Explore the vast range of titles available.

Growing environmental concern over pharmaceutical contaminants in water, combined with the limited effectiveness of conventional treatment methods in removing persistent antibiotics, creates a need for advanced remediation technologies. This study investigates the degradation of the cephalosporin antibiotic cefuroxime axetil using an electrochemical advanced oxidation process with a boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode. Experiments were conducted under varying pH levels and in natural water matrices, specifically river and lake water, to evaluate the process efficiency under realistic conditions. Significant differences were observed between matrices, with the best result obtained in river water, enabling complete degradation of cefuroxime axetil within 30 min. To clarify the factors influencing process efficiency, additional experiments examined the effects of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and chlorides. Cefuroxime axetil proved highly susceptible to electrooxidation, generally following pseudo-first-order kinetics, and chloride significantly accelerated its degradation. Using high-resolution mass spectrometry, ten transformation products were identified, including six not previously reported in the literature, representing a key novelty of this work. Their potential aquatic toxicity was subsequently evaluated in silico using fish and algae models. Finally, energy consumption analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of various factors on the process’s economic efficiency.

The benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis is uncertain when performing transperineal prostate biopsies. Judicious use of antibiotics is required as antimicrobial resistance increases worldwide. We aimed to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis can be omitted when performing transperineal prostate biopsies under local anaesthesia as an outpatient procedure. In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we aimed to enrol all patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing transperineal prostate biopsies at two hospitals in Norway and Germany. Patients with a high risk of infection or ongoing infection were excluded. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive intramuscular (in Norway) or intravenous (in Germany) 1·5 g cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis or not. Follow-up assessments were done after 2 weeks and 2 months. The primary outcome was rate of sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation within 2 months. The secondary outcome was the rate of urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation. These outcomes were assessed in all eligible randomly allocated participants with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. Biopsies were performed using an MRI–transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal technique under local anaesthesia. Patients with a positive MRI underwent 2–4 biopsies per target; in addition, 8–12 systematic biopsies were performed in biopsy naive and MRI-negative patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04146142. Between Nov 11, 2019, and Feb 23, 2021, 792 patients were referred for biopsy, of whom 555 (70%) were randomly allocated to treatment groups. 277 (50%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis and 276 (50%) did not; two (<1%) patients were excluded after randomisation because of unknown allergy to study drug. Sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation occurred in no patients given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 95% CI 0 to 1·37) or not given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 0 to 1·37; difference 0% [95% CI –1·37 to 1·37]). Urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation occurred in one patient given antibiotic prophylaxis (0·36%, 95% CI 0·01 to 2·00) and three patients not given antibiotic prophylaxis (1·09%, 0·37 to 3·15; difference 0·73% [95% CI –1·08 to 2·81]). The number needed to treat with antibiotic prophylaxis to avoid one infection was 137. The non-inferiority margin of 4% was not exceeded, suggesting rates of infections were not higher in patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy than in those receiving it. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis might be omitted in this population. Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.

To compare the in-vitro antibacterial effects of branded and its locally produced cefuroxime sodium against ATCC29213, clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) 164342 and methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative (MSCNS) 117933, and ATCC25922, and to provide a reference for their clinical use. An in-vitro antibacterial susceptibility test, time-kill curve and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling was used in the comparison. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the two types of cefuroxime sodium were identical against four bacterial strains; both types of cefuroxime sodium had MICs of 0.5 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 0.25 μg/mL against ATCC 29213, ATCC 25922, M164342 and MSCNS117933, respectively. There were no significant differences in the time-kill curves of the two forms against the four strains at three concentrations. At drug concentrations of 2×MIC and 4×MIC, the bacterial count of all the strains decreased from 6 log CFU/mL to around 4 log CFU/mL. The bactericidal efficacies of the two agents were generally similar in the pharmacokinetics model of simulated intravenous drug administration of 1 g q8h. Only the PD parameter of bactericidal rate (KR) for ATCC 29213 and the area difference between the drug bactericidal curve and the bacterial growth control curve (I ) for ATCC25922 were statistically different. The KR and I of the locally produced form were 0.73±0.10 logCFU·h/mL and 83.73±12.69 logCFU·h/mL, respectively, while the KR and I of the branded form were 1.19±0.07 logCFU·h/mL and 104.02±16.28 logCFU·h/mL, respectively. The in-vitro antibacterial effect of locally produced cefuroxime sodium against and is comparable to that of branded cefuroxime sodium.

Decreased surgical site infections (SSIs) and morbidity have been reported with mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) compared with no bowel preparation (NBP) in colonic surgery. Several societies have recommended routine use of MOABP in patients undergoing colon resection on the basis of these data. Our aim was to investigate this recommendation in a prospective randomised context. In this multicentre, parallel, single-blinded trial, patients undergoing colon resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to either MOABP or NBP in four hospitals in Finland, using a web-based randomisation technique. Randomly varying block sizes (four, six, and eight) were used for randomisation, and stratification was done according to centre. The recruiters, treating physicians, operating surgeons, data collectors, and analysts were masked to the allocated treatment. Key exclusion criteria were need for emergency surgery; bowel obstruction; colonoscopy planned during surgery; allergy to polyethylene glycol, neomycin, or metronidazole; and age younger than 18 years or older than 95 years. Study nurses opened numbered opaque envelopes containing the patient allocated group, and instructed the patients according to the allocation group to either prepare the bowel, or not prepare the bowel. Patients allocated to MOABP prepared their bowel by drinking 2 L of polyethylene glycol and 1 L of clear fluid before 6 pm on the day before surgery and took 2 g of neomycin orally at 7 pm and 2 g of metronidazole orally at 11 pm the day before surgery. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after surgery, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who were randomly allocated to and underwent elective colon resection with an anastomosis) along with safety analyses. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02652637, and EudraCT, 2015–004559–38, and is closed to new participants. Between March 17, 2016, and Aug 20, 2018, 738 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of the 417 patients who were randomised (209 to MOABP and 208 to NBP), 13 in the MOABP group and eight in the NBP were excluded before undergoing colonic resection; therefore, the modified intention-to-treat analysis included 396 patients (196 for MOABP and 200 for NBP). SSI was detected in 13 (7%) of 196 patients randomised to MOABP, and in 21 (11%) of 200 patients randomised to NBP (odds ratio 1·65, 95% CI 0·80–3·40; p=0·17). Anastomotic dehiscence was reported in 7 (4%) of 196 patients in the MOABP group and in 8 (4%) of 200 in the NBP group, and reoperations were necessary in 16 (8%) of 196 compared with 13 (7%) of 200 patients. Two patients died in the NBP group and none in the MOABP group within 30 days. MOABP does not reduce SSIs or the overall morbidity of colon surgery compared with NBP. We therefore propose that the current recommendations of using MOABP for colectomies to reduce SSIs or morbidity should be reconsidered. Vatsatautien Tutkimussäätiö Foundation, Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth's Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital research funds.

Standard bolus-dosed antibiotic prophylaxis may not inhibit growth of antibiotic resistant colonic bacteria, a cause of SSIs after colorectal surgery. An alternative strategy is continuous administration of antibiotic throughout surgery, maintaining concentrations of antibiotics that inhibit growth of resistant bacteria. This study is a pilot comparing bolus-continuous infusion with bolus-dosed cefuroxime prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. This is a pilot randomised controlled trial in which participants received cefuroxime bolus-infusion (intervention arm) targeting free serum cefuroxime concentrations of 64 mg/L, or 1.5 g cefuroxime as a bolus dose four-hourly (standard arm). Patients in both arms received metronidazole (500 mg intravenously). Eligible participants were adults undergoing colorectal surgery expected to last for over 2 h. Results were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The study was successfully piloted, with 46% (90/196) of eligible patients recruited and 89% (80/90) of participants completing all components of the protocol. A trialled bolus-continuous dosing regimen was successful in maintaining free serum cefuroxime concentrations of 64 mg/L. No serious adverse reactions were identified. Rates of SSIs (superficial and deep SSIs) were lower in the intervention arm than the standard treatment arm (24% (10/42) vs. 30% (13/43)), as were infection within 30 days of operation (41% (17/43) vs 51% (22/43)) and urinary tract infections (2% (1/42) vs. 9% (4/43)). These infection rates can be used to power future clinical trials. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cefuroxime bolus-continuous infusion of antibiotic prophylaxis trials, and provides safety data for infusions targeting free serum cefuroxime concentrations of 64 mg/L. Trial registration: NCT02445859.

ObjectiveThis study sought to evaluate the antibacterial effect of fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) on the bacteria inside urinary infection stones.MethodsThe internal structures of urinary stones were observed via scanning electron microscopy to verify the presence of internal bacteria. We randomly assigned equal numbers of patients with kidney stones who met the inclusion criteria into two groups in a prospective study and treated them with different perioperative antibiotics. One group (experimental group) was treated with FT, and the other (control group) was treated with cefuroxime sodium. All stone specimens were collected via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The primary infection stones were screened via a stone component analysis, 30 cases in the experimental group and 31 cases in the control group. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry was used to measure the drug concentration inside the stones, the bacterial count was calculated via stone culture, and the clinical infection index were monitored for between-group comparisons.ResultsCompared with the control group, the experimental group had a higher internal drug concentration, a higher drug sensitivity against various pathogenic bacteria, a lower bacterial colony count in the stone culture, and a lower incidence of postoperative clinical infection.ConclusionsFT is more effective than cefuroxime, which is commonly used during the perioperative period of urinary stones, and exerts a high antibacterial effect on these internal bacteria, and effectively reduces the probability of infection and sepsis after urinary stone surgery. FT can be used as an antibiotic during the perioperative period of urinary stones.

Lyme borreliosis is a tick-borne disease that predominantly occurs in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere and is primarily caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi in North America and Borrelia afzelii or Borrelia garinii in Europe and Asia. Infection usually begins with an expanding skin lesion, known as erythema migrans (referred to as stage 1), which, if untreated, can be followed by early disseminated infection, particularly neurological abnormalities (stage 2), and by late infection, especially arthritis in North America or acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans in Europe (stage 3). However, the disease can present with any of these manifestations. During infection, the bacteria migrate through the host tissues, adhere to certain cells and can evade immune clearance. Yet, these organisms are eventually killed by both innate and adaptive immune responses and most inflammatory manifestations of the infection resolve. Except for patients with erythema migrans, Lyme borreliosis is diagnosed based on a characteristic clinical constellation of signs and symptoms with serological confirmation of infection. All manifestations of the infection can usually be treated with appropriate antibiotic regimens, but the disease can be followed by post-infectious sequelae in some patients. Prevention of Lyme borreliosis primarily involves the avoidance of tick bites by personal protective measures. Lyme borreliosis is a tick-borne disease that is caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi , Borrelia afzelii and Borrelia garinii . This Primer by Steere and colleagues discusses the epidemiology, mechanisms and management of Lyme borreliosis in North America and Europe.

The aim of this study was to develop eye-drops with cefuroxime (CEF) sodium or vancomycin (VAN) hydrochloride, antibiotics that are instable in water. Anhydrous self-emulsifying oils (SEO) are proposed as a carrier and antibiotics are suspended. In the contact with tear fluid, the formulation should transform into emulsion, with fast dissolution of an antibiotic. CEF or VAN (5% w/w) was suspended in SEO carriers prepared by dissolving surfactants (Tween 20 or Span 80 5% w/w) in Miglyol, castor oil, or olive oil. Formulations with or without sodium citrate (2% w/w) were compared. Six-months or 1-year stability tests were carried out at 40 °C. The content of CEF and VAN was evaluated using HPLC and the potency of the antibiotic was assessed with agar diffusion method. In contact with water, drug particles suspended in SEO dissolved rapidly and o/w emulsion was formed. After 1-year at 40 °C, the content of degradation products was at most 0.5% in CEF and 4.0% in VAN formulations. The agar diffusion assay has shown that CEF and VAN loaded into SEO retained its potency against the sensitive microorganisms comparable to an aqueous solution. Therefore, SEO can be used as a novel carrier for the active substances which may not require improved solubility or absorption but need to be protected from moisture. This is a formulation that can be produced on industrial scale, with no limitation of stability or drug concentration.

The ever-growing commercialization of poor-quality and substandard medicines, especially anti-infectives characterized by inadequate postmarket surveillance by stakeholders remains a major global health challenge, particularly in developing countries, where antibiotic drug resistance and its repercussions on human health remain dominant. This research sought to evaluate the pharmaceutical quality of six randomly selected brands of cefuroxime axetil tablets (250 mg) marketed in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The selected brands were coded and subjected to both compendial and noncompendial tests. Statistical analysis and model-independent parameter (similarity factor, f2) were employed in analyzing the dissolution profiles of all the brands. All brands including the reference brand conformed to the pharmacopeial specifications for both compendial and noncompendial tests, indicating that they were of good quality. However, there were significant variations (p<0.05) in the disintegration time amongst the various brands. All the brands had ƒ2 values > 50 indicating similarity of their drug release profiles with the innovator. Hence, all the sampled cefuroxime axetil brands can be considered as pharmaceutical equivalents to the innovator drug. These brands can, therefore, be used as a substitute for the innovator drug by physicians to patients in cases of unaffordability or unavailability of the innovator brand.

IntroductionThe optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in children with febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) is still a matter of debate. Current guidelines recommend treating children with febrile UTIs with antimicrobials for 7 to 14 days. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of 7-day versus 10-day course of oral or sequence therapy (intravenous with a switch to oral) with cefuroxime/cefuroxime axetil for febrile UTIs in children.Methods and analysisA non-inferiority, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial will be conducted. Two hundred twenty-one patients aged 3 months to 7 years with febrile UTIs (defined as a combination of fever and leucocyturia in urine sediment) will be randomly assigned to a 7-day treatment arm (7 days of cefuroxime/cefuroxime axetil followed by 3 days of blinded placebo) or a 10-day treatment arm (7 days of cefuroxime/cefuroxime axetil followed by 3 days of blinded cefuroxime axetil). The primary outcome measure will be frequencies of recurrence and reinfection of UTI during the 6 months after the intervention.Ethics and disseminationThe Bioethics Committee approved the study protocol. The findings of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed paediatric journal. Abstracts will be submitted to relevant national and international conferences.Date and protocol version identifier04/09/2017Trial registration number NCT03221504.