Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and bacteriological effect of oral treatment with ceftibuten plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in patients with a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing micro-organism. In this retrospective observational case-series, oral treatment with ceftibuten 400 mg QD plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 625 mg TID for 14 days was evaluated in ten patients with pyelonephritis caused by an ESBL-positive micro-organism resistant to ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole. Presence of ESBL genes was confirmed using PCR and micro-array. EUCAST breakpoints were used for susceptibility testing. Ten patients (five women) were evaluated in 2016 and 2017. Six patients were from outpatient hospital care, and four from primary care. Urinary cultures yielded seven E. coli and three K. pneumoniae ESBL-positive isolates. Using Vitek-2, all isolates were resistant to cefotaxime, and resistant (n = 7) or intermediately susceptible (n = 3) to ceftazidime. With disc diffusion, all isolates were susceptible to ceftibuten (zones 25–32 mm), while with MIC test strips eight of ten isolates were resistant to ceftibuten (MICs 0.5–4 mg/L). An amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disc next to the ceftibuten disc extended the ceftibuten zone by 2–8 mm. All patients experienced clinical cure. Bacteriological cure (absence of pretreatment micro-organism in the first follow-up culture obtained within 3 months after treatment) was observed in all eight patients with follow-up cultures. This case-series shows that the synergistic combination of ceftibuten plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid may be an option for oral treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against Enterobacterales causing urinary tract infection (UTI). A total of 3216 isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from patients with UTI in 72 hospitals from 25 countries in 2021 then susceptibility tested by CLSI broth microdilution. Ceftibuten-susceptible breakpoints currently published by EUCAST (≤ 1 mg/L) and CLSI (≤ 8 mg/L) were applied to ceftibuten-avibactam for comparison. The most active agents were ceftibuten-avibactam (98.4%/99.6% inhibited at ≤ 1/ ≤ 8 mg/L), ceftazidime-avibactam (99.6% susceptible [S]), amikacin (99.1%S), and meropenem (98.2%S). Ceftibuten-avibactam (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 mg/L) was fourfold more potent than ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 mg/L) based on MIC 50/90 values. The most active oral agents were ceftibuten (89.3%S; 79.5% inhibited at ≤ 1 mg/L), levofloxacin (75.4%S), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; 73.4%S). Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 97.6% of isolates with an extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype, 92.1% of multidrug-resistant isolates, and 73.7% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) at ≤ 1 mg/L. The second most active oral agent against CRE was TMP-SMX (24.6%S). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 77.2% of CRE isolates. In conclusion, ceftibuten-avibactam was highly active against a large collection of contemporary Enterobacterales isolated from patients with UTI and exhibited a similar spectrum to ceftazidime-avibactam. Ceftibuten-avibactam may represent a valuable option for oral treatment of UTI caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) clinical isolates with reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS) have emerged through acquisition of amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 2X (PBP2X). Moreover, we also reported the emergence of penicillin-susceptible GBS clinical isolates with reduced ceftibuten susceptibility (CTBr PSGBS) due to amino acid substitutions in PBPs. However, whether or not these amino acid substitutions are responsible for the reduced ceftibuten susceptibility (RCTBS) profile remains unclear. Furthermore, the rate of CTBr PSGBS isolation and their multidrug resistance tendency remain uncertain. Therefore, we collected 377 clinical GBS isolates from multiple regions in Japan between August 2013 and August 2015. These isolates were characterized by determining MICs and sequencing the pbp2x gene. The isolation rate of CTBr PSGBS was 7.2% (27/377). CTBr PSGBS isolate harbor two types of amino acid substitutions in PBP2X [(T394A type) and (I377V, G398A, Q412L, and H438H type)]. The relevance of the amino acid substitutions found to the RCTBS was confirmed with allelic exchange techniques. Allelic exchange recombinant clones acquired two types of amino acid substitutions in PBP2X showed RCTBS. Furthermore, total ratio of resistance and non-susceptibility to both macrolides and fluoroquinolones in CTBr PSGBS was 51.9% (14/27). The isolation rate of CTBr PSGBS is non-negligibly high and the CTBr PSGBS tends to exhibit resistance and non-susceptible profile to both macrolides and fluoroquinolones.

Use of third-generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, is associated with an increased risk of selection for antimicrobial resistance, so alternative antibiotics need to be considered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate intestinal colonisation with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant pathogens following use of temocillin—an alternative antibiotic to cefotaxime that is potentially less prone to disturbing the intestinal microbiota—in empirical treatment of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). We did a randomised, multicentre, superiority, open-label phase 4 trial in patients who had been admitted to inpatient care in 12 Swedish hospitals with suspected or diagnosed febrile UTI (complicated or uncomplicated). To meet inclusion criteria, a patient was required to have at least one sign or symptom of pyelonephritis (ie, flank pain; costovertebral angle tenderness; and changes to urinary frequency or urgency or dysuria), a fever of 38·0°C or higher, and a positive urine dipstick (for nitrites, white blood cells, or both). Participants were also required to have an indication for intravenous antibiotic treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 2 g temocillin or 1–2 g cefotaxime, by local investigators opening consecutive sealed randomisation envelopes that were generated centrally in advance. Both drugs were administered intravenously every 8 h. The trial was open label for investigators and patients, but those doing the microbiological analyses were masked to the groups. Participants were treated with antibiotics for 7–10 days (or up to 14 days if they had bacteraemia), at least 3 days of which were on the study drug; at day 4 and later, participants who were showing improvement could be given an oral antibiotic (ciprofloxacin, ceftibuten, cefixime, or co-trimoxazole). Patients not showing improvement were regarded as having treatment failures. Rectal swabs were collected at three timepoints: at baseline (before the first dose), after the last dose of study drug, and 7–10 days after treatment stopped. The composite primary outcome was colonisation with Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, or colonisation with toxin-producing Clostridioides difficile, or both, to evaluate disturbance of the intestinal microbiota. The study is registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2015-003898-15). Between May 20, 2016, and July 31, 2019, 207 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 55 patients were excluded. 152 participants were randomly assigned to groups: 77 (51%) patients received temocillin, 75 (49%) patients received cefotaxime. The composite primary endpoint was met by 18 (26%) of 68 participants receiving temocillin versus 30 (48%) of 62 patients receiving cefotaxime (risk difference −22% [95% CI −42% to −3%]), showing superiority of temocillin versus cefotaxime (ie, less disturbance of the intestinal microbiota). 43 adverse events were reported in 40 (52%) of 77 patients in the temocillin group, versus 46 adverse events in 34 (45%) of 75 patients in the cefotaxime group. Most events were of mild to moderate severity. 21 (27%) patients in the temocillin and 17 (23%) patients in the cefotaxime group had an adverse event that was considered to be associated with the study drug. Temocillin was found to be less selective than cefotaxime of Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, and it could therefore be a favourable alternative in the empirical treatment of febrile UTI. Use of this antibiotic could reduce hospital transmission and health-care-associated infections by these pathogens. Public Health Agency of Sweden.

The exposure-response relationship of anti-infective agents at the site of infection is currently being re-examined. Epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has been suggested as the site (compartment) of antimicrobial activity against lung infections caused by extracellular pathogens. There have been an extensive number of studies conducted during the past 20 years to determine drug penetration into ELF and to compare plasma and ELF concentrations of anti-infective agents. The majority of these studies estimated ELF drug concentrations by the method of urea dilution and involved either healthy adult subjects or patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. Antibacterial agents such as macrolides, ketolides, newer fluoroquinolones and oxazolidinones have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1. In comparison, β-lactams, aminoglycosides and glycopeptides have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of ≤1. Potential explanations (e.g. drug transporters, overestimation of the ELF volume, lysis of cells) for why these differences in ELF penetration occur among antibacterial classes need further investigation. The relationship between ELF concentrations and clinical outcomes has been under-studied. In vitro pharmacodynamic models, using simulated ELF and plasma concentrations, have been used to examine the eradication rates of resistant and susceptible pathogens and to explain why selected anti-infective agents (e.g. those with ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1) are less likely to be associated with clinical treatment failures. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations have recently been used and permit ELF and plasma concentrations to be evaluated with regard to achievement of target attainment rates. These mathematical modelling techniques have also allowed further examination of drug doses and differences in the time courses of ELF and plasma concentrations as potential explanations for clinical and microbiological effects seen in clinical trials. Further studies are warranted in patients with lower respiratory tract infections to confirm and explore the relationships between ELF concentrations, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Most infections are still caused by pathogens susceptible to generic antibiotics, which are often preferred to newer antibiotics because of lower risks for toxicity and resistance development.1 Although data for the manufacturing and distribution of antibiotics are not publicly available, reports on limited availability, shortages, and price increases of old antibiotics suggest that the current system is too fragile to provide—what should be fundamental in modern medicine—access to effective treatment for common and potentially severe bacterial infections. In a recent study, 25 (69%) of 36 selected generic antibiotics were marketed in less than half of the 39 countries surveyed.2 Additionally, shortages in supply of generic antibiotics are frequently reported, and paediatric formulations are often unavailable.3 In the USA alone, 148 antibacterial drug shortages occurred during 2001–13.4 Intravenous benzylpenicillin, the first-line treatment option for community-acquired pneumonia, was reported unavailable in 2015 in the Netherlands.5 Ceftibuten, the only recommended oral treatment for febrile urinary tract infections in children in Sweden, was withdrawn from the market in 2016.6 In 2017, the worldwide shortage of piperacillin–tazobactam, a cornerstone antibiotic and β-lactamase inhibitor combination in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with severe infections, is reported to be the result of damage to a single factory in China.7 In practice, shortages often result in shifts to use of antibiotics that are less effective and more expensive.8 Furthermore, some countries have had substantial increases in prices for generic antibiotics in recent years that will inevitably affect prescribing patterns.9,10 These problems have multiple causes. Exploitation of business opportunities in a niche market and a paucity of competition can cause sudden price increases that will inevitably affect treatment decisions and patient outcomes.

The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has been complicated by the emergence of multidrug-resistant, β-lactamase-expressing pathogens. As a result of the limited treatment options, patients often require hospitalization and intravenous therapy. In essence, a strong unmet need for oral antibiotics, active against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) uropathogens has emerged. Oral carbapenems (tebipenem and sulopenem) and oral cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are in various stages of clinical development for the treatment of uncomplicated and complicated UTI. Tebipenem, if approved, will be the first oral treatment for complicated UTI while sulopenem will be for uncomplicated UTI. The β-lactamase inhibitors ETX0282, VNRX7145, ARX1796, and QPX7728 are combined with cefpodoxime proxetil or ceftibuten that achieve favorable exposures in urine compared to other uropathogen-active oral cephalosporins. The combination ceftibuten-QPX7728 has potential broad-spectrum coverage against carbapenemase producers including metallo β-lactamase producers. Other novel combinations, namely cefpodoxime/ETX0282, ceftibuten/VNRX-7145, and ceftibuten/ARX1796, have also demonstrated excellent activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapanemase (KPC) and OXA-48-like producers. All these agents, upon their arrival for commercial use, would strengthen the outpatient therapy.

Background: This paper provides the first national analysis of antimicrobial use (AMU) of oral and parenteral dosages in Bangladesh, as well as biannual trends for the years from 2019 to 2023. It also analyzes the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMU. Methods: AMU was analyzed in accordance with the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification and defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day methodology. Data on antimicrobial medicine dispatched from manufacturers’ central warehouse was collected and categorized based on the WHO’s Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. Findings: This AMU surveillance demonstrates an increase in the use of antimicrobial medicines from 2021 to 2022, and in 2023, it decreased, with our national AMU surveillance data indicating that cefixime and azithromycin were the most consumed antibiotics during this period. Most antibiotics used in Bangladesh are broad-spectrum ‘Watch’-category antibiotics. Among oral antibiotics, 50 to 67% are from the ‘Watch’-category. When considering only parenteral antibiotics, 70 to 91 % fall under the ‘Watch’-category. Third-generation cephalosporin consumption has been found to be higher than second- and first-generation cephalosporins. The oral antimicrobials are more commonly used than parenteral ones. AMU notably increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the case of systemic antibacterial use. Conclusions: To achieve the global target of 70% use of Access category antibiotics by 2030, the use of Watch-group antibiotics, like cefixime, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ceftibuten, needs to be reduced through investing in and strengthening stewardship programs and eliminating self-medication in Bangladesh. The findings of this study provide useful information to policymakers to tackle AMR in Bangladesh.

The emergence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates with reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS) and their tendency to be nonsusceptible to fluoroquinolones prompted us to analyze the possible presence of amino acid mutations in penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) (PBP2X, PBP1A, and PBP2B) from a collection of fluoroquinolone-resistant GBS isolates. We analyzed 21 GBS isolates resistant to levofloxacin. Sequence analysis of genes for PBPs was performed. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for penicillin, ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefixime, cefotaxime, and ceftizoxime were performed by the Etest method and by broth microdilution method. The isolates were furthermore characterized by PCR-based capsular typing and analysis of surface protein genes. Genetic relatedness among the isolates was examined by multilocus sequence typing. Phylogenetic analysis of PBPs sequences was performed by Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software (MEGA7). All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, even if different mutations were detected in all PBPs in most of the isolates (12/21, 57%). However, we observed a reduced susceptibility to cefixime in seven isolates and to cefaclor in six isolates. These PSGBS isolates shared an I377V mutation in PBP2X and a T145A mutation in PBP1A. Most of the isolates belongs to the clonal complex 1, has serotype III and rib as surface protein. The results of phylogenetic comparative analysis show that several genetic lineages of our isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefixime/cefaclor have been independently emerging through the accumulation of mutations in their pbp genes, especially in pbp1a. If the MICs of penicillins and cephalosporins for GBS increase, careful epidemiological surveillance on this issue is recommended.

Consequences of oral health problems and disorders, such as missing teeth, toothache, cognitive impairment,and impaired salivary secretion are several factors could have an impact on one's chewing ability1-4. [...]in the modern context of the pharmaceutical drug product development, quality of drug product ensured through quality risk assessment approach called Quality by design (QBD), a systematic approach to drug product design with a set of quality characteristic linked to the safety of the targeted population based on the critical quality attribute (CQA), a characteristic with appropriate limit/range/distribution either of physical/chemical/biological/microbiological origin or combination thereof18-20. Dosage Form Design Attributes: The following dosage form design features need to consider while designing a flexible dispersible tablet. (i)To facilitate as a single dosage form design to cover the intended age groups, (ii) Tend to stable at controlled room temperature condition, (iii) To formulate with minimum excipients are known to be safe across the age groups, and (iv) Non-complex and cost-effective manufacturing process including packaging and supply chain 3. Literature search and review carried out with a focus on below outlines section: A. Commercially approved oral third-generation cephalosporin and selection ofmodel drug (Table 1) B. Patent literature aboutdosage forms with high drug loading related to model drug selected A. Commercially Approved Oral Third Generation Cephalosporin and selection of Model Drug: Currently, there are three generations of oral cephalosporin commercially approved across the globe in several dosage forms viz. tablet,capsule,andpowder for oral suspension.Antimicrobial potency and stability against hydrolysis by beta-lactamase producing bacterial strains increase from first to third generation B. Patent literature about dosage forms with high drug loading relatd to model drug selected: