention group or standard group at two French University Hospitals from June 2016 to October 2018. The intervention consisted in delivering of an inspired fraction of oxygen of one to one during CPB. The standard care consisted in delivering oxygen to achieve a partial arterial blood pressure less than 150 mmHg. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of POAF and/or ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) within the 15 days following cardiac surgery. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE: in-hospital mortality, stroke, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, and mesenteric ischemia).Results330 patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 161) or the standard group (n = 163). Mean PaO2 was 447 ± 98 mmHg and 161 ± 60 mmHg during CPB, for the intervention and standard group (p < 0.0001) respectively. The incidence of POAF or VT/VF were similar in the intervention group and the standard group (30% [49 of 161 patients] and 30% [49 of 163 patients], absolute risk reduction 0.4%; 95% CI, − 9.6–10.4; p = 0.94). MACCE was similar between groups with, an occurrence of 24% and 21% for the intervention group and the standard groups (absolute risk reduction 3.4%; 95% CI, − 5.7–12.5; p = 0.47) respectively. After adjustment, the primary and secondary endpoints remained similar for both groups.ConclusionHyperoxia did not decrease POAF and cardiovascular morbidity following cardiac surgery with CPB.Clinicaltrial.gov identifierNCT02819739.

Background Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is often associated with degrees of complex inflammatory response mediated by various cytokines. This response can, in severe cases, lead to systemic hypotension and organ dysfunction. Cytokine removal might therefore improve outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. CytoSorb® (Cytosorbents, NJ, USA) is a recent device designed to remove cytokine from the blood using haemoadsorption (HA). This trial aims to evaluate the potential of CytoSorb® to decrease peri-operative cytokine levels in cardiac surgery. Methods We have conducted a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial in 30 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and deemed at risk of complications. Patients were randomly allocated to either standard of care ( n  = 15) or CytoSorb® HA ( n  = 15) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in cytokines levels (IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, MCP-1) measured at anaesthesia induction, at the end of CPB, as well as 6 and 24 h post-CPB initiation. In a consecutive subgroup of patients (10 in HA group, 11 in control group), we performed cross-adsorber as well as serial measurements of coagulation factors’ activity (antithrombin, von Willebrand factor, factor II, V, VIII, IX, XI, and XII). Results Both groups were similar in terms of baseline and peri-operative characteristics. CytoSorb® HA during CPB was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse event. The procedure did not result in significant coagulation factors’ adsorption but only some signs of coagulation activation. However, the intervention was associated neither with a decrease in pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokine levels nor with any improvement in relevant clinical outcomes. Conclusions CytoSorb® HA during CPB was not associated with a decrease in pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines nor with an improvement in relevant clinical outcomes. The procedure was feasible and safe. Further studies should evaluate the efficacy of CytoSorb® HA in other clinical contexts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02775123 . Registered 17 May 2016.

Background Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients’ perioperative course. Methods In this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed. Results We did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0–4.5; control: not traceable, P  = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0–1.2 versus not traceable, P  = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0–28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7–597.3, P  = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found. Conclusions We did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176 , registration date: June 7, 2013.

Background Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers marked cytokine release often followed by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. This trial investigates the intraoperative use of haemoadsorption (HA) during cardiac surgery with CPB to assess its impact on postoperative systemic inflammatory response. Methods In this prospective randomised controlled trial (ethics approval no. 5094-14DRKS00007928), patients (> 65 years) undergoing elective on-pump cardiac surgery were randomised to intraoperative HA (CytoSorb) during CPB or standard care without HA. Primary outcome was the difference in mean interleukin (IL)-6 serum concentrations between groups on intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The secondary outcomes included various clinical and biochemical endpoints. Statistical methods included paired and unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests. Results Thirty-eight patients were allocated to receive either intraoperative HA (n = 19) or standard care (n = 19). The primary outcome, IL-6 levels on ICU admission, did not differ between the study group and controls (214.4 ± 328.8 vs. 155.8 ± 159.6 pg/ml, p  = 0.511). During surgery pre- versus post-adsorber IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, heparan sulfate and myoglobin post- levels were reduced. Furthermore, IL-6 levels did not differ between the study groups on day 1 and 2 in the ICU. While sequential organ failure assessment scores, lactate levels, and C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) showed no statistically significant differences. Regarding haemodynamic stability in the treatment group the cardiac index (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 2.47 ± 0.47 l/min/m 2 , p  = 0.012) on ICU day 2 increased, and lower fluid requirements as well as decreased fibrinogen requirement were observed. Need for renal replacement therapy did not differ though a shorter duration was observed in the treatment group. Time on ventilator, respiratory parameters, infectious complications, delirium scores, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and mortality did not differ between groups. Conclusion HA did not reduce the IL-6 level on ICU admission or afterwards. Even though HA reduced cytokine load during cardiac surgery in the treatment group. There were no significant differences between groups in the postoperative course of other cytokine concentrations, organ dysfunction, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mortality rates. Trial registration prospectively DRKS00007928 and published under: Baumann A, Buchwald D, Annecke T, Hellmich M, Zahn PK, Hohn A. RECCAS - REmoval of Cytokines during Cardiac Surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17: 137. Graphical abstract

Purpose Cardiopulmonary bypass induces an ischaemia–reperfusion injury and systemic inflammatory response, which contributes to low cardiac output syndrome following cardiac surgery. Exogenous nitric oxide during cardiopulmonary bypass has shown potential to ameliorate such injury. We undertook a large randomised controlled trial to investigate the clinical effects of administering nitric oxide to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit in children. Methods After written informed consent, children were randomised to receive 20 ppm nitric oxide to the gas inflow of the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator, or standard conduct of bypass. Results 101 children received nitric oxide and developed low cardiac output syndrome less frequently (15 vs. 31 %, p  = 0.007) than the 97 children who did not receive nitric oxide. This effect was most marked in children aged less than 6 weeks of age (20 vs. 52 %, p  = 0.012) and in those aged 6 weeks to 2 years (6 vs. 24 %, p  = 0.026), who also had significantly reduced ICU length of stay (43 vs. 84 h, p  = 0.031). Low cardiac output syndrome was less frequent following more complex surgeries if nitric oxide was administered (17 vs. 48 %, p  = 0.018). ECMO was used less often in the nitric oxide group (1 vs. 8 %, p  = 0.014). Conclusions Delivery of nitric oxide to the oxygenator gas flow during paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass reduced the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome by varying degrees, according to age group and surgery complexity. Clinical Trial Registration: ACTRN12615001376538.

Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass received either an intravenous balanced mixture of amino acids or placebo for up to 3 days. Amino acids reduced the occurrence of acute kidney injury.

Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in infants. Renal near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is used to evaluate regional oximetry in a non-invasive continuous real-time fashion, and reflects tissue perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between renal oximetry and development of AKI in the operative and post-operative setting in infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Methods In this prospective study, we enrolled 59 infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease for univentricular ( n  = 26) or biventricular ( n  = 33) repair. Renal NIRS was continuously measured intraoperatively and for at least 24 hours postoperatively and analysed for the intraoperative and first 12 hours, first 24 hours and first 48 hours postoperatively. The renal oximetry values were correlated with the paediatric risk, injury, failure, loss, end (pRIFLE) classification for AKI, renal biomarkers and the postoperative course. Results Twenty-eight (48%) infants developed AKI based on pRIFLE classification. Already during intraoperative renal oximetry and further in the first 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, significantly lower renal oximetry values in AKI patients compared with patients with normal renal function were recorded ( P  < 0.05). Of the 28 patients who developed AKI, 3 (11%) needed renal replacement therapy and 2 (7%) died. In the non-AKI group, no deaths occurred. Infants with decreased renal oximetry values developed significantly higher lactate levels 24 hours after surgery. Cystatin C was a late parameter of AKI, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin values were not correlated with AKI occurrence. Conclusion Our results suggest that prolonged low renal oximetry values during cardiac surgery correlate with the development of AKI and may be superior to conventional biochemical markers. Renal NIRS might be a promising non-invasive tool of multimodal monitoring of kidney function and developing AKI in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Background In cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), large amounts of fluids are administered. CPB priming with crystalloid solution causes marked hemodilution and fluid extravasation. Colloid solutions may reduce fluid overload because they have a better volume expansion effect than crystalloids. The European Medicines Agency does not recommend the use of hydroxyethyl starch solutions (HES) due to harmful renal effects. Albumin solution does not impair blood coagulation but the findings on kidney function are conflicting. On the other hand, albumin may reduce endothelial glycocalyx destruction and decrease platelet count during CPB. No large randomized, double-blind, clinical trials have compared albumin solution to crystalloid solution in cardiac surgery. Methods/design In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comprising 1386 adult cardiac surgery patients, 4% albumin solution will be compared to Ringer’s acetate solution in CPB priming and volume replacement up to 3200 mL during surgery and the first 24 h of intensive care unit stay. The primary efficacy outcome is the number of patients with at least one major adverse event (MAE) during 90 postoperative days (all-cause death, acute myocardial injury, acute heart failure or low output syndrome, resternotomy, stroke, major arrhythmia, major bleeding, infection compromising post-procedural rehabilitation, acute kidney injury). Secondary outcomes are total number of MAEs, incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, acute myocardial injury, acute heart failure, arrhythmia), amount of each type of blood product transfused (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets), total fluid balance at the end of the intervention period, total measured blood loss, development of acute kidney injury, days alive without mechanical ventilation in 90 days, days alive outside intensive care unit at 90 days, days alive at home at 90 days, and 90-day mortality. Discussion The findings of this study will provide new evidence regarding efficacy and safety of albumin solution in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Trial registration EudraCT (clinicaltrialsregister.eu) 2015–002556-27 Registered 11 Nov 2016 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02560519 . Registered 25 Sept 2015.

Introduction The intra-aortic balloon pump is routinely used in cardiac surgery; however, its impact on outcome is still a matter of debate and several randomized trials have been published recently. We perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods Potentially eligible trials were identified by searching the Medline, Embase, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Library. Searches were not restricted by language or publication status and were updated in August 2014. Randomized controlled trials on preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting either with or without cardiopulmonary bypass were identified. The primary end point was mortality at the longest follow-up available and the secondary end point was 30-day mortality. Results The eight included randomized clinical trials enrolled 625 patients (312 to the intra-aortic balloon pump group and 313 to control). The use of intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of mortality (11 of 312 (3.5%) versus 33 of 313 (11%), risk ratio = 0.38 (0.20 to 0.73), P for effect = 0.004, P for heterogeneity = 0.7, I-square = 0%, with eight studies included). The benefit on mortality reduction was confirmed restricting the analysis to trials with low risk of bias, to those reporting 30-day follow-up and to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Conclusions Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump reduces perioperative and 30-day mortality in high-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting.